ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04471909TRIOMPHEUpdated Oct 20, 2025

NEXUS Aortic Arch Clinical Study to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness

An interventional study of NEXUS Aortic Stent Graft System in Aortic Dissection, Aortic Aneurysm and Intramural Hematoma, sponsored by Endospan Ltd.. Recruiting at 32 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-20.

Sponsored by Endospan Ltd. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Oct 2025, 1 year 1 month ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Oct 2020; still recruiting 6 years later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
110
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Prospective, non-randomized, multi-center clinical investigation of the NEXUS™ Aortic Arch Stent Graft System (NEXUSTM) for the treatment of thoracic aortic lesions involving the aortic arch with a proximal landing zone, native or previously implanted surgical graft, in the ascending aorta and with a brachiocephalic trunk native landing zone.

02

Conditions studied

  • Aortic Dissection
  • Aortic Aneurysm
  • Intramural Hematoma
  • Penetrating Aortic Ulcer
03

In context

Aortic Dissection

205 studies on the registry are indexed under Aortic Dissection; 73 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 110 is close to the median of 114 across 86 interventional studies indexed under Aortic Dissection.

Browse Aortic Dissection studies →

Lead sponsor

Endospan Ltd. is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male and female age ≥ 18.
  2. Proximal/ascending native or previously implanted surgical graft landing zone of appropriate length
  3. Proximal/ascending native or previously implanted surgical graft landing zone of appropriate diameter
  4. Distal/descending native landing zone of appropriate length
  5. Distal/descending native landing zone of appropriate diameter
  6. Brachiocephalic trunk native landing zone of appropriate length
  7. Brachiocephalic trunk native landing zone of appropriate diameter
  8. Appropriate take off angle between the Brachiocephalic Artery and the Aortic Arch perpendicular
  9. Appropriate aortic arch perpendicular diameter
  10. Chronic dissection with at least one of the following conditions:

    1. An aortic aneurysm with a maximum diameter ≥ 55 mm
    2. Rapidly expanding false lumen (growth of > 0.5 cm/6 months)
    3. Compressed true lumen associated with end organ malperfusion
    4. Symptomatic
  11. Aneurysm with at least one of the following conditions:

    1. Dilatation of the aortic arch larger than 5 cm in diameter for subject with fusiform aneurysm
    2. Dilatation of the aortic arch is 1.5 times the normal diameter for subjects ascending or descending
    3. Dilation of the aortic arch larger than 2.5 cm for subject with saccular aneurysm
    4. Symptomatic aneurysm of the aortic arch
    5. Aortic diameter growth rate > 5mm per 6 months
    6. Postoperative pseudoaneurysm expanding from anastomotic suture lines
  12. Penetrating aortic ulcer with at least one of the following:

    1. Symptomatic
    2. Ulcer demonstrates expansion
  13. Intramural hematoma with at least one of the following:

    1. Symptomatic (persistent pain)
    2. Transverse or longitudinal expansion on serial imaging
  14. In the event of a lesion in the ascending aortic, the proximal/ascending native or previously implanted surgical graft the landing zone must be appropriate
  15. Femoral / iliac artery diameter as documented by CTA or MRA that allows endovascular access to the diseased site with a 20 Fr. delivery catheter.
  16. Access vessels morphology suitable for endovascular repair in terms of tortuosity, calcification and angulation, documented by CTA/MRA.
  17. Brachial/Axial Artery diameter that allows endovascular access suitable for 7 Fr.
  18. Subject is considered an appropriate candidate for an elective surgery.
  19. Subject is considered to be at high risk for open repair, as determined by the investigator.
  20. Access vessels, iliac/femoral \& brachial/axillary compatible with vascular access techniques (femoral cutdown or percutaneous), devices, and /or accessories.
  21. Subject is willing and able to comply with procedures specified in the protocol and is able to return for follow-up visits as specified by the protocol.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Acute dissection
  2. Lesions that can be safely treated with TEVAR landing in zone 2 (with or w/o LSA vascularization)
  3. Required emergent treatment, e.g., trauma, rupture
  4. Acute vascular injury of the aorta due to trauma
  5. Aortic rupture or unstable aneurysm
  6. Received a previous stent or stent graft in the treated area (including planned landing area)
  7. Required surgical or endovascular treatment of an infra-renal aneurysm at time of implantation
  8. Planned major surgical or interventional procedure at time of screening, to be performed after the NEXUS™ implantation.
  9. Any major surgical or interventional procedure 6 weeks before the NEXUS™ implantation, exclusive of planned procedures that are needed for the safe and effective placement of the stent graft (e.g. supra-aortic bypass).
  10. Subject has had a myocardial infarction (MI) or cerebral vascular accident (CVA) within 90 days prior to the planned implantation
  11. Subjects with severe aortic valvular insufficiency as determined by echocardiography
  12. Mechanical valve that preclude safe delivery of NEXUS™
  13. Known Connective tissue disease (e.g., Marfan's or Ehler's-Danlos syndromes)
  14. Subject has an active systemic infection at the time of the procedure documented by pain, fever, drainage, positive culture
  15. Pregnant
  16. of less than 2 years
  17. Unsuitable vascular anatomy
  18. Subject who have a previously implanted surgical wrap of the ascending aorta
  19. Any medical condition that, according to the investigator's decision, might expose the subject to increased risk by the device or procedure.
  20. An aneurysm that is mycotic, inflammatory or suspected to be infected.
  21. Subject with hostile groins/axilla (scarring, obesity, or previous failed puncture) unless conduit are used.
  22. Subjects with severe atherosclerosis, severe calcification or extensive intraluminal thrombus of the aorta or in the brachiocephalic trunk
  23. Subject is suffering from unstable angina or classification III and IV.
  24. Subject has a known or to anticoagulants, antiplatelets, or contrast media, which is not amenable to pre-treatment.
  25. Subject with a contraindication to undergo angiography
  26. Subject with known sensitivities or allergies to the device materials (including Nitinol [NiTi], polyester fabric [PET], tantalum [TA])
  27. Clinical conditions that severely inhibit x-ray visualization of the Aorta.
  28. Subject has history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy that may limit the use of dual antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy by the decision of the investigator
  29. Acute renal failure; chronic renal failure (excluding dialysis); Creatinine > 2.00 mg/dl
  30. Any other medical, social, or psychological issues that in the opinion of the investigator preclude them from receiving this treatment, or the procedures and evaluations pre- and post- treatment.
  31. Active participation in another clinical study that has not completed primary endpoint(s) evaluation or that clinically interferes with the endpoints in this study, or subject is planning to participate in such study prior to the completion of this study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
110 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Chronic Dissection (arm closed to enrollment)

    Device: NEXUS Aortic Stent Graft System

  • Experimental
    Penetrating Aortic Ulcer and/or Intramural Hematoma

    Device: NEXUS Aortic Stent Graft System

  • Experimental
    Aneurysm (arm closed to enrollment)

    Device: NEXUS Aortic Stent Graft System

Interventions

  • DeviceNEXUS Aortic Stent Graft System

    Arch Stent Graft, whose cranial narrow end is intended to be deployed into the Brachiocephalic artery and whose distal end is intended to be deployed into the Descending Thoracic Aorta. Ascending Stent Graft intended to be deployed in the Ascending Aorta. OPTIONAL: Descending Extension can be used in case the aortic lesion elongates further distally and out of the covered length offered by the Arch Stent Graft. Multiple Descending Extensions can be used if needed to cover the entire length of the lesion.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Device Technical Failure

    * Failure to accurately deliver, track and deploy all required endovascular device components at the intended implantation site and failure to retrieve the device delivery systems without the need for unplanned additional procedures * Device occlusion * Failed exclusion of primary entry tear * Additional unanticipated surgical or interventional procedure related to the device or procedure, to prevent life-threatening or permanent disabling event.

    Time frame: 30 Days

  2. Clinical Failure

    Subjects experiencing early mortality or at least one of the following MAEs through 30-Day of Phase 1 Procedure and 30-Day of Index Procedure: Disabling stroke, permanent paralysis/paraplegia, renal failure, aortic rupture, development of new dissections in the thoracic aorta or brachiocephalic artery.

    Time frame: 30 Days

07

Study locations

25 of 32 sites recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Oct 2020 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2025, 60 months after the start.

Of 49 interventional studies with no phase under Aortic Dissection, half reached primary completion within 45 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23. This study's planned 60 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 9, 2020
First posted
Jul 15, 2020
StartActual
Oct 20, 2020
Primary completionEst.
Oct 2025
CompletionEst.
Oct 2029
Last update
Oct 20, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 20, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04471909
Lead sponsor
Endospan Ltd.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 15, 2020
Start date
Oct 20, 2020
Primary completion
Oct 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 20, 2025

Study contacts

Jessica Kleine
Contact
j.kleine@endospan.com
+1 (612) 280-0208

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion