CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04591769Updated Sep 17, 2021

Tracheal Tube Cuff Shape and Pressure

An interventional study of Different tracheal tube cuff design in Intubation, Intratracheal, Pain, Postoperative and Dysphonia, sponsored by Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan. Completed at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-09-17.

Sponsored by Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a randomized controlled trial focusing on the effect of different tracheal tube cuff shape; the tapered-shaped tracheal tube cuff versus the cylindrical-shaped tracheal cuff in anterior cervical spine surgery.

Read the detailed description

High endotracheal cuff pressure (ETCP) during surgical retractor splay associates with recurrent laryngeal nerve paresis/ palsy and results in post-anterior cervical spine surgery (post-ACSS) dysphonia. Control of intraoperative ETCP during ACSS may benefit voice outcome. The taper-shaped tracheal tube cuff was originally designed as a new strategy to reduce fluid leakage across the conventional cylindrical cuff and prevention of ventilator associated pneumonia. Literature has revealed the just seal pressure for the tapered-shaped tracheal tube (TT) cuff was lower than conventional cylindrical cuff. Therefore the investigators hypothesize that use of a tapered-shaped ET cuff during the surgery can lead to a lower ETCP during retractors splay and improve voice recovery after ACSS. In this study, 80 patients were randomized into 2 groups, to receive endotracheal intubation using TaperGuard tracheal tube (tapered- shaped cuff) or a conventional tracheal tube (a cylindrical cuff). The just seal pressure, intraoperative cuff pressure, and postoperative sore throat and voice outcome are recorded and compared.

02

Conditions studied

  • Intubation, Intratracheal
  • Pain, Postoperative
  • Dysphonia
03

In context

Dysphonia

131 studies on the registry are indexed under Dysphonia; 34 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 80 is above the median of 39 across 94 interventional studies indexed under Dysphonia.

Browse Dysphonia studies →

Lead sponsor

Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan is the lead sponsor of 325 studies on the registry; 72 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Receiving elective anterior cervical spine surgery
  • Right side approach

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unstable cervical spine (acute trauma history, or dislocation/ subluxation in image studies)
  • Anticipated difficult airway
  • Facial anomaly that may hinder facemask ventilation
  • Preoperative hoarseness or vocal cord palsy regardless of etiology
  • Re-operation of cervical spine surgery or left side approach
  • BMI >35
  • Operation field involved cervical spine C1 or C2
  • Unwilling to sign the informed consent
  • Unwilling to finish the study
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
80 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group T(Tapered- shaped)

    Tracheal intubation using TaperedGuard Tracheal Tube

    Device: Different tracheal tube cuff design

  • Active comparator
    Group C(Cylindrical-shaped)

    Tracheal intubation using Hi-Contour Tracheal Tube

    Device: Different tracheal tube cuff design

Interventions

  • DeviceDifferent tracheal tube cuff design

    Comparison of effect between 2 different designs of tracheal tube cuff

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Just seal tracheal tube cuff pressure

    Minimal tracheal tube cuff pressure that prevent leakage of the ventilator system

    Time frame: 1 minute after anesthesia and tracheal intubation

  2. Tracheal tube cuff pressure on retractor splay

    Cuff pressure when the retractors are set-up and removed

    Time frame: Intraoperative monitoring

Secondary outcomes

  1. Sore throat-NRS

    Postoperative sore throat, Numeric Rating Scale(NRS) 0\~10; 0=no sore throat; 10=maximal sore throat

    Time frame: preOP(operation) day 1, post OP 2 hours, day 1, 2, 3, 7

  2. Sore throat-VAS

    Postoperative sore throat, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) 0\~10; 0=no sore throat; 10=maximal sore throat

    Time frame: preOP(operation) day 1, post OP 2 hours, day 1, 2, 3, 7

  3. Subjective dysphonia

    Hoarseness; Pitch; Loudness (0= none; 1= mild; 2= severe); compared with baseline

    Time frame: preOP day 1, post OP 2 hours, day 1, 2, 3, 7

  4. Subjective dysphonia-GRBAS score

    GRBAS (Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain) score (normal, slight, moderate, severe); compared with baseline

    Time frame: One day before operation, and post operation day 1

  5. Subjective dysphonia- Voice Handicap Index-10(VHI-10)

    VHI-10 questionnaire (0 best\~40 worst; \>15 may be abnormal)

    Time frame: One day before operation, and post operation day 7

  6. Objective dysphonia

    Software voice analysis; compared with baseline

    Time frame: One day before operation(baseline), and post operation day 1

  7. Postoperative complication

    Any postoperative complication related complication

    Time frame: After operation to post operation day 7

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Taipei Veterans General Hospital
    Taipei, 11217, Taiwan
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Li YS, Tan EC, Tsai YJ, Mandell MS, Huang SS, Chiang TY, Huang WC, Chang WK, Chu YC. A Tapered Cuff Tracheal Tube Decreases the Need for Cuff Pressure Adjustment After Surgical Retraction During Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery: A Randomized Controlled, Double-Blind Trial. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 29;9:920726. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.920726. eCollection 2022. PubMed 35847807 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All of the individual participant data collected during the trial, after deidentification.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 17, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04591769
Lead sponsor
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
Responsible party
vghtpe user (Ya-Chun Chu, MD, PhD, Division of Neuroanesthesia, Department of Anesthesiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 19, 2020
Start date
Nov 5, 2020
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2021
Completion
Jun 30, 2021
Last update
Sep 17, 2021

Study contacts

Ya-Chun Chu, MD, PhD
study chair · Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion