CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04603703Updated Oct 27, 2020

Sacroiliac Joint Manipulation Effect in Chronic Piriformis Syndrome.

An interventional study of HVLAT Manipulation and Conventional Physical Therapy in Piriformis Syndrome, sponsored by Riphah International University. Completed at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-10-27.

Sponsored by Riphah International University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2020, registered Oct 2020).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
30 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of the study was to determine the effects of sacroiliac joint thrust manipulation on pain, pain pressure threshold, piriformis length and straight leg raise, in chronic piriformis syndrome.

Read the detailed description

In 2017, a systematic review was conducted to measure the effectiveness of physical therapy approach for relieving the SIJ pain linked with PS. Participants were administered with conservative physical therapy, Kinesiology taping and sacroiliac joint manipulation in group A, group B and group C respectively. They have concluded that Sacroiliac joint manipulation was more effective as compare to the rest of the physiotherapy approach in lowering the SIJ pain associated with piriformis syndrome.

In 2014, an experimental study was conducted to compare the effects of nerve mobilization technique with conventional physical therapy approach. Pre and post treatment data was taken from the respective participants. The results of this study concluded that there is a significant differences in the outcome measures of both groups and nerve MOBS were proven to be more effective in relieving the sciatic nerve radiating pain associated with inflamed piriformis muscle in PS.

A study in July, 2012 was conducted to compare the effects of two possible physical therapy treatments in lowering the low back pain threshold associated with piriformis syndrome. These two techniques were METs and SCS. Their results concluded that both Muscle energy technique and Strain counter strain were proved to be equally effective in the management of functional disability and pain in low back associated with chronic PS.

An RCT was conducted in 2011, to measure the effectiveness of two possible manipulation methods which can be applied in patients with chronic piriformis syndrome. According to this study, manipulating the of SIJ along with lumber manipulation is more effective as compare to the SIJ manipulation alone to regain the total piriformis length for patients with Chronic PS.

Another study was conducted by Gopal Nambi and colleagues in Saudi Arabia. It was concluded that Program comprises of Post Isometric Relaxation is more effective as compare to conservative physical therapy in alleviating the pain, improving hip ROM and functional improvement in participants with PS.

02

Conditions studied

  • Piriformis Syndrome

Keywords

  • High Velocity Low Amplitude Thrust
  • Piriformis Syndrome
  • Sacroiliac joint manipulation
03

In context

Piriformis Muscle Syndrome

53 studies on the registry are indexed under Piriformis Muscle Syndrome; 22 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 42 across 47 interventional studies indexed under Piriformis Muscle Syndrome.

Browse Piriformis Muscle Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Riphah International University is the lead sponsor of 2,133 studies on the registry; 633 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients having alteast 3 months chronic Piriformis syndrome
  • FAIR test positive
  • Unilateral or bilateral Piriformis Syndrome

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lumber Prolapsed Intervertebral Disc (PIVD)
  • Patients having hip osteoarthritis
  • Sacroiliatis (FABER test, Mennell's test, Sacral Thrust Test, Compression test, Distraction test, thigh thrust test)
  • Lumbosacral instability
  • Patients having any joint replacement in lumbosacral and hip regions.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    HVLAT Manipulation

    Ultrasound, moist hot pack, piriformis stretching, myofascial release, gluteal muscles strengthening, sciatic neurodynamics, HVLAT

    Other: HVLAT Manipulation

  • Active comparator
    Conventional physical therapy

    Ultrasound, moist hot pack, piriformis stretching, myofascial release, gluteal muscles strengthening, sciatic neurodynamics

    Other: Conventional Physical Therapy

Interventions

  • OtherHVLAT Manipulation

    Ultrasound for 10 mins/1 set/ (3 days/ week), Moist hot pack for 10 mins/1 set/ (3 days/ week), Piriformis stretching for 7 sec hold/ 7 repititions/ 1 set/ (3 days/ week), Myofascial release of lumbosacral paraspinal muscles for 3 mins/ 1 set/ (3 days/ week), Gluteal muscles strengthening for 10 sec hold/ 5 reps/ 1 set/ (3 days/ week), Sciatic Neurodynamics with 10 oscillations/ 3 sets/(3 days/ week), HVLAT manipulation/ 1 rep/ 1set/ (3 days/ week), A total of 2 weeks (6 sessions, 3 sessions/ week) were given each consisting of 30 mins.

  • OtherConventional Physical Therapy

    Ultrasound for 10 mins/1 set/ (3 days/ week), Moist hot pack for 10 mins/1 set/ (3 days/ week), Piriformis stretching for 7 sec hold/ 7 repititions/ 1 set/ (3 days/ week), Myofascial release of lumbosacral paraspinal muscles for 3 mins/ 1 set/ (3 days/ week), Gluteal muscles strengthening for 10 sec hold/ 5 reps/ 1 set/ (3 days/ week), Sciatic Neurodynamics with 10 oscillations/ 3 sets/(3 days/ week), A total of 2 weeks (6 sessions, 3 sessions/ week) were given each consisting of 30 mins.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)

    Changes from baseline, Numeric Pain Rating Scale is a scale for pain starting from 0 to 10 where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates severe pain.

    Time frame: 6th Day

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pressure Pain Threshold

    Changes from baseline, pressure pain Threshold were taken with the help of Algometer.

    Time frame: 6th Day

  2. Piriformis Length

    Changes from the baseline, Piriformis Length were taken with the help of Goniometer.

    Time frame: 6th Day

  3. Straight Leg Raise

    Changes from baseline, Straight Leg Raise were taken with the help of Inclinometer.

    Time frame: 6th Day

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Max Rehab & Physical Therapy Centre G-8 Markaz
    Islamabad, Federal 46000, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Al-Subahi M, Alayat M, Alshehri MA, Helal O, Alhasan H, Alalawi A, Takrouni A, Alfaqeh A. The effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions for sacroiliac joint dysfunction: a systematic review. J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Sep;29(9):1689-1694. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.1689. Epub 2017 Sep 15. PubMed 28932014 ↗
  • Kutty RK, Gebrekidan HG, Lerebo WT, Gebretsadik MA. Neural mobilization a therapeutic efficacy in a piriformis syndrome model: an experimental study. International journal of physiotherapy and research. 2014;2(3):577-83.
  • Ellythy MA. Efficacy of muscle energy technique versus strain counter strain on low back dysfunction. Bulletin of Faculty of Physical Therapy. 2012;17(2).
  • Rodrigue T, Hardy RW. Diagnosis and treatment of piriformis syndrome. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2001 Apr;12(2):311-9. PubMed 11525209 ↗
  • Bose GNSC, Dusad G. EFFECT OF RECIPROCAL INHIBITION AND POST ISOMETRIC RELAXATION; TYPES OF MUSCLE ENERGY TECHNIQUE IN PIRIFORMIS SYNDROME-A COMPARATIVE STUDY.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 27, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04603703
Lead sponsor
Riphah International University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 27, 2020
Start date
May 9, 2020
Primary completion
Sep 8, 2020
Completion
Sep 18, 2020
Last update
Oct 27, 2020

Study contacts

Asghar Khan, Phd
principal investigator · Riphah International University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion