ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04621279COOLPRIMEUpdated Sep 25, 2026

Cool Prime Comparative Effectiveness Study for Mild HIE

An observational study in Mild Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy of Newborn, sponsored by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 36 Weeks and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-25.

Sponsored by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2023; still recruiting 3 years 3 months later.
Updated Sep 25, 2026Sponsor changedGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
460
Ages
36 Weeks and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To determine effectiveness of therapy to improve neurodevelopmental outcomes in infants with mild HIE. To determine the adverse effects of Therapeutic Hypothermia (TH) in mild HIE on the neonate and his/her family. Determine heterogeneity of the treatment effect across key subgroups obtained in the first 6 hours after birth prior to the decision to initiate therapy.

Read the detailed description

This study leverages practice variation within and across 15 participating sites to compare the effectiveness of TH versus normothermia for mild HIE on neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years of age.After standardizing all aspects of clinical care for mild HIE (except for TH vs. normothermia)we will enroll 460 infants with mild HIE into the longitudinal, observational comparative effectiveness study.The central aim of the comparative longitudinal cohort of mild HIE is (1) to compare the effectiveness of hypothermia to normothermia on neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years, (2) determine the adverse effects of TH on the infant and his/her family; and (3) determine the heterogeneity of treatment effects (moderating effect) across mild HIE subgroups as determined by physiological biomarkers obtained during the 6 hours window to initiate hypothermia. The decision to apply TH or normothermia will be entirely determined by practice parameters at each site.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mild Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy of Newborn

Keywords

  • mild HIE (Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy)
  • neonatal encephalopathy
  • brain ischemia
  • brain hypoxia
03

In context

Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain

261 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain; 95 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 460 is above the median of 100 across 92 observational studies indexed under Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain.

Browse Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 1,010 studies on the registry; 199 are open to participants now.

Of its 139 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 105 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
36 Weeks and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Term infants ≥ 36 weeks' gestation with evidence of both perinatal event fetal acidosis and encephalopathy on exam.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Infants must meet all 3 inclusion criteria

  1. Neonates born at ≥ 36 0/7 weeks
  2. Mild Encephalopathy on neonatal neurologic exam within 6 hours after birth: defined as presence of at least 2 signs of mild, moderate, or severe encephalopathy with no more than 2 signs in the moderate or severe category.
  3. Perinatal Acidosis based on at least one of the following (A or B):

    1. pH ≤ 7.00 in any cord or first infant gas (arterial, venous, or capillary) within ≤ 60 min OR base deficit ≥ 16 in any cord or first infant gas (arterial, venous or capillary) within ≤ 60 min
    2. If pH is between 7.01 and 7.15, OR base deficit is between 10 and 15.9 mmol/liter, OR blood gas is not available, an acute perinatal event is an additional criteria required (see below definition)

An acute perinatal event is defined by at least one of the following:

  1. Apgar score at 10 min ≤ 5
  2. Continued need for resuscitation at 10 min (chest compressions, bag mask ventilation, or positive pressure ventilation)
  3. Uterine rupture, placental abruption, cord accident (prolapse, rupture, knot or tight nuchal cord)
  4. maternal trauma, maternal hemorrhage, or cardiorespiratory arrest
  5. fetal exsanguination from either vasa previa or feto-maternal hemorrhage, shoulder dystocia
  6. Any evidence suggestive of acute perinatal event.

Infants are still eligible for enrollment in the COOLPRIME study if the cord or infant's first blood gas (arterial, venous, or capillary) is obtained >60 minutes of life.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Gestational age at birth \< 36 0/7 weeks
  2. Birth weight \< 1800gm
  3. Head circumference \<30cm
  4. Congenital or chromosomal anomaly associated with abnormal neurodevelopment or death
  5. Moderate or Severe HIE of 3 or more moderate or severe abnormalities on COOLPRIME Sarnat exam within 6 hours of life
  6. Any seizures within first six hours of life
  7. Redirection of care is being considered
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
460 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Mild HIE

    Mild HIE identified in the first 6 hours of life according to the published PRIME study definition: newborn with evidence of encephalopathy (using the validated Sarnat Exam) NOT meeting prior cooling trials criteria.

    Procedure: Normothermia · Procedure: Whole body therapeutic hypothermia

Interventions

  • ProcedureNormothermia

    Usual care for first 72 hours for neonates with mild encephalopathy maintaining core temperature (36.5°C ± 1 C).

  • ProcedureWhole body therapeutic hypothermia

    Whole-body therapeutic hypothermia (33.5°C ± 0.5°C) for 72 hours began by 6 hours of age for neonates with mild encephalopathy per site standard of care practice.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Effectiveness of normothermia in infants as measured by Composite Bayley IV score

    Effectiveness of normothermia in infants is measured by Composite Bayley IV score scale, which is. an extensive formal developmental assessment tool for diagnosing developmental delays in early childhood. Possible scores range from 55- 120 where lower scores indicate worse outcome.

    Time frame: 22-26 months of age.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Adverse events SAE

    Safety will be measured by the presence or absence of a serious adverse event (SAE) at discharge.

    Time frame: Discharge (approximately 7 days)

  2. Parent-Infant stress and bonding as measured by MIBS

    Parent-Infant stress and bonding is measured by Mother-to-infant bonding (MIBS) scale, which is a validated questionnaire with good psychometric properties that assesses the mother's feelings towards infant (bondedness) from birth to 4 months. Possible scores range from 0-3, where 0 indicates "not at all" and 3, "very much".

    Time frame: 3-4 months

  3. Parent-Infant stress and bonding as measured by IBQR

    Parent-Infant stress and bonding is measured by Infant Behavior Questionnaire-Revised (IBQR) which measures differences in reactivity and regulation, and the structure of infant temperament and its relation to parental family functioning. Item scores were summed according to IBQR scoring rules to create scores on the 14 scales, with higher scores indicating greater levels of that temperament dimension.

    Time frame: 3-4 months

  4. Parent-Infant stress and bonding as measured by PSI

    Parent-Infant stress and bonding is measured by Parenting Stress Index (PSI) which is an abbreviated version of the full-length test with 36 items in three domains (Parental Distress, Parent-Child Dysfunctional Interaction, and Difficult Child) that combine to form a Total Stress scale, which helps identify families that are most in need of support services. In general, items are scored using the following 5-point scale: 1) SA (Strongly Agree), 2) A (Agree), 3) NS (Not Sure), 4) D (Disagree), 5) SD (Strongly Disagree). Responses to both the overall stress score and the three subscales are summed to generate representative scores, resulting the total stress score, perceptions of child behavioral problems, parenting distress, and parent-child dysfunctional interactions.

    Time frame: 3-4 months

Other outcomes

  1. Infant neurological integrity as measured with HNNE

    Infant neurological integrity is measured with HNNE (Hammersmith Neonatal Neurological Exams), which is used to assess tone, spontaneous movements, reflexes, and visual and auditory attention allowing for a continuum of assessment from birth to 2 years. The maximum score for any one item is a score of 3 and the minimum is a score of 0. A subscore can be given for each section and the overall global score can be calculated by summing up all 26 items (range: 0-78), with higher scores indicating better neurological performance. The maximum global score is 78.

    Time frame: Discharge

  2. Infant neurological integrity as measured with HINE

    Infant neurological integrity is measured with HINE (Hammersmith Infant Neurological Exams), which is used to assess tone, spontaneous movements, reflexes, and visual and auditory attention allowing for a continuum of assessment from birth to 2 years. The maximum score for any one item is a score of 3 and the minimum is a score of 0. A subscore can be given for each section and the overall global score can be calculated by summing up all 26 items (range: 0-78), with higher scores indicating better neurological performance. The maximum global score is 78.

    Time frame: 3 - 4 months

  3. Infant neurological integrity as measured with HINE

    Infant neurological integrity is measured with HINE (Hammersmith Infant Neurological Exams), which is used to assess tone, spontaneous movements, reflexes, and visual and auditory attention allowing for a continuum of assessment from birth to 2 years. The maximum score for any one item is a score of 3 and the minimum is a score of 0. A subscore can be given for each section and the overall global score can be calculated by summing up all 26 items (range: 0-78), with higher scores indicating better neurological performance. The maximum global score is 78.

    Time frame: 22-26 months

  4. Behavioral tendency CBCL

    The Child Behavior Checklist-parent report (CBCL) will provide a profile of behavior and social functioning validated in relation to age and gender.

    Time frame: 22-26 months of age.

  5. Composite PARCA-R

    The Parent Report of Children's Abilities-Revised (PARCA-R) is used against the Mental Development Index of the Bayley Scales.

    Time frame: 22-26 months of age.

  6. IFS-R

    Impact on Family Scale - Revised

    Time frame: 9-12 months

  7. IBQ-R

    Infant Behavior Questionnaire Revised (very short)

    Time frame: 9-12months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Prempunpong C, Chalak LF, Garfinkle J, Shah B, Kalra V, Rollins N, Boyle R, Nguyen KA, Mir I, Pappas A, Montaldo P, Thayyil S, Sanchez PJ, Shankaran S, Laptook AR, Sant'Anna G. Prospective research on infants with mild encephalopathy: the PRIME study. J Perinatol. 2018 Jan;38(1):80-85. doi: 10.1038/jp.2017.164. Epub 2017 Nov 2. PubMed 29095433 ↗
  • Chalak LF, Nguyen KA, Prempunpong C, Heyne R, Thayyil S, Shankaran S, Laptook AR, Rollins N, Pappas A, Koclas L, Shah B, Montaldo P, Techasaensiri B, Sanchez PJ, Sant'Anna G. Prospective research in infants with mild encephalopathy identified in the first six hours of life: neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18-22 months. Pediatr Res. 2018 Dec;84(6):861-868. doi: 10.1038/s41390-018-0174-x. Epub 2018 Sep 13. PubMed 30250303 ↗
  • Chalak LF, Adams-Huet B, Sant'Anna G. A Total Sarnat Score in Mild Hypoxic-ischemic Encephalopathy Can Detect Infants at Higher Risk of Disability. J Pediatr. 2019 Nov;214:217-221.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.06.026. Epub 2019 Jul 10. PubMed 31301853 ↗
  • El-Dib M, Inder TE, Chalak LF, Massaro AN, Thoresen M, Gunn AJ. Should therapeutic hypothermia be offered to babies with mild neonatal encephalopathy in the first 6 h after birth? Pediatr Res. 2019 Mar;85(4):442-448. doi: 10.1038/s41390-019-0291-1. Epub 2019 Jan 16. PubMed 30733613 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Sponsor
Collaborators added: Parkland Health and Hospital System
Sep 25, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Sep 25, 2026
    Sponsor Collaborators added: Parkland Health and Hospital System
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04621279
Collaborators
University of California, San Francisco, Children's National Research Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, St. Louis University, Stanford University, University of Utah, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, University College Cork, The Children's Hospital of San Antonio, Harvard University, Washington University School of Medicine, Sharp HealthCare, The Cleveland Clinic, University of Florida Health, Emory University, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Children's Hospital of Orange County, Parkland Health and Hospital System
Responsible party
Lina Chalak (PROFESSOR, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 9, 2020
Start date
Jul 19, 2023
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 1, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 25, 2026

Study contacts

Lina Chalak, MD
Contact
lina.chalak@utsouthwestern.edu
214-648-3903
Pollieanna Sepulveda, MSN, RN
Contact
pollieanna.sepulveda@utsouthwestern.edu
214-648-3698
Lina Chalak, MD
principal investigator · University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion