CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04529382NOFNAITUpdated Aug 27, 2020

Neurodevelopmental Outcome After Fetal Neonatal AlloImmune Thrombocytopenia

An observational study in Fetal and Neonatal Alloimmune Thrombocytopenia, Long Term Adverse Effects and Neurodevelopmental Abnormality, sponsored by Leiden University Medical Center. Status unknown at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Months to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-08-27.

Sponsored by Leiden University Medical Center · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Aug 2020), so the status shown — last known as Enrolling by invitation — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
78
Ages
18 Months to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT) is a disease caused by allo-immunisation during pregnancy. If left untreated, FNAIT can lead to severe fetal intracranial haemorrhage. This complication can be prevented by weekly administration of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) to the mother during pregnancy. Knowledge on long-term development of FNAIT survivors with or without IVIg treatment is very limited but an important subject in the counselling of parents of newly diagnosed cases. To evaluate the long-term neurodevelopmental outcome in two groups of children with FNAIT will be asked to participate in our study in an outpatient clinic setting.

Read the detailed description

INTRODUCTION AND RATIONALE Fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT) is the most common cause of thrombocytopenia in otherwise healthy term-born neonates. FNAIT is a rare disease with an incidence estimated around 1 per 1000 live newborns. During pregnancy alloimmunization can occur due to incompatibility of the Human Platelet Antigens (HPA) on the maternal and fetal platelets. Alloimmunization and maternal production of antibodies directed against the HPA-positive fetal platelets, leads to thrombocytopenia and an increased risk of intracranial hemorrhages (ICH) in the fetus. Clinical presentation can vary from skin bleedings to severe ICH leading to lifelong neurologic sequelae or intrauterine death.

In the past, FNAIT was managed with invasive and high-risk interventions including intrauterine platelet transfusion (IUPT). Since the end of the 20th century, invasive intrauterine transfusions (IUT) were replaced by a new, non-invasive therapy: maternal administration of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg). This novel therapy resulted in a significant lower risk of intrauterine fetal death and ICH. Intervention with immune modulation in the semi -allogenic environment of the fetus by administration of immunoglobulins (Ig) is successful, especially in preventing ICH. However antenatal treatment with IVIg has been implemented as standard of care without strong methodological follow-up research of children from mothers treated with IVIg. To date, only two follow-up studies have been published in children with anticipated FNAIT cases. The first study of a FNAIT cohort treated with IVIg was done by Ward et al. in 2006. They concluded that development of children treated for FNAIT was better compared to their non-treated siblings. Their conclusions were based on non-validated questionnaires taken by telephone, assessing the behavioral outcome of the children and were limited by a \~40% lost-to-follow-up rate. A second follow-up study including 39 children was published by a research group from our center in 2004. This research stated that the outcome in children with FNAIT and exposed to maternal IVIg treatment was similar to the normal population. However, this study included a heterogenic group of children with different treatment strategies including IUT, hampering definitive conclusions and substantiating the need for more research.

No long-term standardized follow-up studies were performed on FNAIT cases without antenatal treatment and/or ICH. The natural course of the disease and long-term effects of thrombocytopenia on the developing fetus and newborn are unknown. FNAIT is defined as a disease caused by alloantibodies, resulting in thrombocytopenia and a risk of bleeding in the neonate. In the last years, evidence is increasing that the maternal alloantibodies can also bind to the fetal endothelium and may impair angiogenesis in the developing fetuses It is not known at which moment in pregnancy the developing brain is most vulnerable for damage induced by these kind of alloantibodies. The timing in fetal life FNAIT associated ICH ranges from 23 to 42 weeks, but small bleeding may not be diagnosed. It may also be that these type of alloantibodies not lead to ICH but to other type of cerebral damage. These lesions can remain subclinical directly after birth but lead to developmental delay on the long term. This knowledge can be of great interest when counseling parents with a risk of FNAIT or in writing guidelines.

For 3 decades a nationwide screening on FNAIT to detect pregnancies with alloantibodies in time and start treatment to prevent bleedings is being discussed. If alloantibodies lead to cerebral damage on the long term also in patients without large ICH this might have large implications in the debate on the introduction of a national screening programme. Therefore the investigators want to underline that more knowledge about the long-term development of FNAIT survivors is required.

The Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), a national fetal therapy center in The Netherlands, has a close and long-lasting collaboration with Sanquin. This collaboration offers a unique opportunity to evaluate a large and complete cohort of children with FNAIT. LUMC and Sanquin are both nationwide referral centers for FNAIT and committed to improve timely detection of high-risk cases who need intra-uterine therapy. This research group from the national expertise centers are designated to assess long-term outcome in children with FNAIT and describe the natural history of children affected by FNAIT and the long term effects of a given therapy.

OBJECTIVE The primary objective is to determine the cognitive test score of children diagnosed with FNAIT without and with antenatal treatment.

STUDY DESIGN The investigators will perform an observational cohort study. The long-term neurodevelopmental outcome of children affected by FNAIT will be evaluated. All children born between 2002 and 2017 and diagnosed with FNAIT are eligible for follow-up assessment and will be invited for an assessment at our outpatient clinic. The FNAIT survivors will be collected in two cohorts; cohort 1 will consist of FNAIT survivors without antenatal treatment, cohort 2 will consist of FNAIT survivors that were antenatally anticipated and therefore IVIg treatment to the mother was given.

Enrollment in this study will take place via the LUMC and Stichting Sanquin Bloedvoorziening. The LUMC is national referral center for intrauterine therapy and Sanquin is national reference laboratory to diagnose FNAIT. Retrospectively FNAIT cases will be collected and asked for permission directly or via referring specialist.

After informed consent, child cognitive functioning will be assessed with a formal psychological test of cognitive functioning. According to age, the parents will complete a standardized behavioral and HRQoL questionnaire. Academic performance will be assessed by collecting the most recent CITO test scores from the Dutch Pupil monitoring system developed by the National Institute for Educational Measurement. Assessment of the prevalence of possible late effects of IVIg on the immune system will be assessed by questionnaires about the prevalence of allergies, astma, eczema and course of infections by questionnaires. Parents and children, when 12 years old or older, are asked for consent to request the medical letters from the maternity or neonatology ward to obtain perinatal and neonatal data.

No laboratory tests will be performed in this study, however data of the laboratory tests that were performed at timepoint of diagnosing FNAIT will be involved in this study.

After assessment a report will be made from the observations and test results, this report will be sent to the parents.

02

Conditions studied

  • Fetal and Neonatal Alloimmune Thrombocytopenia
  • Long Term Adverse Effects
  • Neurodevelopmental Abnormality
  • Intravenous Immunoglobulin Adverse Reaction

Browse trials for

03

In context

Thrombocytopenia

697 studies on the registry are indexed under Thrombocytopenia; 153 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 78 is below the median of 120 across 183 observational studies indexed under Thrombocytopenia.

Browse Thrombocytopenia studies →

Lead sponsor

Leiden University Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 326 studies on the registry; 106 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Months to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

All children born between 2002 and 2017 and diagnosed with FNAIT are eligible for this study. They will be invited for an assessment at our outpatient clinic. FNAIT cases that were not antenatally treated with IVIg will be eligible for the study (cohort 1), as well as FNAIT cases which were anticipated antenatally by materal IVIg administration (cohort 2).

Inclusion criteria

  • Children diagnosed with FNAIT during pregnancy or postnatal, at moment of inclusion 2 to 16 years of age.
  • Children living in the Netherlands.
  • Parents or guardian aged ≥ 18 years old, with parental authority.
  • Written informed consent form both parents with, form being approved by Ethic Committee.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children born with congenital and/or chromosomal abnormalities.
  • Children that passed away before inclusion.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
78 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Cohort 1: Unanticipated FNAIT cases

    All children born between 2002 and 2017 and diagnosed with FNAIT are eligible for this study. Children in cohort 1 will be FNAIT cases that were not antenatally treated with by maternal IVIg administration (or other forms of fetal therapy).

    Diagnostic Test: Cognitive testing (Bayley III, WPPSI III and WISC V)

  • Cohort 2: Anticipated FNAIT cases

    All children born between 2002 and 2017 and diagnosed with FNAIT are eligible for this study. Children in cohort 2 will be FNAIT cases which were anticipated antenatally by maternal IVIg administration according to our local protocol.

    Diagnostic Test: Cognitive testing (Bayley III, WPPSI III and WISC V)

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testCognitive testing (Bayley III, WPPSI III and WISC V)

    Parents and children will be invited to come for an outpatient clinic visit where cognitive testing and neurologic examination will be performed. In addition to this parents will be asked to fill in questionnaires, provide latest school results and medical files will be requested from treating physicians.

    Also known as: Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory, Child Behavior Checklist, Questionnaire based on 'Richtlijn diagnostiek naar onderliggende aandoeningen bij kinderen met recidiverende luchtweginfecties', Questionnaire composited in collaboration with allergist (Dr. H. de Groot)., Neurologic Examination

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cognitive test score

    IQ test score calculated from a standardized cognitive test.

    Time frame: From birth until study enrollment. Average age of the participants is expected to be 8 years old.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Neurodevelopmental injury (NDI)

    NDI is a composite outcome of: * Cerebral palsy ≥ grade II according to Gross Motor Classification System (GMFCS) * Impaired cognitive, language and/or motor development (test scores \<70) * Bilateral blindness and/or bilateral deafness * Bilateral deafness requiring amplification

    Time frame: From birth until study enrollment. Average age of the participants is expected to be 8 years old.

  2. Health Related Quality of Life

    Health Related Quality of Life score calculated from the PedsQol questionnaire.

    Time frame: From birth until study enrollment. Average age of the participants is expected to be 8 years old.

  3. Cerebral Palsy

    Spastic bilateral, spastic unilateral or mixed Classification by European CP Network

    Time frame: From birth until study enrollment. Average age of the participants is expected to be 8 years old.

  4. Bilateral blindness

    Blind or partially sighted.

    Time frame: From birth until study enrollment. Average age of the participants is expected to be 8 years old.

  5. Bilateral deafness

    Needing hearing aids.

    Time frame: From birth until study enrollment. Average age of the participants is expected to be 8 years old.

  6. Behaviour test score

    Behaviour test score bases on Child Behavior Checklist

    Time frame: From birth until study enrollment. Average age of the participants is expected to be 8 years old.

  7. Abnormal course or incidence of infections

    Need to refer to an immunologist or the need to preform diagnostics based on history taking according to the Dutch guidelines.

    Time frame: From birth until study enrollment. Average age of the participants is expected to be 8 years old.

  8. Prevalence of eczema

    Number of children that suffer from eczema.

    Time frame: From birth until study enrollment. Average age of the participants is expected to be 8 years old.

  9. Prevalence of allergies

    Number of children that suffer from allergies

    Time frame: From birth until study enrollment. Average age of the participants is expected to be 8 years old.

  10. Patient reported anaphylaxis

    Serious allergic reaction, requiring urgent medical treatment with epinephrine.

    Time frame: From birth until study enrollment. Average age of the participants is expected to be 8 years old.

  11. Poor control of allergic rhinitis

    CARAT score of upper airways \< 8

    Time frame: From birth until study enrollment. Average age of the participants is expected to be 8 years old.

  12. Poor control of asthma

    CARAT score of lower airways \< 16.

    Time frame: From birth until study enrollment. Average age of the participants is expected to be 8 years old.

  13. Academic performance

    The latest test scores from primary school will be requested. Three academic domains will be assessed; arithmetic and spelling performance and measurements on reading comprehension.

    Time frame: From birth until study enrollment. Average age of the participants is expected to be 8 years old.

Other outcomes

  1. Maternal characteristics

    Age mother at delivery

    Time frame: Measured at delivery of the child that is assessed. Calculated in years.

  2. Obstetric history

    History of pre-eclampsia, miscarriages or intra uterine fetal demise

    Time frame: Measured at delivery of the child that is assessed.

  3. Gravidity/Parity

    Gravidity/Parity

    Time frame: Measured at delivery of the child that is assessed.

  4. Mode parturition

    Mode parturition

    Time frame: Measured at delivery of the child that is assessed.

  5. Gestational age at birth

    Gestational age at birth in days

    Time frame: Measured at delivery of the child that is assessed. Gestational age expressed in days.

  6. Birthweight

    Birthweight in grams

    Time frame: Measured at delivery of the child that is assessed, measurement directly after birth.

  7. Apgar score

    Apgar score

    Time frame: Measured at delivery of the child that is assessed, measured at 1, 5 and 10 minutes after birth.

  8. anti-HPA specificity

    HPA specificity of the antibody found in the presence of an HPA incompatibility between mother and fetus.

    Time frame: Measured at diagnosis of FNAIT, during pregnancy or until 1 week after birth.

  9. Platelet count

    Lowest platelet count

    Time frame: Lowest platelet count measured between birth and 7 days after birth.

  10. Platelet transfusion

    Any platelet transfusion.

    Time frame: Platelet transfusion between birth and 7 days after birth.

  11. Neonatal IVIG treatment

    Any administration of IVIG after birth.

    Time frame: Between birth and 7 days after birth.

  12. Skin bleeding manifestations

    Petechiae, purpura or hematoma diagnosed by the caretaker at neonatal period (gynecologist, pediatrician or midwife).

    Time frame: Between birth and 7 days after birth.

  13. Intracranial hemorrhage

    Any intracranial hemorrhage

    Time frame: Between birth and 7 days after birth.

  14. Convulsions

    Any paroxysmal, repetitive or stereotypical events interpreted as neonatal convulsions by a pediatrician.

    Time frame: Between birth and 7 days after birth.

  15. Organ bleeding

    Bleeding in any organ located in the thorax or abdomen

    Time frame: Between birth and 7 days after birth.

  16. Respiratory distress syndrome

    Requiring mechanical ventilation and/or surfactant.

    Time frame: Between birth and 7 days after birth.

  17. Perinatal asphyxia

    One of the following criteria; Apgar score \< 7 and/or umbilical cord pH ≤ 7.0.

    Time frame: Diagnosed within 24 hours after birth.

  18. Proven early onset neonatal sepsis

    Positive blood culture within 72 hours postpartum and clinical suspicion of a neonatal sepsis.

    Time frame: Between birth and 7 days after birth.

  19. Necrotizing enterocolitis

    Bells Stage 2 or higher.

    Time frame: Between birth and 28 days after birth.

  20. Family history (first degree) of allergy, asthma or eczema

    Positive when 1st degree of family members receive daily treatment for asthma or eczema. Or when a family member wears an epinephrine pencil because of a severe allergy.

    Time frame: From birth until study enrollment. Average age of the participants is expected to be 8 years old.

  21. Ethnic origin of the parents

    Ethnic origin of mother and father.

    Time frame: Asked at study enrollment.

  22. Parent smoking

    Any person living in the household of the child smoking one or more cigarettes a day.

    Time frame: Within 1 month before study enrollment.

  23. Day-care visit

    When child is in day care at least one day a week.

    Time frame: From birth until study enrollment. Average age of the participants is expected to be 8 years old.

  24. Educational level of the parents

    Highest level of graduation of the parents.

    Time frame: From birth until study enrollment. Average age of the participants is expected to be 8 years old.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Leiden University Medical Center
    Leiden, 2333 ZA, Netherlands
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Dreyfus M, Kaplan C, Verdy E, Schlegel N, Durand-Zaleski I, Tchernia G. Frequency of immune thrombocytopenia in newborns: a prospective study. Immune Thrombocytopenia Working Group. Blood. 1997 Jun 15;89(12):4402-6. PubMed 9192764 ↗
  • Williamson LM, Hackett G, Rennie J, Palmer CR, Maciver C, Hadfield R, Hughes D, Jobson S, Ouwehand WH. The natural history of fetomaternal alloimmunization to the platelet-specific antigen HPA-1a (PlA1, Zwa) as determined by antenatal screening. Blood. 1998 Oct 1;92(7):2280-7. PubMed 9746765 ↗
  • Winkelhorst D, Kamphuis MM, Steggerda SJ, Rijken M, Oepkes D, Lopriore E, van Klink JMM. Perinatal Outcome and Long-Term Neurodevelopment after Intracranial Haemorrhage due to Fetal and Neonatal Alloimmune Thrombocytopenia. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2019;45(3):184-191. doi: 10.1159/000488280. Epub 2018 May 4. PubMed 29730660 ↗
  • Bussel JB, Berkowitz RL, Lynch L, Lesser ML, Paidas MJ, Huang CL, McFarland JG. Antenatal management of alloimmune thrombocytopenia with intravenous gamma-globulin: a randomized trial of the addition of low-dose steroid to intravenous gamma-globulin. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 May;174(5):1414-23. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70582-3. PubMed 9065105 ↗
  • Winkelhorst D, Murphy MF, Greinacher A, Shehata N, Bakchoul T, Massey E, Baker J, Lieberman L, Tanael S, Hume H, Arnold DM, Baidya S, Bertrand G, Bussel J, Kjaer M, Kaplan C, Kjeldsen-Kragh J, Oepkes D, Ryan G. Antenatal management in fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: a systematic review. Blood. 2017 Mar 16;129(11):1538-1547. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-10-739656. Epub 2017 Jan 27. PubMed 28130210 ↗
  • Ward MJ, Pauliny J, Lipper EG, Bussel JB. Long-term effects of fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia and its antenatal treatment on the medical and developmental outcomes of affected children. Am J Perinatol. 2006 Nov;23(8):487-92. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-954958. Epub 2006 Nov 8. PubMed 17094038 ↗
  • Radder CM, de Haan MJ, Brand A, Stoelhorst GM, Veen S, Kanhai HH. Follow up of children after antenatal treatment for alloimmune thrombocytopenia. Early Hum Dev. 2004 Oct;80(1):65-76. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2004.05.007. PubMed 15363839 ↗
  • Yougbare I, Lang S, Yang H, Chen P, Zhao X, Tai WS, Zdravic D, Vadasz B, Li C, Piran S, Marshall A, Zhu G, Tiller H, Killie MK, Boyd S, Leong-Poi H, Wen XY, Skogen B, Adamson SL, Freedman J, Ni H. Maternal anti-platelet beta3 integrins impair angiogenesis and cause intracranial hemorrhage. J Clin Invest. 2015 Apr;125(4):1545-56. doi: 10.1172/JCI77820. Epub 2015 Mar 16. PubMed 25774504 ↗
  • van Gils JM, Stutterheim J, van Duijn TJ, Zwaginga JJ, Porcelijn L, de Haas M, Hordijk PL. HPA-1a alloantibodies reduce endothelial cell spreading and monolayer integrity. Mol Immunol. 2009 Jan;46(3):406-15. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2008.10.015. Epub 2008 Nov 26. PubMed 19038456 ↗
  • Tiller H, Kamphuis MM, Flodmark O, Papadogiannakis N, David AL, Sainio S, Koskinen S, Javela K, Wikman AT, Kekomaki R, Kanhai HH, Oepkes D, Husebekk A, Westgren M. Fetal intracranial haemorrhages caused by fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: an observational cohort study of 43 cases from an international multicentre registry. BMJ Open. 2013 Mar 22;3(3):e002490. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002490. PubMed 23524102 ↗
  • Janssen J, V.N., Engelen R, et al., Wetenschappelijke verantwoording van de toetsen LOVS rekenen-wiskunde voor groep 3 tot en met 8. [Scientific justification of the mathematics test for grade 1 until grade 6]. 2010, Cito: Arnhem.
  • Mols A, K.F., Wetenschappelijke verantwoording van de toetsen Spelling nietwerkwoorden voor groep 7 en 8. [Scientific justification of the spelling test for grade 5 and 6]. . 2010, Cito: Arnhem.
  • Weekers A, G.I., Kleintjes F, et al., Wetenschappelijke verantwoording papieren toetsen Begrijpend lezen voor groep 7 en 8. [Scientific justification of the reading comprehension test for grade 5 and 6]. 2011, Cito: Arnhem.
  • Gilijns P, V.L., Het CITO leerlingvolgsysteem: Met het oog op de praktijk [The CITO pupil monitoring system: focus on practice]. Pedagogische Studiën 1992. 86:291-6.
  • Touwen BC, Hempel MS, Westra LC. The development of crawling between 18 months and four years. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1992 May;34(5):410-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1992.tb11453.x. PubMed 1592193 ↗
  • Bayley, N., Bayley scales of infant and toddler development-Third edition. 2006: San Antonio, TX: Pearson Education, Inc.
  • Wechsler, D., Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence - Third Edition (WPPSI-III-NL). 2002: TX, The Psychological Corporation.
  • Wechsler, D., Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (5th ed.). 2014a, San Antonio, TX: NCS Pearson
  • Verhulst, F.C., J. van der Ende, and H.M. Koot,, Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL)/4-18 manual. 1996: Rotterdam: Afdeling Kinder- en Jeugdpsychiatrie, Sophia Kinderziekenhuis/Academisch Ziekenhuis Rotterdam/ Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam.
  • Varni JW, Seid M, Kurtin PS. PedsQL 4.0: reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations. Med Care. 2001 Aug;39(8):800-12. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200108000-00006. PubMed 11468499 ↗
  • Emons JA, Flokstra BM, de Jong C, van der Molen T, Brand HK, Arends NJ, Amaral R, Fonseca JA, Gerth van Wijk R. Use of the Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test (CARATkids) in children and adolescents: Validation in Dutch. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2017 Mar;28(2):185-190. doi: 10.1111/pai.12678. Epub 2016 Dec 23. PubMed 27801950 ↗
  • Driessen, G.J., Richtlijn diagnostiek naar onderliggende aandoeningen bij kinderen met recidiverende luchtweginfecties. 2016.
  • Foundation, J.M. 10 Warning signs of primary immunodeficiency. 2016 [cited 2019 31-05].
  • UNESCO, Institute for Statistics. International standard classification of education: ISCED 2011. 2012, UNESCO Institute for Statistics, : Montreal.
  • Brown MA, Lindheimer MD, de Swiet M, Van Assche A, Moutquin JM. The classification and diagnosis of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: statement from the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP). Hypertens Pregnancy. 2001;20(1):IX-XIV. doi: 10.1081/PRG-100104165. No abstract available. PubMed 12044323 ↗
  • Winkelhorst D, Oepkes D, Lopriore E. Fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: evidence based antenatal and postnatal management strategies. Expert Rev Hematol. 2017 Aug;10(8):729-737. doi: 10.1080/17474086.2017.1346471. Epub 2017 Jun 29. PubMed 28644735 ↗
  • Volpe JJ. Intraventricular hemorrhage and brain injury in the premature infant. Diagnosis, prognosis, and prevention. Clin Perinatol. 1989 Jun;16(2):387-411. PubMed 2663308 ↗
  • Fonseca JA, Nogueira-Silva L, Morais-Almeida M, Azevedo L, Sa-Sousa A, Branco-Ferreira M, Fernandes L, Bousquet J. Validation of a questionnaire (CARAT10) to assess rhinitis and asthma in patients with asthma. Allergy. 2010 Aug;65(8):1042-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.02310.x. Epub 2010 Feb 1. PubMed 20121755 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Sep 20, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — In principle we do not share individual participant data with other researchers. If there is a request on sharing data this request is first submitted to the project leader (J.M.M. van Klink) or the principal investigators (E. Lopriore or M. de Haas). If they agree upon sharing data this request will be sent to the scientific committee of the Department of Pediatrics. If the project leader or scientific committees give permission for access to the data, the request is sent to a the METC of the LUMC. The METC will evaluate whether the purpose of reuse is in line with the informed consent.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 27, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04529382
Lead sponsor
Leiden University Medical Center
Collaborators
Sanquin-LUMC J.J van Rood Center for Clinical Transfusion Research
Responsible party
elopriore (Prof. E. Lopriore, Leiden University Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 27, 2020
Start date
Dec 17, 2019
Primary completion
Dec 17, 2020 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 17, 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 27, 2020

Study contacts

Enrico Lopriore, Prof. MD PhD
principal investigator · Department of Neonatology, Leiden University Medical Center
Masja de Haas, Prof. MD PhD
principal investigator · Stichting Sanquin Bloedvoorziening

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Aug 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion