CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04449627FeelGoodUpdated Aug 28, 2020

Psychological Impact of Admission With Covid-19 During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: Naturalistic Cohort Study With a Digital Intervention

An observational study in Anxiety Disorders, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and Depressive Disorder, sponsored by Royal Free Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-08-28.

Sponsored by Royal Free Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Aug 2020), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
125
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Studies have shown that admission to hospital during a coronavirus epidemic is associated with increased levels of anxiety, depression and panic disorder. During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in North London the Royal Free Hospital admitted over 500 patients with Covid-19. As part of the standard of care, these patients are screened at 8 weeks post discharge for signs of anxiety and depression. The Feeling Good app is a NHS approved digital application which utilises applied relaxation, mindfulness based cognitive therapy and positive visualisation through audio tracks for the treatment of anxiety and depression.

This is a naturalistic cohort study aimed to track the post illness psychological symptoms of those who have been admitted with Covid-19 to the Royal Free hospital up to 5-7 months after discharge. The study population is those who are exhibiting anxiety or depressive symptoms as measure by the PHQ-2 or TSQ questionnaires. All those with symptoms will be offered free access to a NHS approved app for anxiety and depression, and followed up for 3 months after recruitment to track changes to their symptoms.

Read the detailed description

It is important that the long-term wellbeing of patients who have been admitted with Covid-19 during the pandemic is addressed. A newly published meta analysis (Rogers et al 2020) has looked at the neuropsychiatric consequences of all coronavirus epidemics, including Serious Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and Middle East Respiratory (MERS) outbreaks, as well as the first emerging studies from SARS-CoV-2. These studies demonstrate that postillness neuropsychiatric complications including anxiety and depression can persist up to 36 months after the original illness. This is a naturalistic cohort trial with a digital intervention. The study population consists of those patients who were admitted with Covid-19, during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, who at 8 weeks after discharge were found to have symptoms relating to anxiety and depression. In this context Covid-19 refers to the disease caused by the virus (named SARS-CoV-2). The study population does not include those who required intensive care admission during their stay. Excluding usual community psychiatric services (for example improving access to psychological therapies) and some specialist intensive care follow up services, no interventions at the Royal Free have been set up to address the long-term psychological impacts of admission to hospital with COVID-19. The digital intervention is an app that consists of twelve audio tracks that combine applied relaxation, mindfulness, cognitive behaviour therapy and positive visualisation. It is a validated guided self-help tool for treatment of anxiety and depression in the NHS, and recommended by NHS digital. Participants are asked to listen to one or two tracks daily for the initial 14 days, and as they find beneficial thereafter. They are then followed up, at 2 and 12 weeks, with their anxiety and depression scales (the GAD-7 and PHQ-9). The trial is a single site study that will take place at the Royal Free, with discharged patients in the community

02

Conditions studied

  • Anxiety Disorders
  • Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
  • Depressive Disorder
  • Covid19
03

In context

COVID-19

7,638 studies on the registry are indexed under COVID-19; 488 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 125 is below the median of 260 across 3,135 observational studies indexed under COVID-19.

Browse COVID-19 studies →

Lead sponsor

Royal Free Hospital NHS Foundation Trust is the lead sponsor of 34 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients who were hospitalised with Covid19 who have psychological symptoms 8 weeks after discharge. That is a >=6 on TSQ or >= 3 on PHQ9.

Inclusion criteria

  • Over the age of 18
  • Treated for Covid-19 at the Royal Free Hospital
  • Capacity to consent AND
  • At screening had a PHQ-2 score >=3 (positive) OR
  • At screening had a TSQ score >= 6 (positive)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

  • A current inpatient
  • Participant on alternative trial that excludes being in a secondary trial
  • Patient currently using alternative MBCT app tool
  • Patients under 18 years old
  • Background of psychotic illness
  • Patient declined
  • Patient unable to consent
  • Underlying cognitive impairment which may impede ability to comply with the intervention
  • Severe hearing impairment
  • Current delirium
  • Was an in-patient in intensive care during hospital stay
  • Unable to contact patient via telephone on 2 attempts Patient is not registered with a GP. Unable to understand English proficiently enough to engage with the audio tracks.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
125 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Naturalistic cohort

    Patients who were hospitalised between March and June from Covid19, who did not require treatment in intensive care, who at 8 weeks post discharge have symptoms of anxiety or depression. All patients are offered access to an audio based self help programme based on applied relaxation and mindfulness based cognitive therapy.

    Other: Feeling Good Digital App

Interventions

  • OtherFeeling Good Digital App

    Audio based tracks using Jacobson relaxation and mindfullness based cognitive therapy (MBCT) techniques including positive visualisation.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Anxiety as measured by generalised anxiety disorder score (GAD-7) scale

    Generalised anxiety disorder score (GAD-7) scale. Score 0-21, with a higher score associated with greater anxiety symptoms. Scores of 5, 10, and 15 represent cut-points for mild, moderate, and severe anxiety, respectively. GAD-7 score at baseline will be controlled for.

    Time frame: Day 14

Secondary outcomes

  1. Depression as measured by the patient health questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9)

    The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) is a screening tool for the identification of depressive disorders, which has been validated for use in primary care. Each of the nine items in the questionnaire is based on the DSM diagnostic criteria for clinical depression. The PHQ-9 is scored out of 27 according to severity, where score of 5-9 indicates mild depression, 10-14 moderate, 15-19 moderately severe, and 20 or above severe depression.

    Time frame: 14 days and week 12

  2. Trauma as measured by Trauma screening questionnaire (TSQ)

    The Trauma screening questionnaire (TSQ) is a 10 point scale used to identify symptoms of post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), with a score between 0 and 10, with a score of 6 or higher scored as positive.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  3. Anxiety as measured by generalised anxiety disorder score (GAD-7) scale

    Generalised anxiety disorder score (GAD-7) scale. Score 0-21, with a higher score associated with greater anxiety symptoms. Scores of 5, 10, and 15 represent cut-points for mild, moderate, and severe anxiety, respectively. GAD-7 score at baseline will be controlled for.

    Time frame: Week 12

Other outcomes

  1. Risk associated with distress

    Risk factors for psychological distress from admission with Covid-19 will be collected, these will include, age, gender, ethnicity, length of hospital stay, oxygen requirement, co-morbidites, years of education, smoking status, occupation.

    Time frame: Baseline analysis

  2. Qualitative analysis

    Framework analysis. Qualitative feedback of patient experience. Semi structured interviews of a subset of patients will be performed to gain further insight into the patient experience. These will be analysed using a framework thematic analysis, to identify themes which will then be used to code the text.

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 28, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04449627
Lead sponsor
Royal Free Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Collaborators
University College, London
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 29, 2020
Start date
Aug 31, 2020 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2020 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 31, 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 28, 2020

Study contacts

Joanna Dobbin, MScMBBS
Contact
j.dobbin@nhs.net
07833457884
Research and Development Manager
study chair · Sponsor GmbH

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Aug 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion