CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT046052763DmpUS for PCaUpdated Oct 15, 2024

Threedimensional Multiparametric Ultrasound for Prostate Cancer Detection

An observational study in Prostate Cancer, sponsored by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA). Completed at 3 sites in Netherlands. Open to male participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-15.

Sponsored by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
608
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

Rationale: Current imaging techniques for the detection and grading of prostate cancer are imperfect, leading to unnecessary biopsies, suboptimal treatment decisions and missed clinically significant cancers. The hypothesis of this study is that computer assisted analysis of 3D multiparametric ultrasound (mpUS) images can accurately detect, grade and localize prostate cancer. 3D mpUS may then become a more cost-effective and more streamlined imaging strategy than the current standard: mpMRI.

Objective: The primary objective is to collect high-quality 3D mpUS and histology data, to train and improve the classifier algorithm with the goal of achieving an accurate ultrasound imaging tool for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.

Secondary objectives are related to the preliminary assessment of the performance of 3D mpUS with computer assisted analysis.

Study design: This is a prospective, multi-center study in men with a suspicion of prostate cancer who are scheduled for prostate biopsies, and men with confirmed prostate cancer who are scheduled to undergo a radical prostatectomy. Prior to prostate biopsies or the radical prostatectomy, 3D mpUS imaging will be performed. The ultrasound images will be analyzed and used for algorithm training using the biopsies and/or prostatecomy specimens as gold standard. Additional research coupes of pathology material (both biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens) from study subjects will be anonymized and separately analyzed and stored in a central, independent institution. The outcome of the 3D mpUS analysis and the additional pathology evaluation are for research purposes only and will not interfere with standard patient care.

Study population: 1) Male patients of age ≥18 suspected for prostate cancer who are scheduled for systematic and/or targeted biopsy after mpMRI examination.

  1. patients of age ≥18 with confirmed prostate cancer who are scheduled for radical prostatectomy.

Main study parameters/endpoints:

  • Gleason/Grade group scoring based on histology. Using histology as the reference standard the accuracy of the algorithm will be optimized to be differentiating between benign tissue and various grades of malignancy.
  • Localization and size of lesions at full-gland histology in the subset of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Correlation in tumour size and location will be optimized between 3D mpUS findings and histology of the full gland.

For the secondary objective, preliminary assessment of the performance of 3D mpUS, the following endpoints are evaluated

  • Among all clinically significant detected cancers confirmed by histology, the proportion of these cancers that would have been detected by 3D mpUS will be calculated. The number of false positive findings by 3D mpUS both as an absolute count and expressed as a mean rate per patient.
  • The concordance in the detection and grading of abnormalities between mpMRI and 3D mpUS by examining the frequency and type of disagreements and calculating the kappa statistic.
02

Conditions studied

  • Prostate Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound
  • CEUS
  • Machine Learning
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Multiparametric Ultrasound
03

In context

Prostatic Neoplasms

6,370 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms; 1,397 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 608 is above the median of 200 across 1,179 observational studies indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms.

Browse Prostatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) is the lead sponsor of 512 studies on the registry; 178 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

  1. Male patients of age ≥18 suspected for prostate cancer who are scheduled for systematic and/or targeted biopsy after mpMRI examination.
  2. patients of age ≥18 with confirmed prostate cancer who are scheduled for radical prostatectomy.

Inclusion criteria

In order to be eligible to participate in this study, a subject must meet all of the following criteria:

  • Men ≥18 years with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer or confirmed prostate cancer.
  • Scheduled for either systematic and/or targeted biopsy after mpMRI examination or radical prostatectomy
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

A potential subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:

  • No mpMRI performed prior to prostate biopsy or radical prostatectomy
  • A history of chemotherapy for PCa or currently being treated with chemotherapy for PCa.
  • A patient history that includes any of the following prostate related interventions:

    • Brachytherapy or external radiotherapy for PCa;
    • Focal therapy for prostate cancer;
    • Prostate biopsy within the last 30 days.
  • Hormonal therapy for prostate cancer within the last six months
  • A patient history with a cardiac right to left shunt.
  • Current treatment with dobutamine
  • Known severe pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary artery pressure >90 mmHg), uncontrolled systemic hypertension or respiratory distress syndrome
  • Incapable of understanding the language in which the patient information is given.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
608 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Pre-biopsy cohort

    Male patients of age ≥18 suspected for prostate cancer who are scheduled for systematic and/or targeted biopsy after mpMRI examination. No intervention study

    Other: No intervention

  • Pre-radical prostatectomy cohort

    Male patients of age ≥18 diagnosed with prostate cancer who are scheduled for radical prostatectomy

    Other: No intervention

Interventions

  • OtherNo intervention

    No intervention

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To collect high quality 3D multiparametric ultrasound and histology data to train and improve the classifier algorithm with the goal of achieving an accurate ultrasound imaging tool for detection, grading and localization of prostate cancer.

    This is a diagnostic accuracy study with cross-sectional interest between 3D multiparametric ultrasound results and histological findings at biopsy or histological examination of the full grand as the reference standards.

    Time frame: The 3D multiparametric ultrasound images collected te moment the ultrasound is done. Histology findings will be collected 2 week after prostatebiopsies or radical prostatectomy. No patient follow-up is needed.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The number of histologically proven clinically relevant cancer that can be detected by 3D multiparametric ultrasound using full mount prostate histopathology as the reference standard.

    Sensitivity / Negative predictive value

    Time frame: The 3D multiparametric ultrasound images collected the moment the ultrasound is done. Histology findings will be collected 2 week after prostatebiopsies or radical prostatectomy. No patient follow-up is needed.

  2. The frequency of false-positive result by 3D multiparametric ultrasound using full mount prostate histopathology as the reference standard.

    Specificity / Positive Predictive Value

    Time frame: The 3D multiparametric ultrasound images collected the moment the ultrasound is done. Histology findings will be collected 2 week after prostatebiopsies or radical prostatectomy. No patient follow-up is needed.

  3. The concordance between findings from mpMRI and 3D multiparametric ultrasound.

    Cancer detection rates, relative sensitivity / specificity

    Time frame: mpMRI is present at time of inclusion, 3D mpUS images will be collected 1-3 weeks after inclusion. The concordance between mpMRI and 3DmpUS can be evaluated after imaging and histpathology data is in.

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • Amsterdam Univesity Medical Centers location VUmc
    Amsterdam, Noord Holland 1081HV, Netherlands
  • Academic Medical Center
    Amsterdam, Noord-Holland 1105AZ, Netherlands
  • Netherlands Cancer Institute
    Amsterdam, North Holland 1066 CX, Netherlands
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Russo G, Mischi M, Scheepens W, De la Rosette JJ, Wijkstra H. Angiogenesis in prostate cancer: onset, progression and imaging. BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt C):E794-808. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11444.x. Epub 2012 Sep 7. PubMed 22958524 ↗
  • van Moorselaar RJ, Voest EE. Angiogenesis in prostate cancer: its role in disease progression and possible therapeutic approaches. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2002 Nov 29;197(1-2):239-50. doi: 10.1016/s0303-7207(02)00262-9. PubMed 12431818 ↗
  • Mischi M, Kuenen MP, Wijkstra H. Angiogenesis imaging by spatiotemporal analysis of ultrasound contrast agent dispersion kinetics. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2012 Apr;59(4):621-9. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2012.2241. PubMed 22547274 ↗
  • Kuenen MP, Saidov TA, Wijkstra H, de la Rosette JJ, Mischi M. Spatiotemporal correlation of ultrasound contrast agent dilution curves for angiogenesis localization by dispersion imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2013 Dec;60(12):2665-9. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2013.2865. PubMed 24297031 ↗
  • Postema AW, Frinking PJ, Smeenge M, De Reijke TM, De la Rosette JJ, Tranquart F, Wijkstra H. Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound parametric imaging for the detection of prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2016 Apr;117(4):598-603. doi: 10.1111/bju.13116. Epub 2015 Jun 29. PubMed 25754526 ↗
  • Postema AW, Gayet MCW, van Sloun RJG, Wildeboer RR, Mannaerts CK, Savci-Heijink CD, Schalk SG, Kajtazovic A, van der Poel H, Mulders PFA, Beerlage HP, Mischi M, Wijkstra H. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound with dispersion analysis for the localization of prostate cancer: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens. World J Urol. 2020 Nov;38(11):2811-2818. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03103-4. Epub 2020 Feb 20. PubMed 32078707 ↗
  • Mannaerts CK, Engelbrecht MRW, Postema AW, van Kollenburg RAA, Hoeks CMA, Savci-Heijink CD, Van Sloun RJG, Wildeboer RR, De Reijke TM, Mischi M, Wijkstra H. Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men: direct comparison of systematic biopsy, multiparametric MRI- and contrast-ultrasound-dispersion imaging-targeted biopsy. BJU Int. 2020 Oct;126(4):481-493. doi: 10.1111/bju.15093. Epub 2020 May 13. PubMed 32315112 ↗
  • Mannaerts CK, Wildeboer RR, Remmers S, van Kollenburg RAA, Kajtazovic A, Hagemann J, Postema AW, van Sloun RJG, J Roobol M, Tilki D, Mischi M, Wijkstra H, Salomon G. Multiparametric Ultrasound for Prostate Cancer Detection and Localization: Correlation of B-mode, Shear Wave Elastography and Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound with Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. J Urol. 2019 Dec;202(6):1166-1173. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000415. Epub 2019 Jun 27. PubMed 31246546 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 15, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04605276
Lead sponsor
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Collaborators
Angiogenesis Analytics
Responsible party
Harrie P. Beerlage (Principal investigator, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 28, 2020
Start date
Jun 28, 2021
Primary completion
Mar 4, 2024
Completion
Mar 7, 2024
Last update
Oct 15, 2024

Study contacts

Harrie Beerlage, Professor
principal investigator · Amsterdam University Medical Centers

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion