CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04477304AESOPS-T1Updated Aug 7, 2025Results posted

Application of Economics & Social Psychology to Improve Opioid Prescribing Safety Trial 1: EHR Nudges

An interventional study of Opioid Naive, OR and At-risk for long-term use, OR in Opioid Abuse, Unspecified, sponsored by University of Southern California. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-07.

Sponsored by University of Southern California · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
555
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The opioid epidemic has had a tremendous negative impact on the health of persons in the U.S. The objective of the trial 1 of Application of Economics \& Social psychology to improve Opioid Prescribing Safety (AESOPS-T1), is to discourage unnecessary opioid prescribing through the application of "behavioral insights"-empirically-tested social and psychological interventions that affect choice.

Read the detailed description

A multisite study, AESOPS-T1 randomizes clinics to behavioral intervention or control. Clinics randomized to the behavioral intervention arm receive electronic health record (EHR)-based nudges. Eligible participants are clinicians who practice ambulatory primary care at the participating clinical sites in Illinois and California. At the time of opioid prescribing, clinicians in clinics randomized to the intervention group will be prompted with an EHR nudge when the prescribing history for the patient falls into one of the following three mutually exclusive categories: Opioid naïve, At-risk for long-term use, or Long-term opioid recipient. These EHR-based nudges include accountable justification, defaults and precommitments. The control arm receives no EHR-based intervention. Both arms receive guideline education. The primary outcome is the change in clinician aggregate weekly milligram morphine equivalent (MME) dose and the secondary outcome is the proportion of dosages that equal or exceed 50 MME per day. These outcomes will be estimated by treatment arm with an intent-to-treat difference-in-differences framework using a mixed-effects regression model on clinician MME daily dose. The intervention period will be 18-months, with a 6-month follow-up period to measure the persistence of effects after the interventions conclude.

02

Conditions studied

  • Opioid Abuse, Unspecified

Keywords

  • opioid use disorder
  • randomized control trial
  • behavioral economics
  • nudges
03

In context

Opioid-Related Disorders

1,411 studies on the registry are indexed under Opioid-Related Disorders; 290 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 555 is above the median of 63 across 1,123 interventional studies indexed under Opioid-Related Disorders.

Browse Opioid-Related Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Southern California is the lead sponsor of 773 studies on the registry; 135 are open to participants now.

Of its 68 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 32 (47%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Providers of clinics that see patients ≥ 18 years old and for whom clinic leadership agrees to participate.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Visits will be excluded from intervention when the patient has active cancer.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
555 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Behavioral Intervention Arm

    Clinicians in clinics randomized to the intervention group will be prompted with an EHR nudge when the prescribing history for the patient falls into one of the following three categories: Opioid naïve, At-risk for long-term use, or Long-term opioid recipient. These EHR-based nudges include elements of accountable justification, defaults and precommitments. Clinicians will also receive web-based guideline education, consisting of an online educational module at the start of the study period. This will include educational clinical content related to the CDC guidelines, the Oregon Pain Guidance document, tapering training and other resources such as Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Medication-Assisted Treatment Physician Locator and the Naloxone Provider Guide.

    Behavioral: Opioid Naive, OR · Behavioral: At-risk for long-term use, OR · Behavioral: Long-term opioid recipient

  • No intervention
    Control

    Clinicians in clinics randomized to the control group will receive web-based guideline education, consisting of an online educational module at the start of the study period. This will include educational clinical content related to the CDC guidelines, the Oregon Pain Guidance document, tapering training and other resources such as Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Medication-Assisted Treatment Physician Locator and the Naloxone Provider Guide.

Interventions

  • BehavioralOpioid Naive, OR

    Visits where the order is for an included opioid and there is no prior opioid prescription with a start date of greater than 1 day and less than 91 days and clinician is on the clinic list as a treating member of the clinic

  • BehavioralAt-risk for long-term use, OR

    Visit where the order is for an included opioid, there is a prior opioid prescription with a start date greater than 1 day and less than 91 days, and there is no prior opioid prescription with a start date greater than 90 days and clinician is on the clinic list as a treating member of the clinic

  • BehavioralLong-term opioid recipient

    Total opioid doses are at least 50 MME per day, there are two or more prior opioid prescriptions with two different start dates both greater than 1 day and less than 91 days, and there is a prior opioid prescription with a start date greater than 90 days and less than 181 days and clinician is on the clinic list as a treating member of the clinic

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Average Per-clinician Log Total Weekly MME Between Baseline and Intervention for Opioid Naïve and At-Risk Patients (Below 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs)

    Change = (18-month intervention average of natural log MME summed per-clinician, per-week - 6-month baseline average of natural log MME summed per-clinician, per-week). Log(total MME) = log(Rx strength x number of pills x opioid conversion factor)

    Time frame: 6-month baseline and 18-month intervention

  2. Change in Average Per-clinician Log Total Weekly MME Between Baseline and Intervention for Chronic Opioid Patients (=> 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs)

    Change = (18-month intervention average of natural log MME summed per-clinician, per-week - 6-month baseline average of natural log MME summed per-clinician, per-week). Log(total MME) = log(Rx strength x number of pills x opioid conversion factor)

    Time frame: 6-month baseline and 18-month intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Average Per-clinician Weekly Proportion of Chronic Patients Prescribed a High Dose Opioid (=> 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs) Between Baseline and Intervention

    Change = (18-month intervention average per-clinician weekly proportion - 6-month baseline average per-clinician weekly proportion). Proportion = number of chronic patients who received Rx =\> 50 MME per-clinician, per-week/total patients who received opioid Rx per-clinician, per-week

    Time frame: 6-month baseline and 18-month intervention

Other outcomes

  1. Change in Average Per-clinician Log Total Weekly MME Between Baseline and Post-intervention for Opioid Naïve and At-Risk Patients (Below 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs)

    Change = (6-month post-intervention average of natural log MME summed per-clinician, per-week - the 18-month baseline average of natural log MME summed per-clinician, per-week). Log(total MME) = log(Rx strength x number of pills x opioid conversion factor)

    Time frame: 6-month baseline and 6-month post-intervention

  2. Change in Average Per-clinician Weekly Proportion of Chronic Patients Prescribed a High Dose Opioid (=> 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs) Between Baseline and Post-intervention

    Change = (6-month post-intervention average per-clinician weekly proportion - 6-month baseline average per-clinician weekly proportion). Proportion = number of chronic patients who received Rx =\> 50 MME per-clinician, per-week/total patients who received opioid Rx per-clinician, per-week

    Time frame: 6-month baseline and 6-month post-intervention

  3. Change in Average Per-clinician Log Total Weekly MME Between Baseline and Post-intervention for Chronic Opioid Patients (=> 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs)

    Change = (6-month post-intervention average of natural log MME summed per-clinician, per-week - the 6-month baseline average of natural log MME summed per-clinician, per-week). Log(total MME) = log(Rx strength x number of pills x opioid conversion factor)

    Time frame: 6-month baseline and 6-month post-intervention

07

Results

Posted Mar 6, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBehavioral Intervention ArmControl
Started322233
Completed275207
Not completed4726
Withdrew: No valid opioid prescriptions during study timeframe4726

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Average Per-clinician Log Total Weekly MME Between Baseline and Intervention for Opioid Naïve and At-Risk Patients (Below 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs)

Change = (18-month intervention average of natural log MME summed per-clinician, per-week - 6-month baseline average of natural log MME summed per-clinician, per-week). Log(total MME) = log(Rx strength x number of pills x opioid conversion factor)

Time frame:
6-month baseline and 18-month intervention
Reported as:
Mean · chg in avg per-clin log total weekly MME
Change in Average Per-clinician Log Total Weekly MME Between Baseline and Intervention for Opioid Naïve and At-Risk Patients (Below 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs)
chg in avg per-clin log total weekly MMEBehavioral Intervention ArmControl
Change in Average Per-clinician Log Total Weekly MME Between Baseline and Intervention for Opioid Naïve and At-Risk Patients (Below 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs)-0.14 ± 0.01-0.05 ± 0.01
Statistical analysis
  • Behavioral Intervention Arm vs Control · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 (The threshold for statistical significance was p = 0.05) · Mean difference (net): -0.09 · 95% CI -0.12 to -0.07Left-Censored Tobit Regression
PrimaryChange in Average Per-clinician Log Total Weekly MME Between Baseline and Intervention for Chronic Opioid Patients (=> 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs)

Change = (18-month intervention average of natural log MME summed per-clinician, per-week - 6-month baseline average of natural log MME summed per-clinician, per-week). Log(total MME) = log(Rx strength x number of pills x opioid conversion factor)

Time frame:
6-month baseline and 18-month intervention
Reported as:
Mean · chg in avg per-clin log total weekly MME
Change in Average Per-clinician Log Total Weekly MME Between Baseline and Intervention for Chronic Opioid Patients (=> 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs)
chg in avg per-clin log total weekly MMEBehavioral Intervention ArmControl
Change in Average Per-clinician Log Total Weekly MME Between Baseline and Intervention for Chronic Opioid Patients (=> 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs)-0.21 ± 0.02-0.02 ± 0.01
Statistical analysis
  • Behavioral Intervention Arm vs Control · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 (The threshold for statistical significance was p = 0.05.) · Mean difference (net): -0.19 · 95% CI -0.23 to -0.16Left-Censored Tobit Regression
SecondaryChange in Average Per-clinician Weekly Proportion of Chronic Patients Prescribed a High Dose Opioid (=> 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs) Between Baseline and Intervention

Change = (18-month intervention average per-clinician weekly proportion - 6-month baseline average per-clinician weekly proportion). Proportion = number of chronic patients who received Rx =\> 50 MME per-clinician, per-week/total patients who received opioid Rx per-clinician, per-week

Time frame:
6-month baseline and 18-month intervention
Reported as:
Mean · Mean weekly proportion of chronic pts
Change in Average Per-clinician Weekly Proportion of Chronic Patients Prescribed a High Dose Opioid (=> 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs) Between Baseline and Intervention
Mean weekly proportion of chronic ptsBehavioral Intervention ArmControl
Change in Average Per-clinician Weekly Proportion of Chronic Patients Prescribed a High Dose Opioid (=> 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs) Between Baseline and Intervention-0.08 ± 0.010 ± 0.01
Statistical analysis
  • Behavioral Intervention Arm vs Control · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 (The threshold for statistical significance was p = 0.05) · Mean difference (net): -0.08 · 95% CI -0.10 to -0.06
Other pre-specifiedChange in Average Per-clinician Log Total Weekly MME Between Baseline and Post-intervention for Opioid Naïve and At-Risk Patients (Below 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs)

Change = (6-month post-intervention average of natural log MME summed per-clinician, per-week - the 18-month baseline average of natural log MME summed per-clinician, per-week). Log(total MME) = log(Rx strength x number of pills x opioid conversion factor)

Time frame:
6-month baseline and 6-month post-intervention
Reported as:
Mean · chg in avg per-clin log total weekly MME
Change in Average Per-clinician Log Total Weekly MME Between Baseline and Post-intervention for Opioid Naïve and At-Risk Patients (Below 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs)
chg in avg per-clin log total weekly MMEBehavioral Intervention ArmControl
Change in Average Per-clinician Log Total Weekly MME Between Baseline and Post-intervention for Opioid Naïve and At-Risk Patients (Below 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs)-0.09 ± 0.01-0.04 ± 0.01
Statistical analysis
  • Behavioral Intervention Arm vs Control · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 (The threshold for statistical significance was p = 0.05.) · Mean difference (net): -0.05 · 95% CI -0.08 to -0.03Left-Censored Tobit Regression
Other pre-specifiedChange in Average Per-clinician Weekly Proportion of Chronic Patients Prescribed a High Dose Opioid (=> 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs) Between Baseline and Post-intervention

Change = (6-month post-intervention average per-clinician weekly proportion - 6-month baseline average per-clinician weekly proportion). Proportion = number of chronic patients who received Rx =\> 50 MME per-clinician, per-week/total patients who received opioid Rx per-clinician, per-week

Time frame:
6-month baseline and 6-month post-intervention
Reported as:
Mean · Mean weekly proportion of chronic pts
Change in Average Per-clinician Weekly Proportion of Chronic Patients Prescribed a High Dose Opioid (=> 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs) Between Baseline and Post-intervention
Mean weekly proportion of chronic ptsBehavioral Intervention ArmControl
Change in Average Per-clinician Weekly Proportion of Chronic Patients Prescribed a High Dose Opioid (=> 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs) Between Baseline and Post-intervention-0.02 ± 0.01-0.01 ± 0.01
Statistical analysis
  • Behavioral Intervention Arm vs Control · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.392 (The threshold for statistical significance was p = 0.05.) · Mean difference (net): -0.01 · 95% CI -0.03 to -0.01
Other pre-specifiedChange in Average Per-clinician Log Total Weekly MME Between Baseline and Post-intervention for Chronic Opioid Patients (=> 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs)

Change = (6-month post-intervention average of natural log MME summed per-clinician, per-week - the 6-month baseline average of natural log MME summed per-clinician, per-week). Log(total MME) = log(Rx strength x number of pills x opioid conversion factor)

Time frame:
6-month baseline and 6-month post-intervention
Reported as:
Mean · chg in avg per-clin log total weekly MME
Change in Average Per-clinician Log Total Weekly MME Between Baseline and Post-intervention for Chronic Opioid Patients (=> 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs)
chg in avg per-clin log total weekly MMEBehavioral Intervention ArmControl
Change in Average Per-clinician Log Total Weekly MME Between Baseline and Post-intervention for Chronic Opioid Patients (=> 50 MME Daily Dose Rxs)-0.13 ± 0.01-0.04 ± 0.02
Statistical analysis
  • Behavioral Intervention Arm vs Control · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 (The threshold for statistical significance was p = 0.05.) · Mean difference (net): -0.09 · 95% CI -0.13 to -0.05Left-Censored Tobit Regression

Adverse events

Collected over 18 month intervention period. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Behavioral Intervention Arm0/322 (0%)0/322 (0%)0/322 (0%)
Control0/233 (0%)0/233 (0%)0/233 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(years)Behavioral Intervention ArmControlTotal
Unknown/Not reported322233555
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)Behavioral Intervention ArmControlTotal
Female199135334
Male12192213
Unknown/Not reported268
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Behavioral Intervention ArmControlTotal
Count of participants——0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Behavioral Intervention ArmControlTotal
United States322233555
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Northwestern University
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Kelley MA, Persell SD, Linder JA, Friedberg MW, Meeker D, Fox CR, Goldstein NJ, Knight TK, Zein D, Rowe TA, Sullivan MD, Doctor JN. The protocol of the Application of Economics & Social psychology to improve Opioid Prescribing Safety Trial 1 (AESOPS-1): Electronic health record nudges. Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Apr;103:106329. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106329. Epub 2021 Feb 24. PubMed 33636344 ↗

Related links

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Mar 18, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 7, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04477304
Lead sponsor
University of Southern California
Collaborators
Northwestern University, AltaMed Health Services Corporation, National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Responsible party
Jason Doctor (Associate Professor, University of Southern California) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 20, 2020
Start date
Dec 1, 2020
Primary completion
Aug 6, 2023
Completion
Aug 6, 2023
Results posted
Mar 6, 2025
Last update
Aug 7, 2025

Study contacts

Jason N Doctor, PhD
principal investigator · University of Southern California

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion