CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04621786Updated Jan 11, 2024Results posted

Electroconvulsive Therapy Amplitude Titration

An interventional study of Mecta Spectrum 5000Q paired with Soterix Medical 4X1 HD - ECT Multi-Channel Stimulation Interface in Major Depressive Disorder, sponsored by University of New Mexico. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 50 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-01-11.

Sponsored by University of New Mexico · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
41
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
50 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is focused on advancing ECT treatment for older adults with depressive disorders by refining neuromodulation stimulus parameters to improve efficacy and cognitive safety.

Read the detailed description

Amplitude titration, as proposed in this current proposal, can reduce the variability related to fixed amplitude dosing and optimize clinical and cognitive outcomes. The goal of this project is to change standard ECT parameter selection from a fixed amplitude to an individualized and empirically determined amplitude. To achieve this goal, the investigators will focus on the relationship between amplitude titration and treatment-responsive changes in hippocampal neuroplasticity with RUL fixed amplitude ECT. Fixed amplitude ECT results in variable E-field or ECT dose. Over the course of an ECT series, the variable ECT dose will result in inconsistent changes in hippocampal neuroplasticity. In contrast, pre-translational investigations have demonstrated that amplitude titration results in a consistent E-field or ECT "dose". Seizure titration amplitudes (based on historic data, 233 to544mA) are below the amplitude range of FDA-approved ECT devices (500 to 900mA) and will require an adaptor to reduce the output amplitude (Investigational Device Exemption). Amplitude titration will also be below the hippocampal neuroplasticity threshold and insufficient for antidepressant response. The difference between RUL amplitude titration and RUL fixed amplitude (800mA) ECT will determine the degree of target engagement with the hippocampus. To illustrate, subjects with low amplitude titration of \~250 mA (800/250, high fixed/titration amplitude ratio) will have significant changes in hippocampal neuroplasticity. Subjects with high amplitude titration \~500mA (800/500, low fixed/titration ratio) will have minimal changes in hippocampal neuroplasticity. The relationship between amplitude titration and fixed amplitude hippocampal neuroplasticity will be used to develop the amplitude multiplier required for consistent and clinically effective ECT dosing.

02

Conditions studied

  • Major Depressive Disorder

Keywords

  • Electroconvulsive Therapy
  • Depressive Episode
  • Cognition
03

In context

Depressive Disorder

4,845 studies on the registry are indexed under Depressive Disorder; 514 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 41 is below the median of 80 across 3,999 interventional studies indexed under Depressive Disorder.

Browse Depressive Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

University of New Mexico is the lead sponsor of 306 studies on the registry; 28 are open to participants now.

Of its 25 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 23 (92%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of major depressive disorder
  • Clinical indications for ECT with right unilateral electrode placement
  • Right-handed
  • Age range between 50 and 80 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Defined neurological or neurodegenerative disorder (e.g., traumatic brain injury, epilepsy, Alzheimer's disease)
  • Other psychiatric conditions (e.g., schizophrenia, bipolar disorder)
  • Current drug or alcohol use disorder (except for nicotine); and 4) contraindications to MRI.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
41 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental arm

    All subjects enrolled will receive amplitude titration for their first treatment. The remainder of the ECT series will be completed with traditional (800mA) pulse amplitude with right unilateral electrode placement. This investigation only includes the single open-label arm.

    Device: Mecta Spectrum 5000Q paired with Soterix Medical 4X1 HD - ECT Multi-Channel Stimulation Interface

Interventions

  • DeviceMecta Spectrum 5000Q paired with Soterix Medical 4X1 HD - ECT Multi-Channel Stimulation Interface

    The Mecta Spectrum 5000Q paired with Soterix Medical 4X1 HD-ECT Multi-Channel Stimulation Interface will reduce ECT current amplitude for amplitude-seizure titration.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Beta Coefficient From Linear Regression of Amplitude-determined Seizure (Independent Variable) and Ebrain (Dependent Variable)

    Electric field modeling is used to calculate Ebrain from the pre-ECT structural MRI. Ebrain is an individual's electric field strength (Volts/meter) per unit current (milliampere). To avoid confounds from the tissue boundary effects, Ebrain is calculated as the 90th percentile of maximal. Higher values (0.2 Volts/meter per milliampere) indicate that an individual receives a higher electric field strength per unit current. The Ebrain in this sample ranges from 0.1 to 0.19 Volts/meter per milliampere. Linear regression model assessed the relationship between amplitude-determined seizure (independent variable) and Ebrain (dependent variable) with beta coefficient and 95% confidence intervals.

    Time frame: First treatment

07

Results

Posted Jun 1, 2023

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneExperimental Arm
Started41
Completed29
Not completed12
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up9
Withdrew: Protocol violation3

Outcome measures

PrimaryBeta Coefficient From Linear Regression of Amplitude-determined Seizure (Independent Variable) and Ebrain (Dependent Variable)

Electric field modeling is used to calculate Ebrain from the pre-ECT structural MRI. Ebrain is an individual's electric field strength (Volts/meter) per unit current (milliampere). To avoid confounds from the tissue boundary effects, Ebrain is calculated as the 90th percentile of maximal. Higher values (0.2 Volts/meter per milliampere) indicate that an individual receives a higher electric field strength per unit current. The Ebrain in this sample ranges from 0.1 to 0.19 Volts/meter per milliampere. Linear regression model assessed the relationship between amplitude-determined seizure (independent variable) and Ebrain (dependent variable) with beta coefficient and 95% confidence intervals.

Time frame:
First treatment
Reported as:
Least squares mean · beta coefficient from linear regression
Beta Coefficient From Linear Regression of Amplitude-determined Seizure (Independent Variable) and Ebrain (Dependent Variable)
beta coefficient from linear regressionExperimental Arm
Beta Coefficient From Linear Regression of Amplitude-determined Seizure (Independent Variable) and Ebrain (Dependent Variable)-.0001054 (-.0001767 to -.0000341)

Adverse events

Collected over 3 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Experimental Arm0/29 (0%)1/29 (3.4%)0/29 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventExperimental Arm
Attempted self-harmPsychiatric disorders1/29

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Experimental Arm
Mean64.2 ± 7.9
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Experimental Arm
Female17
Male12
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Experimental Arm
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian1
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American1
White27
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Experimental Arm
United States29
Amplitude determined seizure
Amplitude determined seizure(milliamperes)Experimental Arm
Mean312 ± 113
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of New Mexico
    Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Nov 19, 2020
  • Statistical analysis plan · Nov 19, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 11, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04621786
Lead sponsor
University of New Mexico
Collaborators
The Zucker Hillside Hospital, National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), The Mind Research Network, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 9, 2020
Start date
Mar 1, 2021
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2022
Completion
Dec 15, 2022
Results posted
Jun 1, 2023
Last update
Jan 11, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion