CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04462731Updated Oct 1, 2020Results posted

Post-endodontic Pain Survey

An interventional study of Non-surgical root canal treatment filled with WVT and Non-surgical root canal treatment filled with SBT in Postoperative Pain, Endodontic Disease and Obturation, sponsored by Ya-Hsin Yu, DDS, MS. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-10-01.

Sponsored by Ya-Hsin Yu, DDS, MS · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 years 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2016, registered Jun 2020).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
194
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

As part of root canal treatment, canals should be sealed to prevent further contaminations. There are multiple accepted techniques to fill-obturate canals. In the past, different obturation techniques have been compared. The most current technique used, a single cone with bioceramic sealer, has not been compared. This clinical investigation will compare the postoperative pain of this technique to another common technique used in our clinic. Postoperative pain after one-visit root-canal treatment on teeth with vital pulps: Comparison of three different obturation techniques.

02

Conditions studied

  • Postoperative Pain
  • Endodontic Disease
  • Obturation

Keywords

  • Postoperative Pain
  • Bioceramic
  • Root canal filling
03

In context

Dental Pulp Diseases

125 studies on the registry are indexed under Dental Pulp Diseases; 38 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 194 is above the median of 50 across 103 interventional studies indexed under Dental Pulp Diseases.

Browse Dental Pulp Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Ya-Hsin Yu, DDS, MS as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of asymptomatic or symptomatic irreversible pulpitis according to AAE consensus. The diagnosis was based on clinical examinations and confirmed upon accessing the teeth.
  • Consenting adults age 18 years and older
  • Non-contributory medical history (ASA Class I \& II)
  • Included patients were given oral and written information agreed for participation and signed the informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-consenting patients and patients below 18 years of age
  • Medical history with ASA Class III \& IV
  • Non-restorable teeth
  • Teeth with a non-vital pulp
  • Periodontal probing depths were more than 4mm
  • Pre-medication with antibiotics and/or analgesics 24 hours before the treatment
  • Patients taking analgesics routinely for non-dental reasons
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
194 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Obturation technique: WVT

    Warm vertical compaction technique (WVT): Teeth filled with AH Plus Jet Root Canal Sealer were filled with .04 taper gutta-percha points by WVT. The sealer was introduced with the master cone. The depth of heated plugger was within 3-5 mm of WL in the WVT group, and the remaining canal space was backfilled with additional sealer and thermoplasticized gutta-percha.

    Procedure: Non-surgical root canal treatment filled with WVT

  • Active comparator
    Obturation technique: SBT

    Sealer-based filling technique (SBT): Teeth filled with SBT were obturated with EndoSequence BC Sealer by injecting the sealer into the coronal third of each canal. Size 30 Lentulo spiral coated with additional sealer was introduced 3 mm short of WL depth at 300rpm. Bioceramic coated gutta-percha was dipped in BC sealer and introduced into the canal to WL. A heated plugger was used to sear the gutta-percha point at each orifice.

    Procedure: Non-surgical root canal treatment filled with SBT

Interventions

  • ProcedureNon-surgical root canal treatment filled with WVT

    All eligible teeth were isolated with a rubber dam during root canal treatment. The procedures were performed under a microscope (OPMI Pico; Carl Zeiss, Gottingen, Germany). After access, location of canals, and determination of working length (WL) with Root ZX II apex locator (J Morita, Kyoto, Japan), the canals were instrumented using various .04 taper rotary NiTi instruments to a minimum apical size of 35. 4% Sodium hypochlorite was used as the main irrigant with a 31-gauge needle. 17% EDTA was used as the final irrigant. Passive ultrasonic irrigation with size 20 Acteon tip inserted 2mm short of WL was performed with both 4% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA for 10 seconds in each canal. After final irrigation, the canals were dried with paper points. The master gutta-percha cone fit was verified with periapical radiographs before filling the tooth. WVT was used to fill the tooth when the months were January, March, May, July, September, and November.

  • ProcedureNon-surgical root canal treatment filled with SBT

    All eligible teeth were isolated with a rubber dam during root canal treatment. The procedures were performed under a microscope (OPMI Pico; Carl Zeiss, Gottingen, Germany). After access, location of canals, and determination of working length (WL) with Root ZX II apex locator (J Morita, Kyoto, Japan), the canals were instrumented using various .04 taper rotary NiTi instruments to a minimum apical size of 35. 4% Sodium hypochlorite was used as the main irrigant with a 31-gauge needle. 17% EDTA was used as the final irrigant. Passive ultrasonic irrigation with size 20 Acteon tip inserted 2mm short of WL was performed with both 4% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA for 10 seconds in each canal. After final irrigation, the canals were dried with paper points. The master gutta-percha cone fit was verified with periapical radiographs before filling the tooth. SBT was used to fill the tooth when the months were February, April, June, August, October, and December.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    Patients were asked to rate the intensity of preoperative pain on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever) before receiving root canal treatment. At the end of the visit, the patients were given a survey and asked to rate the intensity of postoperative pain (VAS 0-10) at 4 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours after the procedure.

    Time frame: 4-, 24-, and 48-hour after receiving root canal treatment

07

Results

Posted Jul 24, 2020

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneObturation Technique: WVTObturation Technique: SBT
Started9797
Completed4151
Not completed5646

Outcome measures

PrimaryVisual Analogue Scale (VAS)

Patients were asked to rate the intensity of preoperative pain on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever) before receiving root canal treatment. At the end of the visit, the patients were given a survey and asked to rate the intensity of postoperative pain (VAS 0-10) at 4 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours after the procedure.

Time frame:
4-, 24-, and 48-hour after receiving root canal treatment
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
score on a scaleObturation Technique: WVTObturation Technique: SBT
Preoperative4.06 (2.95 to 5.17)2.68 (1.90 to 3.45)
Postoperative 4-hour2.41 (1.74 to 3.09)2.27 (1.65 to 2.94)
Postoperative 24-hour1.95 (1.27 to 2.63)1.8 (1.14 to 2.49)
Postoperative 48-hour1.15 (0.60 to 1.70)1.00 (0.54 to 1.46)

Adverse events

Collected over 1.Preoperative 2. 4-, 24-, and 48-hour postoperatively. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Obturation Technique: WVT0/41 (0%)0/41 (0%)0/41 (0%)
Obturation Technique: SBT0/51 (0%)0/51 (0%)0/51 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Obturation Technique: WVTObturation Technique: SBTTotal
Mean46.2 ± 14.446.7 ± 16.646.5 ± 15.6
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Obturation Technique: WVTObturation Technique: SBTTotal
Female303464
Male111728
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Obturation Technique: WVTObturation Technique: SBTTotal
Count of participants——0
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Yu YH, Kushnir L, Kohli M, Karabucak B. Comparing the incidence of postoperative pain after root canal filling with warm vertical obturation with resin-based sealer and sealer-based obturation with calcium silicate-based sealer: a prospective clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Aug;25(8):5033-5042. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03814-x. Epub 2021 Feb 8. PubMed 33555456 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Nov 1, 2016
  • Informed consent form · Nov 1, 2016

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 1, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04462731
Lead sponsor
Ya-Hsin Yu, DDS, MS
Responsible party
Ya-Hsin Yu, DDS, MS (Principal Investigator, University of Pennsylvania) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jul 8, 2020
Start date
Nov 2016
Primary completion
May 2018
Completion
May 2018
Results posted
Jul 24, 2020
Last update
Oct 1, 2020

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion