An interventional study of Family Strengthening Intervention for Early Childhood Development and Community Health Worker Routine in Parent-Child Relations, Behavioral Intervention and Exposure to Violent Event, sponsored by Boston College. Completed at 1 site in Sierra Leone. Open to participants aged 6 Months to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-18.
Sponsored by Boston College · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research
This study will pilot a family-focused, behavioral health intervention while also developing and piloting mHealth tools to support Community Health Workers (CHWs) in Sierra Leone. This dual focus will help build capacity both for delivery of evidence-based mental health services to reduce family violence and harsh parenting practices, and for effective use of mHealth strategies to improve healthcare delivery quality. This study will leverage Government of Sierra Leone investments in community health initiatives as a strategy to address critical healthcare workforce limitations that plague delivery of evidence-based interventions to vulnerable families in post-conflict Sierra Leone. Study aims are to:
Aim 1. Employ a five-phase user-centered design approach to develop and test mHealth tools to improve training, supervision, and fidelity monitoring of Community Health Workers. Study investigators hypothesize that mHealth tools will be feasible, acceptable, and user-friendly.
Aim 2. Conduct a Randomized Controlled Pilot Study to assess feasibility, acceptability, costs and preliminary effects of the mHealth-supported delivery of FSI-ECD on parent mental health, emotion regulation, and familial violence in high risk families with children aged 6-36 months (n=40) in comparison to control families (n=40) who receive standard care. Parental mental health, emotion regulation, household violence, and parenting practices will be assessed at baseline, post-intervention and 6-month follow-up. Study investigators hypothesize that (a) the effects of the FSI-ECD will be comparable to results observed with vulnerable families in Rwanda; (b) digital tools will be feasible and acceptable to CHWs and supervisors.
Aim 3. Leverage well-established relationships and government partners to strengthen capacity for mHealth research and quality healthcare delivery in Sierra Leone. Partners include the University of Makeni, the Directorate of Science, Technology and Innovation, and the Ministry of Health and Sanitation.
2,193 studies on the registry are indexed under Psychological Well-Being; 728 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 180 is above the median of 110 across 1,796 interventional studies indexed under Psychological Well-Being.
Browse Psychological Well-Being studies →Boston College is the lead sponsor of 38 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
The Family Strengthening Intervention for Early Childhood Development (FSI-ECD) is an evidence-based home-visiting behavioral intervention for vulnerable families with children aged 6-36 months. The FSI-ECD targets improving parental emotion regulation and parent-child interactions to improve parental mental health and child development outcomes and reduce family violence. The FSI-ECD will be delivered in weekly 90-minute home visiting sessions for 12 consecutive weeks.
Behavioral: Family Strengthening Intervention for Early Childhood Development
The control is standard maternal and child health home visiting delivered by community health workers. Families will receive three 90-minute home visiting educational sessions focused on nutrition, hygiene, and post-natal care.
Other: Community Health Worker Routine
The Family Strengthening Intervention for Early Childhood Development (FSI-ECD) is an evidence-based home-visiting behavioral intervention for vulnerable families with children aged 6-36 months. The FSI-ECD targets improving parental emotion regulation and parent-child interactions to improve parental mental health and child development outcomes and reduce family violence. FSI-ECD compromises five core components delivered in 12 modules delivered in weekly sessions via active coaching by community health workers. Core components include coaching on: a) nutrition, health and hygiene; b) early stimulation and playful parenting; c) building resilience and coping skills; d) building problem-solving skills; and d) building emotion regulation and conflict resolution skills.
Standard CHW care involves three home visiting sessions delivered to families following childbirth with weekly supervision via phone or face-to-face. Topics of home visiting sessions include: skilled post-natal care for mothers, early initiation of breastfeeding and exclusive breastfeeding practices, adequate nutrition, immunization services and timely use of these services, hand washing and hygiene practices (including waste disposal and food hygiene), building the capacity of family members to appropriately take care of newborns and children under age 5, and building the capacity of family members to recognize and act on postnatal danger signs for newborns, mothers, and children under 5. CHWs also conduct screenings for acute malnutrition and growth monitoring to identify early referrals, and they can provide family planning methods, deworming tablets and other vitamins for acute malnutrition, dehydration, and anti-malaria treatment. Each home-visiting session lasts about 60 minutes.
Feasibility as assessed through the John Hopkins Implementation and Dissemination Science Scale
Feasibility of mHealth tool implementation to support FSI-ECD delivery will be assessed via a Dissemination and Implementation measures developed by the John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Health. This is a 20-item self-report measure and items are scored on a 4-point Likert scale: 1=not at all, 2=a little bit, 3=a moderate amount, 4=a lot.
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention
Acceptability as assessed through the John Hopkins Implementation and Dissemination Science Scale
Acceptability of mHealth tool implementation to support FSI-ECD delivery will be assessed via a Dissemination and Implementation measures developed by the John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Health. This is a 10-item self-report measure and items are scored on a 4-point Likert scale: 1=not at all, 2=a little bit, 3=a moderate amount, 4=a lot.
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention
Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS)
The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) is a 36-item measure that assesses emotion dysregulation across 6 domains, i.e., non-acceptance of emotional responses, difficulty engaging in goal-directed behavior, impulse control difficulties, lack of emotional awareness, limited access to emotion regulation strategies, and lack of emotional clarity. The DERS is scored on a 5-point Likert scale: 1=Almost Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=About half the time, 4=Most of the time, 5=Almost always. Higher scores indicate greater difficulties in emotion regulation.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 3-months after the intervention
Conflict Tactics Scale-2 (CTS-2)
The Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS-2) is a 78-item scale (39 behaviors or experiences, each asked once for respondent and one for partner). The CTS is comprised of 5 subscales, i.e., negotiation, psychological aggression, physical assault, injury, and sexual coercion. The response categories gauge the frequency with which acts were used during conflict with a partner in the past year using a 6-point scale ranging from "never" to "20 or more times." There are also response options of "Never in the last year, but it did happen before that," and "This has never happened."
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 3-months after the intervention
Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME)
The Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME) is a 43-item measure that assesses the level of stimulation and support provided by caregivers in the home. All items receive a binary score based on the presence (score = 1) or absence (score = 0) of self-reported and direct observation of parenting behaviors and household conditions. Item scores are summed to derive scores on a total scale and the 6 subscales, i.e., variety, organization, acceptance, involvement, learning materials, and responsivity.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 3-months after the intervention
Observation of Mother-Child Interaction (OMCI)
The Observation of Mother-Child Interaction (OMCI) is a direct observational measure used to assess mother-child interaction during a shared picture-book reading activity that includes maternal (10 items) and child assessments (5 items). Maternal responsive behaviors include contingent responding, emotional-affective support, support for infant foci of attention, and language inputs. Child behaviors include the child's behavioral and social-emotional reactions during the observation. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale: 0 = Never, 1 = Very few, 2 = Sometimes (3-4 times), and 3 = Five or more times. Total scores are assigned for the mother's reaction, the child's reaction, and mother-child interaction, respectively.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 3-months after the intervention
Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL)
The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL) is a 25-item inventory that measures symptoms of anxiety and depression. Part I of the measure has 10 items assessing anxiety symptoms and Part II has 15 items assessing depression symptoms. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale: 1 = Not at all, 2 = A little, 3 = Quite a bit, and 4 = Extremely. Item scores are summed to derive scores for the total scale and subscales, i.e., anxiety and depression.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention and 3-months after the intervention
Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Civilian Checklist
The Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Civilian Checklist is a 17-item scale that assesses symptoms of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder. Items are rated on a binary scale of "yes" or "no" responses.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention and 3-months after the intervention
Plan to share: Yes — Data sharing will be in accordance with the NIH Data Sharing Policy and Implementation Guidance and more specifically the "Data Sharing Expectations for National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)-funded Clinical Trials". The data generated in this study will be entered into the NIMH Data Archive as required and prescribed by the Notice of Award as well as presented at national and/or international conferences and published in a timely fashion. All final peer-reviewed manuscripts that arise from this proposal will be submitted to the digital archive PubMed Central. Published data will be available in print or electronically from publishers, subject to subscription or printing charges. Research data that document, support and validate research findings will be made available after the main findings from the final research data set have been accepted for publication.
Time frame: Data will become available after the main findings from the final research data set have been accepted for publication and will be available for 3 years following closeout of the award.
Access criteria: The data generated in this clinical will be entered into the NIMH Data Archive as required and prescribed by the Notice of Award as well as presented at national and/or international conferences and published in a timely fashion. All final peer-reviewed manuscripts that arise from this proposal will be submitted to the digital archive PubMed Central. Published data will be available in print or electronically from publishers, subject to subscription or printing charges. Research data that document, support and validate research findings will be made available after the main findings from the final research data set have been accepted for publication.
Ran from Aug 2021 to primary completion in Feb 2023, 17 months.
Of 1,259 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Psychological Well-Being, half reached primary completion within 17 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 34. This study's 17 months is close to that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 1,302 studies reached it within 16 months; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 34.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Boston College