CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04540510OPEPUpdated Sep 24, 2021Results posted

OPEP Devices in Acute Inpatient Treatment of Pneumonia

An interventional study of OPEP therapy and Standard care in Community-acquired Pneumonia, sponsored by Danbury Hospital. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-09-24.

Sponsored by Danbury Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
due to COVID-19

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year after the study started (first participant enrolled Aug 2019, registered Aug 2020).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
11
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a randomized-controlled prospective study to be conducted at Danbury Hospital and Norwalk Hospital to evaluate oscillatory positive expiratory pressure (OPEP) devices for "airway clearance" (helping to clear out phlegm or mucous from your lungs and bronchial tubes) in the treatment of patients admitted to the hospital with pneumonia.

Approximately 200 subjects are expected to participate in this study.

Read the detailed description

Pneumonia is one of the most common health conditions leading to hospitalization today. Approximately 1.3 million people in the US are admitted to the hospital with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) annually, with readmission rates within the first 30 days as high as 20%. In a retrospective analysis of patients with culture-confirmed bacterial pneumonia, 30-day readmission occurred in 19.3% of patients. At Norwalk Hospital, the 30-day readmission rate for patients with pneumonia is 13.1%. CAP is the sixth most common cause of death with a case-fatality rate of up to 16% for hospitalized CAP patients, and an overall 30-day mortality up to 23%. The economic burden of CAP is also high, l with a CAP cost burden estimated to be at least $13 billion in 2008 within just the Medicare population.

There have been several small studies done to analyze the utility of airway clearance and its potential role in CAP. These studies have generally been small and have used a wide variety of airway clearance devices and techniques, including external chest wall physiotherapy devices and postural drainage, both now considered second line therapies for most patients. These studies have been variable in their findings and overall have not shown that airway clearance is either beneficial or harmful in CAP. The studies did show, however, that the duration of fever and hospital length of stay were both significantly decreased, suggesting the possibility of other clinically important benefits.

In this prospective randomized controlled trial, investigators will test the hypothesis that the use of OPEP devices, specifically the handheld Aerobika (Monaghan Medical) will result in more rapid and durable recovery in patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia as measured by decreased hospital length of stay, reduced duration of fever, improvement in dyspnea, decreased duration of antibiotics, increased rate of diagnosis of the etiologic organism responsible for the pneumonia, and reduced readmission rates:

Primary outcome

  1. Reduction in hospital length of stay

Secondary outcomes

  1. Reduction in dyspnea by modified-Borg score
  2. Reduction in duration of antibiotics
  3. Reduction in duration of fever
  4. Reduction in need for oxygen at hospital discharge
  5. Reduction in 30-, 60-, and 90-day readmission rates
  6. Diagnosis of organism by sputum
  7. Transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU)
02

Conditions studied

  • Community-acquired Pneumonia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Oscillatory positive expiratory pressure
03

In context

Pneumonia

2,044 studies on the registry are indexed under Pneumonia; 283 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 11 is below the median of 106 across 1,247 interventional studies indexed under Pneumonia.

Browse Pneumonia studies →

Lead sponsor

Danbury Hospital is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical symptoms suggesting pneumonia (eg. cough, fever, pleuritic chest pain, sputum production, dyspnea)
  • Any new chest radiographic infiltrate consistent with pneumonia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Untreated or recently (within the past 90 days) treated pneumothorax
  • Active hemoptysis
  • Recent facial, oral, or skull trauma
  • Hemodynamically unstable patients
  • Severe nausea or active vomiting
  • Recent diagnosis of pneumonia prior to current inpatient encounter (within 60 days)
  • Significant cognitive impairment or psychiatric conditions that prevent ability to participate in or cooperate with oPEP use
  • Active TB or in negative pressure room
  • Pregnancy
  • Pre-existing medical condition with a life expectancy of less than 3 months
  • Inability to form appropriate mouth seal on device (eg. due to neuromuscular disease)
  • Pre-existing active use of oPEP devices
  • Requiring >=50% FiO2 or facemask (excluding high flow NC)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
11 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    OPEP therapy added to standard pneumonia care

    The intervention group will be asked to use an OPEP device twice daily, with the help of study investigators, for a total of at least 5 minutes per session. This treatment will be in addition to the usual care that the hospital physician prescribe for them to treat the pneumonia.

    Device: OPEP therapy · Other: Standard care

  • Active comparator
    Standard pneumonia care

    The control group will continue to receive the usual care that their hospital team prescribe for them to treat the pneumonia.

    Other: Standard care

Interventions

  • DeviceOPEP therapy

    Oscillatory Positive Expiratory Pressure therapy

  • OtherStandard care

    Standard pneumonia care

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Length of Hospital Stay

    Number of days that the patient stays in hospital was collected from medical record. We have calculated the mean and the standard deviation for both groups.

    Time frame: duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Reported Dyspnea by Modified-Borg Score

    Dyspnea as measured by modified-Borg score, minimum value 0 (No shortness of breath) and maximum value 10 (Maximal breathlessness). Score scale is from 0-10. We have calculated the mean and the standard deviation for both groups.

    Time frame: duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 days

  2. Duration of Antibiotics

    Duration of antibiotics was collected from medical record. We have calculated the mean and the standard deviation for both groups.

    Time frame: duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 days

  3. Duration of Fever

    Duration of fever was collected from medical record. We have calculated the mean and the standard deviation for both groups.

    Time frame: duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 days

  4. Number of Participants With Need for Oxygen Supplement at Hospital Discharge

    Number of participants with need for oxygen supplement at the time of hospital discharge was collected from medical record for both groups.

    Time frame: duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 days

  5. Reported 30-, 60-, and 90-day Readmission Rates

    Number of total hospital readmissions post-enrollment was obtained from medical record.

    Time frame: 90 day after the hospital discharge

  6. Number of Participants With Positive Sputum Culture

    Data on the diagnosis of organism by sputum (positive sputum culture) was collected from medical record. We have counted number of participants with intervention and without intervention.

    Time frame: duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 days

  7. Number of Participants Transferred to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU)

    Number of participants transferred to the intensive care unit post enrollment was obtained from medical record for both groups.

    Time frame: duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 days

07

Results

Posted Sep 24, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneOPEP Therapy Added to Standard Pneumonia CareStandard Pneumonia Care
Started56
Completed56
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryLength of Hospital Stay

Number of days that the patient stays in hospital was collected from medical record. We have calculated the mean and the standard deviation for both groups.

Time frame:
duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 days
Reported as:
Mean · days
Length of Hospital Stay
daysOPEP Therapy Added to Standard Pneumonia CareStandard Pneumonia Care
Length of Hospital Stay1.2 ± 0.94.0 ± 1.2
SecondaryReported Dyspnea by Modified-Borg Score

Dyspnea as measured by modified-Borg score, minimum value 0 (No shortness of breath) and maximum value 10 (Maximal breathlessness). Score scale is from 0-10. We have calculated the mean and the standard deviation for both groups.

Time frame:
duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 days
Reported as:
Mean · score on scale
Reported Dyspnea by Modified-Borg Score
score on scaleOPEP Therapy Added to Standard Pneumonia CareStandard Pneumonia Care
Reported Dyspnea by Modified-Borg Score1.2 ± 3.82.4 ± 2.0
SecondaryDuration of Antibiotics

Duration of antibiotics was collected from medical record. We have calculated the mean and the standard deviation for both groups.

Time frame:
duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 days
Reported as:
Mean · days
Duration of Antibiotics
daysOPEP Therapy Added to Standard Pneumonia CareStandard Pneumonia Care
Duration of Antibiotics8.8 ± 4.57.4 ± 4.3
SecondaryDuration of Fever

Duration of fever was collected from medical record. We have calculated the mean and the standard deviation for both groups.

Time frame:
duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 days
Reported as:
Mean · days
Duration of Fever
daysOPEP Therapy Added to Standard Pneumonia CareStandard Pneumonia Care
Duration of FeverNA ± NA0.8 ± 1.0
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Need for Oxygen Supplement at Hospital Discharge

Number of participants with need for oxygen supplement at the time of hospital discharge was collected from medical record for both groups.

Time frame:
duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Need for Oxygen Supplement at Hospital Discharge
ParticipantsOPEP Therapy Added to Standard Pneumonia CareStandard Pneumonia Care
Number of Participants With Need for Oxygen Supplement at Hospital Discharge00
SecondaryReported 30-, 60-, and 90-day Readmission Rates

Number of total hospital readmissions post-enrollment was obtained from medical record.

Time frame:
90 day after the hospital discharge
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Reported 30-, 60-, and 90-day Readmission Rates
ParticipantsOPEP Therapy Added to Standard Pneumonia CareStandard Pneumonia Care
Reported 30-, 60-, and 90-day Readmission Rates00
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Positive Sputum Culture

Data on the diagnosis of organism by sputum (positive sputum culture) was collected from medical record. We have counted number of participants with intervention and without intervention.

Time frame:
duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Positive Sputum Culture
ParticipantsOPEP Therapy Added to Standard Pneumonia CareStandard Pneumonia Care
Number of Participants With Positive Sputum Culture13
SecondaryNumber of Participants Transferred to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU)

Number of participants transferred to the intensive care unit post enrollment was obtained from medical record for both groups.

Time frame:
duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Transferred to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
ParticipantsOPEP Therapy Added to Standard Pneumonia CareStandard Pneumonia Care
Number of Participants Transferred to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU)11

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were monitored for each subject from the time informed consent was signed until termination from the study, up to a week. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
OPEP Therapy Added to Standard Pneumonia Care0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)
Standard Pneumonia Care0/6 (0%)0/6 (0%)0/6 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)OPEP Therapy Added to Standard Pneumonia CareStandard Pneumonia CareTotal
Mean75.6 ± 20.078.2 ± 11.377 ± 15.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)OPEP Therapy Added to Standard Pneumonia CareStandard Pneumonia CareTotal
Female347
Male224
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)OPEP Therapy Added to Standard Pneumonia CareStandard Pneumonia CareTotal
Hispanic or Latino101
Not Hispanic or Latino4610
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)OPEP Therapy Added to Standard Pneumonia CareStandard Pneumonia CareTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian011
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American123
White336
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported101
BMI
BMI(kg/m^2)OPEP Therapy Added to Standard Pneumonia CareStandard Pneumonia CareTotal
Mean37.4 ± 0.824.7 ± 3.030.4 ± 7.0
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Norwalk Hospital
    Norwalk, Connecticut 06856, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Yang M, Yan Y, Yin X, Wang BY, Wu T, Liu GJ, Dong BR. Chest physiotherapy for pneumonia in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28;(2):CD006338. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006338.pub3. PubMed 23450568 ↗
  • Narula D, Nangia V. Use of an oscillatory PEP device to enhance bronchial hygiene in a patient of post-H1NI pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome with pneumothorax. BMJ Case Rep. 2014 Mar 7;2014:bcr2013202598. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2013-202598. PubMed 24717858 ↗
  • Graham WG, Bradley DA. Efficacy of chest physiotherapy and intermittent positive-pressure breathing in the resolution of pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 1978 Sep 21;299(12):624-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197809212991203. PubMed 355879 ↗
  • Christensen EF, Nedergaard T, Dahl R. Long-term treatment of chronic bronchitis with positive expiratory pressure mask and chest physiotherapy. Chest. 1990 Mar;97(3):645-50. doi: 10.1378/chest.97.3.645. PubMed 2106412 ↗
  • Halm EA, Fine MJ, Marrie TJ, Coley CM, Kapoor WN, Obrosky DS, Singer DE. Time to clinical stability in patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia: implications for practice guidelines. JAMA. 1998 May 13;279(18):1452-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.18.1452. PubMed 9600479 ↗
  • Sato R, Gomez Rey G, Nelson S, Pinsky B. Community-acquired pneumonia episode costs by age and risk in commercially insured US adults aged >/=50 years. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013 Jun;11(3):251-8. doi: 10.1007/s40258-013-0026-0. PubMed 23605251 ↗
  • File TM Jr, Marrie TJ. Burden of community-acquired pneumonia in North American adults. Postgrad Med. 2010 Mar;122(2):130-41. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2010.03.2130. PubMed 20203464 ↗
  • Khoudigian-Sinani S, Kowal S, Suggett JA, Coppolo DP. Cost-effectiveness of the Aerobika* oscillating positive expiratory pressure device in the management of COPD exacerbations. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Oct 19;12:3065-3073. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S143334. eCollection 2017. PubMed 29089755 ↗
  • De Alba I, Amin A. Pneumonia readmissions: risk factors and implications. Ochsner J. 2014 Winter;14(4):649-54. PubMed 25598730 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Feb 4, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 24, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04540510
Lead sponsor
Danbury Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 7, 2020
Start date
Aug 13, 2019
Primary completion
Feb 18, 2021
Completion
Feb 18, 2021
Results posted
Sep 24, 2021
Last update
Sep 24, 2021

Study contacts

Amy Ahasic, MD
principal investigator · Nuvance Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Aug 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion