ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04601493PRINCEUpdated Aug 26, 2024Results posted

PRescribing INterventions for Chronic Pain Via the Electronic Health Record Study - Opioid-Naive Population

An interventional study of Choice Architecture Nudge and PMP Integration & Nudge in Opioid-use Disorder, Opioid Use and Opioid Abuse, sponsored by University of Minnesota. Completed at 1 site in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-08-26.

Sponsored by University of Minnesota · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
631
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this research is to assess the effects of electronic health record (EHR)-based decision support tools on primary care provider (PCP) decision-making around pain treatment and opioid prescribing. The decision support tools are informed by principles of "behavioral economics," whereby clinicians are "nudged," though never forced, towards guideline-concordant care.

Read the detailed description

To test the effects of these decision support tools for improving the quality of care for pain treatment, the investigators will implement a pragmatic clinic-randomized trial across the primary care clinics of Fairview Medical Group and University of Minnesota Physicians.

The study has two parallel components. The decision support tools to be tested will differ somewhat depending on whether a given patient is opioid-naïve, or whether a given patient is a current opioid-user. Four sets of analyses will be conducted separately: one for the opioid-naïve group using EHR data, one for the current opioid-user group using EHR data, one at the PCP-level using web survey data, and one at the PCP-level using MN Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) data.

02

Conditions studied

  • Opioid-use Disorder
  • Opioid Use
  • Opioid Abuse
03

In context

Opioid-Related Disorders

1,439 studies on the registry are indexed under Opioid-Related Disorders; 291 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 631 is above the median of 62 across 1,145 interventional studies indexed under Opioid-Related Disorders.

Browse Opioid-Related Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Minnesota is the lead sponsor of 1,210 studies on the registry; 195 are open to participants now.

Of its 133 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 92 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

- All primary care providers from all of the Fairview and University of Minnesota Physicians study clinics

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

- Primary care providers who work less than 20% full time equivalent (FTE)

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
631 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Care as Usual

    Clinics assigned to this arm will continue to care for the patients as usual in regards to opioid prescribing.

  • Experimental
    Choice Architecture Nudge

    Clinics in this arm will receive the choice architecture nudge intervention.

    Behavioral: Choice Architecture Nudge

  • Experimental
    PMP Integration & Nudge

    Clinics in this arm will receive the Prescription Drug Monitoring (PMP) Integration \& Nudge intervention.

    Behavioral: PMP Integration & Nudge

  • Experimental
    Choice Architecture Nudge + PMP Integration & Nudge

    Clinics in this arm will receive both the choice architecture nudge and prescription drug monitoring (PMP) integration \& nudge interventions.

    Behavioral: Choice Architecture Nudge · Behavioral: PMP Integration & Nudge

Interventions

  • BehavioralChoice Architecture Nudge

    During the choice architecture nudge intervention, Primary Care Providers (PCPs) will be sent alerts in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) system when they initiate an opioid order for a patient who has not had an opioid prescription within the past six months. The alert provides guidance language about opioid prescribing and prompts the PCP to open the "SmartSet" to order non-opioid treatment alternatives. PCPs can choose to ignore this, but opening the SmartSet is the default option. When the SmartSet is opened, PCPs can choose to click on a variety of treatment order options, including both non-opioid pharmacological options and non-pharmacological options (e.g., referral to physical therapy or pain clinic).

  • BehavioralPMP Integration & Nudge

    During the Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PMP) integration \& nudge intervention, Primary Care Providers (PCPs) will have integrated access to the PMP embedded within the EHR. All clinicians can already access the PMP to look up a patient's prior opioid prescriptions and prescription fills. However, this process involves signing in to the separate PMP website and can be complicated and time-consuming within typical clinical workflow. The integrated PMP tool makes it much easier and faster for a PCP to access the PMP information for a given patient.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Opioid Prescription Rate

    Outcome reported as the percent of Primary Care Appointments (PCAs) at each clinic during which an opioid is prescribed, without currently receiving a non-opioid alternative pain treatment (including a new order for a non-opioid pain treatment).

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rate of Non-Opioid Treatment Prescription

    Outcome reported as the percent of Primary Care Appointments (PCAs) at each clinic during which a CDC-recommended non-opioid treatment in ordered

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Opioid Prescription Length

    Outcome reported as the mean length of opioid prescription (in days) given during Primary Care Appointments

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Opioid Prescription MME

    Outcome reported as the mean Milligram Morphine Equivalents (MME) of opioid prescriptions given during Primary Care Appointments

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Results

Posted Aug 26, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCare as UsualChoice Architecture NudgePMP Integration & NudgeChoice Architecture Nudge + PMP Integration & Nudge
Started126112104131
Completed126112104131
Not completed0000

Outcome measures

PrimaryOpioid Prescription Rate

Outcome reported as the percent of Primary Care Appointments (PCAs) at each clinic during which an opioid is prescribed, without currently receiving a non-opioid alternative pain treatment (including a new order for a non-opioid pain treatment).

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · percent
Opioid Prescription Rate
percentCare as UsualChoice Architecture NudgePMP Integration & NudgeChoice Architecture Nudge + PMP Integration & Nudge
Opioid Prescription Rate0.0159 ± 0.1250.0141 ± 0.1180.0161 ± 0.1290.0120 ± 0.109
SecondaryRate of Non-Opioid Treatment Prescription

Outcome reported as the percent of Primary Care Appointments (PCAs) at each clinic during which a CDC-recommended non-opioid treatment in ordered

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · percent
Rate of Non-Opioid Treatment Prescription
percentCare as UsualChoice Architecture NudgePMP Integration & NudgeChoice Architecture Nudge + PMP Integration & Nudge
Rate of Non-Opioid Treatment Prescription0.239 ± 0.4260.227 ± 0.4190.23 ± 0.4210.228 ± 0.419
SecondaryOpioid Prescription Length

Outcome reported as the mean length of opioid prescription (in days) given during Primary Care Appointments

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · Days
Opioid Prescription Length
DaysCare as UsualChoice Architecture NudgePMP Integration & NudgeChoice Architecture Nudge + PMP Integration & Nudge
Opioid Prescription Length9.63 ± 18.6611.85 ± 21.413.43 ± 35.8611.75 ± 25.39
SecondaryOpioid Prescription MME

Outcome reported as the mean Milligram Morphine Equivalents (MME) of opioid prescriptions given during Primary Care Appointments

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · Milligram Morphine Equivalents
Opioid Prescription MME
Milligram Morphine EquivalentsCare as UsualChoice Architecture NudgePMP Integration & NudgeChoice Architecture Nudge + PMP Integration & Nudge
Opioid Prescription MME23.41 ± 14.923.89 ± 18.321.6 ± 12.123.89 ± 15.9

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were not collected. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Care as Usual———
Choice Architecture Nudge———
PMP Integration & Nudge———
Choice Architecture Nudge + PMP Integration & Nudge———

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Care as UsualChoice Architecture NudgePMP Integration & NudgeChoice Architecture Nudge + PMP Integration & NudgeTotal
<=18 years00000
Between 18 and 65 years00000
>=65 years00000
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)Care as UsualChoice Architecture NudgePMP Integration & NudgeChoice Architecture Nudge + PMP Integration & NudgeTotal
Female70646686286
Male49443842173
Unkown740314
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Care as UsualChoice Architecture NudgePMP Integration & NudgeChoice Architecture Nudge + PMP Integration & NudgeTotal
Count of participants————0
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Minnesota
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · May 9, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 26, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04601493
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 23, 2020
Start date
Aug 26, 2020
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2021
Completion
Oct 1, 2021
Results posted
Aug 26, 2024
Last update
Aug 26, 2024

Study contacts

Ezra Golberstein, PhD
principal investigator · University of Minnesota

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion