ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04498026Updated Oct 22, 2026Results posted

Adherus™ Dural Sealant in Spinal Procedures

An interventional study of Adherus Dural Sealant System and DuraSeal Exact Dural Sealant System in Spinal Duraplasty, sponsored by Stryker Craniomaxillofacial. Completed at 14 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-22.

Sponsored by Stryker Craniomaxillofacial (part of Stryker) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 22, 2026Now CompletedResults posted+5 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
94
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to test an experimental device, the Adherus AutoSpray and Adherus AutoSpray ET Dural Sealant, in spinal surgical procedures.

This study is being done to compare Adherus AutoSpray and Adherus AutoSpray ET Dural Sealant to DuraSeal Exact Spinal Sealant, which has already received Federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in spinal procedures.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind, multicenter, pivotal trial that will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Adherus Dural Sealant when used in conjunction with standard methods of dural repair in spinal procedures. This trial uses the commercially available DuraSeal Exact as an active control. The trial is designed to demonstrate non-inferiority of Adherus Dural Sealant to DuraSeal Exact.

Subjects who are undergoing spinal surgery, consent to participate in this trial and experience a durotomy will be considered for study enrollment. Following a two-tiered inclusion/exclusion consideration, subjects will be randomized intraoperatively using a 1:1 randomization ratio. Up to 90 subjects will be randomized to treatment with either Adherus Dural Sealant or DuraSeal Exact with at least 50% of subjects undergoing procedures at lumbar or lumbosacral levels. Up to 30 investigational sites within the United States will participate in this trial.

A primary composite endpoint evaluating safety and effectiveness will be measured within a 90-day required follow-up period post-procedure. Subjects will be followed at discharge or between postoperative days (POD) 1-4 from the index procedure (whichever occurs first) and at 30 days and 90 days post-index procedure.

02

Conditions studied

  • Spinal Duraplasty

Keywords

  • Adherus Dural Sealant
  • Adherus AutoSpray Dural Sealant
  • Dura mater
  • Durotomy
  • CSF leak
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Stryker Craniomaxillofacial is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Subject is ≥ 18 and ≤ 75 years old.
  2. Subject is scheduled for an elective spinal procedure that will require a planned durotomy.
  3. Subject requires a procedure involving a Class I/clean wound (uninfected surgical wound in which no inflammation is encountered).
  4. Subject is able and willing to provide and HIPAA authorization.
  5. Subject is able and willing to meet all study requirements, including attending all post-index procedure assessment visits and radiological tests.

    Intra-Operative Inclusion Criteria:

  6. Subject has durotomy edges that can be re-approximated using the investigator's standard methods of dural repair.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject has hydrocephalus or clinical evidence of altered CSF dynamics.
  2. Subject has a pre-existing external lumbar CSF drain or internal CSF shunt.
  3. Subject has experienced previous CSF leak (secondary to trauma, neoplasm, surgery, or other etiology).
  4. Subject is undergoing a Chiari malformation procedure.
  5. Subject has undergone a previous spinal procedure in the same anatomical location.
  6. Subject has had radiation treatment to the surgical site, or standard fractionated radiation therapy is planned within ten days post indexprocedure.
  7. Subject has spinal metallic implants that may cause significant imaging artifact on the MRI evaluation of the spine.
  8. Subject has metallic implant(s) that are not MRI compatible, e.g., cochlear implant, neurostimulator, stent, surgical clip, cardiac pacemakers, or other non-MRI compatible implants, or an elective implant of such devices is planned during the course of the study. Note: mercury amalgam dental fillings or similar metallic dental prostheses are not an exclusion criterion.
  9. Subject has a known or another condition with anticipated survival shorter than six months.
  10. Subject has undergone chemotherapy treatment, excluding hormonal therapy, within three weeks prior to the planned index procedure, or chemotherapy treatment is planned within two weeks after the index procedure is performed.
  11. Subject has been treated with chronic therapy (defined as regular (daily) administration of steroid agent(s) for ≥ 8 weeks) unless discontinued greater than four weeks prior to the planned index procedure. Note: standard acute perioperative steroids are permitted; administration of steroid agents for \< 8 weeks duration prior to the planned index procedure is permitted.
  12. Subject has received warfarin, heparin, other anticoagulant agents, aspirin or non steroid anti-inflammatory agents on a daily basis and pre-surgical, standard of care drug did not occur.
  13. Subject has a compromised immune system or disease or is on chronic agents at baseline.
  14. Subject has a systemic infection or evidence of any infection near planned operative site.
  15. Subject has a serum creatinine level > 2.0 mg/dL.
  16. Subject has a serum total > 2.5 mg/dL at baseline.
  17. Subject has uncontrolled diabetes as evidenced by an > 7% prior to surgery.
  18. Subject has a known allergy to FD\&C Blue #1 and/or FD\&C Yellow #5 or any of the constituents of the dural sealants.
  19. Subject is pregnant, breast-feeding, or intends to become pregnant during the course of the study.
  20. Subject is participating in a clinical trial of another drug or device and has not completed the required follow-up period.

    Intra-Operative Exclusion Criteria:

  21. Subject has an incidental finding that meets any pre-operative exclusion criterion listed above.
  22. Subject's dural defect cannot be closed with suture and/or duraplasty material.
  23. Subject has a gap > 2 mm present between dural edges, or between the edge of dura and duraplasty material, based on visual estimate by surgeon before application of the surgical sealant.
  24. Subject had undergone laminoplasty decompression.
  25. Subject had undergone a syringomyelia procedure where the shunt is not placed in the subarachnoid position.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(10)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Washout period

A planned gap after a treatment, so that its effects can lessen before the study treatment or a study assessment. Ask the study team and the doctor who prescribed it before changing any medicine.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
94 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Adherus Dural Sealant System

    Device: Adherus Dural Sealant, In situ polymerizing sealant

    Device: Adherus Dural Sealant System

  • Active comparator
    DuraSeal Exact Dural Sealant System

    Device: DuraSeal Exact (P080013b)

    Device: DuraSeal Exact Dural Sealant System

Interventions

  • DeviceAdherus Dural Sealant System

    Adherus Dural Sealant, In situ polymerizing sealant

  • DeviceDuraSeal Exact Dural Sealant System

    DuraSeal Exact (P080013b)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Primary Endpoint Was the Success Rate Defined as Freedom From the Following Events:

    * CSF leak or pseudomeningocele diagnosed by physical examination, biochemical assay or imaging through 90-day following the index procedure. * Unplanned retreatment of the original surgical site, adjudicated as device related by the CEC, other than CSF leak or pseudomeningocele formation or those related to the subject's pre-existing condition, through 90-day following the index procedure including: * treatment for deep infection * treatment for meningitis * minimally invasive procedures or return to the operating room for neurosurgical complications

    Time frame: 90 Days

07

Results

Posted Oct 22, 2026

Participant flow

The first subject first visit occurred November 19, 2020, and the last subject last visit occurred on April 17, 2025.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAdherus Dural Sealant (Test Group)DuraSeal Exact (Control Group)
Started5044
Completed4439
Not completed65
Withdrew: Death10
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up11
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject22
Withdrew: Other21
Withdrew: Physician decision01

Outcome measures

PrimaryThe Primary Endpoint Was the Success Rate Defined as Freedom From the Following Events:

* CSF leak or pseudomeningocele diagnosed by physical examination, biochemical assay or imaging through 90-day following the index procedure. * Unplanned retreatment of the original surgical site, adjudicated as device related by the CEC, other than CSF leak or pseudomeningocele formation or those related to the subject's pre-existing condition, through 90-day following the index procedure including: * treatment for deep infection * treatment for meningitis * minimally invasive procedures or return to the operating room for neurosurgical complications

Time frame:
90 Days
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
The Primary Endpoint Was the Success Rate Defined as Freedom From the Following Events:
percentage of participantsAdherus Dural Sealant (Test Group)DuraSeal Exact (Control Group)
The Primary Endpoint Was the Success Rate Defined as Freedom From the Following Events:95.5 (84.5 to 99.4)92.1 (78.6 to 98.3)
Statistical analysis
  • Adherus Dural Sealant (Test Group) vs DuraSeal Exact (Control Group) · z-test,1-sided · p = 0.001 · Risk difference (rd): 2.2 · 95% CI -18.3 to 24.8Difference calculated as Adherus minus Duraseal.

Adverse events

Collected over Overall Incidence of AEs by Seriousness and Relation through 90 days (all enrolled population). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Adherus Dural Sealant (Test Group)1/50 (2%)10/50 (20%)20/50 (40%)
DuraSeal Exact (Control Group)0/44 (0%)7/44 (15.9%)24/44 (54.5%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventAdherus Dural Sealant (Test Group)DuraSeal Exact (Control Group)
OtherGeneral disorders8/507/44
InfectionInfections and infestations2/503/44
PseudomeningoceleNervous system disorders1/503/44
DeathGeneral disorders1/500/44
CSF LeakNervous system disorders0/500/44
Retreatment of surgical siteGeneral disorders0/500/44
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 15
Most frequent other events
EventAdherus Dural Sealant (Test Group)DuraSeal Exact (Control Group)
Pain - BackMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders3/508/44
Weakness - Lower ExtremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders3/505/44
Paresthesia - Lower ExtremityNervous system disorders3/504/44
IncontinenceGeneral disorders3/504/44
Swelling - Upper ExtremityVascular disorders1/504/44
Pain - Lower ExtremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders4/500/44
Pain - AbdominalGastrointestinal disorders4/502/44
Urinary Tract Infection (UTI)General disorders4/502/44
Swelling - Lower ExtremityVascular disorders3/503/44
PseudomeningoceleNervous system disorders1/503/44

Baseline characteristics

The demographics and baseline characteristics of the enrolled population are typical for a dural sealant study performed in the US.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Adherus Dural Sealant (Test Group)DuraSeal Exact (Control Group)Total
Median54.1 (24.1 to 70.7)61.6 (30.6 to 73.9)58.5 (24.1 to 73.9)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Adherus Dural Sealant (Test Group)DuraSeal Exact (Control Group)Total
Female281947
Male222547
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Adherus Dural Sealant (Test Group)DuraSeal Exact (Control Group)Total
Hispanic or Latino6410
Not Hispanic or Latino413879
Unknown or Not Reported325
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants (not mutually exclusive))Adherus Dural Sealant (Test Group)DuraSeal Exact (Control Group)Total
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian426
Black or African American156
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
White403272
Other325
Unknown or Not Reported437
Primary Indication for Surgery
Primary Indication for Surgery(Participants)Adherus Dural Sealant (Test Group)DuraSeal Exact (Control Group)Total
Intradural Tumor413273
Intradural Lesion5611
Tethered Cord011
Vascular Malformations033
Arachnoid Cysts213
Syringomyelia000
Other213
Anatomical Location
Anatomical Location(participants)Adherus Dural Sealant (Test Group)DuraSeal Exact (Control Group)Total
Lumbar or Lumbosacral221840
Cervical or Thoracic282654
Approach
Approach(Participants)Adherus Dural Sealant (Test Group)DuraSeal Exact (Control Group)Total
Anterior112
Dorsal403676
Lateral000
Other9716
History of Spinal Surgery
History of Spinal Surgery(Participants)Adherus Dural Sealant (Test Group)DuraSeal Exact (Control Group)Total
Count of participants7512

1 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

14 sites
  • City of Hope National Medical Center
    Duarte, California 91010, United States
  • University of California Davis Health
    Sacramento, California 95817, United States
  • Stanford University
    Stanford, California 94305, United States
  • Mayo Clinic (FL)
    Jacksonville, Florida 32224, United States
  • Rush University Medical Center
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
  • University of Illinois at Chicago
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
  • Mayo Clinic
    Rochester, Minnesota 55902, United States
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center
    New York, New York 10032, United States
  • Carolina Neurosurgery & Spine Associates
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28204, United States
  • Duke University
    Durham, North Carolina 27705, United States
  • Thomas Jefferson University
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, United States
  • Houston Methodist Research Institute
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Carilion Clinic
    Roanoke, Virginia 24014, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Status
Enrolling by invitation→Completed
changed Oct 22, 2026
Results
Results posted
posted Oct 22, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 2025→Aug 29, 2025 (actual)
Oct 22, 2026
Study completion
Dec 2025→Aug 29, 2025 (actual)
Oct 22, 2026
Enrollment
114 (estimated)→94 (actual)
Oct 22, 2026
Primary outcomes
1 edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • ChangedBefore The proportion of treated subjects who are free from the following incidences:Now The Primary Endpoint Was the Success Rate Defined as Freedom From the Following Events:Time frame: 90 Days
Oct 22, 2026
Documents
Oct 22, 2026
Secondary outcomes
1 removed
What changed in the outcomes
  • RemovedSecondary endpoints, which will only be tested for superiority of Adherus over DuraSeal Exact after the primary objective of the study has been met:Time frame: 30 Day, 90 Day
Oct 22, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 22, 2026
    Enrolling by invitation→Completed
    Results posted
    Documents Study protocol ↗ posted
    Primary completion Dec 2025→Aug 29, 2025 (now actual)
    Study completion Dec 2025→Aug 29, 2025 (now actual)
    Enrollment 114 (estimated)→94 (actual)
    Primary outcomes 1 edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • ChangedBefore The proportion of treated subjects who are free from the following incidences:Now The Primary Endpoint Was the Success Rate Defined as Freedom From the Following Events:Time frame: 90 Days
    Secondary outcomes 1 removed
    What changed in the outcomes
    • RemovedSecondary endpoints, which will only be tested for superiority of Adherus over DuraSeal Exact after the primary objective of the study has been met:Time frame: 30 Day, 90 Day
    + 3 other changes: verification date, site details and index terms

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04498026
Collaborators
Fortrea
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 4, 2020
Start date
Nov 19, 2020
Primary completion
Aug 29, 2025
Completion
Aug 29, 2025
Results posted
Oct 22, 2026
Last update
Oct 22, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion