ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04620356Updated Dec 6, 2024Results posted

Effect of Use of DryNites Absorbent Pants on the Rate of Spontaneous Resolution of Paediatric Nocturnal Enuresis (NE)

An interventional study of DryNites Pyjama Pants in Nocturnal Enuresis, sponsored by Kimberly-Clark Corporation. Completed at 2 sites in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 4 Years to 8 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-06.

Sponsored by Kimberly-Clark Corporation · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2020, registered Sep 2020).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
105
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
4 Years to 8 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Children vary in the age at which they achieve night-time dryness; in almost all cases children will stop bed-wetting without any need for treatment. Use of absorbent pants for the management of nocturnal enuresis is controversial regarding the impact on the speed at which children become dry throughout the night. The aim of this study is to determine the effect of using DryNites absorbent pants in children with monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis on the speed they become dry throughout the night compared with removing absorbent pants.

Read the detailed description

Children with severe monosymptomatic NE between 4 and 8 years of age were recruited from study centers in Denmark, Belgium, and the UK. All participants had used absorbents pandt of any manufacturer for at least the previous 6 months. Participants fulfilling the inclusion criteria entered a 4-week run-in period during which they slept wearing the intervention absorbent pant. To be eligible for randomization, participants needed to have 7/7 wet nights in the last week of the run-in period. Eligible participants were then randomly assigned (2:1) to either discontinuation or continuation of absorbent pants for the 4-week core intervention period. The children sleeping without absorbent pants were permitted to sleep with an absorbent bed mat instead. No behavioral changes such as fluid restriction or lifting the child to the toilet when the parents went to bed were allowed in either group. After completing the core intervention period, participants were invited to take part in a 4-week extension period, during which they would remain on their randomly assigned treatment. Number of wet nights were assesed during the study using an electronic diary. Quality- of- life (QoL) and sleep parameters were assessed using the following validated questionnaires: Paediatric Incontinence Questionnaire (PinQ), World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version Paediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale (PDSS), and Checklist Individual Strength. Questionnaires were completed jointly by children and parents.

02

Conditions studied

  • Nocturnal Enuresis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Nocturnal Enuresis

104 studies on the registry are indexed under Nocturnal Enuresis; 22 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 105 is above the median of 68 across 76 interventional studies indexed under Nocturnal Enuresis.

Browse Nocturnal Enuresis studies →

Lead sponsor

Kimberly-Clark Corporation is the lead sponsor of 16 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Years to 8 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient aged between 4-8 years at the time of enrollment
  • Have a clinical diagnosis of monosymptomatic primary NE
  • Have been dry in the day for >/= 6 months prior to enrollment
  • Have on average no more than 1 dry night per month during the past 6 months at enrollment
  • Have an signed by the their parent(s)/carer(s)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children in foster/court care
  • Have implemented any previous intervention to address NE (use of prescribed alarm schedule, desmopressin, imipramine, anticholinergics) or withdrawal of pants/nappies for > 7 days in the previous 6 months
  • Have secondary NE
  • Have wetting in the day
  • Have faecal soiling
  • Have known urinary tract disease
  • Have diabetes
  • Receive any regular intake of medication
  • Have a known developmental/neurological disorder
  • Have links to Kimberly-Clark of any kind (including family relations employed by Kimberly-Clark, holding stocks or share in Kimberly-Clark)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
105 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    DryNites arm

    Participants in this arm use DryNites every night for 4 weeks ("run-in" period), an additional 4 weeks (intervention "core trial" period), and an optional additional 4 weeks ("extension" period). All participants in this arm also receive absorbent bad mats to use every night.

    Device: DryNites Pyjama Pants

  • No intervention
    No Pants arm

    Participants in this arm use DryNites every night for 4 weeks only during the initial "run-in" period. Thereafter, participants in this arm do not use DryNites during the 4 week intervention "core trial" period or the optional additional 4 weeks "extension" period. All participants in this arm also receive absorbent bad mats to use every night.

Interventions

  • DeviceDryNites Pyjama Pants

    DryNites Pyjama Pants are disposable, absorbent youth pants designed to help children manage bed wetting by absorbing involuntary urine loss and protecting the child's garments and bedding. DryNites Pyjama Pants are underwear-like alternatives that can be discreetly worn beneath pyjamas or nightwear during the bedwetting phase.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Wet Nights

    Average number of wet nights

    Time frame: Last week of the 4-week intervention period

Secondary outcomes

  1. Impact of Urinary Incontinence on Emotional Wellbeing of Child as Assessed by Paediatric Incontinence Questionnaire (PinQ)

    The PinQ will be used to assess the child's QoL. The PinQ is a validated cross-cultural continence-specific paediatric QoL questionnaire to assess children with bladder dysfunction, developed by Bower el al (Bower et al. 2006). It is available as self-rated and proxy versions. This will be completed by the child themselves in the older participant group and will be completed by the parent/carer on behalf of the child in the younger participant group. The PinQ measures the emotional impact that urinary incontinence has on a child. It consists of 20 urinary incontinence QoL related questions divided in 2 dimensions: intrinsic (14 items) and extrinsic (6 items), which are graded on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=No, 1=Hardly ever,2=Sometimes, 3=Often, 4=All the time) with a score range of 0 to 80. The total score indicates the impact urinary incontinence has on the child's QoL with the higher scores indicating a more significant effect.

    Time frame: Assessment will be done at each study clinic visit (Day 56 +/- 7)

  2. Impact of Child Nighttime Enuresis on Parent/Carer Quality of Life as Assessed by the WHOQoL-BREF Questionnaire

    The WHOQoL-BREF questionnaire (WHO 1996) will be completed directly by the parent/carer. . The WHOQoL-BREF questionnaire is derived from a larger instrument, the WHOQoL-100. It includes 26 items, grouped in 4 domains: Physical Heath, Psychological, Social Relationships, and Environment, and 2 separate items asking the crespondent about overall perception of QoL (item 1) and an individual's overall perception of their health (item 2). The scores of items 3, 4 and 5, which are negatively phrased, need to be reversed. The mean score of items within each domain is used to calculate the domain scores, which are converted into a 0-100 scale. Higher scores denote higher QoL. Where more than 20% of data is missing from an assessment, the assessment should be discarded. Where an item is missing, the mean of other items in the domain is substituted. Where more than 2 items are missing from the domain, the domain score should not be calculated

    Time frame: Assessment will be done at each study clinic visit (Day 56 +/- 7)

  3. Child Daytime Sleepiness as Assessed by PDSS Questionnaire

    The Paeditric Daytime Sleepiness Scale (PDSS) questionnaire measures daytime sleepiness in children. It is comprised of 8 items assessing daytime sleepiness and rated on a 5-point scale with 0 = Never and 4 = Always/Very Often. The scale ranges from 0 to 32. The questionnaire will be completed by the child themselves (with attendance of an adult) in the older participant group and by the parent/carer on behalf of the child in the younger participant group. Higher scores indicate greater daytime sleepiness. Higher scores indicate greater daytime sleepiness, and were associated with reduced total sleep time, poorer school achievement, poorer anger control, and frequent illness.

    Time frame: Assessment will be done at each study clinic visit (Day 56 +/- 7)

  4. Parent/Carer Fatigue as Assessed by Checklist Individual Strength (CIS Questionnaire)

    The CIS questionnaire was used to assess the parents' sleep. It was completed directly by the parent/carer. The CIS consists of 20 statements on fatigue-related problems responders might have experienced in the past 2 weeks. A Likert scoring scheme from 1 to 7 ranging from 1-"no, that is not true" to 7-"yes, that is true" with items 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 15 and 20 hold inverted scores. The total score ranges from 20 to 140. The questionnaire covers measures 4 dimensions of fatigue: Subjective fatigue severity (8 items), Concentration problems (5 items), Reduced motivation (4 items) and Physical activity (3 items). Dimensions can be analyzed separately, with higher scores indicating higher levels of subjective fatigue (8-56), reduced concentration (5-35), reduced motivation (4-28), and lower levels of physical activity (3-21). A total score over 76 is considered at risk of a fatigue disorder, while 36 provides the cutoff score on the subjective experience of fatigue sub-scale

    Time frame: Assessment will be done at each study clinic visit (Day 56 +/- 7 )

07

Results

Posted Dec 6, 2024

Participant flow

participants were recruited both from the community and from primary and tertiary care centers.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneDryNites ArmNo Pants Arm
Started3570
Completed3149
Not completed421

Outcome measures

PrimaryWet Nights

Average number of wet nights

Time frame:
Last week of the 4-week intervention period
Reported as:
Mean · wet nights per week
Wet Nights
wet nights per weekDryNites ArmNo Pants Arm
Wet Nights2.4 ± 2.214.6 ± 1.99
SecondaryImpact of Urinary Incontinence on Emotional Wellbeing of Child as Assessed by Paediatric Incontinence Questionnaire (PinQ)

The PinQ will be used to assess the child's QoL. The PinQ is a validated cross-cultural continence-specific paediatric QoL questionnaire to assess children with bladder dysfunction, developed by Bower el al (Bower et al. 2006). It is available as self-rated and proxy versions. This will be completed by the child themselves in the older participant group and will be completed by the parent/carer on behalf of the child in the younger participant group. The PinQ measures the emotional impact that urinary incontinence has on a child. It consists of 20 urinary incontinence QoL related questions divided in 2 dimensions: intrinsic (14 items) and extrinsic (6 items), which are graded on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=No, 1=Hardly ever,2=Sometimes, 3=Often, 4=All the time) with a score range of 0 to 80. The total score indicates the impact urinary incontinence has on the child's QoL with the higher scores indicating a more significant effect.

Time frame:
Assessment will be done at each study clinic visit (Day 56 +/- 7)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Impact of Urinary Incontinence on Emotional Wellbeing of Child as Assessed by Paediatric Incontinence Questionnaire (PinQ)
score on a scaleDryNites ArmNo Pants Arm
Impact of Urinary Incontinence on Emotional Wellbeing of Child as Assessed by Paediatric Incontinence Questionnaire (PinQ)12.9 ± 8.1715.2 ± 10.83
SecondaryImpact of Child Nighttime Enuresis on Parent/Carer Quality of Life as Assessed by the WHOQoL-BREF Questionnaire

The WHOQoL-BREF questionnaire (WHO 1996) will be completed directly by the parent/carer. . The WHOQoL-BREF questionnaire is derived from a larger instrument, the WHOQoL-100. It includes 26 items, grouped in 4 domains: Physical Heath, Psychological, Social Relationships, and Environment, and 2 separate items asking the crespondent about overall perception of QoL (item 1) and an individual's overall perception of their health (item 2). The scores of items 3, 4 and 5, which are negatively phrased, need to be reversed. The mean score of items within each domain is used to calculate the domain scores, which are converted into a 0-100 scale. Higher scores denote higher QoL. Where more than 20% of data is missing from an assessment, the assessment should be discarded. Where an item is missing, the mean of other items in the domain is substituted. Where more than 2 items are missing from the domain, the domain score should not be calculated

Time frame:
Assessment will be done at each study clinic visit (Day 56 +/- 7)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Impact of Child Nighttime Enuresis on Parent/Carer Quality of Life as Assessed by the WHOQoL-BREF Questionnaire
score on a scaleDryNites ArmNo Pants Arm
Impact of Child Nighttime Enuresis on Parent/Carer Quality of Life as Assessed by the WHOQoL-BREF Questionnaire21.3 ± 3.1321.5 ± 3.86
SecondaryChild Daytime Sleepiness as Assessed by PDSS Questionnaire

The Paeditric Daytime Sleepiness Scale (PDSS) questionnaire measures daytime sleepiness in children. It is comprised of 8 items assessing daytime sleepiness and rated on a 5-point scale with 0 = Never and 4 = Always/Very Often. The scale ranges from 0 to 32. The questionnaire will be completed by the child themselves (with attendance of an adult) in the older participant group and by the parent/carer on behalf of the child in the younger participant group. Higher scores indicate greater daytime sleepiness. Higher scores indicate greater daytime sleepiness, and were associated with reduced total sleep time, poorer school achievement, poorer anger control, and frequent illness.

Time frame:
Assessment will be done at each study clinic visit (Day 56 +/- 7)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Child Daytime Sleepiness as Assessed by PDSS Questionnaire
score on a scaleDryNites ArmNo Pants Arm
Child Daytime Sleepiness as Assessed by PDSS Questionnaire7.7 ± 3.638.5 ± 4.13
SecondaryParent/Carer Fatigue as Assessed by Checklist Individual Strength (CIS Questionnaire)

The CIS questionnaire was used to assess the parents' sleep. It was completed directly by the parent/carer. The CIS consists of 20 statements on fatigue-related problems responders might have experienced in the past 2 weeks. A Likert scoring scheme from 1 to 7 ranging from 1-"no, that is not true" to 7-"yes, that is true" with items 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 15 and 20 hold inverted scores. The total score ranges from 20 to 140. The questionnaire covers measures 4 dimensions of fatigue: Subjective fatigue severity (8 items), Concentration problems (5 items), Reduced motivation (4 items) and Physical activity (3 items). Dimensions can be analyzed separately, with higher scores indicating higher levels of subjective fatigue (8-56), reduced concentration (5-35), reduced motivation (4-28), and lower levels of physical activity (3-21). A total score over 76 is considered at risk of a fatigue disorder, while 36 provides the cutoff score on the subjective experience of fatigue sub-scale

Time frame:
Assessment will be done at each study clinic visit (Day 56 +/- 7 )
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Parent/Carer Fatigue as Assessed by Checklist Individual Strength (CIS Questionnaire)
score on a scaleDryNites ArmNo Pants Arm
Parent/Carer Fatigue as Assessed by Checklist Individual Strength (CIS Questionnaire)43.7 ± 16.8846.1 ± 22.75

Adverse events

Collected over 56 +/- 7 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
DryNites Arm0/35 (0%)0/35 (0%)1/35 (2.9%)
No Pants Arm0/70 (0%)1/70 (1.4%)4/70 (5.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventDryNites ArmNo Pants Arm
subglottic laryngitisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/351/70
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventDryNites ArmNo Pants Arm
rashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/350/70
genital candidiasis,Infections and infestations0/351/70
pharyngitisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/351/70
subglottic laryngitisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/351/70
pyrexiaInfections and infestations0/351/70

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)DryNites ArmNo Pants ArmTotal
Mean5.4 ± 1.225.6 ± 1.095.6 ± 1.13
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)DryNites ArmNo Pants ArmTotal
Female142943
Male214162
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)DryNites ArmNo Pants ArmTotal
Hispanic or Latino000
Not Hispanic or Latino3569104
Unknown or Not Reported011
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)DryNites ArmNo Pants ArmTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White3570105
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Mounts Bay Medical
    Connor, Haley TR27 5DT, United Kingdom
  • Siddarth Marnekar
    Hull, HU12 8JD, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Feb 2020 to primary completion in Jan 2023, 35 months.

Results were first posted in Dec 2024, 1 year 10 months after primary completion.

Of 40 interventional studies with no phase under Nocturnal Enuresis, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 49. This study's 35 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 23, 2020
First posted
Nov 9, 2020
StartActual
Feb 21, 2020
Primary completionActual
Jan 28, 2023
CompletionActual
Jun 28, 2023
Results first posted
Dec 6, 2024
Last update
Dec 6, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 6, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04620356
Lead sponsor
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 9, 2020
Start date
Feb 21, 2020
Primary completion
Jan 28, 2023
Completion
Jun 28, 2023
Results posted
Dec 6, 2024
Last update
Dec 6, 2024

Study contacts

Søren Riting
principal investigator · Department of Pediatrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion