CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04509895Updated Apr 16, 2024

Minimally Invasive Calcaneal Fracture Fixation vs Standard Lateral Approach

An interventional study of Lateral extensile approach in calcaneal fractures fixation and Minimally invasive sinus tarsi approach in calcaneal fractures fixation in Calcaneus Fracture, sponsored by Assiut University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-16.

Sponsored by Assiut University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
225
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

a comparison between the standard lateral extensile approach and minimally invasive sinus tarsi approach in this research.

Read the detailed description

Calcaneal fracture occurred in about 2% of patients; they represented almost 60% of all tarsal fractures.

Calcaneal fractures are caused by high velocity Force to the heel, mostly vehicle accident or fall from height. There are many factors affect the fracture pattern: age of the patient, weight , type of fall . Male patients predominated (75%) and younger than 50 years. In most cases, these fractures are bilateral and conjoined with lumbar spine fractures.

According to the result of computed tomography (CT) scanning. The calcaneal fractures can be classified into 4 categories, among which the SANDERS TYPE Ⅱ and Ⅲ fractures are the most common types.2 Thus the development of effective and safe treatment strategies for these two fracture types has always been an issue among orthopedic surgeons.

The treatment of intra-articular calcaneal fractures has always been controversial. Currently open reduction and internal fixation through L-Shape extensile incision has been considered as the gold standard surgical therapy for calcaneal fractures. This approach provide a large view to expose the fracture, allowing accurate reduction of the deformed posterior facet and convenient placement of the plate to achieve stable fixation. Postoperatively, plaster cast is worn for 2 weeks, walking with the crutches for additional 8-12 weeks is prescribed, and return to work is achieved after 6-9 months. However, the high incidence (approximately 30%) of complications associated with this approach, including wound dehiscence and deep infection , remain a non-negligible problem .

To lower the wound complications , a minimally invasive approaches has been introduced such as percutaneously applied distraction systems K-wires or screw fixation of intra-articular fractures , the use of elizarov device , percutaneous arthroscopy assisted osteosynthesis and Sinus Tarsi approaches . The sinus tarsi approach has become one of the most frequently applied minimally invasive approaches because of its ability to provide adequate exposure for the posterior facet, the anterolateral fragment and the lateral wall. Wound complication rate with this approach have been reported to range from 0% to 15.4% . Nevertheless, the poor visualization of the lateral wall of the calcaneus through this small incision makes it difficult to insert the conventional plate for obtaining a stable fixation. Thus, the development of a plate that is adaptable to the anatomic characteristics of the calcaneus and sinus tarsi approach is important.

02

Conditions studied

  • Calcaneus Fracture

Browse trials for

03

In context

Fractures, Bone

2,261 studies on the registry are indexed under Fractures, Bone; 325 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 225 is above the median of 69 across 1,482 interventional studies indexed under Fractures, Bone.

Browse Fractures, Bone studies →

Lead sponsor

Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 4,916 studies on the registry; 2,113 are open to participants now.

Of its 13 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  1. patients with calcaneal fractures according to Sanders classification, are Sanders type II or type III.
  2. closed calcaneal fractures

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1)patients with calcaneal fractures classification according to sanders classification , are sanders type I or IV 2)patients who have systemic comorbidity as( cardic ,diabetec ,cirrhotic patients, etc.) or smokers or local lesion as (blisters,vasculopathy , swelling etc.).
  1. open calcaneal fractures.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
225 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    lateral extensile approach in calcaneal fractures fixation

    Lateral extensile approach is the standard approach for intra-articular calcaneal fractures .

    Procedure: Lateral extensile approach in calcaneal fractures fixation

  • Experimental
    minimally invasive sinus tarsi approach in calc.fixation

    Sinus tarsi approach become one of the most frequently applied minimally invasive approaches.

    Procedure: Minimally invasive sinus tarsi approach in calcaneal fractures fixation

Interventions

  • ProcedureLateral extensile approach in calcaneal fractures fixation

    The standard extended lateral approach with L-shaped incision was made in this group, which originated vertically from 5 cm over lateral malleolus or the midpoint between the fibula and Achilles tendon and ended on the base of the fifth metatarsal . The incision is made directly to the bone at the corner to create a full-thickness flap. Attention must be paid to protect the sural nerve and peroneal tendons as well.

  • ProcedureMinimally invasive sinus tarsi approach in calcaneal fractures fixation

    An incision is made from the tip of the lateral malleolus toward the base of the fourth metatarsal bone. The incision lies in a plane between the superficial peroneal nerve and the sural nerve. Care is taken to bluntly dissect after the skin incision to protect the sural nerve or branches of the superficial peroneal nerve. By mobilizing the sinus tarsi fat pad dorsally, the incision was deepened. The extensor digitorum brevis muscle is sharply elevated off of the anterior process with the lateral root of the inferior extensor retinaculum and reflected dorsally and distally. The peroneus brevis and peroneus longus tendons are split, allowing exposure to the sinus tarsi and visualization of the posterior facet of the subtalar joint.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. AOFAS( American association of foot and ankle score )for hind foot

    american association foot and ankle score

    Time frame: baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time needed before full weight bearing ( from 3 to 6 month )

    the time the patient take for full weight bearing , usually take from 3 to 6 months in each arm

    Time frame: baseline

  2. Radiological bohler angle

    restoration of bohler of hind foot

    Time frame: baseline

  3. Wound complications

    wound dehiscence, infection, etc

    Time frame: baseline

  4. Radiological gissane angle

    Restoration of gissane angle of hind foot

    Time frame: Baseline

  5. Union rate

    the percentage of union in each arm

    Time frame: baseline

07

Study locations

1 site
  • AssiutU
    Assiut, Egypt
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sanders R, Fortin P, DiPasquale T, Walling A. Operative treatment in 120 displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures. Results using a prognostic computed tomography scan classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993 May;(290):87-95. PubMed 8472475 ↗
  • Cohen Z, Volpin G, Shtarker H. Surgical treatment of displaced calcaneal fractures Europian Instructional lectures, EFORT, 2011; 11: 199-214.
  • Sanders RW, Clare MP. Fractures of the calcaneus in the Surgery of the Foot and Ankle, Coughlin MJ, Mann RA, Saltzman CL. (eds), Mosby Elsevier 8th ed. 2007; 2017-2073.
  • Mitchell MJ, McKinley JC, Robinson CM. The epidemiology of calcaneal fractures. Foot (Edinb). 2009 Dec;19(4):197-200. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2009.05.001. PubMed 20307476 ↗
  • Cao L, Weng W, Song S, Mao N, Li H, Cai Y, Zhou Q Jr, Su J. Surgical treatment of calcaneal fractures of Sanders type II and III by a minimally invasive technique using a locking plate. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015 Jan-Feb;54(1):76-81. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2014.09.003. Epub 2014 Oct 18. PubMed 25441282 ↗
  • Backes M, Schepers T, Beerekamp MS, Luitse JS, Goslings JC, Schep NW. Wound infections following open reduction and internal fixation of calcaneal fractures with an extended lateral approach. Int Orthop. 2014 Apr;38(4):767-73. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2181-1. Epub 2013 Nov 27. PubMed 24281853 ↗
  • Yeo JH, Cho HJ, Lee KB. Comparison of two surgical approaches for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures: sinus tarsi versus extensile lateral approach. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Mar 19;16:63. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0519-0. PubMed 25886471 ↗
  • Xia S, Lu Y, Wang H, Wu Z, Wang Z. Open reduction and internal fixation with conventional plate via L-shaped lateral approach versus internal fixation with percutaneous plate via a sinus tarsi approach for calcaneal fractures - a randomized controlled trial. Int J Surg. 2014;12(5):475-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Mar 5. PubMed 24607889 ↗
  • Xia S, Wang X, Lu Y, Wang H, Wu Z, Wang Z. A minimally invasive sinus tarsi approach with percutaneous plate and screw fixation for intra-articular calcaneal fractures. Int J Surg. 2013;11(10):1087-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.09.017. Epub 2013 Oct 5. PubMed 24103451 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 16, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04509895
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Responsible party
peter mamdouh shehata (Resident doctor, Assiut University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 12, 2020
Start date
Oct 1, 2021
Primary completion
Feb 1, 2024
Completion
Mar 1, 2024
Last update
Apr 16, 2024

Study contacts

wael Y Eladly, professor
study chair · Assiut University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion