ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04501679Updated Jul 10, 2024Results posted

A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Nemolizumab (CD14152) in Participants With Prurigo Nodularis (PN)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Nemolizumab and Placebo in Prurigo Nodularis, sponsored by Galderma R&D. Completed at 74 sites in 9 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-10.

Sponsored by Galderma R&D (part of Galderma Group AG) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
274
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective was to assess the efficacy of nemolizumab (CD14152) compared to placebo in participants greater than or equal to (>=) 18 years of age with prurigo nodularis (PN) after a 16-week treatment period.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prurigo Nodularis

Keywords

  • Prurigo
  • Neurodermatitis
  • Pruritus
  • Skin diseases
03

In context

Prurigo

38 studies on the registry are indexed under Prurigo; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 274 is above the median of 135 across 31 interventional studies indexed under Prurigo.

Browse Prurigo studies →

Lead sponsor

Galderma R&D is the lead sponsor of 284 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Of its 60 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 55 (92%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical diagnosis of PN for at least 6 months with: Pruriginous nodular lesions on upper limbs, trunk, and/or lower limbs, at least 20 nodules on the entire body with a bilateral distribution and Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score more than equal to (>=) 3 (based on the IGA scale ranging from 0 to 4, in which 3 was moderate and 4 is severe) at both the screening and baseline visits
  • Severe pruritus was defined as follows on the PP NRS:

    1. At the screening visit (Visit 1): PP NRS score was >= 7.0 for the 24-hour period immediately preceding the screening visit.
    2. At the baseline visit (Visit 2): Mean of the daily intensity of the PP NRS score was >= 7.0 over the previous week
  • Female participants of (that is [i.e,], fertile, following menarche and until becoming unless permanently sterile) must agree to use at least 1 adequate and approved method of throughout the study and for 12 weeks after the last study drug injection

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Body weight less than \< 30 kg
  • Chronic pruritus resulting from another active condition other than PN, such as but not limited to scabies, lichen simplex chronicus, psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, acne, folliculitis, lichen planus, habitual picking/excoriation disorder, sporotrichosis, bullous disease, end-stage renal disease, or cholestatic liver disease (example [eg] primary biliary cirrhosis) or diabetes mellitus or thyroid disease that is not adequately treated, as per standard of care
  • Unilateral lesions of prurigo (eg, only one arm affected)
  • History of or current confounding skin condition (eg, Netherton syndrome, cutaneous T-cell lymphoma [mycosis fungoides or Sezary syndrome], chronic actinic dermatitis, dermatitis herpetiformis)
  • Participants with a current medical history of and/or chronic bronchitis
  • Neuropathic and psychogenic pruritus such as but not limited to notalgia paresthetica, brachioradial pruritus, small fiber neuropathy, skin picking syndrome, or delusional parasitosis
  • Requiring rescue therapy for PN during the screening period or expected to require rescue therapy within 4 weeks following the baseline visit
  • Positive serology results ( surface antigen [HBsAg] or hepatitis B core antibody [HBcAb], (HCV) antibody with positive confirmatory test for HCV (eg, polymerase chain reaction [PCR]), or antibody) at the screening visit
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(8)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
274 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Nemolizumab

    Participants weighing less than (\<) 90 kilogram (kg) received two subcutaneous (SC) injections of 30 milligrams (mg) nemolizumab (60 mg loading dose) at baseline then one SC injection once for every 4 weeks (Q4W). Participants weighing greater than or equal to (\>=) 90 kg received two SC injections of 30 mg nemolizumab (60 mg total) at baseline (no loading dose) and two SC injections Q4W throughout the treatment period of 16 weeks.

    Drug: Nemolizumab

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Participants weighing \< 90 kg received two SC injections of matching placebo at baseline, then one SC injection Q4W. Participants weighing \>= 90 kg received two SC injections of matching placebo at baseline, then two SC injections Q4W throughout the treatment period of 16 weeks.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • Participants received either 30 mg or 60 mg dose of nemolizumab as SC injection.

    Also known as: CD14152

  • DrugPlacebo

    Participants received matching placebo as SC injection.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With an Improvement of Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 4 From Baseline in Weekly Average Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PP NRS) at Week 16

    The Peak Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. For maximum itch intensity: the scores were provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Weekly values are calculated as average of 7 consecutive days data up to the target study day (excluding) and set to missing, if less than 4 days data are available. Analysis window extension was applied to both timepoints, as described in the SAP. If a subject received any rescue therapy, the data at/after receipt of rescue therapy are considered as non-responders. Subjects with missing results are considered as non-responders.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

  2. Number of Participants With an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Success at Week 16

    IGA success is defined as clear (0) or almost clear (1), and a reduction from baseline of greater than or equal to 2 points at week 16. Full scale is scored from 0-4, higher score indicates more severe symptoms. If a subject received any rescue therapy, the data at/after receipt of rescue therapy are considered as non-responders. Subjects with missing results are considered as non-responders.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With an Improvement of >= 4 From Baseline in Weekly Average PP NRS at Week 4

    The Peak Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. For maximum itch intensity: the scores were provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Weekly values are calculated as average of 7 consecutive days data up to the target study day (excluding) and set to missing, if less than 4 days data are available. Analysis window extension was applied to baseline, as described in the SAP. If a subject received any rescue therapy, the data at/after receipt of rescue therapy are considered as non-responders. Subjects with missing results are considered as non-responders.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

  2. Number of Participants With PP NRS < 2 at Week 16

    The Peak Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. For maximum itch intensity: the scores were provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Weekly values are calculated as average of 7 consecutive days data up to the target study day (excluding) and set to missing, if less than 4 days data are available. Analysis window extension was applied to week 16, as described in the SAP. If a subject received any rescue therapy, the data at/after receipt of rescue therapy are considered as non-responders. Subjects with missing results are considered as non-responders.

    Time frame: Week 16

  3. Number of Participants With an Improvement of >=4 From Baseline in Sleep Disturbance Numeric Rating Scale (SD NRS) at Week 16

    The SD NRS is a scale to be used by the participants to report the degree of their sleep loss related to PN. The baseline SD NRS was determined based on the average of daily SD NRS (score ranging from 0 to 10) during the 7 days up to the treatment start (including until treatment start time) (rounding to nearest whole number is not permitted). A minimum of 4 daily scores out of the 7 days up to baseline study day is required for this calculation. On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no sleep loss related to the symptoms of my skin disease (prurigo nodularis)' and 10 being 'I did not sleep at all due to the symptoms of prurigo nodularis'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Analysis window extension was applied to both timepoints, as described in the SAP. If a subject received any rescue therapy, the data at/after receipt of rescue therapy are considered as non-responders. Subjects with missing results are considered as non-responders.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

  4. Number of Participants With an Improvement of >=4 From Baseline in SD NRS at Week 4

    The SD NRS is a scale to be used by the participants to report the degree of their sleep loss related to PN. The baseline SD NRS was determined based on the average of daily SD NRS (score ranging from 0 to10) during the 7 days up to the treatment start (including until treatment start time) (rounding to nearest whole number is not permitted). A minimum of 4 daily scores out of the 7 days up to baseline study day is required for this calculation. On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no sleep loss related to the symptoms of my skin disease (prurigo nodularis)' and 10 being 'I did not sleep at all due to the symptoms of prurigo nodularis'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Analysis window extension was applied to baseline, as described in the SAP. If a subject received any rescue therapy, the data at/after receipt of rescue therapy are considered as non-responders. Subjects with missing results are considered as non-responders.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

  5. Number of Participants With PP NRS < 2 at Week 4

    The Peak Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. For maximum itch intensity: the scores were provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Weekly values are calculated as average of 7 consecutive days data up to the target study day (excluding) and set to missing, if less than 4 days data are available. If a subject received any rescue therapy, the data at/after receipt of rescue therapy are considered as non-responders. Subjects with missing results are considered as non-responders.

    Time frame: Week 4

  6. Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs), and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    AE defined as any untoward medical occurrence in clinical study participant administered a medicinal product which does not necessarily have causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs defined as AEs occurring after first administration of study drug until the last study visit. SAE was any untoward medical occurrence, in view of either Investigator or Sponsor, that resulted in death, was life-threatening, resulted in inpatient hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalisation, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was congenital anomaly/birth defect or was important medical event. AESI was noteworthy TEAE for study drug that was to be monitored closely and reported promptly. Relatedness to study drug was based on Investigator's discretion. Analysis was performed on safety population which included all randomised participants who received at least 1 administration of study drug.

    Time frame: From baseline up to end of treatment period (16 Weeks)

07

Results

Posted Jul 10, 2024

Participant flow

The study was conducted at 55 sites in 9 countries.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneNemolizumabPlacebo
Started18391
Treated18391
Completed17488
Not completed93
Withdrew: Pregnancy01
Withdrew: Adverse event42
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject20
Withdrew: Physician decision10
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up20

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With an Improvement of Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 4 From Baseline in Weekly Average Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PP NRS) at Week 16

The Peak Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. For maximum itch intensity: the scores were provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Weekly values are calculated as average of 7 consecutive days data up to the target study day (excluding) and set to missing, if less than 4 days data are available. Analysis window extension was applied to both timepoints, as described in the SAP. If a subject received any rescue therapy, the data at/after receipt of rescue therapy are considered as non-responders. Subjects with missing results are considered as non-responders.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With an Improvement of Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 4 From Baseline in Weekly Average Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PP NRS) at Week 16
ParticipantsNemolizumabPlacebo
Number of Participants With an Improvement of Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 4 From Baseline in Weekly Average Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PP NRS) at Week 1610319
Statistical analysis
  • Nemolizumab vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.0001 (A 2-sided p-value was derived from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test using the randomized stratification variables (analysis center and body weight at randomization \[\< 90 kg, \>= 90 kg\]). Threshold of significance at 0.05.) · Strata-adjusted percentage difference: 37.4 · 95% CI 26.3 to 48.5Strata adjusted percentage difference was obtained using weighted average of stratum-specific percentage using CMH.
PrimaryNumber of Participants With an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Success at Week 16

IGA success is defined as clear (0) or almost clear (1), and a reduction from baseline of greater than or equal to 2 points at week 16. Full scale is scored from 0-4, higher score indicates more severe symptoms. If a subject received any rescue therapy, the data at/after receipt of rescue therapy are considered as non-responders. Subjects with missing results are considered as non-responders.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Success at Week 16
ParticipantsNemolizumabPlacebo
Number of Participants With an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Success at Week 166910
Statistical analysis
  • Nemolizumab vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.0001 (A 2-sided p-value was derived from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test using the randomized stratification variables (analysis center and body weight at randomization \[\< 90 kg, \>= 90 kg\]). Threshold of significance at 0.05.) · Strata-adjusted percentage difference: 28.5 · 95% CI 18.8 to 38.2Strata adjusted percentage difference was obtained using weighted average of stratum-specific percentage using CMH.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With an Improvement of >= 4 From Baseline in Weekly Average PP NRS at Week 4

The Peak Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. For maximum itch intensity: the scores were provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Weekly values are calculated as average of 7 consecutive days data up to the target study day (excluding) and set to missing, if less than 4 days data are available. Analysis window extension was applied to baseline, as described in the SAP. If a subject received any rescue therapy, the data at/after receipt of rescue therapy are considered as non-responders. Subjects with missing results are considered as non-responders.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 4
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With an Improvement of >= 4 From Baseline in Weekly Average PP NRS at Week 4
ParticipantsNemolizumabPlacebo
Number of Participants With an Improvement of >= 4 From Baseline in Weekly Average PP NRS at Week 4757
Statistical analysis
  • Nemolizumab vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.0001 (A 2-sided p-value was derived from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test using the randomized stratification variables (analysis center and body weight at randomization \[\< 90 kg, \>= 90 kg\]). Threshold of significance at 0.05.) · Strata-adjusted percentage difference: 33.4 · 95% CI 24.3 to 42.4Strata adjusted percentage difference was obtained using weighted average of stratum-specific percentage using CMH.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With PP NRS < 2 at Week 16

The Peak Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. For maximum itch intensity: the scores were provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Weekly values are calculated as average of 7 consecutive days data up to the target study day (excluding) and set to missing, if less than 4 days data are available. Analysis window extension was applied to week 16, as described in the SAP. If a subject received any rescue therapy, the data at/after receipt of rescue therapy are considered as non-responders. Subjects with missing results are considered as non-responders.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With PP NRS < 2 at Week 16
ParticipantsNemolizumabPlacebo
Number of Participants With PP NRS < 2 at Week 16647
Statistical analysis
  • Nemolizumab vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.0001 (A 2-sided p-value was derived from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test using the randomized stratification variables (analysis center and body weight at randomization \[\< 90 kg, \>= 90 kg\]). Threshold of significance at 0.05.) · Strata-adjusted percentage difference: 30.0 · 95% CI 21.3 to 38.6Strata adjusted percentage difference was obtained using weighted average of stratum-specific percentage using CMH.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With an Improvement of >=4 From Baseline in Sleep Disturbance Numeric Rating Scale (SD NRS) at Week 16

The SD NRS is a scale to be used by the participants to report the degree of their sleep loss related to PN. The baseline SD NRS was determined based on the average of daily SD NRS (score ranging from 0 to 10) during the 7 days up to the treatment start (including until treatment start time) (rounding to nearest whole number is not permitted). A minimum of 4 daily scores out of the 7 days up to baseline study day is required for this calculation. On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no sleep loss related to the symptoms of my skin disease (prurigo nodularis)' and 10 being 'I did not sleep at all due to the symptoms of prurigo nodularis'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Analysis window extension was applied to both timepoints, as described in the SAP. If a subject received any rescue therapy, the data at/after receipt of rescue therapy are considered as non-responders. Subjects with missing results are considered as non-responders.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With an Improvement of >=4 From Baseline in Sleep Disturbance Numeric Rating Scale (SD NRS) at Week 16
ParticipantsNemolizumabPlacebo
Number of Participants With an Improvement of >=4 From Baseline in Sleep Disturbance Numeric Rating Scale (SD NRS) at Week 169519
Statistical analysis
  • Nemolizumab vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.0001 (A 2-sided p-value was derived from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test using the randomized stratification variables (analysis center and body weight at randomization \[\< 90 kg, \>= 90 kg\]). Threshold of significance at 0.05.) · Strata-adjusted percentage difference: 31.9 · 95% CI 20.7 to 43.2Strata adjusted percentage difference was obtained using weighted average of stratum-specific percentage using CMH.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With an Improvement of >=4 From Baseline in SD NRS at Week 4

The SD NRS is a scale to be used by the participants to report the degree of their sleep loss related to PN. The baseline SD NRS was determined based on the average of daily SD NRS (score ranging from 0 to10) during the 7 days up to the treatment start (including until treatment start time) (rounding to nearest whole number is not permitted). A minimum of 4 daily scores out of the 7 days up to baseline study day is required for this calculation. On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no sleep loss related to the symptoms of my skin disease (prurigo nodularis)' and 10 being 'I did not sleep at all due to the symptoms of prurigo nodularis'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Analysis window extension was applied to baseline, as described in the SAP. If a subject received any rescue therapy, the data at/after receipt of rescue therapy are considered as non-responders. Subjects with missing results are considered as non-responders.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 4
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With an Improvement of >=4 From Baseline in SD NRS at Week 4
ParticipantsNemolizumabPlacebo
Number of Participants With an Improvement of >=4 From Baseline in SD NRS at Week 4689
Statistical analysis
  • Nemolizumab vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.0001 (A 2-sided p-value was derived from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test using the randomized stratification variables (analysis center and body weight at randomization \[\< 90 kg, \>= 90 kg\]). Threshold of significance at 0.05.) · Strata-adjusted percentage difference: 27.9 · 95% CI 18.4 to 37.5Strata adjusted percentage difference was obtained using weighted average of stratum-specific percentage using CMH.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With PP NRS < 2 at Week 4

The Peak Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. For maximum itch intensity: the scores were provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Weekly values are calculated as average of 7 consecutive days data up to the target study day (excluding) and set to missing, if less than 4 days data are available. If a subject received any rescue therapy, the data at/after receipt of rescue therapy are considered as non-responders. Subjects with missing results are considered as non-responders.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With PP NRS < 2 at Week 4
ParticipantsNemolizumabPlacebo
Number of Participants With PP NRS < 2 at Week 4362
Statistical analysis
  • Nemolizumab vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.0001 (A 2-sided p-value was derived from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test using the randomized stratification variables (analysis center and body weight at randomization \[\< 90 kg, \>= 90 kg\]). Threshold of significance at 0.05.) · Strata-adjusted percentage difference: 18.8 · 95% CI 12.0 to 25.7Strata adjusted percentage difference was obtained using weighted average of stratum-specific percentage using CMH.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Adverse Events, Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs), and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

AE defined as any untoward medical occurrence in clinical study participant administered a medicinal product which does not necessarily have causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs defined as AEs occurring after first administration of study drug until the last study visit. SAE was any untoward medical occurrence, in view of either Investigator or Sponsor, that resulted in death, was life-threatening, resulted in inpatient hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalisation, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was congenital anomaly/birth defect or was important medical event. AESI was noteworthy TEAE for study drug that was to be monitored closely and reported promptly. Relatedness to study drug was based on Investigator's discretion. Analysis was performed on safety population which included all randomised participants who received at least 1 administration of study drug.

Time frame:
From baseline up to end of treatment period (16 Weeks)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs), and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
ParticipantsNemolizumabPlacebo
Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)11248
Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)219
Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)45

Adverse events

Collected over From baseline up to end of treatment period (16 Weeks). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Nemolizumab0/183 (0%)4/183 (2.2%)29/183 (15.8%)
Placebo0/91 (0%)5/91 (5.5%)13/91 (14.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 12
Most frequent serious events
EventNemolizumabPlacebo
Atrial flutterCardiac disorders0/1831/91
Coronary artery occlusionCardiac disorders0/1831/91
Myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders0/1831/91
AppendicitisInfections and infestations0/1831/91
Postoperative wound infectionInfections and infestations0/1831/91
OsteoarthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/1831/91
Dermatitis exfoliative generalisedSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/1831/91
Supraventricular tachycardiaCardiac disorders1/1830/91
Pneumococcal sepsisInfections and infestations1/1830/91
PneumoniaInfections and infestations1/1830/91
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventNemolizumabPlacebo
NeurodermatitisSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders7/18310/91
HeadacheNervous system disorders12/1834/91
Dermatitis atopicSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders10/1830/91

Baseline characteristics

Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)NemolizumabPlaceboTotal
Mean53.7 ± 14.4150.8 ± 15.0052.7 ± 14.64
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)NemolizumabPlaceboTotal
Female11355168
Male7036106
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)NemolizumabPlaceboTotal
Hispanic or Latino5712
Not Hispanic or Latino17379252
Unknown or Not Reported5510
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)NemolizumabPlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian231437
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander202
Black or African American5712
White14768215
More than one race000
Others527
Unknown or Not Reported101
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)NemolizumabPlaceboTotal
Europe12261183
North America472269
Pacifica14822
08

Study locations

74 sites
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Fountain Valley, California 92708, United States
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    San Diego, California 92123, United States
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Washington, District of Columbia 20037, United States
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Aventura, Florida 33180, United States
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Miami, Florida 33136, United States
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    North Miami Beach, Florida 33162-4708, United States
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Ormond Beach, Florida 32174, United States
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Chicago, Illinois 60602, United States
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46250, United States
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Louisville, Kentucky 40241, United States
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Boston, Massachusetts 02111, United States
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Saint Joseph, Michigan 49085, United States
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    New York, New York 10021, United States
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45627, United States
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Dublin, Ohio 43016, United States
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Anderson, South Carolina 29621, United States
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Murfreesboro, Tennessee 37130, United States
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Dallas, Texas 75230, United States
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Dripping Springs, Texas 78620, United States
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Pflugerville, Texas 78660, United States
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Webster, Texas 77004, United States
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Morgantown, West Virginia 26505, United States
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Brussel, 1200, Belgium
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Ghent, 9000, Belgium
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Jette, 1090, Belgium
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Leuven, 3000, Belgium
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Liège, 4000, Belgium
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    North York, Ontario M2M 4J5, Canada
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Bathurst, M3H 5Y8, Canada
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Calgary, T2G 1B1, Canada
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    London, N6H 5L5, Canada
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Markham, L3P 1X2, Canada
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Bordeaux, 33000, France
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Brest, 29200, France
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Lille, 59037, France
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Nantes, 44093, France
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Nice, 06202, France
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Paris, 75020, France
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Paris, 75475, France
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Pierre-Bénite, 69495, France
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Rouen, 76000, France
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Saint-Étienne, 42055, France
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Toulouse, 31000, France
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Valence, 26953, France
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Gyeonggi-do, 15355, Korea, Republic of
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Seoul, 02841, Korea, Republic of
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Seoul, 03722, Korea, Republic of
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Seoul, 04763, Korea, Republic of
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Seoul, 07441, Korea, Republic of
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Groningen, 9713, Netherlands
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Utrecht, 3508, Netherlands
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Bydgoszcz, 85-065, Poland
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Chorzów, 41-500, Poland
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Kraków, 31-559, Poland
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Lublin, 20-081, Poland
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Olsztyn, 10-229, Poland
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Ostrowiec Świętokrzyski, 27-400, Poland
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Rzeszów, 35-055, Poland
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Szczecin, 71-434, Poland
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Warsaw, 01-518, Poland
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Warsaw, 01-817, Poland
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Warsaw, 02-507, Poland
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Warsaw, 02-758, Poland
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Wrocław, 50-566, Poland
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Wrocław, 51-318, Poland
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Łódź, 90-265, Poland
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Łódź, 90-436, Poland
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Barcelona, 08041, Spain
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Las Palmas De Gran Canaria, 35019, Spain
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Bern, 3010, Switzerland
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Buochs, 6374, Switzerland
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Lausanne, 1011, Switzerland
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Saint Gallen, 9007, Switzerland
  • Galderma Investigational Site
    Weinfelden, 8570, Switzerland
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Kwatra SG, Yosipovitch G, Legat FJ, Reich A, Paul C, Simon D, Naldi L, Lynde C, De Bruin-Weller MS, Nahm WK, Sauder M, Gharib R, Barbarot S, Szepietowski JC, Conrad C, Fleischer A, Laquer VT, Misery L, Serra-Baldrich E, Lapeere H, Ahmad F, Jabbar Lopez ZK, Piketty C, Stander S; OLYMPIA 2 Investigators. Phase 3 Trial of Nemolizumab in Patients with Prurigo Nodularis. N Engl J Med. 2023 Oct 26;389(17):1579-1589. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2301333. PubMed 37888917 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Qualified researchers may request access to anonymized data sets from which results presented are derived.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Analytic code

Time frame: Data availability will begin 6 months after approval of the indication by a regulatory body. Data availability will end 5 years from publication of the primary study results article.

Access criteria: Data will be made available to qualified science and medical researchers upon formal request and submission of research proposal detailing planned analyses. Proposals should be directed to clinical.studies@galderma.com

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Aug 2020 to primary completion in Mar 2022, 19 months.

Results were first posted in Jul 2024, 2 years 3 months after primary completion. A results delay was requested in Mar 2023.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 30, 2020
First posted
Aug 6, 2020
StartActual
Aug 11, 2020
Primary completionActual
Mar 30, 2022
CompletionActual
Mar 31, 2022
Results delay requested
Mar 29, 2023
Results first posted
Jul 10, 2024
Last update
Jul 10, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 10, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04501679
Lead sponsor
Galderma R&D
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 6, 2020
Start date
Aug 11, 2020
Primary completion
Mar 30, 2022
Completion
Mar 31, 2022
Results posted
Jul 10, 2024
Last update
Jul 10, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Nemolizumab

Start the discussion