An observational study in Varicose Veins and Surgery, sponsored by Belarusian State Medical University. Status unknown at 1 site in Belarus. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-11-16.
Sponsored by Belarusian State Medical University · Observational
This study will be evaluate the clinical efficacy of micronized purified flavonoid fraction (MPFF) phlebotropic therapy for postoperative pain, venospecific symptoms, and quality of life in patients with incompetent great or small saphenous veins (GSV/SSV) following an endovenous mechanochemical ablation procedure (MOCA).
The pre-op examination involved taking patient history (including the information about prior venous surgeries), identifying varicose veins (VV's) clinical symptoms/signs, duplex ultrasound (US) evaluation of the lower extremities, clinical-etiological and anatomical-pathophysiological assessment based on the CEAP classification.
The primary transverse and longitudinal US examination (B-mode, color and spectral Doppler) was performed by expert doctors at the Vascular Pathology Non-Invasive Diagnostics Unit before deciding on treatment choices. Reflux in the saphenofemoral/saphenopopliteal junction (SFJ/SPJ) area was determined in supine and upright positions using the Valsalva manoeuvre or manual compression/decompression test, respectively. SFJ/SPJ and great/small saphenous vein (GSV/SSV) segments with retrograde blood flow longer than 0.5 seconds were considered incompetent. Venous reflux section length and incompetent GSV/SSV segments' diameter (in mm) were reflected in medical documentation.
The trial inclusion criteria were as follows: age >18 years old; VV's CEAP clinical class C2-C4; SFJ/SPJ insufficiency and pathological (>0.5 s) reflux in GSV/SSV manifested by one or more "venous" symptoms (pain, itching, nocturnal leg cramps, swelling/pulsing sensation, heaviness, fatigue and overall discomfort), vein diameter at the SFJ/SPJ >4.5 mm and \<8 mm in an upright position.
The patients were informed about the MOCA technique, the intervention's potential complications and side effects.
The exclusion criteria included isolated reflux in tributaries, excessive GSV/SSV tortuosity, known allergy to the sclerosant, deep/superficial vein thrombosis, post-thrombotic occlusion, confirmed thrombophilia, postoperative VV recurrence, obliterating peripheral artery diseases (ankle-brachial pressure index \<0.8), pregnancy and lactation.
The Flebogrif™ device's design is based on a 5Fr single-channel diagnostic vascular catheter 60 cm or 90 cm long (with 1-cm graduated marks), its lumen containing a retractable metal rod with five sharp wires ("claws") attached to its tip. As the "claws" get released and the catheter is then withdrawn from the vessel, the vein wall's endothelial layer gets damaged; at this time, the distance between the fully opened cutting elements is \~29 mm, which is quite enough to treat incompetent veins up to 17-20 mm in diameter.
The patients were put in supine or prone positions for GSV or SSV ablation, respectively. The catheter length choice was determined by that of the incompetent vein segment. The GSV/SSV was punctured with a straight needle 18G at the distal point of reflux in an operating room under local anesthesia (1% lidocaine hydrochloride solution) and US guidance, after which a 0.035" J-shape guidewire was employed to insert a 6Fr introducer with an expander. Upon the latter's removal, a Flebogrif™ catheter was delivered to the target vein's lumen so as to have its tip positioned 2-3 cm below the SFJ/SPJ. Following the guidewire's removal, the catheter's cutting elements were released, shifting its outer "shell" against the stationary inner rod, after which a syringe containing a dose of 3% lauromacrogol-400 foamed solution (Ethoxysclerol®, Kreussler \& Co. GmbH, Wiesbaden, Germany) prepared using the Tessari's method was connected to the central channel's port. The catheter was being distally removed from the vein in a smooth motion all the way up to the introducer, damaging the endothelium with its cutters, with simultaneous introduction of the foam in the amount of 0.1-0.2 ml per 1 cm. The graduated marks on the catheter helped measure the treated GSV/SSV section's length. During and within 5 minutes after the foam injection, the ultrasound probe was used to apply percutaneous compression in the SFJ/SPJ plane. Where deemed necessary, MOCA was supplemented with simultaneous Müller- Varadi miniphlebectomy or standard foam sclerotherapy of the visible varicose tributaries.
Immediately after the procedure, a class 2 RAL compression stocking was put on the operated lower limb, and the patients were recommended a 30-minute walk. The duration of elastic compression was continuous over the first 24 hours, with subsequent transition to daytime wear for 4 weeks.
Patients with GSV/SSV incompetence and C2-C4 were included in in the prospective consecutive case study if they satisfied the selection criteria
Exclusion Criteria:
MPFF \[Detralex®, Servier, France\] 1,000 mg OD for 30 days in the postoperative period.
Drug: Micronized Purified Flavonoid Fraction
No venoactive drug prescribed in the postoperative period.
Based on the (non-)use of adjuvant phlebotropic therapy in the postoperative period.
Also known as: Endovenous Mechano-Chemical Ablation
Number of Participants with pain from absent (score 0) to severe (score 3)
None (0), Occasional (1), Daily, interfering with, but not preventing regular daily activities (2), Daily, limiting most regular daily activities (3)
Time frame: 7 days
Number of Participants with pain from absent (score 0) to severe (score 3)
None (0), Occasional (1), Daily, interfering with, but not preventing regular daily activities (2), Daily, limiting most regular daily activities (3)
Time frame: 14 days
Number of Participants with pain from absent (score 0) to severe (score 3)
None (0), Occasional (1), Daily, interfering with, but not preventing regular daily activities (2), Daily, limiting most regular daily activities (3)
Time frame: 30 days
Number of Participants with other discomfort (ie aching, heaviness, fatigue, soreness, burning) from absent (score 0) to severe (score 3)
None (0), Occasional (1), Daily, interfering with, but not preventing regular daily activities (2), Daily, limiting most regular daily activities (3)
Time frame: 7 days
Number of Participants with other discomfort (ie aching, heaviness, fatigue, soreness, burning) from absent (score 0) to severe (score 3)
None (0), Occasional (1), Daily, interfering with, but not preventing regular daily activities (2), Daily, limiting most regular daily activities (3)
Time frame: 14 days
Number of Participants with other discomfort (ie aching, heaviness, fatigue, soreness, burning) from absent (score 0) to severe (score 3)
None (0), Occasional (1), Daily, interfering with, but not preventing regular daily activities (2), Daily, limiting most regular daily activities (3)
Time frame: 30 days
Number of Participants with venous oedema from absent (score 0) to severe (score 3)
None (0), Limited to foot or ankle (1), Extends above ankle but below knee (2), Extends to knee or above (3)
Time frame: 7 days
Number of Participants with venous oedema from absent (score 0) to severe (score 3)
None (0), Limited to foot or ankle (1), Extends above ankle but below knee (2), Extends to knee or above (3)
Time frame: 14 days
Number of Participants with venous oedema from absent (score 0) to severe (score 3)
None (0), Limited to foot or ankle (1), Extends above ankle but below knee (2), Extends to knee or above (3)
Time frame: 30 days
Number of Participants with inflammation from absent (score 0) to severe (score 3)
None (0), Limited to paramalleolar area (1), Diffuse over lower third of calf (2), Wider distribution (above lower third of calf) (3)
Time frame: 7 days
Number of Participants with inflammation from absent (score 0) to severe (score 3)
None (0), Limited to paramalleolar area (1), Diffuse over lower third of calf (2), Wider distribution (above lower third of calf) (3)
Time frame: 14 days
Number of Participants with inflammation from absent (score 0) to severe (score 3)
None (0), Limited to paramalleolar area (1), Diffuse over lower third of calf (2), Wider distribution (above lower third of calf) (3)
Time frame: 30 days
Responders to Treatment, Assessed by Duplex Ultrasound
Responders; elimination of reflux through the saphenofemoral/saphenopopliteal junctions and/or coplete occlusion of the great/small saphenous veins at 8 weeks, as measured by duplex ultrasound.
Time frame: 8 weeks
Plan to share: Yes — To evaluate clinical efficacy of micronized purified flavonoid fraction (MPFF) phlebotropic therapy for postoperative pain, venospecific symptoms, and quality of life in patients with varicose veins (VV) following an endovenous mechanochemical ablation procedure (MOCA).
Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr, Analytic code
This study is status unknown, as verified in Nov 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Belarusian State Medical University