CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04618120Updated Nov 5, 2020

Virtual Reality-based Exercise Training in Radiotherapy Period After Breast Cancer Surgery

An interventional study of Virtual reality-based exercise and Exercise in Breast Cancer, Exercise and Upper Extremity Dysfunction, sponsored by Gazi University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to female participants aged 28 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-11-05.

Sponsored by Gazi University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 years 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2017, registered Oct 2020).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
66
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
28 Years to 70 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The main purpose of this study is to compare two different exercise approaches during the radiotherapy period in patients who have undergone breast cancer surgery.

Read the detailed description

Exercise therapies are effective methods in the treatment of complications after breast cancer surgery. The study aims to compare exercise practices with virtual reality-based exercise training during radiotherapy period after breast cancer surgery. Patients were randomly divided into 3 groups as virtual reality group, exercise group, and control group, considering the order of arrival at the clinic and the type of surgery (mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery). Patients in virtual reality group received virtual reality-based exercise training using Microsoft Xbox 360 Kinect (Redmond, WA). Patients in exercise group received an exercise program including range of motion, posture, stretching and breathing exercises. Both exercise groups participated in the exercise program for 30- 40 minutes, 3 days a week, as long as radiotherapy continued (5-6 weeks). Patients in the control group did not receive any exercise intervention as is done in the current practice. Assessment methods were applied at the beginning and at the end of the radiotherapy for all groups. Shoulder range of motion was measured using universal goniometer. Hand grip strength was measured using Jamar hand dynamometer. Shoulder proprioception was measured using Cybex (Lumex,NY,USA) isokinetic dynamometer. Upper extremity functional status, kinesiophobia, anxiety and depression level, fatigue and quality of life were evaluated with various questionnaires.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer
  • Exercise
  • Upper Extremity Dysfunction

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Virtual Reality Exercises
  • Breast cancer
  • Radiotherapy
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

12,544 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 2,892 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 66 is close to the median of 72 across 9,303 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Gazi University is the lead sponsor of 531 studies on the registry; 99 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
28 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Being over 18 years old
  • Being literate
  • Having a diagnosis of unilateral breast cancer
  • Having undergone surgery for breast cancer
  • Radiotherapy will be applied for breast cancer treatment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Metastasis
  • Have an active infection
  • Having a cardiac or neurological disease that would prevent participation in the study
  • Having uncontrolled hypertension
  • Having an orthopedic disorder that prevents exercise
  • Having sensory or cognitive impairments that interfere with communication
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
66 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Virtual Reality-based Exercise Group

    Virtual reality-based exercises, breathing exercises and patient education on general considerations. Virtual reality-based exercises were done using the "Microsoft Xbox 360 Kinect" system. Among the 'Kinect Sports' games, especially tennis, table tennis, boxing and bowling games including upper extremity movements were selected. These games require all-directional and repetitive motion of the shoulder and elbow joint. Patients played the games using the operated / affected side arms. Between games, the patient was rested in a chair. In the meantime, deep breathing exercises were done. The patients participated in virtual reality-based exercises 3 days a week (15-18 sessions in total) during the radiotherapy treatment continued (5-6 weeks). Each exercise session was set to last 30-40 minutes in total.

    Other: Virtual reality-based exercise

  • Experimental
    Exercise Group

    Stretching exercises, range of motion exercises, posture exercises, breathing exercises and patient education on general considerations. 11 different exercises consisting of shoulder range of motion in all directions, stretching exercises, posture exercises and breathing exercises were performed in the presence of a physiotherapist.The patients participated in this exercise program 3 days a week (15-18 sessions in total) during the radiotherapy treatment continued (5-6 weeks). One session of the exercises was completed in an average of 30-40 minutes. The same exercises were repeated in each session.

    Other: Exercise

  • No intervention
    Control Group

    Only patient education on general considerations.

Interventions

  • OtherVirtual reality-based exercise

    Virtual reality-based exercises with "Microsoft Xbox 360 Kinect" and breathing exercises. Patient education

  • OtherExercise

    Shoulder range of motion, stretching, posture and breathing exercises. Patient education

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in the shoulder range of motion

    Universal Goniometer

    Time frame: Baseline and after the exercise training (5-6 weeks)

  2. Change in the grip strength assessed by hydraulic hand dynamometer

    Jamar Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer

    Time frame: Baseline and after the exercise training (5-6 weeks)

  3. Change in the shoulder proprioception assessed by isokinetic dynamometer

    Cybex 770 Norm isokinetic dynamometer (Lumex Inc. NY,USA)

    Time frame: Baseline and after the exercise training (5-6 weeks)

  4. Change in circumference of upper extremities

    Lymphedema circumference measurement

    Time frame: Baseline and after the exercise training (5-6 weeks)

  5. Change in the functionality of upper extremities assessed by the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire

    The Turkish version of the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire is used to evaluate functional status of upper extremities. The questionnaire consists of 30 questions. A score between 0-100 is obtained from the questionnaire. 0 point means "no disability", 100 point means "maximum level of disability".

    Time frame: Baseline and after the exercise training (5-6 weeks)

  6. Change in kinesiophobia assessed by theTampa Kinesiophobia Scale

    The Turkish version of theTampa Kinesiophobia Scale was used to determine the level of kinesiophobia. 4-point Likert scoring (1 = Strongly disagree, 4 = Strongly agree) is used in the scale. After reversing items 4, 8, 12 and 16, a total score is calculated. A score between 17-68 is obtained from the scale. The higher scores indicate higher kinesiophobia level.

    Time frame: Baseline and after the exercise training (5-6 weeks)

  7. Change in anxiety and depression level assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

    The Turkish version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale was used to determine the anxiety and depression level. The scale consists of 14 questions in total. 7 of the questions measure depression, 7 measure anxiety. A total score between 0-42 is obtained from the sum of the anxiety and depression scores. The higher scores indivate higher depression and /or anxiety.

    Time frame: Baseline and after the exercise training (5-6 weeks)

  8. Change in fatigue assessed by Piper Fatigue Scale

    The Turkish version of Piper Fatigue Scale was used to determine the level of fatigue. The scale consists of 22 items (0-10 points) and 4 subscales: behavioral/severitiy (6 items), affective meaning (5 items), sensory (5 items) and cognitive/mood (6 items). Each subscale is scored individually and then aggregated together for an overall score. Higher scores indicate more fatigue. As a result of the average score; 0 points are interpreted as no fatigue, 1-3 points mild fatigue, 4-6 points moderate fatigue, 7-10 points severe fatigue. There are also 5 more questions in the scale that are not used in the subscale or total score calculation. These open-ended questions are about the duration of perceived fatigue, its causes, methods to alleviate fatigue and associated symptoms. They provide qualitative data.

    Time frame: Baseline and after the exercise training (5-6 weeks)

  9. Change in quality of life assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)

    The Turkish version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) was used to evaluate quality of life level. It contains five functioning scales (physical, social, role, cognitive, and emotional functioning), eight symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain, dyspnea, sleep disturbances, appetite loss, constipation, and diarrhea), financial impact, and overall quality of life. All scale scores are converted to range from 0 to 100. higher scores indicate better functioning for the functioning scales and overall quality of life; higher scores indicate higher symptom burden for the symptom scales.

    Time frame: Baseline and after the exercise training (5-6 weeks)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient Satisfaction

    The motivation of the exercises, the state of enjoying the exercise, believing that the exercise is beneficial, and the patient's willingness to continue the exercise were evaluated with 4 questions that they could answer with Likert-type answers.

    Time frame: Patient satisfaction was evaluated at the end of the 5-6 week exercise training.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Gazi University Faculty of Health Sciences
    Ankara, Emek 06490, Turkey
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 5, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04618120
Lead sponsor
Gazi University
Responsible party
İlknur Onurlu (Principal Investigator, Gazi University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 5, 2020
Start date
May 22, 2017
Primary completion
Jan 2, 2019
Completion
Mar 2, 2019
Last update
Nov 5, 2020

Study contacts

İlknur Onurlu, PhD
principal investigator · Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion