ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04460053ILP-NfLUpdated Apr 24, 2024

Neurofilament Light Protein in Peripheral Blood Used as a Biomarker for Neurotoxicity After Isolated Limb Perfusion.

An interventional study of Neurofilament light protein measurement in Isolated limb perfused patients in Malignant Melanoma, sponsored by Vastra Gotaland Region. Completed at 1 site in Sweden. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-24.

Sponsored by Vastra Gotaland Region · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
18
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A prospective feasibility trial initially including 10 patients to investigate if Neurofilament light protein can be detected in peripheral blood in patients undergoing Isolated Limb Perfusion with chemotherapeutic agents. This biomarker could act as predictive biomarker for neurotoxicity after isolated limb perfusion.

Read the detailed description

In isolated limb perfusion (ILP) neurotoxicity is a known side effect, this is in spite of the fact that a relatively mild hyperthermic temperature is used which should be well tolerated by the nerves and other normal tissues in the limbs. It seems probable that the neurotoxicity observed after ILP results from both a thermal enhancement of drug toxicity combined with a local effect of a high tourniquet pressure that is used to isolate the blood flow. Prevention of regional and systemic toxicity is essential for improving the outcome after the procedure. It is known that both higher doses of melphalan, higher temperatures and longer perfusion time correlates to a higher toxicity. The Wieberdink method is a grading system for the reaction of the normal tissues after ILP and the grading is used as a routine in ILP today. Neurofilament light protein (NfL) is released into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) during axonal damage and has been shown to be elevated in different forms of dementia. An NfL assay sensitive enough to measure NfL in blood was recently developed. Its concentration reflects axonal injury in both central and peripheral nervous system disorders.The primary aim of this study is to investigate the possibility to measure neurofilament as a biomarker for peripheral nerve toxicity after isolated limb perfusion.

02

Conditions studied

  • Malignant Melanoma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • toxicity
  • biomarker
  • Neurofilament Light protein
  • In-transit metastasis
  • Hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion
03

In context

Melanoma

3,073 studies on the registry are indexed under Melanoma; 529 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 18 is below the median of 38 across 2,400 interventional studies indexed under Melanoma.

Browse Melanoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Vastra Gotaland Region is the lead sponsor of 272 studies on the registry; 107 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patient scheduled for treatment with isolated limb perfusion
  2. Age over 18 years
  3. Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
18 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Neurofilament light protein measurement

    Neurofilament light protein measurements in peripheral blood pre- peri- and postoperatively.

    Procedure: Neurofilament light protein measurement in Isolated limb perfused patients

Interventions

  • ProcedureNeurofilament light protein measurement in Isolated limb perfused patients

    A prospective feasibility trial measuring neurofilament light protein in peripheral blood as a biomarker for neurotoxicity after isolated limb perfusion.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Neurofilament light protein measurement in peripheral blood

    Neurofilament light protein

    Time frame: 1 day postoperatively

  2. Neurofilament light protein measurement in peripheral blood

    Neurofilament light protein

    Time frame: 3 days postoperatively

  3. Neurofilament light protein measurement in peripheral blood

    Neurofilament light protein

    Time frame: 4 weeks postoperatively

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital
    Gothenburg, 413 45, Sweden
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Corderfeldt Keiller A, Axelsson M, Bragadottir G, Blennow K, Zetterberg H, Olofsson Bagge R. A prospective feasibility trial exploring novel biomarkers for neurotoxicity after isolated limb perfusion. Perfusion. 2024 Nov;39(8):1657-1666. doi: 10.1177/02676591231213506. Epub 2023 Nov 7. PubMed 37933726 ↗
  • Corderfeldt Keiller A, Holmen A, Hansson C, Ricksten SE, Bragadottir G, Olofsson Bagge R. Non-invasive and invasive measurement of skeletal muscular oxygenation during isolated limb perfusion. Perfusion. 2023 Jul;38(5):1019-1028. doi: 10.1177/02676591221093201. Epub 2022 May 16. PubMed 35575302 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Apr 2019 to primary completion in Sep 2020, 17 months.

Of 196 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Melanoma, half reached primary completion within 42 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 22 and three quarters within 64. This study's 17 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 202 studies reached it within 39 months; a quarter within 21 and three quarters within 62.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 9, 2019
First posted
Jul 7, 2020
StartActual
Apr 12, 2019
Primary completionActual
Sep 18, 2020
CompletionActual
Oct 25, 2020
Last update
Apr 24, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 24, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04460053
Responsible party
Roger Olofsson Bagge (Associate professor, Vastra Gotaland Region) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 7, 2020
Start date
Apr 12, 2019
Primary completion
Sep 18, 2020
Completion
Oct 25, 2020
Last update
Apr 24, 2024

Study contacts

Roger Olofsson Bagge
principal investigator · Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Sugery

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion