CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04625374CHROPAINUpdated May 24, 2022

Prevalence of Chronic Pain After an Emergency Department Visit for Severe Acute Pain

An observational study in EMERGENCY MEDICINE, sponsored by University Hospital, Grenoble. Completed at 2 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-05-24.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Grenoble · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
495
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The main objective for investigators is to determine the prevalence of moderate to severe chronic pain in the adult population 6 months after consultation in the emergency department for acute pain (less than 7 days old) and severe pain assessed at admission and defined as greater than or equal to 6/10 by the numerical pain scale.

Read the detailed description

The presence of pain is the most frequent reason for a patient to visit the emergency department. the investigators know that severe acute pain can be a risk factor for developing chronic pain.

Chronic pain is a symptom, devoid of biological utility, that persists despite the absence of nociceptive stimulus, even after a reasonable period of time that would have allowed the tissue lesion to heal. It is therefore a public health problem with a negative impact on patients' lives.

Chronic pain has been studied in anesthesia and surgery in recent years. In 2006, a study showed the appearance of chronic pain (incidence between 10-50%) in patients who had undergone routine surgery. On the other hand, few studies have looked at the occurrence of chronic pain in patients who came to the emergency department for acute pain.

It is in this context that the investigators find it relevant to assess the prevalence of moderate to severe chronic pain after an emergency department consultation for severe acute pain.

The physiological mechanisms of pain are better identified and the activation of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors contributes to the onset of hyperalgesia. These receptors are activated under certain conditions, such as during intense and prolonged pain or exposure to high doses of opioids. In addition, the hyperalgesic effect of opioids is known and widely described in the literature. Finally, in the perioperative period, it is now accepted that the administration of a low dose of ketamine can combat these hyperalgesic effects thanks to its NMDA receptor inhibitory action. This effect may have an impact on pain at six months after surgery.

On the basis of these data, it seems relevant to question the prevalence of chronic pain in the course of an emergency department consultation, all the more so in patients with severe initial pain, in whom there is an initial indication for morphine titration, based on the recommendations of the French Society of Emergency Medicine (SFMU).

In addition, the investigators need to question the effects of initial analgesia administered in the emergency department for patients with severe acute pain. Is there a link between the use of certain molecules or the combination of molecules on the onset of chronic pain?

02

Conditions studied

  • EMERGENCY MEDICINE

Keywords

  • prevalence chronic pain
  • emergency department
  • severe acute pain
  • initial analgesia
03

In context

Emergencies

1,692 studies on the registry are indexed under Emergencies; 332 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 495 is above the median of 353 across 714 observational studies indexed under Emergencies.

Browse Emergencies studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Grenoble is the lead sponsor of 815 studies on the registry; 205 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patient who have consulted in the emergency department between 4 to 5 months before reading the files to be contacted 6 months after the consultation in the emergency department

Inclusion criteria

  • To have consulted in the emergency department between 4 to 5 months before reading the files to be contacted 6 months after the consultation in the emergency department;
  • Initial pain ≥6 on the Numerical Pain Scale ;
  • Acute pain that has been evolving for less than 7 days.
  • No oral opposition of the subject required during the phone call

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient who has undergone surgery in the direct course or within one month of the emergency department visit;
  • Patient with suspected or confirmed coronary chest pain at the time of discharge from the emergency department;
  • Patient with a mental disability;
  • Patient dead;
  • Patient who is deaf or hard of hearing;
  • Patient who does not speak French or does not live in France
  • Patient whose medical history was noted in the file as being impossible due to communication problems;
  • Patient who left the emergency department before the end of medical care;
  • Patient consulting for acutization of chronic pain;
  • Patient during pregnancy;
  • Patient consulting for a recent complication of care (within the month), surgical or other;
  • Patient taking daily analgesic treatments in the last 2 months;
  • Patient known to be dependent on opioids or treated with substitution therapy;
  • Homeless patient;
  • Patient who has been injured in the course of an assault or violence.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
495 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Determine prevalence of moderate to severe chronic pain in adult population 6 months after consultation in the emergency department for acute pain (less than 7 days old) and severe pain assessed at admission (defined ≥6/10 by the numerical pain scale)

    The main judgment criteria is the presence of chronic pain, related to the pain that motivated the emergency department visit 6 months earlier, moderate to severe defined as pain evolving since the emergency department visit (6 months), experienced at least 2 times per week, and of intensity ≥ 4 on a numerical pain scale during the patient's last painful experience.

    Time frame: 6 month

Secondary outcomes

  1. To compare the prevalence of chronic pain in patients who initially consulted for pain of traumatic or non-traumatic origin.

    Compare the prevalence of moderate to severe chronic pain (defined in the primary end point ≥4/10) in the group of patients who initially consulted for pain from traumatic and nontraumatic causes. Traumatic pain is defined as pain related to a traumatic mechanism less than 1 week old.

    Time frame: 6 month

  2. Evaluate whether there is an association between the prevalence of chronic pain at 6 months and pain management in use of analgesic, which molecule when the patient goes to the emergency department ;

    Association between the prevalence of chronic pain and pain management in the emergency department at analgesic treatment used per molecule

    Time frame: 6 month

  3. Evaluate whether there is an association between the prevalence of chronic pain at 6 months and pain management in use of analgesic at which dose when the patient goes to the emergency department ;

    Association between the prevalence of chronic pain and pain management in the emergency department at the total dose administered to the emergency department

    Time frame: 6 month

  4. Evaluate whether there is an association between the prevalence of chronic pain at 6 months and pain management at the performance of a locoregional anaesthesia when the patient goes to the emergency department ;

    Association between the prevalence of chronic pain and pain management in the emergency department in the realization of a locoregional anaesthesia

    Time frame: 6 month

  5. Evaluate whether there is an association between the prevalence of chronic pain at 6 months and pain management at the performance of sedation when the patient goes to the emergency department ;

    Association between the prevalence of chronic pain and pain management in the emergency department in the performance of procedural sedation

    Time frame: 6 month

  6. If patients with chronic pain at 6 months reconstructed more often than patients without chronic pain

    We will assess whether patients with chronic pain at 6 months reconstruct more often than patients without chronic pain by asking them whether or not they consulted a list of medical specialists, paramedics or did other tests.

    Time frame: 6 month

  7. The type, characteristics and impact of pain at 6 months after admission to the emergency department.

    Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, 6 months after their visit to the emergency department.

    Time frame: 6 month

  8. Neuropathic characteristics of pain at 6 months

    The neuropathic characteristics of pain will be characterized by the DN-4 questionnaire

    Time frame: 6 month

  9. Quality of life 6 months after admission to the emergency department

    The SF-12 questionnaire will assess quality of life 6 months after admission to the emergency department

    Time frame: 6 month

  10. Analgesic treatment at 6 months.

    Analgesic treatment at 6 months will be evaluated by asking the patient his usual analgesic treatment by class of molecule

    Time frame: 6 month

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • CHU Pellegrin
    Bordeaux, 33000, France
  • Grenoble Alpes University Hospital
    Grenoble, 38000, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 24, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04625374
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Grenoble
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 12, 2020
Start date
Dec 5, 2020
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2021
Completion
Mar 1, 2022
Last update
May 24, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion