CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT04534972SAVE-O2Updated Apr 2, 2025

Strategy to Avoid Excessive Oxygen in Major Burn Patients

A Phase 3 interventional study of Targeting Normoxemia (SpO2 90-96%; PaO2 60-100 mmHg) in Critical Illness, Wounds and Injury and Disease Attributes, sponsored by University of Colorado, Denver. Active, not recruiting at 6 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 120 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-02.

Sponsored by University of Colorado, Denver · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,000
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 120 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective is to determine the effectiveness of a multimodal educational intervention to reduce supplemental oxygen use in major burn patients. Investigators will also evaluate the safety and clinical effectiveness of the more targeted use of oxygen therapy.

Read the detailed description

Oxygen therapy has undisputed importance in the care of critically ill patients to prevent secondary complications related to hypoxemia. Although routine, the practice of excessive over-oxygenation may be harmful. An expert panel was convened and developed the strong consensus to target normoxemia at an oxygen saturation (SpO2) range of 90-96%, an arterial oxygen (PaO2) range of 60-100 mmHg (when applicable), and a fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) of 21% for mechanically ventilated patients or room air for nonmechanically ventilated patients.

Specific Aim: The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of a multimodal educational intervention to reduce supplemental oxygen use in major burn patients. Investigators will also evaluate the safety and clinical effectiveness of the more targeted use of oxygen therapy.

Hypotheses: Clinical efforts to through a multimodal educational intervention will:

  1. Improve the proportion of time spent within target normoxemia thresholds (oxygen saturation [SpO2] 90-96% and/or arterial oxygen [PaO2] 60-100 mmHg [when applicable])
  2. Limiting use of excessive supplemental oxygen
  3. Reduce exposure to hyperoxemia without a substantive increase in hypoxemic episodes or adverse effects
02

Conditions studied

  • Critical Illness
  • Wounds and Injury
  • Disease Attributes
  • Pathologic Processes

Keywords

  • hypoxia
  • hyperoxia
  • burn
  • critical illness
  • supplemental oxygen
  • oxygenation
  • SpO2
  • PaO2
  • FiO2
  • normoxia
  • hypoxemia
  • hyperoxemia
  • normoxemia
03

In context

Critical Illness

1,881 studies on the registry are indexed under Critical Illness; 462 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 2,000 is above the median of 90 across 979 interventional studies indexed under Critical Illness.

Browse Critical Illness studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Colorado, Denver is the lead sponsor of 1,499 studies on the registry; 315 are open to participants now.

Of its 139 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 89 (64%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 120 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with acute thermal burn injury who meet the criteria for entry into the state or national burn data repository
  • Admission to burn unit within 24 hours of burn injury

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age \<18 years
  • Prisoners
  • Known pregnancy
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
2,000 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Pre-Implementation

    The control (pre-implementation) group will be burn patients admitted to the burn unit in ICU during the site's control period of the stepped-wedge implementation process (up to 22 months).

  • Active comparator
    Post-Implementation Targeting Normoxemia in Burn ICU

    The intervention (post-implementation) group will be patients admitted to the burn unit in ICU during the targeting normoxemia intervention period of the stepped-wedge design implementation process (up to 19 months).

    Other: Targeting Normoxemia (SpO2 90-96%; PaO2 60-100 mmHg)

Interventions

  • OtherTargeting Normoxemia (SpO2 90-96%; PaO2 60-100 mmHg)

    Post-implementation of targeted normoxemia through oxygen titration for individual patients. Intervention for treatment of hypoxemia will follow usual local practice. Interventions for treatment of hyperoxemia (SpO2 \>96% or PaO2 \> 100 mmHg) will involve down titration of FiO2 (or supplemental oxygen for non-mechanically ventilated patients) within a time frame based on local site preferences-typically in increments of no greater than 0.10 until goal oxygenation in the normoxemia range is achieved (including room air \[no supplemental oxygen\] for non-mechanically ventilated patients).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Supplemental Oxygen Free Days (SOFD)

    Number of days alive and not on supplemental oxygen during the index hospitalization (0 days \[worst outcome\] to 28 days \[best outcome\])

    Time frame: up to 28 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hospital-Free Days to day 90 (HFD90)

    Number of days alive and outside the hospital (0 days \[worst outcome\] to 90 days \[best outcome\])

    Time frame: up to 90 days

  2. In-hospital Mortality to day 90

    Dichotomous vital status (survived or died) at hospital discharge or day 90, whichever is first

    Time frame: up to 90 days

  3. Time to Mortality to day 90

    Vital status and date of death censored at hospital discharge or day 90, whichever is first

    Time frame: up to 90 days

  4. Ventilator Free Days (VFD) to day 28

    Ventilator Free days = Days off ventilator (0 VFD \[worst outcome\] to 28 VFD \[best outcome\])

    Time frame: up to 28 days

  5. Time to Room air

    Duration of supplemental oxygen (FiO2 = 0.21 or room air)

    Time frame: up to 90 days

  6. Time to Burn Wound Healing

    Wound closure of \>90% of the original burn or time to grafting (for non-full thickness wounds)

    Time frame: up to 90 days

  7. Discharge Disposition

    Defined as home (return to prior level of care) or facility (e.g., acute rehab, skilled nursing facility)

    Time frame: up to 90 days

  8. Amount of Supplemental Oxygen Administered

    Total estimated oxygen volume while in the burn until after hospital arrival

    Time frame: up to 90 days

  9. Duration of Time on Normoxemia Protocol Target

    Defined as SpO2 90-96% or receiving no supplemental oxygen (FiO2 0.21 or room air) while in the burn unit

    Time frame: up to 90 days

  10. Proportion of Participants Receiving High Levels of Supplemental Oxygen

    FiO2\>0.40 or \>4 liters per minute for \>2 hours while in the burn unit \[excludes time in the operating room\]

    Time frame: up to 90 days

  11. Duration of Time Receiving High Levels of Supplemental Oxygen

    FiO2\>0.40 or \>4 liters per minute while in the burn unit

    Time frame: up to 90 days

  12. Duration of Time Receiving No Supplemental Oxygen

    FiO2 0.21 or room air while in the burn unit

    Time frame: up to 90 days

  13. Incidence of Hypoxemic Event (SpO2<88%)

    SpO2 saturation below 88% while in the burn unit

    Time frame: up to 90 days

  14. Duration of Hypoxemic Events (SpO2<88%)

    SpO2 saturation below 88% while in the burn unit

    Time frame: up to 90 days

  15. Incidence of Hyperoxemic Event (SpO2>96%)

    SpO2 saturation above 96% while in the burn unit

    Time frame: up to 90 days

  16. Duration of Hyperoxemic Event (SpO2>96%)

    SpO2 saturation above 96% while in the burn unit

    Time frame: up to 90 days

07

Study locations

6 sites
  • University of Alabama-Birmingham Medical Center
    Birmingham, Alabama 35294, United States
  • University of Colorado
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • University of Cincinnati Medical Center
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45219, United States
  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15224, United States
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
    Nashville, Tennessee 37232, United States
  • Army Institute of Surgical Research
    San Antonio, Texas 78234, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Leverve XM. To cope with oxygen: a long and still tumultuous story for life. Crit Care Med. 2008 Feb;36(2):637-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0B013E31816296AD. No abstract available. PubMed 18216624 ↗
  • Damiani E, Adrario E, Girardis M, Romano R, Pelaia P, Singer M, Donati A. Arterial hyperoxia and mortality in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2014 Dec 23;18(6):711. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0711-x. PubMed 25532567 ↗
  • Panwar R, Capellier G, Schmutz N, Davies A, Cooper DJ, Bailey M, Baguley D, Pilcher V, Bellomo R. Current oxygenation practice in ventilated patients-an observational cohort study. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2013 Jul;41(4):505-14. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1304100412. PubMed 23808511 ↗
  • Suzuki S, Eastwood GM, Peck L, Glassford NJ, Bellomo R. Current oxygen management in mechanically ventilated patients: a prospective observational cohort study. J Crit Care. 2013 Oct;28(5):647-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.03.010. Epub 2013 May 15. PubMed 23683560 ↗
  • Rachmale S, Li G, Wilson G, Malinchoc M, Gajic O. Practice of excessive F(IO(2)) and effect on pulmonary outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients with acute lung injury. Respir Care. 2012 Nov;57(11):1887-93. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01696. Epub 2012 May 15. PubMed 22613692 ↗
  • Parke RL, Eastwood GM, McGuinness SP; George Institute for Global Health; Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group. Oxygen therapy in non-intubated adult intensive care patients: a point prevalence study. Crit Care Resusc. 2013 Dec;15(4):287-93. PubMed 24289510 ↗
  • Iscoe S, Beasley R, Fisher JA. Supplementary oxygen for nonhypoxemic patients: O2 much of a good thing? Crit Care. 2011;15(3):305. doi: 10.1186/cc10229. Epub 2011 Jun 30. PubMed 21722334 ↗
  • Panwar R, Young P, Capellier G. Conservative oxygen therapy in mechanically ventilated patients. Crit Care Med. 2014 Sep;42(9):e630-1. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000439. No abstract available. PubMed 25126814 ↗
  • de Graaff AE, Dongelmans DA, Binnekade JM, de Jonge E. Clinicians' response to hyperoxia in ventilated patients in a Dutch ICU depends on the level of FiO2. Intensive Care Med. 2011 Jan;37(1):46-51. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-2025-z. Epub 2010 Sep 28. PubMed 20878146 ↗
  • Girardis M, Busani S, Damiani E, Donati A, Rinaldi L, Marudi A, Morelli A, Antonelli M, Singer M. Effect of Conservative vs Conventional Oxygen Therapy on Mortality Among Patients in an Intensive Care Unit: The Oxygen-ICU Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016 Oct 18;316(15):1583-1589. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.11993. PubMed 27706466 ↗
  • de Jonge E, Peelen L, Keijzers PJ, Joore H, de Lange D, van der Voort PH, Bosman RJ, de Waal RA, Wesselink R, de Keizer NF. Association between administered oxygen, arterial partial oxygen pressure and mortality in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients. Crit Care. 2008;12(6):R156. doi: 10.1186/cc7150. Epub 2008 Dec 10. PubMed 19077208 ↗
  • Pannu SR. Too Much Oxygen: Hyperoxia and Oxygen Management in Mechanically Ventilated Patients. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Feb;37(1):16-22. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1570359. Epub 2016 Jan 28. PubMed 26820270 ↗
  • Kallet RH, Branson RD. Should Oxygen Therapy Be Tightly Regulated to Minimize Hyperoxia in Critically Ill Patients? Respir Care. 2016 Jun;61(6):801-17. doi: 10.4187/respcare.04933. PubMed 27235315 ↗
  • Hafner S, Beloncle F, Koch A, Radermacher P, Asfar P. Hyperoxia in intensive care, emergency, and peri-operative medicine: Dr. Jekyll or Mr. Hyde? A 2015 update. Ann Intensive Care. 2015 Dec;5(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13613-015-0084-6. Epub 2015 Nov 19. PubMed 26585328 ↗
  • Singh V, Devgan L, Bhat S, Milner SM. The pathogenesis of burn wound conversion. Ann Plast Surg. 2007 Jul;59(1):109-15. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000252065.90759.e6. PubMed 17589272 ↗
  • Cancio LC, Barillo DJ, Kearns RD, Holmes JH 4th, Conlon KM, Matherly AF, Cairns BA, Hickerson WL, Palmieri T. Guidelines for Burn Care Under Austere Conditions: Surgical and Nonsurgical Wound Management. J Burn Care Res. 2017 Jul/Aug;38(4):203-214. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000368. No abstract available. PubMed 27355660 ↗
  • Palmieri TL, Przkora R, Meyer WJ 3rd, Carrougher GJ. Measuring burn injury outcomes. Surg Clin North Am. 2014 Aug;94(4):909-16. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2014.05.010. PubMed 25085096 ↗
  • Kao Y, Loh EW, Hsu CC, Lin HJ, Huang CC, Chou YY, Lien CC, Tam KW. Fluid Resuscitation in Patients With Severe Burns: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Mar;25(3):320-329. doi: 10.1111/acem.13333. Epub 2017 Nov 11. PubMed 29024269 ↗
  • Helmerhorst HJ, Roos-Blom MJ, van Westerloo DJ, de Jonge E. Association Between Arterial Hyperoxia and Outcome in Subsets of Critical Illness: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression of Cohort Studies. Crit Care Med. 2015 Jul;43(7):1508-19. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000998. PubMed 25855899 ↗
  • Austin MA, Wills KE, Blizzard L, Walters EH, Wood-Baker R. Effect of high flow oxygen on mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients in prehospital setting: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2010 Oct 18;341:c5462. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c5462. PubMed 20959284 ↗
  • Chi JH, Knudson MM, Vassar MJ, McCarthy MC, Shapiro MB, Mallet S, Holcroft JJ, Moncrief H, Noble J, Wisner D, Kaups KL, Bennick LD, Manley GT. Prehospital hypoxia affects outcome in patients with traumatic brain injury: a prospective multicenter study. J Trauma. 2006 Nov;61(5):1134-41. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000196644.64653.d8. PubMed 17099519 ↗
  • Panwar R, Hardie M, Bellomo R, Barrot L, Eastwood GM, Young PJ, Capellier G, Harrigan PW, Bailey M; CLOSE Study Investigators; ANZICS Clinical Trials Group. Conservative versus Liberal Oxygenation Targets for Mechanically Ventilated Patients. A Pilot Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Jan 1;193(1):43-51. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201505-1019OC. PubMed 26334785 ↗
  • ICU-ROX Investigators and the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group; Mackle D, Bellomo R, Bailey M, Beasley R, Deane A, Eastwood G, Finfer S, Freebairn R, King V, Linke N, Litton E, McArthur C, McGuinness S, Panwar R, Young P; ICU-ROX Investigators the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group. Conservative Oxygen Therapy during Mechanical Ventilation in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 12;382(11):989-998. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1903297. Epub 2019 Oct 14. PubMed 31613432 ↗
  • Schmidt B, Whyte RK, Asztalos EV, Moddemann D, Poets C, Rabi Y, Solimano A, Roberts RS; Canadian Oxygen Trial (COT) Group. Effects of targeting higher vs lower arterial oxygen saturations on death or disability in extremely preterm infants: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2013 May 22;309(20):2111-20. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.5555. PubMed 23644995 ↗
  • Stockinger ZT, Mcswain NE Jr. Prehospital supplemental oxygen in trauma patients: its efficacy and implications for military medical care. Mil Med. 2004 Aug;169(8):609-12. doi: 10.7205/milmed.169.8.609. PubMed 15379072 ↗
  • Meyhoff CS, Wetterslev J, Jorgensen LN, Henneberg SW, Hogdall C, Lundvall L, Svendsen PE, Mollerup H, Lunn TH, Simonsen I, Martinsen KR, Pulawska T, Bundgaard L, Bugge L, Hansen EG, Riber C, Gocht-Jensen P, Walker LR, Bendtsen A, Johansson G, Skovgaard N, Helto K, Poukinski A, Korshin A, Walli A, Bulut M, Carlsson PS, Rodt SA, Lundbech LB, Rask H, Buch N, Perdawid SK, Reza J, Jensen KV, Carlsen CG, Jensen FS, Rasmussen LS; PROXI Trial Group. Effect of high perioperative oxygen fraction on surgical site infection and pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery: the PROXI randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2009 Oct 14;302(14):1543-50. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1452. PubMed 19826023 ↗
  • Stub D, Smith K, Bernard S, Nehme Z, Stephenson M, Bray JE, Cameron P, Barger B, Ellims AH, Taylor AJ, Meredith IT, Kaye DM; AVOID Investigators. Air Versus Oxygen in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Circulation. 2015 Jun 16;131(24):2143-50. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014494. Epub 2015 May 22. PubMed 26002889 ↗
  • Suzuki S, Eastwood GM, Glassford NJ, Peck L, Young H, Garcia-Alvarez M, Schneider AG, Bellomo R. Conservative oxygen therapy in mechanically ventilated patients: a pilot before-and-after trial. Crit Care Med. 2014 Jun;42(6):1414-22. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000219. PubMed 24561566 ↗
  • Eastwood GM, Peck L, Young H, Suzuki S, Garcia M, Bellomo R. Intensive care clinicians' opinion of conservative oxygen therapy (SpO(2) 90-92%) for mechanically ventilated patients. Aust Crit Care. 2014 Aug;27(3):120-5. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2013.11.004. Epub 2013 Dec 24. PubMed 24369915 ↗
  • Helmerhorst HJ, Schultz MJ, van der Voort PH, Bosman RJ, Juffermans NP, de Jonge E, van Westerloo DJ. Self-reported attitudes versus actual practice of oxygen therapy by ICU physicians and nurses. Ann Intensive Care. 2014 Jul 25;4:23. doi: 10.1186/s13613-014-0023-y. eCollection 2014. PubMed 25512878 ↗
  • Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network; Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris A, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT, Wheeler A. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000 May 4;342(18):1301-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005043421801. PubMed 10793162 ↗
  • Baker DW, Persell SD. Criteria for waiver of informed consent for quality improvement research. JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Jan;175(1):142-3. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.6977. No abstract available. PubMed 25560946 ↗
  • McKinney RE Jr, Beskow LM, Ford DE, Lantos JD, McCall J, Patrick-Lake B, Pletcher MJ, Rath B, Schmidt H, Weinfurt K. Use of altered informed consent in pragmatic clinical research. Clin Trials. 2015 Oct;12(5):494-502. doi: 10.1177/1740774515597688. Epub 2015 Sep 15. PubMed 26374677 ↗
  • Douin DJ, Schauer SG, Anderson EL, Jones J, DeSanto K, Cunningham CW, Bebarta VS, Ginde AA. Systematic review of oxygenation and clinical outcomes to inform oxygen targets in critically ill trauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Oct;87(4):961-977. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002392. PubMed 31162333 ↗
  • BOOST II United Kingdom Collaborative Group; BOOST II Australia Collaborative Group; BOOST II New Zealand Collaborative Group; Stenson BJ, Tarnow-Mordi WO, Darlow BA, Simes J, Juszczak E, Askie L, Battin M, Bowler U, Broadbent R, Cairns P, Davis PG, Deshpande S, Donoghoe M, Doyle L, Fleck BW, Ghadge A, Hague W, Halliday HL, Hewson M, King A, Kirby A, Marlow N, Meyer M, Morley C, Simmer K, Tin W, Wardle SP, Brocklehurst P. Oxygen saturation and outcomes in preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2013 May 30;368(22):2094-104. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1302298. Epub 2013 May 5. PubMed 23642047 ↗
  • SUPPORT Study Group of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD Neonatal Research Network; Carlo WA, Finer NN, Walsh MC, Rich W, Gantz MG, Laptook AR, Yoder BA, Faix RG, Das A, Poole WK, Schibler K, Newman NS, Ambalavanan N, Frantz ID 3rd, Piazza AJ, Sanchez PJ, Morris BH, Laroia N, Phelps DL, Poindexter BB, Cotten CM, Van Meurs KP, Duara S, Narendran V, Sood BG, O'Shea TM, Bell EF, Ehrenkranz RA, Watterberg KL, Higgins RD. Target ranges of oxygen saturation in extremely preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2010 May 27;362(21):1959-69. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0911781. Epub 2010 May 16. PubMed 20472937 ↗
  • Hussey MA, Hughes JP. Design and analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials. Contemp Clin Trials. 2007 Feb;28(2):182-91. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2006.05.007. Epub 2006 Jul 7. PubMed 16829207 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 2, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04534972
Lead sponsor
University of Colorado, Denver
Collaborators
United States Department of Defense
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 1, 2020
Start date
Apr 15, 2021
Primary completion
Nov 15, 2022
Completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 2, 2025

Study contacts

Adit Ginde, MD, MPH
principal investigator · University of Colorado, Denver

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion