ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04599907Updated Sep 7, 2023Results posted

Evaluation of N-SWEAT Patch for Treatment of Primary Axillary Hyperhidrosis or Excessive Axillary Sweating

An interventional study of Roll-In Cohort: Single Application of N-SWEAT Patch and Randomized Cohort: Single Application of N-SWEAT Patch in Primary Axillary Hyperhidrosis, sponsored by Candesant Biomedical, Inc.. Completed at 9 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 22 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-07.

Sponsored by Candesant Biomedical, Inc. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
22 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Sahara Study is a study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the N-SWEAT Patch for use in subjects with excessive axillary sweating, or primary focal axillary hyperhidrosis.

Read the detailed description

The Sahara Study is intended to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the N-SWEAT Patch for use in subjects with excessive axillary sweating, or primary focal axillary hyperhidrosis.

Safety of the N-SWEAT Patch will be confirmed by assessing the occurrence of local skin reactions, treatment-related adverse events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs).

Demonstration of effectiveness will be assessed by a significant improvement (reduction) in Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Score (HDSS) in subjects treated with the N-SWEAT Patch. Secondary and additional endpoints based on complementary clinical instruments, including Quality of Life Measures (QOL) and Gravimetric Sweat Production GSP), have been included to further demonstrate performance.

02

Conditions studied

  • Primary Axillary Hyperhidrosis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Excessive Axillary Sweating
  • Primary Axillary Hyperhidrosis
03

In context

Hyperhidrosis

111 studies on the registry are indexed under Hyperhidrosis; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 120 is above the median of 50 across 99 interventional studies indexed under Hyperhidrosis.

Browse Hyperhidrosis studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Candesant Biomedical, Inc. as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
22 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Signed written
  2. At least 22 years old at the time of consent.
  3. Female or male, who experiences excessive sweating or has been diagnosed with primary axillary focal hyperhidrosis and is in otherwise good general health
  4. GSP >50mg/5min in each axilla
  5. Reports a score of HDSS score of 3 or 4

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Active skin disease, irritation, or abrasions at either axilla based
  2. Subject's medical history is indicative of secondary or diffuse hyperhidrosis and/or subject has a diagnosis of secondary or diffuse hyperhidrosis
  3. GSP exceeds 300 mg/5min in either axilla
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
120 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Roll-In Cohort: N-SWEAT Patch

    Subjects will be treated with N-SWEAT Patch

    Device: Roll-In Cohort: Single Application of N-SWEAT Patch

  • Experimental
    Randomized Cohort: N-SWEAT Patch

    Subjects will be treated with N-SWEAT Patch

    Device: Randomized Cohort: Single Application of N-SWEAT Patch

  • Sham comparator
    Randomized Cohort: Sham Patch

    Subjects will undergo identical procedure with an inactive sham device

    Device: Randomized Cohort: Single Application of Sham Patch

Interventions

  • DeviceRoll-In Cohort: Single Application of N-SWEAT Patch

    Single Application of N-SWEAT Patch in both axillae for 10 subjects

  • DeviceRandomized Cohort: Single Application of N-SWEAT Patch

    Single Application of N-SWEAT Patch in both axillae for subjects randomized to the treatment group

  • DeviceRandomized Cohort: Single Application of Sham Patch

    Single Application of Sham Patch in both axillae for subjects randomized to the control group

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Safety of the N-SWEAT Patch

    Number of patients with Adverse Events and/or Skin reactions following patch treatment

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  2. Effectiveness of the N-SWEAT Patch to Change Subjects From an HDSS 3 or 4 at Baseline to HDSS 1 or 2 at 4 Weeks

    Achievement of Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS) score of 1 or 2 at 4 weeks. HDSS is a disease-specific diagnostic tool that provides a qualitative measure of the severity of the patient's condition based on how it affects daily activities. HDSS 3 or 4 are generally considered to have a clinically significant case and those with HDSS 1 or 2 are considered to have mild to no evidence of hyperhidrosis. SCALE: 1 - My sweating is never noticeable and never interferes with my daily activities 2- My sweating is tolerable but sometimes interferes with my daily activities 3- My sweating is barely tolerable and frequently interferes with my daily activities 4- My sweating is intolerable and and always interferes with my daily activities

    Time frame: 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Change in the Quality of Life. Assessed by Evaluating How Much Sweat Bothers or Impacts the Daily Life of Patients (a Higher Score Means More Bother and More Impact)

    Two Quality of Life (QoL) Assessments were conducted as part of this endpoint. The Level of Bother: Subjects were asked how much their sweat bothered them on a Scale of 1 (not at all bothered by sweating) to 5 (extremely bothered by sweating). The Impact of Sweat on Daily Activities: Subjects were asked how much their sweating impacts their daily activities on a scale of 1 (not at all impacted) to 5 (extremely impacted). The mean improvement of each of these was calculated by comparing the mean baseline level to the mean level at 4 weeks. The mean change in the level of improvement was analyzed for significance. A larger decrease in these levels, i.e. less bother and less impact, (indicated by a larger negative number) will show the most improvement in QoL.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  2. Percentage of Patients With a Mean Change in Gravimetric Sweat Production (GSP) Indicating That Sweating After Treatment is Cut in Half From Pre-treatment Sweat

    Gravimetric Sweat Production (GSP) measures the amount of sweat that is produced in a 5-minute period. The percentage of treated subjects with at least a 50% reduction in mean GSP (mean of both axilla) from baseline to 4 weeks was analyzed for this endpoint.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  3. Percentage of Patients With a 2-point Change in HDSS to Show That Sweat is Less Clinically Significant After Treatment

    Patients with a 2-point decrease in HDSS indicate improvement in sweating. HDSS is a disease-specific diagnostic tool that provides a qualitative measure of the severity of the patient's condition based on how it affects daily activities. HDSS 3 or 4 are generally considered to have a clinically significant case and those with HDSS 1 or 2 are considered to have mild to no evidence of hyperhidrosis. SCALE: 1 - My sweating is never noticeable and never interferes with my daily activities 2- My sweating is tolerable but sometimes interferes with my daily activities 3- My sweating is barely tolerable and frequently interferes with my daily activities 4- My sweating is intolerable and always interferes with my daily activities

    Time frame: 4-weeks

07

Results

Posted Sep 7, 2023

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneRoll-In Cohort: N-SWEAT PatchRandomized Cohort: N-SWEAT PatchRandomized Cohort: Sham Patch
Started105357
Completed94551
Not completed186
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject176
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up010

Outcome measures

PrimarySafety of the N-SWEAT Patch

Number of patients with Adverse Events and/or Skin reactions following patch treatment

Time frame:
4 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Safety of the N-SWEAT Patch
ParticipantsN-SWEAT Patch TreatedRandomized Cohort: Sham Patch
Safety of the N-SWEAT Patch144
PrimaryEffectiveness of the N-SWEAT Patch to Change Subjects From an HDSS 3 or 4 at Baseline to HDSS 1 or 2 at 4 Weeks

Achievement of Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS) score of 1 or 2 at 4 weeks. HDSS is a disease-specific diagnostic tool that provides a qualitative measure of the severity of the patient's condition based on how it affects daily activities. HDSS 3 or 4 are generally considered to have a clinically significant case and those with HDSS 1 or 2 are considered to have mild to no evidence of hyperhidrosis. SCALE: 1 - My sweating is never noticeable and never interferes with my daily activities 2- My sweating is tolerable but sometimes interferes with my daily activities 3- My sweating is barely tolerable and frequently interferes with my daily activities 4- My sweating is intolerable and and always interferes with my daily activities

Time frame:
4 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Effectiveness of the N-SWEAT Patch to Change Subjects From an HDSS 3 or 4 at Baseline to HDSS 1 or 2 at 4 Weeks
ParticipantsRandomized Cohort: N-SWEAT Patch TreatedRandomized Cohort: Sham Patch
Effectiveness of the N-SWEAT Patch to Change Subjects From an HDSS 3 or 4 at Baseline to HDSS 1 or 2 at 4 Weeks2819
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Cohort: N-SWEAT Patch Treated vs Randomized Cohort: Sham Patch · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.05
SecondaryMean Change in the Quality of Life. Assessed by Evaluating How Much Sweat Bothers or Impacts the Daily Life of Patients (a Higher Score Means More Bother and More Impact)

Two Quality of Life (QoL) Assessments were conducted as part of this endpoint. The Level of Bother: Subjects were asked how much their sweat bothered them on a Scale of 1 (not at all bothered by sweating) to 5 (extremely bothered by sweating). The Impact of Sweat on Daily Activities: Subjects were asked how much their sweating impacts their daily activities on a scale of 1 (not at all impacted) to 5 (extremely impacted). The mean improvement of each of these was calculated by comparing the mean baseline level to the mean level at 4 weeks. The mean change in the level of improvement was analyzed for significance. A larger decrease in these levels, i.e. less bother and less impact, (indicated by a larger negative number) will show the most improvement in QoL.

Time frame:
4 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Mean Change in the Quality of Life. Assessed by Evaluating How Much Sweat Bothers or Impacts the Daily Life of Patients (a Higher Score Means More Bother and More Impact)
score on a scaleRandomized Cohort: N-SWEAT Patch TreatedRandomized Cohort: Sham Patch
Change in the Level of Bother due to Sweat-1.52 (-1.88 to -1.16)-0.61 (-0.98 to -0.25)
Change in Level of Impact of Sweat on Daily Activities-1.44 (-1.77 to -1.10)-0.57 (-0.91 to -0.23)
Statistical analysis
  • Randomized Cohort: N-SWEAT Patch Treated vs Randomized Cohort: Sham Patch · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.05 · Mean difference (final values): -0.91 · 95% CI -1.42 to -0.040
  • Randomized Cohort: N-SWEAT Patch Treated vs Randomized Cohort: Sham Patch · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.05 · Mean difference (final values): -0.87 · 95% CI -1.35 to -0.40
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With a Mean Change in Gravimetric Sweat Production (GSP) Indicating That Sweating After Treatment is Cut in Half From Pre-treatment Sweat

Gravimetric Sweat Production (GSP) measures the amount of sweat that is produced in a 5-minute period. The percentage of treated subjects with at least a 50% reduction in mean GSP (mean of both axilla) from baseline to 4 weeks was analyzed for this endpoint.

Time frame:
4 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Patients With a Mean Change in Gravimetric Sweat Production (GSP) Indicating That Sweating After Treatment is Cut in Half From Pre-treatment Sweat
ParticipantsRandomized Cohort: N-SWEAT Patch Treated
Percentage of Patients With a Mean Change in Gravimetric Sweat Production (GSP) Indicating That Sweating After Treatment is Cut in Half From Pre-treatment Sweat26
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With a 2-point Change in HDSS to Show That Sweat is Less Clinically Significant After Treatment

Patients with a 2-point decrease in HDSS indicate improvement in sweating. HDSS is a disease-specific diagnostic tool that provides a qualitative measure of the severity of the patient's condition based on how it affects daily activities. HDSS 3 or 4 are generally considered to have a clinically significant case and those with HDSS 1 or 2 are considered to have mild to no evidence of hyperhidrosis. SCALE: 1 - My sweating is never noticeable and never interferes with my daily activities 2- My sweating is tolerable but sometimes interferes with my daily activities 3- My sweating is barely tolerable and frequently interferes with my daily activities 4- My sweating is intolerable and always interferes with my daily activities

Time frame:
4-weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Patients With a 2-point Change in HDSS to Show That Sweat is Less Clinically Significant After Treatment
ParticipantsRandomized Cohort: N-SWEAT Patch TreatedRandomized Cohort: Sham Patch
Percentage of Patients With a 2-point Change in HDSS to Show That Sweat is Less Clinically Significant After Treatment197

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse Events were collected for 12 weeks, the total duration of the study. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
N-SWEAT Patch0/63 (0%)0/63 (0%)14/63 (22.2%)
Sham Patch0/57 (0%)0/57 (0%)4/57 (7%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventN-SWEAT PatchSham Patch
Device or Treatment Related EventsInjury, poisoning and procedural complications14/634/57

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Roll-In Cohort: N-SWEAT PatchRandomized Cohort: N-SWEAT PatchRandomized Cohort: Sham PatchTotal
<=18 years0000
Between 18 and 65 years105357120
>=65 years0000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Roll-In Cohort: N-SWEAT PatchRandomized Cohort: N-SWEAT PatchRandomized Cohort: Sham PatchTotal
Mean40.9 ± 15.332.6 ± 7.334.4 ± 8.434.3 ± 9.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Roll-In Cohort: N-SWEAT PatchRandomized Cohort: N-SWEAT PatchRandomized Cohort: Sham PatchTotal
Female7303673
Male3232147
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Roll-In Cohort: N-SWEAT PatchRandomized Cohort: N-SWEAT PatchRandomized Cohort: Sham PatchTotal
Hispanic or Latino15915
Not Hispanic or Latino94848105
Unknown or Not Reported0000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Roll-In Cohort: N-SWEAT PatchRandomized Cohort: N-SWEAT PatchRandomized Cohort: Sham PatchTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0123
Asian18514
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0101
Black or African American0121325
White9313777
More than one race0000
Unknown or Not Reported0000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Roll-In Cohort: N-SWEAT PatchRandomized Cohort: N-SWEAT PatchRandomized Cohort: Sham PatchTotal
United States105357120
HDSS
HDSS(Participants)Roll-In Cohort: N-SWEAT PatchRandomized Cohort: N-SWEAT PatchRandomized Cohort: Sham PatchTotal
HDSS 34212550
HDSS 46323270
08

Study locations

9 sites
  • CA Dermatology & Clinical Research Inst
    Encinitas, California 92024, United States
  • Center for Dermatology Clinical Research
    Fremont, California 94538, United States
  • AE Derm
    Rockville, Maryland 20850, United States
  • Skincare Physicians
    Boston, Massachusetts 02467, United States
  • Grekin Skin Institute
    Warren, Michigan 48088, United States
  • Minnesota Clinical Study Center
    Fridley, Minnesota 55432, United States
  • Dermatology Consulting Services, Zoe Draelos, MD
    High Point, North Carolina 27262, United States
  • Research Your Health
    Dallas, Texas 75093, United States
  • Pariser Derm / Virginia Clinical Research
    Norfolk, Virginia 23502, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Doolittle J, Walker P, Mills T, Thurston J. Hyperhidrosis: an update on prevalence and severity in the United States. Arch Dermatol Res. 2016 Dec;308(10):743-749. doi: 10.1007/s00403-016-1697-9. Epub 2016 Oct 15. PubMed 27744497 ↗
  • Glaser DA, Coleman WP 3rd, Fan LK, Kaminer MS, Kilmer SL, Nossa R, Smith SR, O'Shaughnessy KF. A randomized, blinded clinical evaluation of a novel microwave device for treating axillary hyperhidrosis: the dermatologic reduction in underarm perspiration study. Dermatol Surg. 2012 Feb;38(2):185-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02250.x. Epub 2012 Jan 30. PubMed 22289389 ↗
  • Glaser DA, Hebert A, Pieretti L, Pariser D. Understanding Patient Experience With Hyperhidrosis: A National Survey of 1,985 Patients. J Drugs Dermatol. 2018 Apr 1;17(4):392-396. PubMed 29601615 ↗
  • Hamm H. Impact of hyperhidrosis on quality of life and its assessment. Dermatol Clin. 2014 Oct;32(4):467-76. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2014.06.004. Epub 2014 Jul 16. PubMed 25152339 ↗
  • Hornberger J, Grimes K, Naumann M, Glaser DA, Lowe NJ, Naver H, Ahn S, Stolman LP; Multi-Specialty Working Group on the Recognition, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Primary Focal Hyperhidrosis. Recognition, diagnosis, and treatment of primary focal hyperhidrosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004 Aug;51(2):274-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2003.12.029. No abstract available. PubMed 15280848 ↗
  • Stander M, Wallis LA. The emergency management and treatment of severe burns. Emerg Med Int. 2011;2011:161375. doi: 10.1155/2011/161375. Epub 2011 Sep 4. PubMed 22046536 ↗
  • Strutton DR, Kowalski JW, Glaser DA, Stang PE. US prevalence of hyperhidrosis and impact on individuals with axillary hyperhidrosis: results from a national survey. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004 Aug;51(2):241-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2003.12.040. PubMed 15280843 ↗
  • Wade R, Rice S, Llewellyn A, Moloney E, Jones-Diette J, Stoniute J, Wright K, Layton AM, Levell NJ, Stansby G, Craig D, Woolacott N. Interventions for hyperhidrosis in secondary care: a systematic review and value-of-information analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2017 Dec;21(80):1-280. doi: 10.3310/hta21800. PubMed 29271741 ↗
  • Wilke K, Martin A, Terstegen L, Biel SS. A short history of sweat gland biology. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2007 Jun;29(3):169-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2494.2007.00387.x. PubMed 18489347 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 7, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04599907
Lead sponsor
Candesant Biomedical, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 23, 2020
Start date
Oct 13, 2020
Primary completion
Jul 6, 2021
Completion
Dec 20, 2021
Results posted
Sep 7, 2023
Last update
Sep 7, 2023

Study contacts

Patricia Walker, MD
study director · Candesant Biomedical - Medical Monitor

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion