CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04623320BRECLAIRUpdated Mar 18, 2022

Validation of a 13C Glucose Breath Test Compared With the Euglycaemic Clamp Test

An observational study in Insulin Resistance and Type 1 Diabetes, sponsored by University Hospital, Antwerp. Status unknown at 1 site in Belgium. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-03-18.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Antwerp · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Feb 2022), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Insulin resistance can be assessed by the euglycaemic clamp technique. To date, this is the golden standard, but it is not suited for clinical practice. A 13C glucose breath test will be tested as a valid alternative. The curve of the exhaled 13C CO2 as a function of glucose metabolism can be correlated to the curve of the glucose disposal rate obtained via the clamp technique.

Read the detailed description

The hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp technique is the golden standard to assess insulin resistance in type 1 diabetes subjects. The plasma insulin concentration is acutely raised and maintained at 100 μU/ml by a continuous infusion of insulin. Meanwhile, the plasma glucose concentration is held constant at basal levels by a variable glucose infusion. When the steady-state is achieved, the glucose infusion rate equals glucose uptake by all the tissues in the body and is therefore a measure of tissue insulin sensitivity.

These data will be compared with the results of a 13C glucose breath test. Breath tests using 13C substrates are based on the principle that 13C CO2 in the exhaled breath can be measured as a metabolic tracer.

Breath testing has a major advantage over the clamp test in that it can be performed non-invasively and repeatedly without necessary supervision by medical staff.

02

Conditions studied

  • Insulin Resistance
  • Type 1 Diabetes

Keywords

  • insulin resistance
  • type 1 diabetes
  • euglycaemic clamp
  • breath test
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

3,522 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; 577 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 120 across 748 observational studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Antwerp is the lead sponsor of 234 studies on the registry; 68 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Type 1 diabetes subjects from the research facility's outpatient clinic.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult type 1 diabetes patients
  • 25/50 subjects with confirmed NAFLD (using ultrasound criteria)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy
  • gastric bypass surgery
  • cirrhosis
  • secondary cause of liver steatosis present
  • any cause which makes a 4-hour clamp impossible
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
1 Day
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • NAFLD+T1DM+

    Subjects with type 1 diabetes and ultrasound-defined NAFLD

    Diagnostic Test: euglycaemic clamp test · Diagnostic Test: 13C glucose breath test

  • NAFLD-T1DM+

    Subjects with type 1 diabetes without ultrasound-defined NAFLD

    Diagnostic Test: euglycaemic clamp test · Diagnostic Test: 13C glucose breath test

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testeuglycaemic clamp test

    clamp test (golden standard) to determine insulin resistance

  • Diagnostic test13C glucose breath test

    13C glucose breath test to compare with the golden standard

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Correlation of the 13C breath test with the golden standard

    sensitivity and specificity analysis using linear regression

    Time frame: one day

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Antwerp University Hospital
    Antwerp, 2650, Belgium
    • Christophe De Block, M.D., PhD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hussain M, Jangorbhani M, Schuette S, Considine RV, Chisholm RL, Mather KJ. [13C]glucose breath testing provides a noninvasive measure of insulin resistance: calibration analyses against clamp studies. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014 Feb;16(2):102-12. doi: 10.1089/dia.2013.0151. Epub 2013 Oct 11. PubMed 24116833 ↗
  • Maldonado-Hernandez J, Martinez-Basila A, Salas-Fernandez A, Navarro-Betancourt JR, Pina-Aguero MI, Bernabe-Garcia M. The 13C-Glucose Breath Test for Insulin Resistance Assessment in Adolescents: Comparison with Fasting and Post-Glucose Stimulus Surrogate Markers of Insulin Resistance. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2016 Dec 1;8(4):419-424. doi: 10.4274/jcrpe.3260. Epub 2016 Jun 29. PubMed 27354200 ↗
  • Lewanczuk RZ, Paty BW, Toth EL. Comparison of the [13C]glucose breath test to the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp when determining insulin resistance. Diabetes Care. 2004 Feb;27(2):441-7. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.2.441. PubMed 14747226 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 18, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04623320
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Antwerp
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 10, 2020
Start date
Oct 27, 2020
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 31, 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 18, 2022

Study contacts

Jonathan Mertens, M.D.
Contact
jonathan.mertens@uza.be
+32 821 74 03
Maria Braspenning, nurse
Contact
Rie.Braspenning@uza.be
+32 821 40 02
Christophe De Block, Prof.
principal investigator · University Hospital, Antwerp

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Feb 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion