CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04567186Updated Jan 21, 2022Results posted

Evaluation of a Daily Disposable Novel Multifocal Contact Lens in a Hyperopic Population

An interventional study of Investigational senofilcon A C3 Multifocal Lens and delefilcon A Multifocal Lens in Visual Acuity, sponsored by Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.. Completed at 7 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-01-21.

Sponsored by Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
81
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a 6-visit, subject-masked, multi-site, 2×3 crossover dispensing trial that will last approximately 2 - 4 months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Visual Acuity
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 220 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Of its 110 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 101 (92%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Potential subjects must satisfy all the following criteria to be enrolled in the study:

    1. The subject must read, understand, and sign the STATEMENT OF INFORMED CONSENT and receive a fully executed copy of the form.
    2. The subject must appear able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in this clinical protocol.
    3. The subject must be at least 40 years of age and not greater than 70 years of age at the time of consent.
    4. Subjects must own a wearable pair of spectacles if required for their distance vision.
    5. The subject must be an adapted soft contact lens wearer in both eyes (i.e. worn lenses a minimum of 2 days per week for at least 6 hours per wear day, for 1 month or more duration).
    6. The subject must either already be wearing a presbyopic contact lens correction (e.g., reading spectacles over contact lenses, multifocal or monovision contact lenses, etc.) or, if not respond positively to at least one symptom on the "Presbyopic Symptoms Questionnaire" (Appendix E).
    7. The subject's distance spherical equivalent refraction must be in the range of +1.25 D to +3.75 D in each eye.
    8. The subject's refractive cylinder must be ≤0.75 D in each eye.
    9. The subject's ADD power must be in the range of +0.75 D to +2.50 D.
    10. The subject must have distance best corrected visual acuity of 20/20-3 or better in each eye.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Potential subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from participating in the study:

    1. Currently pregnant or lactating.
    2. Any active or ongoing ocular or systemic allergies that may interfere with contact lens wear.
    3. Any active or ongoing systemic disease, autoimmune disease, or use of medication, which may interfere with contact lens wear. This may include, but not be limited to, hyperthyroidism, Sjögren's syndrome, xerophthalmia, acne rosacea, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and immunosuppressive diseases or any infectious diseases (e.g. hepatitis, tuberculosis).
    4. Any previous, or planned, ocular or intraocular surgery (e.g. radial keratotomy, PRK, LASIK, lid procedures, cataract surgery, retinal surgery, etc.).
    5. A history of amblyopia, strabismus or binocular vision abnormality.
    6. Use of any of the following medications within 2 weeks prior to enrollment: oral retinoids, oral tetracyclines, anticholinergics, systemic/topical steroids, oral phenothiazines. See section 9.1 for additional details regarding excluded systemic medications.
    7. Use of any ocular medication, with the exception of rewetting drops.
    8. History of herpetic keratitis.
    9. History of irregular cornea.
    10. History of pathological dry eye.
    11. Participation in any contact lens or lens care product clinical trial within 30 days prior to study enrollment.
    12. Employee or immediate family member of an employee of clinical site (e.g., Investigator, Coordinator, Technician).
    13. Any known hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to non-preserved rewetting drop solutions or sodium fluorescein.
    14. Clinically significant (Grade 2 or greater) corneal edema, corneal vascularization, corneal staining, tarsal abnormalities or bulbar injection, or any other corneal or ocular abnormalities which would contraindicate contact lens wear.
    15. Entropion, ectropion, extrusions, chalazia, recurrent styes, dry eye, glaucoma, history of recurrent corneal erosions.
    16. Any current ocular infection or inflammation.
    17. Any current ocular abnormality that may interfere with contact lens wear.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
81 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Test/Control/Control

    Eligible subjects that are habitual soft contact lens wearers will be randomized to lens wear sequence, (Test/Control/Control).

    Device: Investigational senofilcon A C3 Multifocal Lens · Device: delefilcon A Multifocal Lens

  • Experimental
    Control/Test/Test

    Eligible subjects that are habitual soft contact lens wearers will be randomized to lens wear sequence, (Control/Test/Test).

    Device: Investigational senofilcon A C3 Multifocal Lens · Device: delefilcon A Multifocal Lens

Interventions

  • DeviceInvestigational senofilcon A C3 Multifocal Lens

    TEST

  • Devicedelefilcon A Multifocal Lens

    Dailies Total 1® Multifocal Contact Lens

    Also known as: CONTROL

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Binocular Visual Acuity (logMAR)

    Binocular visual acuity was measured on a logMAR (Logarithm of Minimal Angle of Resolution) scale and was evaluated at distance (4 meters), intermediate (64 cm) and near (40 cm) under high lumiance high contrast lighting conditions using ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) charts. The room illuminance was required to be beetween 7.3 and 7.9 EV (394-597 lux). For Distance (4 meters), the acceptable range for the chart luminance was 10.5-10.7 EV (181-208 cd/m2). For Intermediate (64 cm) and Near (40cm), the acceptable range for the chart luminance 10.8-11.1 EV (223-274 cd/m2). Letter-by-letter results calculated the visual performance score for each chart read. logMAR scores closer to zero, or below zero, indicate a better visual acuity. A logMAR visual performance score of 0.0 is equivalent to Snellen visual acuity of 20/20.

    Time frame: 1-Week Follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Subjective Overall Vision Scores

    Overall vision scores were assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patientexperience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120. The average CLUE vision score for each lens type was reported.

    Time frame: 1- Week Follow-up

07

Results

Posted Jan 21, 2022

Participant flow

A total of 81 subject were enrolled into this study. Of those enrolled, 78 were dispensed at least one study lens while 3 subjects failed to meet all eligibility criteria. Of those dispensed, 70 completed the study while 8 subjects were discontinued.

Period 1
Participant flow — Period 1
MilestoneTest/Control/ControlControl/Test/Test
Started3840
Completed3737
Not completed13
Withdrew: Covid-19 related10
Withdrew: Protocol violation01
Withdrew: Adverse event02
Period 2
Participant flow — Period 2
MilestoneTest/Control/ControlControl/Test/Test
Started3737
Completed3734
Not completed03
Withdrew: Covid-19 related01
Withdrew: Protocol violation01
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up01
Period 3
Participant flow — Period 3
MilestoneTest/Control/ControlControl/Test/Test
Started3734
Completed3634
Not completed10
Withdrew: Subject no longer meets eligibilty criteria10

Outcome measures

PrimaryBinocular Visual Acuity (logMAR)

Binocular visual acuity was measured on a logMAR (Logarithm of Minimal Angle of Resolution) scale and was evaluated at distance (4 meters), intermediate (64 cm) and near (40 cm) under high lumiance high contrast lighting conditions using ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) charts. The room illuminance was required to be beetween 7.3 and 7.9 EV (394-597 lux). For Distance (4 meters), the acceptable range for the chart luminance was 10.5-10.7 EV (181-208 cd/m2). For Intermediate (64 cm) and Near (40cm), the acceptable range for the chart luminance 10.8-11.1 EV (223-274 cd/m2). Letter-by-letter results calculated the visual performance score for each chart read. logMAR scores closer to zero, or below zero, indicate a better visual acuity. A logMAR visual performance score of 0.0 is equivalent to Snellen visual acuity of 20/20.

Time frame:
1-Week Follow-up
Reported as:
Mean · logMAR
Binocular Visual Acuity (logMAR)
logMARTestControl
Distance-0.07 ± 0.083-0.05 ± 0.084
Intermediate-0.05 ± 0.087-0.04 ± 0.080
Near0.07 ± 0.1020.08 ± 0.095
Statistical analysis
  • Test · Linear Mixed Model · Least-square mean: -0.078 · 95% CI -0.099 to -0.057Distance (4 meter)
  • Test · Linear Mixed Model · Least-square mean: -0.059 · 95% CI -0.079 to -0.039Intermediate (64cm)
  • Test · Linear Mixed Model · Least-square mean: 0.062 · 95% CI 0.040 to 0.084Near (40cm)
SecondarySubjective Overall Vision Scores

Overall vision scores were assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patientexperience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120. The average CLUE vision score for each lens type was reported.

Time frame:
1- Week Follow-up
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Subjective Overall Vision Scores
units on a scaleTestControl
Subjective Overall Vision Scores53.1 ± 20.0955.2 ± 18.90
Statistical analysis
  • Test · Linear Mixed Model · Least-square mean: 55.93 · 95% CI 49.25 to 62.61The Kenward and Roger method was used for the denominator degrees of freedom
  • Test vs Control · Linear Mixed Model · Least-square mean difference: -2.98 · 95% CI -5.893 to -0.073mean difference was calculated as Test minus Control

Adverse events

Collected over Throughout the entire duration of the study. Approximately 1 month per subject .. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Test0/75 (0%)0/75 (0%)0/75 (0%)
Control0/77 (0%)0/77 (0%)0/77 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)All Dispensed Subjects
Mean56.6 ± 6.84
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)All Dispensed Subjects
Female61
Male17
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)All Dispensed Subjects
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian5
Black or African American7
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander1
White63
Other2
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)All Dispensed Subjects
United States78
08

Study locations

7 sites
  • Empire Eye and Laser Center
    Bakersfield, California 93309, United States
  • James R. Dugue, OD
    Mission Viejo, California 92691, United States
  • Stame & Associates, Eye Care
    Jacksonville, Florida 32256, United States
  • VRC-East
    Jacksonville, Florida 32256, United States
  • St. Johns Eye Associates, PA
    Saint Augustine, Florida 32092, United States
  • Spectrum Eyecare
    Jamestown, New York 14701, United States
  • Eye Associates of New York
    Manhattan, New York 10022, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Oct 2, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Johnson \& Johnson Medical Device Companies have an agreement with the Yale Open Data Access (YODA) to serve as the independent review panel for evaluation of requests for clinical study reports and participant level data from investigators and physicians for scientific research that will advance medical knowledge and public health. Requests for access to the study data can be submitted through the YODA Project site at http://yoda.yale.edu

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 21, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04567186
Lead sponsor
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 28, 2020
Start date
Sep 6, 2020
Primary completion
Nov 25, 2020
Completion
Nov 25, 2020
Results posted
Jan 21, 2022
Last update
Jan 21, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion