CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04550923Updated May 24, 2024

Comparison of Rigid and Non-Rigid Interbody Fusion Device for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease in Adults

A Phase 4 interventional study of Z-Brace interbody fusion device and PEEK interbody fusion device in Cervical Disc Degeneration, sponsored by National Taiwan University Hospital. Recruiting at 13 sites in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 69 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-24.

Sponsored by National Taiwan University Hospital · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Dec 2020; still recruiting 5 years 10 months later.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
180
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 69 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Rigid interbody fusion device in bulk configuration has been widely used in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery. It is a randomized, prospective, multicenter clinical study to compare rigid and non-rigid fusion device in ACDF for cervical degenerative disc disease.

Read the detailed description

This study is a randomized, prospective, multicenter clinical trial comparing rigid (PEEK) interbody fusion device with non-rigid (Titanium Alloy, Z-Brace, Baui Biotech) interbody fusion device in ACDF surgery at 11 clinical sites. ACDF was performed with stand-alone interbody fusion device and artificial bone graft (hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate). Patients have 1-level or 2-level cervical degenerative disc disease approved for ACDF surgery by National Health Insurance, which is the blind, third-party, administrative approved and insurance reimbursement for surgical indication. Total 180 patients were enrolled, and 180 patients were randomized into either investigational device (non-rigid) group or the control (rigid) group in a 2:1 ratio. After confirming a patient's eligibility and having the patient sign an informed consent form, the site investigator or study coordinator call the coordinator at National Taiwan University Hospital for the randomization. Each patient will be then assigned to 1 of the treatment group according to a randomized schedule. Patient were evaluated preoperatively, one month postoperatively, and 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively. Measured outcomes included overall success, Neck Disability Index (NDI), VAS neck and arm pain, adjacent range of motion, patient satisfaction, anxiety score, SF-12 MCS/PCS, major complications, subsequent surgery rate, and subsidence and fusion rate on radiological examinations. The primary endpoint was a FDA composite definition of success comprising clinical improvement and absence of major complications and secondary surgery events.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cervical Disc Degeneration

Keywords

  • Cervical Spine
  • Interbody Fusion
  • Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
03

In context

Intervertebral Disc Degeneration

464 studies on the registry are indexed under Intervertebral Disc Degeneration; 98 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 180 is above the median of 60 across 261 interventional studies indexed under Intervertebral Disc Degeneration.

Browse Intervertebral Disc Degeneration studies →

Lead sponsor

National Taiwan University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2,563 studies on the registry; 569 are open to participants now.

Of its 11 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (18%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 69 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age 20 - 69 years;
  2. Symptomatic cervical degenerative disc disease in one or two levels between C3-7 with radiculopathy or myeloradiculopathy and/or decrease muscle strength and/or abnormal sensation and/or abnormal reflexes;
  3. Deficit confirmed by CT, MRI, or X-ray;
  4. NDI Score of ≥ 30/100;
  5. Unresponsive to non-operative treatment of at least 6 weeks or presence of progressive symptoms or signs of nerve root/spinal cord compression despite continued non-operative treatment;
  6. No prior surgical procedures at the operative level and non-prior fusions at any cervical level;
  7. Physically and mentally able and willing to comply with the protocol;
  8. Signed informed consent;

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient does not meet the indication of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF), which is under the surveillance. (Surgical indication of ACDF is approved by National Health Insurance Administration Ministry of Health and Welfare, a blinded third-party authority).
  2. More than two vertebral levels required surgery;
  3. Immobile levels between C1 and C7 from any cause;
  4. Any prior surgery at the operative level or any prior fusion at any cervical level;
  5. T-score less than -1.5 (osteoporosis evaluation)
  6. Paget's disease, osteomalacia, or any other metabolic bone disease other than osteoporosis;
  7. Active infection of surgical site or history of anticipated treatment for systemic infection including HIV
  8. Active malignancy: a history of any invasive malignancy (except carcinoma in situ and non-melanoma skin cancer), unless treated with curative intent with no clinical signs or symptoms of malignancy in the past 5 years;
  9. Marked instability of the cervical spine on resting lateral or flexion-extension radiographs;
  10. Known allergy to device materials including titanium or polyetheretherketone (PEEK);
  11. Segmental kyphosis of greater than 11 degrees at treatment or adjacent levels
  12. Rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, or other autoimmune disease;
  13. Any diseases or conditions that would preclude accurate clinical evaluation;
  14. Daily, high-dose oral and/or inhaled steroid or a history of chronic use of high dose steroids;
  15. Body Mass Index (BMI) > 35
  16. Smoking more than one pack of cigarettes per day;
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
180 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Investigational device (non-rigid) group

    Use non-rigid (Titanium Alloy, Z-Brace, Baui Biotech) interbody fusion device.

    Combination Product: Z-Brace interbody fusion device

  • Active comparator
    Control device (rigid) group

    Use rigid (PEEK) interbody fusion device .

    Combination Product: PEEK interbody fusion device

Interventions

  • Combination productZ-Brace interbody fusion device

    Use non-rigid (Titanium Alloy, Z-Brace, Baui Biotech) interbody fusion device in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) surgery

  • Combination productPEEK interbody fusion device

    Use rigid (PEEK) interbody fusion device in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) surgery

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline postoperative condition (if patients have major complications)

    No adverse events (AEs) classified as major complications by Research Ethics Committee.

    Time frame: Patient were evaluated one month postoperatively, and 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively.

  2. Change from baseline postoperative condition (if patients have subsequent surgeries)

    No subsequent surgical intervention.

    Time frame: Patient were evaluated one month postoperatively, and 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively.

  3. Change from baseline Subsidence and Fusion rate

    Subsidence and fusion rate on radiological.

    Time frame: Patient were evaluated one month postoperatively, and 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively.

  4. Change from baseline Adjacent range of motion

    Adjacent range of motion on radiological.

    Time frame: Patient were evaluated preoperatively, one month postoperatively, and 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively.

  5. Change from baseline Neck Disability Index (NDI)

    An improvement in Neck Disability Index (NDI) score of at least 30 points for a patient with a preoperative NDI score of 60 or greater; or an improvement of at least 50% of preoperative NDI score for patients with a preoperative score of less than 60.

    Time frame: Patient were evaluated preoperatively, one month postoperatively, and 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Visual analogue scale (neck and arm and chest pain)

    Patient will be evaluated by Visual analogue scale(VAS) for their neck, arm and chest pain. The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 10. Higher score means a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Patient were evaluated preoperatively, one month postoperatively, and 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively.

  2. Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire

    Patients will be surveyed by Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire. There are two questions on the questionnaire to evaluate if they are satisfied with their treatment and if they will recommend their respective surgery to a friend.

    Time frame: Patient were evaluated one month postoperatively, and 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively.

  3. Anxiety score

    The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 63. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Patient were evaluated preoperatively, one month postoperatively, and 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively.

  4. Short form-12 mental component scale and physical component scale (SF-12 MCS/PCS) score

    Short form-12 mental component scale and physical component scale. The minimum value of physical component scale (PCS-12) is 18.4 and the maximum value of PCS-12 is 57.8. The minimum value of mental component scale (MCS-12) is 18.7 and the maximum value of MCS-12 is 65.2. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Time frame: Patient were evaluated preoperatively, one month postoperatively, and 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively.

  5. Number of days using Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory analgesics(NSAIDs)

    Number of days using Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory analgesics(NSAIDs)

    Time frame: Patient were evaluated preoperatively, one month postoperatively, and 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively.

  6. Depression Score

    Beck Depression Inventory(BDI). The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 63. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Patient were evaluated preoperatively, one month postoperatively, and 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively.

07

Study locations

10 of 13 sites recruiting
  • Chung Shan Medical University Hospital
    Taichung, South Dist. 402, Taiwan
    • Se-Yi Chen · Contact
    • Se-Yi Chen · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital
    New Taipei City, Taishan District 243, Taiwan
    • Wei-Lung Tseng · Contact · puddingj@gmail.com · +886-905301906
    • Wei-Lung Tseng · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Taipei Municipal Wan Fang Hospital
    Taipei City, Wenshan Dist. 116, Taiwan
    • Yi-Jie Kuo · Contact · benkuo5@tmu.edu.tw
    • Ming-Hong Chen · Contact
    • Yi-Jie Kuo · Principal investigator
    • Ming-Hong Chen · Sub investigator
    Not yet recruiting
  • National Taiwan University Hospital Yunlin Branch
    Douliu, Yunlin County 640, Taiwan
    • Yuan-Sen Chen · Contact · +886-5-5323911
    • Yuan-Sen Chen · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital,Ministry of Health and Welfare
    New Taipei, Zhonghe District 23561, Taiwan
    • Chang-Jung Chiang · Contact
    • Chang-Jung Chiang · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • MacKay Memorial Hospital
    Taipei City, Zhongshan 10449, Taiwan
    • Hsu-Chao Chen · Contact · chenshiujau@gmail.com · +886-936099219
    • Hsu-Chao Chen · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • National Taiwan University Hospital
    Taipei, Zhongzheng Dist. 100, Taiwan
    • Dar-Ming Lai · Contact · dmlai@ntu.edu.tw · +88623123456
    • Fon-Yih Tsuang · Contact · tsuangfy@gmail.com · +886972651142
    • Dar-Ming Lai · Principal investigator
    • Fon-Yih Tsuang · Sub investigator
    • Furen Xiao · Sub investigator
    • Shih-Hung Yang · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
  • National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch
    Hsinchu, 300, Taiwan
    Recruiting
  • China Medical University Hospital
    Taichung, 404332, Taiwan
    • Chao-Hsuan Chen · Contact · +886-4-22052121
    • Sung-Tai Wei · Contact · +886-4-22052121
    • Chao-Hsuan Chen · Principal investigator
    • Sung-Tai Wei · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
  • Jen-Ai Hospital Dali Branch
    Taichung, 412, Taiwan
    • Yu-Tung Shih · Contact
    • Yu-Tung Shih · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • National Cheng Kung University Hospital
    Tainan, Taiwan
    • Cheng-Li Lin · Contact
    • Cheng-Li Lin · Principal investigator
    Not yet recruiting
  • Min-Sheng General Hospital
    Taoyuan, 330, Taiwan
    • Shao Hua Ko · Contact · M002013@e-ms.com.tw · +886-975082212
    • Ming Yuan Chang · Contact · arynancha@gmail.com · +886-966500038
    • Ming Yuan Chang · Principal investigator
    • Shao-Hua Ko · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
    Taoyuan, Taiwan
    • Yu-Cheng Yeh · Contact · 03-319-6200
    • Yu-Cheng Yeh · Principal investigator
    • Po-Liang Lai · Sub investigator
    Not yet recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Zdeblick TA, Phillips FM. Interbody cage devices. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Aug 1;28(15 Suppl):S2-7. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000076841.93570.78. PubMed 12897467 ↗
  • Brodke DS, Zdeblick TA. Modified Smith-Robinson procedure for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992 Oct;17(10 Suppl):S427-30. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199210001-00014. PubMed 1440038 ↗
  • Shriver MF, Lewis DJ, Kshettry VR, Rosenbaum BP, Benzel EC, Mroz TE. Pseudoarthrosis rates in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis. Spine J. 2015 Sep 1;15(9):2016-27. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.05.010. Epub 2015 May 15. PubMed 25982430 ↗
  • Bohlman HH, Emery SE, Goodfellow DB, Jones PK. Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis for cervical radiculopathy. Long-term follow-up of one hundred and twenty-two patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993 Sep;75(9):1298-307. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199309000-00005. PubMed 8408151 ↗
  • Sugawara T, Itoh Y, Hirano Y, Higashiyama N, Mizoi K. Long term outcome and adjacent disc degeneration after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with titanium cylindrical cages. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2009 Apr;151(4):303-9; discussion 309. doi: 10.1007/s00701-009-0217-5. Epub 2009 Mar 5. PubMed 19262984 ↗
  • Elsawaf A, Mastronardi L, Roperto R, Bozzao A, Caroli M, Ferrante L. Effect of cervical dynamics on adjacent segment degeneration after anterior cervical fusion with cages. Neurosurg Rev. 2009 Apr;32(2):215-24; discussion 224. doi: 10.1007/s10143-008-0164-2. Epub 2008 Oct 10. PubMed 18846395 ↗
  • Barsa P, Suchomel P. Factors affecting sagittal malalignment due to cage subsidence in standalone cage assisted anterior cervical fusion. Eur Spine J. 2007 Sep;16(9):1395-400. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0284-8. Epub 2007 Jan 13. PubMed 17221174 ↗
  • Goffin J, Geusens E, Vantomme N, Quintens E, Waerzeggers Y, Depreitere B, Van Calenbergh F, van Loon J. Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2004 Apr;17(2):79-85. doi: 10.1097/00024720-200404000-00001. PubMed 15260088 ↗
  • Maiman DJ, Kumaresan S, Yoganandan N, Pintar FA. Biomechanical effect of anterior cervical spine fusion on adjacent segments. Biomed Mater Eng. 1999;9(1):27-38. PubMed 10436851 ↗
  • Gore DR, Gardner GM, Sepic SB, Murray MP. Roentgenographic findings following anterior cervical fusion. Skeletal Radiol. 1986;15(7):556-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00361055. PubMed 3775422 ↗
  • Gao X, Yang Y, Liu H, Meng Y, Zeng J, Wu T, Hong Y. A Comparison of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in Patients with Two-Level Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease: 5-Year Follow-Up Results. World Neurosurg. 2019 Feb;122:e1083-e1089. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.231. Epub 2018 Nov 9. PubMed 30415055 ↗
  • Ma Z, Ma X, Yang H, Guan X, Li X. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical arthroplasty for the management of cervical spondylosis: a meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2017 Apr;26(4):998-1008. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4779-7. Epub 2016 Oct 22. PubMed 27771787 ↗
  • Kuang L, Chen Y, Wang B, Li L, Lu G. Cervical Disk Arthroplasty Versus Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion for the Treatment of 2-Level Cervical Spondylopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Spine Surg. 2016 Nov;29(9):372-382. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000395. PubMed 27295435 ↗
  • Hu Y, Lv G, Ren S, Johansen D. Mid- to Long-Term Outcomes of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Treatment of Symptomatic Cervical Disc Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Eight Prospective Randomized Controlled Trials. PLoS One. 2016 Feb 12;11(2):e0149312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149312. eCollection 2016. PubMed 26872258 ↗
  • Ding D, Shaffrey ME. Cervical disk arthroplasty: patient selection. Clin Neurosurg. 2012;59:91-7. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31826b6fbe. No abstract available. PubMed 22960519 ↗
  • Jaramillo-de la Torre JJ, Grauer JN, Yue JJ. Update on cervical disc arthroplasty: where are we and where are we going? Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2008 Jun;1(2):124-30. doi: 10.1007/s12178-008-9019-2. PubMed 19468885 ↗
  • Tahal D, Madhavan K, Chieng LO, Ghobrial GM, Wang MY. Metals in Spine. World Neurosurg. 2017 Apr;100:619-627. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.12.105. Epub 2017 Jan 3. PubMed 28057595 ↗
  • Epstein NE. A Review of Complication Rates for Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion (ACDF). Surg Neurol Int. 2019 Jun 7;10:100. doi: 10.25259/SNI-191-2019. eCollection 2019. PubMed 31528438 ↗
  • Goffin J, Casey A, Kehr P, Liebig K, Lind B, Logroscino C, Pointillart V, Van Calenbergh F, van Loon J. Preliminary clinical experience with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis. Neurosurgery. 2002 Sep;51(3):840-5; discussion 845-7. doi: 10.1227/00006123-200209000-00048. PubMed 12188968 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 24, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04550923
Lead sponsor
National Taiwan University Hospital
Collaborators
Baui Biotech Co., Ltd.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 16, 2020
Start date
Dec 3, 2020
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2023
Completion
Jun 30, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
May 24, 2024

Study contacts

Dar-Ming Lai
Contact
dmlai@ntu.edu.tw
+886-2312-3456 ext. 65078
Fon-Yih Tsuang
Contact
tsuangfy@gmail.com
+886-972651142

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion