CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04507425Updated Nov 21, 2023

High Flow Nasal Cannula With Noninvasive Ventilation

An interventional study of Standard of Care - Nasal Cannula and High-flow nasal cannula in Acute Respiratory Failure, sponsored by University of Oklahoma. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-21.

Sponsored by University of Oklahoma · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
6
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a prospective, randomized, unblinded trial of trauma patients in the ICU who are identified as being at a high risk to develop acute respiratory failure.

We hope that this study will help the study team to identify how best to use a more aggressive respiratory treatment strategy in a high risk trauma population (thoracic trauma or trauma patients requiring thoracic surgery, spine surgery, or open abdominal procedures) to try and decrease the need for intubation with mechanical ventilation.

Read the detailed description

All patients consented will be randomly assigned into one of three groups: nasal cannula (control group, our current standard of care), high-flow nasal cannula, high-flow nasal cannula plus noninvasive ventilation.

After obtaining consent, patient will be randomized to interventions 1:1:1 within each of two groups: patients admitted to the ICU without being intubated OR intubated patients undergoing an extubation.

Randomization will be managed through RedCap. After consent, the treating clinician will log into RedCap to obtain the patient's treating assignment.

The primary outcome of interest is failure of conservative ventilation intervention in prevention of initial intubation or prevention of reintubation.

A chart review of all enrolled patients will be done quarterly to assess morbidity, mortality, and outcomes.

No placebo will be used as all qualifying patients will be placed on nasal cannula, high-flow nasal cannula, or high-flow nasal cannula plus noninvasive ventilation. All other treatments will be standard of care.

Participants in the study will continue until the patient is discharged from the trauma ICU.

The study will end when the last person enrolled has been discharged from the trauma ICU. If patient's participation ends prematurely, available data will be entered into the database and evaluated appropriately.

This study will take place at the OU Medical Center (OUMC) among patients admitted to the Trauma Intensive Care Unit.

Consent for study enrollment will take place at OUMC during discussion with physician providing trauma care and the patient, family member, or next of kin consenting for the study.

The following data will be collected and recorded: Supplemental oxygen requirements, Date/Time of arrival, Date/Time of Admission to ICU, Date/Time of intubation procedure, Date/Time of extubation, Ventilator settings, Duration of intubation, Comorbidities, PaCO2 values, PaO2 values, Vital signs at arrival and at admission to ICU, Age,Gender, Weight, Height, BMI, Traumatic injuries, Diagnosis, Past medical history/medical co-morbidities, Glasgow coma scale, Oxygen saturation, Negative inspiratory force score, Rapid shallow breathing index score, Pulmonary treatments, including an intolerance to therapy, Injury Severity Score (ISS) and/or Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS).

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Respiratory Failure

Keywords

  • acute respiratory failure
  • mechanical ventilation
03

In context

Respiratory Insufficiency

1,650 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Insufficiency; 296 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 6 is below the median of 55 across 1,043 interventional studies indexed under Respiratory Insufficiency.

Browse Respiratory Insufficiency studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Oklahoma is the lead sponsor of 424 studies on the registry; 99 are open to participants now.

Of its 42 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 16 (38%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adults at least 18 years of age
  2. Admission to an intensive care unit by the trauma surgery service
  3. Trauma patients receiving any respiratory therapies
  4. High risk patients, including intubation, post-operative, chronic cardiac or pulmonary comorbidities
  5. Thoracic injuries, including rib fractures, sternal fractures, spinal fractures, pulmonary contusions, pneumothorax, hemothorax, diaphragm injury
  6. Postoperative from thoracic surgery
  7. Postoperative from spine surgery in patients without spinal cord injury
  8. Abdominal injuries requiring open abdominal surgery
  9. No contraindications to using high flow nasal cannula or noninvasive ventilation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Contraindication to using high flow nasal cannula or noninvasive ventilation
  2. Intolerance of pulmonary therapies
  3. No one able to give informed consent
  4. Long-term treatment with noninvasive ventilation prior to hospital admission
  5. "Do not intubate" order at time of extubation
  6. Unplanned extubation (accidental or self-extubation)
  7. Age \< 18 years of age
  8. Traumatic brain injury with GCS \< 8
  9. Spinal cord injury
  10. Chronic neuromuscular disease
  11. Sinus precautions due to facial/sinus fractures
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
6 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Not Intubated

    Patients admitted with a trauma injury who do not need to be intubated to receive treatment. Intubated means putting a tube down your throat to keep your airway from collapsing. Participants will be randomized to receive one of the three interventions in this arm.

    Other: Standard of Care - Nasal Cannula · Other: High-flow nasal cannula · Other: HFNC plus non-invasive ventilation

  • Active comparator
    Intubated Patients Undergoing Extubation

    Patients admitted with a trauma injury who had to be intubated for treatment of their injury. Interventions administered after the tube is extubated (removed from throat). Participants will be randomized to receive one of the three interventions in this arm.

    Other: Standard of Care - Nasal Cannula · Other: High-flow nasal cannula · Other: HFNC plus non-invasive ventilation

Interventions

  • OtherStandard of Care - Nasal Cannula

    Standard of care. Flexible tube to provide extra oxygen when patients need a little help, but are not in respiratory distress.

  • OtherHigh-flow nasal cannula

    Same as nasal cannula, except the oxygen is heated or humidified and the flow is stronger, pushing air into the lungs to help keep the airway open.

    Also known as: HFNC

  • OtherHFNC plus non-invasive ventilation

    This method uses HFNC as described above and adds noninvasive ventilation which is similar to CPAP machine and uses a mask rather than having to intubate (putting a tube down your throat to keep your airway from collapsing).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. failure rates-nonintubated patients

    Among injured patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) without being intubated, do failure rates within the first 48 hours of ICU admission differ with respect to type of initial respiratory intervention: nasal cannula, high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), or HFNC plus non-invasive ventilation (BiPAP). Failure is defined as escalation to intubation.

    Time frame: first 48 hours

  2. failure rates-intubated patients

    Among injured patients arriving intubated or who undergo intervention after hospital arrival, do failure rates within the first 48 hours after extubation differ with respect to type of initial respiratory intervention: nasal cannula, high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), or HFNC plus non-invasive ventilation (BiPAP). Failure is defined as requiring reintubation.

    Time frame: first 48 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mortality

    Assess mortality of enrolled patients by quarterly retrospective chart reviews.

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

  2. Length of hospital stay

    Compare length of hospitalization between groups

    Time frame: up to 60 days

  3. Length of ICU stay

    Compare length of ICU stay between groups

    Time frame: up to 30 days

  4. Discharge location

    was patient discharged to home, rehabilitation facility, skilled nursing, death; compare between groups

    Time frame: up to 60 days

  5. Complications

    Compare complications (such as need to be mechanically ventilated, infections, etc.) between groups

    Time frame: up to 2 years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • OU Medical Center
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Thille AW, Boissier F, Ben-Ghezala H, Razazi K, Mekontso-Dessap A, Brun-Buisson C, Brochard L. Easily identified at-risk patients for extubation failure may benefit from noninvasive ventilation: a prospective before-after study. Crit Care. 2016 Feb 26;20:48. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1228-2. PubMed 26926168 ↗
  • Thille AW, Muller G, Gacouin A, Coudroy R, Decavele M, Sonneville R, Beloncle F, Girault C, Dangers L, Lautrette A, Cabasson S, Rouze A, Vivier E, Le Meur A, Ricard JD, Razazi K, Barberet G, Lebert C, Ehrmann S, Sabatier C, Bourenne J, Pradel G, Bailly P, Terzi N, Dellamonica J, Lacave G, Danin PE, Nanadoumgar H, Gibelin A, Zanre L, Deye N, Demoule A, Maamar A, Nay MA, Robert R, Ragot S, Frat JP; HIGH-WEAN Study Group and the REVA Research Network. Effect of Postextubation High-Flow Nasal Oxygen With Noninvasive Ventilation vs High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Alone on Reintubation Among Patients at High Risk of Extubation Failure: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019 Oct 15;322(15):1465-1475. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.14901. Erratum In: JAMA. 2020 Feb 25;323(8):793. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0373. PubMed 31577036 ↗
  • Xu Z, Li Y, Zhou J, Li X, Huang Y, Liu X, Burns KEA, Zhong N, Zhang H. High-flow nasal cannula in adults with acute respiratory failure and after extubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Respir Res. 2018 Oct 16;19(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12931-018-0908-7. PubMed 30326893 ↗
  • Honrubia T, Garcia Lopez FJ, Franco N, Mas M, Guevara M, Daguerre M, Alia I, Algora A, Galdos P. Noninvasive vs conventional mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory failure: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Chest. 2005 Dec;128(6):3916-24. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.6.3916. PubMed 16354864 ↗
  • Halub ME, Spilman SK, Gaunt KA, Lamb KD, Jackson JA, Oetting TW, Sahr SM. High-flow nasal cannula therapy for patients with blunt thoracic injury: A retrospective study. Can J Respir Ther. 2016 Fall;52(4):110-113. Epub 2016 Nov 1. PubMed 30996619 ↗
  • Gaunt KA, Spilman SK, Halub ME, Jackson JA, Lamb KD, Sahr SM. High-Flow Nasal Cannula in a Mixed Adult ICU. Respir Care. 2015 Oct;60(10):1383-9. doi: 10.4187/respcare.04016. Epub 2015 Jun 9. PubMed 26060320 ↗
  • Lamb KD, Spilman SK, Oetting TW, Jackson JA, Trump MW, Sahr SM. Proactive Use of High-Flow Nasal Cannula With Critically Ill Subjects. Respir Care. 2018 Mar;63(3):259-266. doi: 10.4187/respcare.05793. Epub 2017 Dec 5. PubMed 29208754 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 21, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04507425
Lead sponsor
University of Oklahoma
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 11, 2020
Start date
Sep 1, 2020
Primary completion
Jul 10, 2023
Completion
Jul 10, 2023
Last update
Nov 21, 2023

Study contacts

Celia Y Quang, MD
principal investigator · University of Oklahoma

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion