CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04495699Updated Oct 21, 2025

Asymptomatic Renal Calculi in Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections

An observational study in Urinary Tract Infections and Kidney Stone, sponsored by Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Completed at 6 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-21.

Sponsored by Vanderbilt University Medical Center · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
94
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will assess patients who have recurrent urinary tract infections and kidney stones which are not blocking the kidney or causing other problems. Currently, we don't know if taking out these stones will improve recurrent urinary tract infections or not. Patients will make a decision with their surgeon about removing or monitoring their stone(s). Whether or not their infections continue with surgery or monitoring will be noted, and this information may help to inform future treatment decisions. The purpose of this study is to assess if treatment of these asymptomatic stones affects the rate of recurrent urinary tract infections.

Read the detailed description

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are common and have a large burden of disease at the population level. This study will assess the effectiveness of removing kidney stones in patients who have recurrent UTIs.

The role of upper urinary tract calculi in UTIs is not well understood. Although there is some evidence that some metabolic stones, such as calcium oxalate, can harbor bacteria, it is not known if this is clinically significant or if these contribute to clinical infections.

This study aims to advance the level of evidence in the treatment of non-obstructing urolithiasis in the context of recurrent UTIs.

The aim of this study is to:

1. Assess the effects of treatment of non-obstructing upper urinary tract calculi on recurrent UTIs in the first prospective observational trial in this area

Patients who meet inclusion criteria will make a decision about treating their asymptomatic stones or not with their surgeon as per usual clinical care. The primary outcome will be the rate of recurrent urinary tract infections for patients, comparing patients who did and did not have their stones treated.

Patient data is securely stored in de-identified fashion in REDCAP database, following all the secure protocols of the institutions involved. The recruitment goal is 80 patients based on power calculations to detect the effect size. Statistical analysis will be performed between the two groups, with t-test used for normally distributed numerical data and fisher's exact or chi-square tests for categorical data.

02

Conditions studied

  • Urinary Tract Infections
  • Kidney Stone

Keywords

  • Urinary Tract Infection
  • Kidney Stones
  • Urolithiasis
03

In context

Urinary Tract Infections

753 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Tract Infections; 127 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 94 is below the median of 200 across 188 observational studies indexed under Urinary Tract Infections.

Browse Urinary Tract Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

Vanderbilt University Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 824 studies on the registry; 164 are open to participants now.

Of its 122 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 91 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients with recurrent UTIs and asymptomatic renal calculi.

Inclusion criteria

  • recurrent UTIs, defined as 3 positive urine cultures of specific organisms with symptoms within 12 months (or 2 positive cultures with symptoms within 6 months) prior to clinical assessment
  • non-obstructing renal stone(s) on imaging within 6 months of initial visit

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age \< 18 years
  • pregnancy
  • hydronephrosis or evidence of obstruction
  • presence of a foreign body in urinary tract (e.g. Foley, ureteral stent, nephrostomy tube) at the time of UTI diagnosis
  • concurrent bladder calculi
  • Urinary diversion or previous surgery involving segments of bowel interposed into the urinary tract (ileal conduit, ileal ureter etc.)
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
94 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
12 Months
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Observation

    Patients who elect to have observation of their asymptomatic stones as part of usual care will be followed. Note that there is no randomization, the decision to treat or not treat a stone is made in the usual clinical fashion by the patient in consultation with their surgeon.

  • Stone treated

    Patients who elect to have intervention of their asymptomatic stones as part of usual care will be followed. Note that there is no randomization, the decision to treat or not treat a stone is made in the usual clinical fashion by the patient in consultation with their surgeon.

    Other: None - observational

Interventions

  • OtherNone - observational

    If the patient elects to have their stone treated, it will be treated in the usual most clinically appropriate fashion (Shockwave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, or percutaneous nephrolithotomy). All types of treatment will be analyzed together.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recurrent urinary tract infections

    • Number of UTIs, defined as positive urine culture (\>10\^5 CFU/mL of a specific organism) with symptoms. If having had surgical intervention for the stones, we will count a UTI during \>30days and \<1year after intervention so that it is not attributed to the intervention

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to first UTI

    Time from first visit to first UTI, defined as above

    Time frame: up to 12 months

  2. Pyelonephritis/urosepsis

    Incidence of pyelonephritis/urosepsis

    Time frame: up to 12 months

  3. Incidence of complications from intervention within 30 days

    Clavien-Dindo complications, ER visits, readmissions, infections within 30 days, non-elective repeat interventions (eg for obstructing fragments)

    Time frame: 30 days

  4. Incidence of further intervention for stones

    any further stone interventions required

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Stone analysis correlation with rUTI

    Correlation between primary outcome and stone analysis

    Time frame: 12 months

  6. Stone free vs not stone free correlation with rUTI

    Correlation between stone free status after intervention and recurrent UTI

    Time frame: 12 months

  7. Correlation of selected demographic factors with rUTI

    Correlation between baseline demographic parameters and recurrent UTIs (including include age, sex, bacteria type, previous sequelae from UTIs, previous sequelae from stones, comorbidities including diabetes mellitus, obesity, hypertension, and immunosuppression, creatinine, total stone burden, location of stones, stone composition, stone culture, post-intervention stone free rate, and 24-h urine parameters if available)

    Time frame: 12 months

  8. Number free from recurrent UTIs

    Number patients free of recurrent UTIs at 1 year, defined as 3 positive urine cultures (\>105 CFU/mL of a specific organism) with symptoms in 1 year, or 2 in 6 months. If having had surgical intervention for the stones, we will count a UTI during \>30days and \<1year after intervention so that it is not attributed to the intervention

    Time frame: 12 months

  9. Number free from any UTI

    Number of patients free from any UTI at one year, as defined above

    Time frame: 12 months

  10. Crossover from observation to intervention

    Patients on observation and decide to seek treatment after enrollment

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

6 sites
  • Mayo Clinic Arizona
    Phoenix, Arizona 85054, United States
  • University of California San Diego
    San Diego, California 92093, United States
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
  • Columbia University
    New York, New York 10027, United States
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
    Nashville, Tennessee 37232, United States
  • Vancouver General Hospital/University of British Columbia
    Vancouver, British Columbia V6T1Z4, Canada
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Anger J, Lee U, Ackerman AL, Chou R, Chughtai B, Clemens JQ, Hickling D, Kapoor A, Kenton KS, Kaufman MR, Rondanina MA, Stapleton A, Stothers L, Chai TC. Recurrent Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections in Women: AUA/CUA/SUFU Guideline. J Urol. 2019 Aug;202(2):282-289. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000296. Epub 2019 Jul 8. PubMed 31042112 ↗
  • Agarwal DK, Krambeck AE, Sharma V, Maldonado FJ, Westerman ME, Knoedler JJ, Rivera ME. Treatment of non-obstructive, non-struvite urolithiasis is effective in treatment of recurrent urinary tract infections. World J Urol. 2020 Aug;38(8):2029-2033. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02977-3. Epub 2019 Oct 23. PubMed 31646382 ↗
  • Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, Monga M, Murad MH, Nelson CP, Pace KT, Pais VM Jr, Pearle MS, Preminger GM, Razvi H, Shah O, Matlaga BR. Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART I. J Urol. 2016 Oct;196(4):1153-60. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.090. Epub 2016 May 27. PubMed 27238616 ↗
  • Barr-Beare E, Saxena V, Hilt EE, Thomas-White K, Schober M, Li B, Becknell B, Hains DS, Wolfe AJ, Schwaderer AL. The Interaction between Enterobacteriaceae and Calcium Oxalate Deposits. PLoS One. 2015 Oct 8;10(10):e0139575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139575. eCollection 2015. PubMed 26448465 ↗
  • Cai T, Mazzoli S, Mondaini N, Meacci F, Nesi G, D'Elia C, Malossini G, Boddi V, Bartoletti R. The role of asymptomatic bacteriuria in young women with recurrent urinary tract infections: to treat or not to treat? Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Sep;55(6):771-7. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis534. Epub 2012 Jun 7. PubMed 22677710 ↗
  • Flannigan RK, Battison A, De S, Humphreys MR, Bader M, Lellig E, Monga M, Chew BH, Lange D. Evaluating factors that dictate struvite stone composition: A multi-institutional clinical experience from the EDGE Research Consortium. Can Urol Assoc J. 2018 Apr;12(4):131-136. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.4804. Epub 2017 Dec 22. PubMed 29319486 ↗
  • Foxman B. Epidemiology of urinary tract infections: incidence, morbidity, and economic costs. Dis Mon. 2003 Feb;49(2):53-70. doi: 10.1067/mda.2003.7. PubMed 12601337 ↗
  • Geerlings SE. Clinical Presentations and Epidemiology of Urinary Tract Infections. Microbiol Spectr. 2016 Oct;4(5). doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.UTI-0002-2012. PubMed 27780014 ↗
  • Griebling TL. Urologic diseases in america project: trends in resource use for urinary tract infections in men. J Urol. 2005 Apr;173(4):1288-94. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000155595.98120.8e. PubMed 15758784 ↗
  • Omar M, Abdulwahab-Ahmed A, Chaparala H, Monga M. Does Stone Removal Help Patients with Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections? J Urol. 2015 Oct;194(4):997-1001. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.04.096. Epub 2015 Apr 30. PubMed 25936865 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 21, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04495699
Lead sponsor
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Collaborators
University of British Columbia, University of California, San Diego, Mayo Clinic, Massachusetts General Hospital, Columbia University
Responsible party
Ryan Hsi (Associate Professor, Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 3, 2020
Start date
Sep 9, 2020
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2025
Completion
Sep 1, 2025
Last update
Oct 21, 2025

Study contacts

Ryan Hsi, MD
principal investigator · Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion