CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04467450Updated Oct 8, 2020

Ultrasound Guided Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection of Subacromial-Subdeltoid Bursa in Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain

An Early Phase 1 interventional study of botulinum toxin type A and Methyl Prednisolonate in Subacromial Bursitis and Subdeltoid Bursitis, sponsored by Benha University. Status unknown at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-10-08.

Sponsored by Benha University · Early Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Oct 2020), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Good shoulder function is a prerequisite for effective hand function, as well as for performing multiple tasks involving mobility, ambulation, and activities of daily living (ADL). A common sequela of stroke is hemiplegic shoulder pain, which can hamper functional recovery and subsequently lead to disability. Hemiplegic shoulder pain can begin as early as 2 weeks post stroke but typically occurs within 2-3 months post stroke.

Read the detailed description

Subject and methods: Patients with clinical diagnosis of hemiparesis on the criteria of the World Health Organization (WHO, 2001) will be recruited from Benha university hospitals' outpatients and inpatients units of Rheumatology ,Rehabilitation and Physical medicine department The diagnosis of stroke was confirmed by the findings of either brain CT or MRI.

All patients should have localized severe shoulder pain of the paretic upper limb with or without limitation of shoulder range of motion (ROM) with the following inclusion criteria:

Hemiplegic shoulder pain (HSP) duration at least 3 months, pain score >3 on a pain visual analog scale (VAS) of 0 to 10 cm (0 no pain, 10 worst possible pain) at rest, and/or pain at movement score >5 on VAS during passive shoulder abduction, pain was not relieved by conventional treatment (common analgesics, such as paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; slings; physical modalities such as transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation of shoulder muscles or manual therapy). No significant spasticity in the upper shoulder joint, defined as Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score ≤2 , ultrasonographically diagnosed subacromial subdeltoid (SASD ) bursitis. previous shoulder steroid or botulinum toxin A injection in the affected side or known allergy for botulinum toxin.

Complete history will be addressed from all subjects emphasizing the age, sex, type of stroke (hemorrhagic, thrombotic) ,duration of the stroke, side of hemiplegia , duration of shoulder pain .Complete neurological and musculoskeletal examination .All patients will be examined by a single independent physiatrist.

Patients will be classified based on the type of the injected material into 2 categories: 18 patients will be injected by 20 IU botulinum Toxin A, ( BoNT/A) group and 18 patients will be injected by 40 mg methyl prednisolone (steroid group) The assessment of therapeutic effects will be performed at the start of the study, and in the 3rd and 10th weeks. Shoulder pain will quantified by VAS score at rest (night pain ) and during the day ( movement pain ) .

The physiatrist who will carry out the initial assessment and will perform the intra-articular injection will not participate in follow-up assessments.

Upper limb motor function was assessed sensorimotor function assessment for the upper extremity domain of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE) .

Spasticity around the shoulder will be assessed by MAS. Physical disability and behavior related to activities of daily living will be assessed by Modified Barthel ADL index for stroke patients .

Subacromial subdeltoid bursitis(SASD) will be assessed in the paretic shoulder by high frequency probe SASD bursitis if there is thickness ≥ 2mm and / or effusion or both

02

Conditions studied

  • Subacromial Bursitis
  • Subdeltoid Bursitis

Keywords

  • stroke
  • hemiplegia
  • botulinum toxin
  • musculoskeletal ultrasound
03

In context

Shoulder Pain

707 studies on the registry are indexed under Shoulder Pain; 152 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 36 is below the median of 60 across 561 interventional studies indexed under Shoulder Pain.

Browse Shoulder Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Benha University is the lead sponsor of 356 studies on the registry; 68 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Clinical diagnosis of hemiparesis caused by stroke diagnosed according to World Health Organization (WHO, 2001),
  2. Shoulder pain for more than 3 months.
  3. pain score >3 on a pain visual analog scale at rest.
  4. pain score >5 on a pain visual analog scale during activity.
  5. pain was not relieved by conventional treatment (common analgesics, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, slings or physical modalities).
  6. No significant spasticity in the upper shoulder joint, defined as Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score ≤2
  7. Ultrasonographically diagnosed subacromial subdeltoid (SASD ) bursitis.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria :

  1. history of shoulder pain or limited ROM before stroke.
  2. previous trauma history affecting shoulder
  3. shoulder subluxation
  4. shoulder diseases ( osteoarthritis , rheumatoid arthritis , others )
  5. other neurologic diseases
  6. resistance greater than a MAS score 2
  7. previous shoulder botulinum toxin or steroid injection in the affected side or known allergy for botulinum toxin.
05

Study design

Phase
Early Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
36 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Botox injection

    half of the hemiplegic patients will be injected by botulinum toxin A in the inflamed subacromial-subdeltoid bursa guided by musculoskeletal ultrasound

    Drug: botulinum toxin type A

  • Active comparator
    methyl prednisolonate injection

    the other half of the hemiplegic patients will be injected by methylprednisolonate in the inflamed subacromial-subdeltoid bursa guided by musculoskeletal ultrasound

    Drug: Methyl Prednisolonate

Interventions

  • Drugbotulinum toxin type A

    ultrasound guided injection of the botulinum toxin type A in the inflamed subacromial subdeltoid bursa

    Also known as: botox 100 IU

  • DrugMethyl Prednisolonate

    ultrasound guided injection of Methyl Prednisolonate in the inflamed subacromial subdeltoid bursa

    Also known as: Depomedrol 40mg /2ml

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. visual analog scale (VAS) for pain

    The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum "no pain" on the left end (0 cm) of the scale and the "worst pain" on the right end of the scale (10 cm).

    Time frame: One hour before the injection.

  2. visual analog scale (VAS) for pain

    The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum "no pain" on the left end (0 cm) of the scale and the "worst pain" on the right end of the scale (10 cm).

    Time frame: In the 1st follow up visit 2 weeks after the injection

  3. visual analog scale (VAS) for pain

    The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum "no pain" on the left end (0 cm) of the scale and the "worst pain" on the right end of the scale (10 cm).

    Time frame: In the 2nd follow up visit 10 weeks after the injection .

  4. The Modified Ashworth scale (MAS)

    measures resistance during passive soft-tissue stretching and is used as a simple measure of spasticity.\[1\] Scoring (taken from Bohannon and Smith, 1987): * 0: No increase in muscle tone * 1: Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension * 1+: Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM * 2: More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affected part(s) easily moved * 3: Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult * 4: Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension

    Time frame: One hour before the injection

  5. The Modified Ashworth scale (MAS)

    measures resistance during passive soft-tissue stretching and is used as a simple measure of spasticity.\[1\] Scoring (taken from Bohannon and Smith, 1987): * 0: No increase in muscle tone * 1: Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension * 1+: Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM * 2: More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affected part(s) easily moved * 3: Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult * 4: Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension

    Time frame: In the 1st follow up visit 2 weeks after the injection

  6. The Modified Ashworth scale (MAS)

    measures resistance during passive soft-tissue stretching and is used as a simple measure of spasticity.\[1\] Scoring (taken from Bohannon and Smith, 1987): * 0: No increase in muscle tone * 1: Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension * 1+: Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM * 2: More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affected part(s) easily moved * 3: Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult * 4: Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension

    Time frame: In the 2nd follow up visit 10 weeks after the injection

  7. Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE)

    The FM scale is a 226-point multi-item Likert-type scale developed as an evaluative measure of recovery from hemiplegic stroke. It is divided into 5 domains: motor function, sensory function, balance, joint range of motion, and joint pain. Each domain contains multiple items, each scored on a 3-point ordinal scale (0 = cannot perform, 1 = performs partially, 2 = performs fully). In our study we will assess only motor function domain of the upper limb excluding coordination testing and the total possible scale score for (FMA-UE) is 60.

    Time frame: One hour before the injection.

  8. Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE)

    The FM scale is a 226-point multi-item Likert-type scale developed as an evaluative measure of recovery from hemiplegic stroke. It is divided into 5 domains: motor function, sensory function, balance, joint range of motion, and joint pain. Each domain contains multiple items, each scored on a 3-point ordinal scale (0 = cannot perform, 1 = performs partially, 2 = performs fully). In our study we will assess only motor function domain of the upper limb excluding coordination testing and the total possible scale score for (FMA-UE) is 60.

    Time frame: In the 1st follow up visit 2 weeks after the injection

  9. Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE)

    The FM scale is a 226-point multi-item Likert-type scale developed as an evaluative measure of recovery from hemiplegic stroke. It is divided into 5 domains: motor function, sensory function, balance, joint range of motion, and joint pain. Each domain contains multiple items, each scored on a 3-point ordinal scale (0 = cannot perform, 1 = performs partially, 2 = performs fully). In our study we will assess only motor function domain of the upper limb excluding coordination testing and the total possible scale score for (FMA-UE) is 60.

    Time frame: In the 2nd follow up visit 10 weeks after the injection

  10. Modified Barthel ADL index*

    Measure of physical disability used widely to assess behaviour relating to activities of daily living for stroke patients or patients with other disabling conditions. It measures what patients do in practice. Assessment is made by anyone who knows the patient well. Total score of 20 Score \<15 - usually represents moderate disability \<10- usually represents severe disability.

    Time frame: One hour before the injection.

  11. Modified Barthel ADL index*

    Measure of physical disability used widely to assess behaviour relating to activities of daily living for stroke patients or patients with other disabling conditions. It measures what patients do in practice. Assessment is made by anyone who knows the patient well. Total score of 20 Score \<15 - usually represents moderate disability \<10- usually represents severe disability.

    Time frame: In the 1st follow up visit 2 weeks after the injection

  12. Modified Barthel ADL index*

    Measure of physical disability used widely to assess behaviour relating to activities of daily living for stroke patients or patients with other disabling conditions. It measures what patients do in practice. Assessment is made by anyone who knows the patient well. Total score of 20 Score \<15 - usually represents moderate disability \<10- usually represents severe disability.

    Time frame: In the 2nd follow up visit 10 weeks after the injection

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Eman
    Banhā, Qalyubia 13512, Egypt
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lee JH, Lee SH, Song SH. Clinical effectiveness of botulinum toxin type B in the treatment of subacromial bursitis or shoulder impingement syndrome. Clin J Pain. 2011 Jul-Aug;27(6):523-8. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31820e1310. PubMed 21368663 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 8, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04467450
Lead sponsor
Benha University
Responsible party
Eman Baraka (Assisstant professor, Benha University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 13, 2020
Start date
Jun 1, 2020
Primary completion
Nov 20, 2020 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 15, 2020 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 8, 2020

Study contacts

Eman Baraka, MD
Contact
dremanbaraka@yahoo.com
00210032080424
Eman Baraka, MD
principal investigator · Assisstant Profesoor

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion