CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04614311MyJIAUpdated Feb 17, 2025

Strategies Towards Personalised Treatment in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA).

A Phase 4 interventional study of Triamcinolone Hexacetonide 20 MG/ML in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis, sponsored by Oslo University Hospital. Completed at 5 sites in Norway. Open to participants aged 1 Year to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-17.

Sponsored by Oslo University Hospital · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
189
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
1 Year to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Inhibitors of tumour necrosis factor (TNFa) reduce inflammation in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), but only 20-40 percent achieve a state of no or very little disease activity. Tailored glucocorticoid joint injections are widely used (usually in general anaesthesia), but no controlled studies have addressed the effect of this approach. In Norway there are unique possibilities for early interventions, rapid escalation of medication and individualised therapy. The investigators aim to find the optimal ways to increase disease control and improve quality of life for JIA patients.

The hypothesis is that JIA patients starting TNF-inhibitors with added steroid injection of inflamed joints, will lead to improved outcomes compared to TNF-inhibitors with no joint injections, and that therapeutic drug monitoring, modern imaging and biologic and clinical profiling can be utilised to characterise JIA patients with different anti-TNF responses.

MyJIA is a national investigator initiated 48 weeks RCT of JIA patients starting TNF-inhibitors; 202 JIA patients will be randomised at baseline to A) concomitant intra-articular glucocorticoid injections versus B) no injections. Primary endpoint is the rate of sustained remission from weeks 24 to 36. Possible risk factors for not reaching remission will be analysed including clinical characteristics, drug antibodies/serum concentrations, patients' reported health status and preferences, molecular signalling (based on transcriptional, cellular and genetic risk) and synovitis detected by modern imaging (ultrasound and whole-body MRI).

Patients will be recruited from all Norwegian health regions through an established collaboration. Unit of Paediatric Rheumatology, Oslo University Hospital, with an extensive research track in this field, will be the coordinating centre. Broad research cooperation across disciplines is established. The trial is highly innovative in evaluating treatment options and strategies to individualise and optimise the efficacy and safety of JIA treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis
03

In context

Arthritis

3,554 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthritis; 317 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 189 is above the median of 90 across 2,377 interventional studies indexed under Arthritis.

Browse Arthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

Oslo University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 810 studies on the registry; 148 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Year to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. 1-18 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent.
  2. Fulfilment of the International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) classification criteria for non-systemic JIA.
  3. Clinical indication for starting TNFi treatment according to consensus between at least two physicians.
  4. Naïve to TNFi or prior use of one TNFi (stopped at least 3 months before study inclusion and no previous TNFi treatment failure).
  5. Juvenile Disease Activity Score (JADAS) >1 at baseline and at least one joint with active arthritis were joint injection is considered.
  6. Willing to give written consent (participant ≥ 16, guardians if \< 16 years of age, both participants and guardians if 16-18) and comply with the requirements of the study protocol.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Medical Conditions

  1. Major comorbidity including uncontrolled infectious, neurological or mental disease, malignant disease, severe heart failure, severe renal failure, active ulcus ventriculi, and uncontrolled diabetes mellitus.

    Prior/Concomitant Therapy

  2. Used two or more TNFi.
  3. Corticosteroid use (including i.a. injection) less than 4 weeks prior to randomisation.

    Other Exclusions

  4. Known hypersensitivity to Triamcinolone hexacetonide (Lederspan) or any of the excipients (sorbitol, polysorbate or benzyl alcohol).
  5. Concomitant therapy with CYP3A-inhibitors or digitalis glycosides.
  6. Known inherited fructose intolerance
  7. Presence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) at screening.
  8. Positive hepatitis C antibody test result at screening or within 12 months prior to starting study treatment.
  9. Evidence of active or latent tuberculosis (TB) as documented by medical history and examination, chest X-rays (front), and TB testing. The choice of TB tests will be made by the investigator according to local licensing and standard of care.
  10. Having received live vaccines less than two weeks prior to randomisation.
  11. Drug / alcohol abuse which hampers adherence to the study protocol.
  12. Language barriers that hampers adherence to the study protocol.
  13. Pregnancy or breast-feeding.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
189 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Intervention

    Intra-articular corticosteroid injections into active joints

    Drug: Triamcinolone Hexacetonide 20 MG/ML

  • No intervention
    Comparator

    No intra-articular injections

Interventions

  • DrugTriamcinolone Hexacetonide 20 MG/ML

    JIA patients (age 1-18 years) starting TNFi treatment randomised to intervention will receive treatment with intra articular glucocorticoids (triamcinolone hexacetonide) injections in inflamed joints

    Also known as: Lederspan

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The proportion of JIA participants with sustained inactive disease

    The proportion of participants with sustained, inactive disease from week 24 to week 36. Inactive disease is defined according the 2011 Wallace criteria: * No active arthritis† * Physician global assessment of disease activity score normal (0) * Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) within normal range * Morning stiffness ≤ 15 minutes * No active uveitis * No fever, rash, serositis, splenomegaly, or generalized lymphadenopathy attributable to JIA In addition, no use of any i.a. or p.o. corticosteroids from week 20 to week 36. †Active arthritis according to the ACR definition: 1. a joint with swelling not due to bony enlargement OR, if no swelling is present 2. limitation of motion accompanied by either pain on motion and/or tenderness.

    Time frame: Week 24 to week 36.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The proportion of participants with ACR pedi 30% response

    American College of Rheumatology (ACR) paediatric 30% response (30% improvement in a minimum of 3 of any 6 variables in the paediatric core set criteria with no more than one of the remaining variables worsening more than 30%). Pediatric core set criteria: * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (visual analogue scale (VAS), range 0-100 where 0 represents best possible outcome). * Patient's/parent's global assessment of overall well-being (VAS, range from 0-100 where 0 represents best possible outcome) * Functional ability (Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire, CHAQ, lower scores are indicative of better functioning) * Number of joints with active arthritis (range 0-71 where 0 represents best possible outcome) * Number of joints with limited range of movement (range 0-70 where 0 represents best possible outcome) * Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (normalised to a 0-10 scale where 0 represents best possible outcome)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 6,12 and 24

  2. The proportion of participants with ACR pedi 50,70 and 90% response

    American College of Rheumatology (ACR) paediatric 50, 70 and 90% response (50,70 and 90% improvement in a minimum of 3 of any 6 variables in the pediatric core set (see above) criteria.

    Time frame: Baseline to week 6, 12 and 24.

  3. Juvenile arthritis disease activity score (JADAS)

    The JADAS is a composite measure of disease activity with a range from 0 to 101 where 0 represents the best possible outcome and 101 the worst possible outcome. The JADAS is calculated as a sum of scores from: * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (visual analogue scale ranging from 0-100 where 0 represents best possible outcome and and 100 the worst possible outcome). * Patient's/parent's global assessment of overall well-being (visual analogue scale ranging from 0-100 where 0 represents best possible outcome and and 100 the worst possible outcome) - Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (normalized to a 0-10 scale, according to the following formula: (ESR (mm/hour)-20)/10. 0 represents best possible outcome and and 10 the worst possible outcome) * Number of joints with active arthritis (range from 0 to 71 where 0 represents best possible outcome and and 71 the worst possible outcome)

    Time frame: Baseline to week 6, 12 and 24.

  4. Time to inactive disease

    Time (months) until participants reach inactive disease according to the Wallace criteria and JADAS.

    Time frame: Baseline to 48 weeks

  5. Proportion of Participants with Minimal Disease Activity

    Proportion of Participants with Minimal Disease Activity

    Time frame: Week 26 to 48

  6. Change from baseline in arthritis-related pain severity as measured by pain VAS item

    Change from Baseline in Arthritis-Related Pain Severity as Measured by Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The Pain VAS ranges from 0 to 100 where 0 represents no pain and 100 the worst possible level of pain.

    Time frame: 48 weeks

07

Study locations

5 sites
  • St Olavs Hospital
    Trondheim, Trønderlag, Norway
  • Haukeland University Hospital
    Bergen, 5021, Norway
  • Oslo University Hospital
    Oslo, 0424, Norway
  • Stavanger University Hospital
    Stavanger, Norway
  • University Hospital of North Norway
    Tromsø, 9019, Norway
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 17, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04614311
Lead sponsor
Oslo University Hospital
Collaborators
The Research Council of Norway, Haukeland University Hospital, St. Olavs Hospital, University Hospital of North Norway, Helse Stavanger HF
Responsible party
Pernille Helen Bøyesen (MD PhD, Oslo University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 3, 2020
Start date
Dec 1, 2020
Primary completion
Nov 7, 2024
Completion
Feb 6, 2025
Last update
Feb 17, 2025

Study contacts

Pernille H Bøyesen, MD PhD
study director · Oslo University Hospital
Anna-Birgitte Aga, MD PhD
principal investigator · Oslo University Hospital
Berit Flatø, Prof
principal investigator · Oslo University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion