ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT04584125EVOKEUpdated Apr 8, 2026

A Randomized Clinical Trial of Ex Vivo Corneal Cross-Linking of Donor Keratoplasty Tissue for Keratoconus Used for Keratoplasty in Keratoconus Patients

An interventional study of Riboflavin 5'-phosphate in 20% dextran ophthalmic solution) 0.146% with UV light and Riboflavin 5'-phosphate in 20% dextran ophthalmic solution) 0.146% without UV light in Keratoconus, sponsored by Joseph B. Ciolino, MD. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-08.

Sponsored by Joseph B. Ciolino, MD · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
216
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized clinical trial will assess corneal astigmatism and visual outcomes in participants who have undergone corneal transplantation for keratoconus with ex vivo cross-linked donor corneal tissue versus participants who have undergone corneal transplantation for keratoconus with non-cross-linked donor corneas. Crosslinking is a procedure that stabilizes the biomechanical properties of the cornea; as a result, the cornea stiffens. It has been shown that this procedure stabilizes the cornea of patients with keratoconus or corneal ectasias. The FDA currently approves crosslinking for patients with progressive keratoconus and corneal ectasia following refractive surgery. Ex vivo crosslinking of donor corneal tissue for patients with keratoconus undergoing PK or DALK could stabilize the cornea and reduce the risk of high astigmatism and improve vision in patient with keratoconus.

Read the detailed description

The 15 clinical sites are expected to recruit cumulatively 216 cases over 18 months. Eligibility is assessed during a routine examination by an investigator. Informed consent will be obtained prior to collecting any information that is not part of usual care. Patients who meet all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria will be given the opportunity to participate in the study. Participants will be randomly assigned to the treatment group (cross-linked corneal tissue) or control group (non-cross-linked corneal tissue that has been exposed to riboflavin, but no ultraviolet light).

The investigator will request a cadaveric cornea from the study's central eye bank CorneaGen, which will prepare the cadaveric cornea. Participants will receive the cross-linked donor tissue or control donor tissue during surgery. Clinical sites, including surgeons, and participants will be masked to treatment assignment.

Participants will be followed up post-operatively by the site investigators as per the standard of care. This will include visits at 1 Day, 1 Week, 1 Month, 6 Months, 1 Year, 1.5 Years, 2 Years, and 2.5 Years post-surgery. Some participants may need to be seen more regularly for routine care. The investigators will monitor for systemic and ocular adverse events at all follow-up visits.

02

Conditions studied

  • Keratoconus

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Corneal Crosslinking
  • Penetrating Keratoplasty
  • Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty
03

In context

Keratoconus

313 studies on the registry are indexed under Keratoconus; 56 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 216 is above the median of 40 across 205 interventional studies indexed under Keratoconus.

Browse Keratoconus studies →

Lead sponsor

Joseph B. Ciolino, MD is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Willing and able to provide written .
  • Willing and able to comply with study assessments for the full duration of the study.
  • Age ≥18 years but ≤50 years
  • History of keratoconus (without a previous transplant) requiring keratoplasty
  • Willing to commit to not having further cross-linking, corneal relaxing incisions, intacs, or corneal laser vision correction during the course of the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age \< 18 years >50
  • Inability to provide written and comply with study assessments for the full duration of the study
  • Participation in another simultaneous interventional medical investigation or trial

Systemic

  • History of Stevens-Johnson syndrome or ocular pemphigoid
  • Signs of current infection, including fever and current treatment with antibiotics
  • Pregnancy (positive pregnancy test) or lactating
  • Pre-menopausal sexually active women not using adequate (Reliable intrauterine devices, hormonal contraception or a spermicide in combination with a barrier method)

Recipient Eye

  • Corneal or ocular surface infection within 30 days prior to study entry
  • History of previous cross-linking
  • History of previous corneal transplant
  • Non-healing epithelial defect of at least 0.5x0.5 mm in host corneal bed lasting ≥6 weeks preoperatively
  • Ocular or periocular
  • Lid abnormalities that in the opinion of the investigator could confound the study results and these include ectropion, lagophthalmos, cicatrization, entropion, and rosacea
  • Neurotrophic cornea
  • Monocular
  • Uncontrolled glaucoma
  • Glaucoma filtering devices or trabeculectomies
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
216 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Ex vivo cross linking of donor corneal tissue

    Treatment Arm: The donor corneal tissue used in the PK or DALK procedures will previously undergo ex vivo crosslinking.

    Drug: Riboflavin 5'-phosphate in 20% dextran ophthalmic solution) 0.146% with UV light

  • Sham comparator
    Non-cross-linked donor corneal tissue for keratoplasty

    Control Arm: The donor corneal tissue used in the PK or DALK procedures will not previously undergo ex vivo crosslinking.

    Drug: Riboflavin 5'-phosphate in 20% dextran ophthalmic solution) 0.146% without UV light

Interventions

  • DrugRiboflavin 5'-phosphate in 20% dextran ophthalmic solution) 0.146% with UV light

    A wavelength of 365 nm ultraviolet A light will be used to direct 5.4 J/cm2 using a beam diameter of 9.5mm to treat the de-epithelialized corneal surface of a donor cornea for 30 minutes. Every 2 minutes, the UV light will be used while another drop of riboflavin is applied on top of the donor cornea.

    Also known as: PHOTREXA VISCOUS

  • DrugRiboflavin 5'-phosphate in 20% dextran ophthalmic solution) 0.146% without UV light

    The corneal tissue for the control arm will be treated the same as the crosslinked tissue except that it will not be exposed to ultraviolet light. The donor cornea will be placed on an artificial anterior chamber maintainer and the epithelium will be removed mechanically. Riboflavin solution (0.1% riboflavin and 20% dextran supplied in a sterile, single-dose container) will be applied to the cornea every 2 minutes for 30 minutes.

    Also known as: PHOTREXA VISCOUS

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. • Keratometric astigmatism with Pentacam Schiempflug imaging at 130 weeks post-surgery.

    • Keratometric astigmatism with Pentacam Schiempflug imaging at 130 weeks post-surgery

    Time frame: 130 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. • Best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) with ETDRS methodology at 2.5 years (130 weeks) post-surgery

    • Best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) with ETDRS methodology at 2.5 years (130 weeks) post-surgery

    Time frame: 130 weeks

  2. Manifest cylinder astigmatism at 130 weeks post-surgery

    Manifest cylinder astigmatism at 130 weeks post-surgerykeratometry, anterior mean keratometry, posterior mean keratometry

    Time frame: 130 weeks

  3. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) 130 weeks post-surgery

    Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) 130 weeks post-surgery

    Time frame: 130 weeks

  4. Low-contrast BSCVA with ETDRS methodology at 130 weeks post-surgery

    Low-contrast BSCVA with ETDRS methodology at 130 weeks post-surgerypermeable contact lens.

    Time frame: 130 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Krachmer JH, Feder RS, Belin MW. Keratoconus and related noninflammatory corneal thinning disorders. Surv Ophthalmol. 1984 Jan-Feb;28(4):293-322. doi: 10.1016/0039-6257(84)90094-8. PubMed 6230745 ↗
  • Tan DT, Por YM. Current treatment options for corneal ectasia. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2007 Jul;18(4):284-9. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e3281a7ecaa. PubMed 17568202 ↗
  • Yoshida J, Murata H, Miyai T, Shirakawa R, Toyono T, Yamagami S, Usui T. Characteristics and risk factors of recurrent keratoconus over the long term after penetrating keratoplasty. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Dec;256(12):2377-2383. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-4131-5. Epub 2018 Sep 8. PubMed 30196480 ↗
  • Bechrakis N, Blom ML, Stark WJ, Green WR. Recurrent keratoconus. Cornea. 1994 Jan;13(1):73-7. doi: 10.1097/00003226-199401000-00012. PubMed 8131410 ↗
  • Abelson MB, Collin HB, Gillette TE, Dohlman CH. Recurrent keratoconus after keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1980 Nov;90(5):672-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)75135-9. PubMed 7004192 ↗
  • Raiskup-Wolf F, Hoyer A, Spoerl E, Pillunat LE. Collagen crosslinking with riboflavin and ultraviolet-A light in keratoconus: long-term results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 May;34(5):796-801. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.12.039. PubMed 18471635 ↗
  • Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Riboflavin/ultraviolet-a-induced collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003 May;135(5):620-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(02)02220-1. PubMed 12719068 ↗
  • Kelly TL, Williams KA, Coster DJ; Australian Corneal Graft Registry. Corneal transplantation for keratoconus: a registry study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011 Jun;129(6):691-7. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.7. Epub 2011 Feb 14. PubMed 21320951 ↗
  • Thompson RW Jr, Price MO, Bowers PJ, Price FW Jr. Long-term graft survival after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2003 Jul;110(7):1396-402. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00463-9. PubMed 12867398 ↗
  • Williams KA, Esterman AJ, Bartlett C, Holland H, Hornsby NB, Coster DJ. How effective is penetrating corneal transplantation? Factors influencing long-term outcome in multivariate analysis. Transplantation. 2006 Mar 27;81(6):896-901. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000185197.37824.35. PubMed 16570014 ↗
  • Williams KA, Lowe M, Bartlett C, Kelly TL, Coster DJ; All Contributors. Risk factors for human corneal graft failure within the Australian corneal graft registry. Transplantation. 2008 Dec 27;86(12):1720-4. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181903b0a. PubMed 19104411 ↗
  • Williams KA, Roder D, Esterman A, Muehlberg SM, Coster DJ. Factors predictive of corneal graft survival. Report from the Australian Corneal Graft Registry. Ophthalmology. 1992 Mar;99(3):403-14. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(92)31960-8. PubMed 1565452 ↗
  • Binder PS. The effect of suture removal on postkeratoplasty astigmatism. Am J Ophthalmol. 1988 Jun 15;105(6):637-45. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(88)90057-8. PubMed 3287939 ↗
  • Limberg MB, Dingeldein SA, Green MT, Klyce SD, Insler MS, Kaufman HE. Corneal compression sutures for the reduction of astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989 Jul 15;108(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)73257-x. PubMed 2665502 ↗
  • Swinger CA. Postoperative astigmatism. Surv Ophthalmol. 1987 Jan-Feb;31(4):219-48. doi: 10.1016/0039-6257(87)90023-3. PubMed 3554571 ↗
  • Troutman RC, Lawless MA. Penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus. Cornea. 1987;6(4):298-305. doi: 10.1097/00003226-198706040-00013. PubMed 3319412 ↗
  • Price FW Jr, Whitson WE, Marks RG. Progression of visual acuity after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 1991 Aug;98(8):1177-85. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(91)32136-5. PubMed 1923353 ↗
  • Riddle HK Jr, Parker DA, Price FW Jr. Management of postkeratoplasty astigmatism. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1998 Aug;9(4):15-28. doi: 10.1097/00055735-199808000-00004. PubMed 10387463 ↗
  • Sporl E, Huhle M, Kasper M, Seiler T. [Increased rigidity of the cornea caused by intrastromal cross-linking]. Ophthalmologe. 1997 Dec;94(12):902-6. doi: 10.1007/s003470050219. German. PubMed 9487761 ↗
  • de Sanctis U, Eandi C, Grignolo F. Phacoemulsification and customized toric intraocular lens implantation in eyes with cataract and high astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Apr;37(4):781-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.01.015. PubMed 21420606 ↗
  • Rajan MS, O'Brart DP, Patel P, Falcon MG, Marshall J. Topography-guided customized laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for the treatment of postkeratoplasty astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Jun;32(6):949-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.02.036. PubMed 16814052 ↗
  • Arenas E, Maglione A. Laser in situ keratomileusis for astigmatism and myopia after penetrating keratoplasty. J Refract Surg. 1997 Jan-Feb;13(1):27-32. doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-19970101-09. PubMed 9049932 ↗
  • Belmont SC, Lazzaro DR, Muller JW, Troutman RC. Combined wedge resection and relaxing incisions for astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty. J Refract Surg. 1995 Nov-Dec;11(6):472-6. doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-19951101-14. PubMed 8624832 ↗
  • Girard LJ. Corneal compression sutures for the reduction of astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989 Nov 15;108(5):614. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(89)90455-8. No abstract available. PubMed 2683795 ↗
  • Fronterre A, Portesani GP. Relaxing incisions for postkeratoplasty astigmatism. Cornea. 1991 Jul;10(4):305-11. doi: 10.1097/00003226-199107000-00005. PubMed 1889216 ↗
  • Bochmann F, Schipper I. Correction of post-keratoplasty astigmatism with keratotomies in the host cornea. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Jun;32(6):923-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.02.013. PubMed 16814049 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — There is not a plan to make individual participant data (IPD) available.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 8, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04584125
Lead sponsor
Joseph B. Ciolino, MD
Responsible party
Joseph B. Ciolino, MD (Associate Professor of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Oct 12, 2020
Start date
Jan 1, 2027 (estimated)
Primary completion
May 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 30, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 8, 2026

Study contacts

Joseph B Ciolino, MD
Contact
Joseph_Ciolino@MEEI.HARVARD.EDU
(617) 573-3938
Ellen Fitzgerald
Contact
Ellen_Fitzgerald@MEEI.HARVARD.EDU
617-573-6971
Joseph B Ciolino
principal investigator · Massachusetts Eye and Ear

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion