CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT04545723Updated Sep 20, 2024

The Effect of a Case-finding App on the Detection Rate of Atrial Fibrillation in Primary Care Patients

An interventional study of FibriCheck in Atrial Fibrillation Paroxysmal, sponsored by KU Leuven. Withdrawn. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-09-20.

Sponsored by KU Leuven · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening

Why this study was withdrawn
Insufficient amount of recruited practices due to workload and COVID19.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Atrial fibrillation is a cardiac arrhythmia commonly encountered in a primary care setting. Current screening is limited to pulse palpation and ECG confirmation when an irregular pulse is found. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation will, however, still be difficult to pick up. With the advent of smartphones, screening could be more cost-efficient by making use of simple applications, lowering the need for intensive screening to discover (paroxysmal) atrial fibrillation.

This cluster randomized trial will examine the effect of using a smartphone-based application such as FibriCheck® on the detection rate of atrial fibrillation in a Flemish general practice population. This study will be conducted in 22 primary care practices across the Flanders region of Belgium and will last 12 months. Patients above 65 years of age will be divided in control and intervention groups on the practice level. The control group will be subjected to standard opportunistic screening only, while the intervention group will be prescribed the FibriCheck® app on top of this opportunistic screening. The difference in detection rate between control and intervention groups will be calculated at the end of the study.

The investigators will use the online platform INTEGO for pseudonymized data collection and analysis, and risk calculation.

Smartphone applications might offer a way to cost-effectively screen for (paroxysmal) atrial fibrillation in a primary care setting. This could open the door for the update of future screening guidelines.

02

Conditions studied

  • Atrial Fibrillation Paroxysmal

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • atrial fibrillation
  • screening
  • FibriCheck
  • case finding
03

In context

Atrial Fibrillation

3,870 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrial Fibrillation; 923 are open to participants now.

Browse Atrial Fibrillation studies →

Lead sponsor

KU Leuven is the lead sponsor of 358 studies on the registry; 62 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  1. The patient is 65 years or older.
  2. The patient has an electronic medical record (EMR) in the practice. This EMR contains all the patient information, for instance regarding medical history and medication and is managed by the general practitioner.
  3. If the patient will be prescribed the FibriCheck® app, he/she signs the relevant patient consent form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The patient has already been diagnosed with AF.
  2. The patient is already under anticoagulant therapy.
  3. The patient has a pacemaker. Active pacing during measurements influences the results obtained with the FibriCheck® app (26).
  4. The patient is unable to use the FibriCheck® application independently due to cognitive disorders, functional limitations, visual impairments...
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control group

    In every cluster designated as a control group, patients aged 65 or older will be selected according to the inclusion criteria. The difference here is that patients will be given the standard opportunistic screening instead: pulse palpation and a 12-lead ECG when an irregular rhythm is found. This is current best practice.

  • Active comparator
    Intervention group

    In every cluster designated as an intervention group, patients aged 65 or older will be selected according to the inclusion criteria. Within this group, high-risk patients will be identified using the CHARGE-AF score, and will be prescribed the FibriCheck® app.

    Device: FibriCheck

Interventions

  • DeviceFibriCheck

    FibriCheck is a smartphone application that measures hearth rhythm using the phone's built-in camera. It is able to detect aberrant rhythms, such as atrial fibrillation.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Detection rate of AF in patients 65 years and older

    The detection rate of AF in both the control and intervention group will be calculated after 4 weeks. A significant difference in both groups will be noted. Compared with previous studies of similar design (32-34), we will realistically assume a 2-fold increase in the detection rate of AF in the intervention group to be significant.

    Time frame: 4 weeks for each participant

Secondary outcomes

  1. Thromboembolic complications

    We will track incidence of transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke during the study period, in addition to the eventual difference between both study populations.

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Death

    We will keep track of all-cause mortality during the study period, as well as difference in mortality between control and intervention populations.

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Compliance

    We will keep track of patient compliance during the study period (e.g. minimum number of measurements with FibriCheck®).

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Beerten SG, Proesmans T, Vaes B. The effect of a case-finding app on the detection rate of atrial fibrillation compared with opportunistic screening in primary care patients: protocol for a cluster randomized trial. Trials. 2021 Aug 9;22(1):525. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05497-x. PubMed 34372905 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual participant data will be available upon reasonable request. The trial's dataset will be held at the University of Leuven, Belgium, and can be shared upon contacting the principal investigator.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 20, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04545723
Lead sponsor
KU Leuven
Collaborators
Qompium NV
Responsible party
Bert Vaes (Professor, KU Leuven) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 11, 2020
Start date
Oct 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 20, 2024

Study contacts

Simon G Beerten, MD, MSc
principal investigator · KU Leuven
Tine Proesmans, MSc
principal investigator · Qompium NV
Bert Vaes, MD, PhD
principal investigator · KU Leuven

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Sep 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion