CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04621058Updated Jul 15, 2022

Efficacy of Vitamin D Treatment in Mortality Reduction Due to COVID-19.

A Phase 3 interventional study of Vitamin D and PLACEBO in SAR and SARS Pneumonia, sponsored by Bioaraba Health Research Institute. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-07-15.

Sponsored by Bioaraba Health Research Institute · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
108
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

HYPOTHESIS: The administration of vitamin D supplements to patients who have a positive diagnosis for SARS-Cov-2, acute pneumonia requiring hospital admission and vitamin D deficiency have a more favourable evolution than subjects not treated with vitamin D (placebo). This favourable evolution will translate into a reduction in mortality, fewer ICU admissions and fewer days of stay in hospital.

OBJECTIVES:

PRINCIPAL: To assess whether the group of patients receiving vitamin D supplements have a less severe evolution of their acute pneumonia, translated into lower mortality, than patients who do not receive that supplement.

SECONDARY: 1) To determine the number of intensive care admissions and the number of days of admission in both groups (control group and intervention group). 2) To estimate the prevalence of Vitamin D deficiency in the patients studied and the effectiveness of its supplementation. 3) To establish the degree of complexity of each study group and carry out a cost-effectiveness study.

METHODOLOGY: DESIGN: Clinical trial, randomized, placebo-controlled and double-blind, with two parallel groups The active treatment will be vitamin D (Hydroferol soft capsules of 0.266 mg). The placebo will consist of a tablet with the same external characteristics and with the same treatment scheme but which will not contain any vitamin D active ingredients.

Read the detailed description

HYPOTHESIS: The administration of vitamin D supplements to patients who have a positive diagnosis for SARS-Cov-2, acute pneumonia requiring hospital admission and vitamin D deficiency have a more favourable evolution than subjects not treated with vitamin D (placebo). This favourable evolution will translate into a reduction in mortality, fewer ICU admissions and fewer days of stay in hospital.

OBJECTIVES:

PRINCIPAL: To assess whether the group of patients receiving vitamin D supplements have a less severe evolution of their acute pneumonia, translated into lower mortality, than patients who do not receive that supplement.

SECONDARY: 1) To determine the number of intensive care admissions and the number of days of admission in both groups (control group and intervention group). 2) To estimate the prevalence of Vitamin D deficiency in the patients studied and the effectiveness of its supplementation. 3) To establish the degree of complexity of each study group and carry out a cost-effectiveness study.

METHODOLOGY: DESIGN: Clinical trial, randomized, placebo-controlled and double-blind, with two parallel groups The active treatment will be vitamin D (Hydroferol soft capsules of 0.266 mg). The placebo will consist of a tablet with the same external characteristics and with the same treatment scheme but which will not contain any vitamin D active ingredients.

Inclusion criteria: Adult patients admitted to the Respiratory/Internal Medicine Unit of Santiago hospital of the OSI Araba HUA for acute pneumonia and suffering from a vitamin D deficit (\< 30 ng/ml) and a RT-PCR, in nasopharyngeal exudate, positive for SARS-CoV-2.

Exclusion criteria: 1)Patients taking any type of vitamin D supplement. 2)Patients with hypoparathyroidism. 3) Patients in whom the administration of vitamin D is formally contraindicated. 4) Patients who cannot take vitamin D orally.

OUR SIZE: In order to answer to the main objective (mortality reduction 21% versus 50% intervention and control group respectively), we will need a total sample of 108 evaluable subjects-54 patients per group (J Crit Care. 2018;44:300-5).Statistical power 90%,95% statistical significance with possible loss of follow-up of 5% of patients.

A recruitment period of about 12 months is needed.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: In order to answer to the main and secondary objectives (mortality and ICU admission), the Chi-square test will be performed and in the event that any of the frequencies is less than 5, the exact Fisher test will be used.

Depending on the distribution of the quantitative variables, the Student t-test for independent samples or the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U-test will be used, respectively.

The analysis criterion will be "by intention to treat". In all cases. The statistical significance will be 95%.

02

Conditions studied

  • SAR
  • SARS Pneumonia

Browse trials for

03

In context

Pneumonia

2,044 studies on the registry are indexed under Pneumonia; 283 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 108 is close to the median of 106 across 1,247 interventional studies indexed under Pneumonia.

Browse Pneumonia studies →

Lead sponsor

Bioaraba Health Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Admitted to the Respiratory or Internal medicine Units of Santiago hospital (HUA) due to pneumonia.
  • Vitamin D deficiency (25(OH) defined by blood levels below 30 mg/ml.
  • Possibility for observation during the treatment period.
  • Signing of written consent (oral informed consent exceptionally).
  • Positive PCR for diagnosis of sars-cov2 infection

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients taking any type of vitamin D supplement.
  • Patients with hypoparathyroidism.
  • Pregnant or lactating women.
  • Patients in whom the administration of vitamin D is formally contraindicated (see annex VI).
  • Patients who at time of inclusion, cannot take vitamin D orally.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
108 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    D VITAMIN GROUP

    The administration of vitamin D will be carried out using the following treatment scheme: If vitamin D deficiency (\< 30 ng/ml) treatment with 2 capsules of 0.266 mg If vitamin D deficiency (\< 40 ng/ml): treatment with 1 capsule of 0.266 mg Blood levels of vitamin D will be determined on day 1, 4, 7 and 14. Based on the results from day 14, a new determination is recommended 4 weeks after starting treatment with the primary care physician who will decide whether to continue or interrupt the treatment. This phase will be carried out outside of the study. In addition, the product should only be administered, if blood calcium and phosphorus levels are within normal limits, as well as if the creatinuria/calciuria ratio is within normal ranges.

    Drug: Vitamin D

  • Placebo comparator
    PLACEBO GROUP

    The procedure will be the same as in the experimental group but instead of the active component, patients will take placebo capsules exactly the same as above but without the active component.

    Drug: PLACEBO

Interventions

  • DrugVitamin D

    In case of Vitamin D levels \<30 or 40ng/ml patients will take vitamin D supplements.

    Also known as: D VITAMIN GROUP

  • DrugPLACEBO

    Placebo capsules exactly the same as the above, but without the active component.

    Also known as: PLACEO GROUP

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. MORTALITY

    Mortality reduction

    Time frame: At 21 days.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Intensive care admissions

    Intensive care admissions reduction

    Time frame: At 21 days

  2. Length of hospital stay

    Length of hospital stay reduction

    Time frame: AT 21 DAYS

  3. Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency

    To assess the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency at baseline

    Time frame: At baseline

  4. Incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER)

    To calculate the incremental cost per event (mortality) avoided

    Time frame: At 21 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Joaquín Durán Cantolla
    Vitoria-Gasteiz, Alava 01002, Spain
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 15, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04621058
Lead sponsor
Bioaraba Health Research Institute
Collaborators
Fundación Eduardo Anitua
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 9, 2020
Start date
Nov 9, 2020
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2021
Completion
Nov 30, 2021
Last update
Jul 15, 2022

Study contacts

Joaquín Durán Cantolla
principal investigator · Bioaraba Health Research Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion