CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04422431Updated Oct 18, 2024Results posted

Copper Concentration & Histopathologic Changes in Liver Biopsy in Participants With Wilson Disease Treated With ALXN1840

A Phase 2 interventional study of Bis-Choline Tetrathiomolybdate in Wilson Disease, sponsored by Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Completed at 12 sites in 8 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-18.

Sponsored by Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
31
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The main objective of the study is to evaluate the change in liver copper (Cu) concentration following 48 weeks of treatment with ALXN1840 in adult participants with Wilson Disease (WD) who have been previously treated for at least 1 year with standard of care (that is, trientine, penicillamine, or zinc). In the Treatment Period, efficacy and safety of ALXN1840 will be assessed at Week 48.

Read the detailed description

Participants who complete the 48-week Treatment Period will be offered the opportunity to continue their treatment in a 48-week Extension Period that will offer additional time for evaluation of long-term efficacy and safety of ALXN1840. There will be no liver biopsies during the Extension Period.

02

Conditions studied

  • Wilson Disease

Keywords

  • Copper
  • ALXN1840
  • Histology
  • Liver Biopsy
03

In context

Hepatolenticular Degeneration

78 studies on the registry are indexed under Hepatolenticular Degeneration; 30 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 31 is close to the median of 30 across 42 interventional studies indexed under Hepatolenticular Degeneration.

Browse Hepatolenticular Degeneration studies →

Lead sponsor

Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 249 studies on the registry; 25 are open to participants now.

Of its 98 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 70 (71%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Diagnosis of WD by Leipzig Criteria ≥ 4 or by historical test results.
  2. Continuous treatment for WD with penicillamine, trientine or zinc for at least 1 year prior to screening.
  3. Body mass index \< 30 kilograms/meter squared.
  4. Able to cooperate with a percutaneous liver biopsy.
  5. Willing and able to follow protocol-specified contraception requirements.
  6. Capable of giving signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Decompensated cirrhosis or Model for End Stage Liver Disease score > 13.
  2. Modified Nazer score > 7.
  3. Clinically significant gastrointestinal bleed within past 3 months.
  4. Alanine aminotransferase > 2 × upper limit of normal.
  5. History of bleeding abnormality or known coagulopathy, including platelet count \< 100,000, and international normalized ratio for prothrombin time ≥ 1.5.
  6. Participant unwilling to accept blood products, if required.
  7. Marked neurological disease requiring either nasogastric feeding tube or intensive inpatient medical care.
  8. Hemoglobin less than lower limit of the reference range for age and sex.
  9. Participants in renal failure, defined as in end-stage renal disease on dialysis (chronic kidney disease 5) or creatinine clearance \< 30 milliliters/minute.
  10. Lymphoma, leukemia, or any malignancy within the past 5 years.
  11. Current or chronic history of liver disease not associated with WD.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
31 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ALXN1840

    Participants will receive ALXN1840.

    Drug: Bis-Choline Tetrathiomolybdate

Interventions

  • DrugBis-Choline Tetrathiomolybdate

    Participants will be initiated at 15 milligrams once daily, then the dose will be increased to 30 milligrams once daily at Week 6.

    Also known as: ALXN1840

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Liver Cu Concentration at Week 48 (Treatment Period)

    Liver biopsy samples were taken for the assessment of liver Cu concentration. Multiple imputation was used to impute missing data at Week 48 due to any reason based on Baseline values.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 48 (Treatment Period)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network (NASH CRN) Fibrosis Stage at Week 48 (Treatment Period)

    Fibrosis from histology was evaluated by NASH CRN Fibrosis Stage, which was scaled from 0 to 4 stages where Score 0: None; Score 1: Perisinusoidal or periportal - 1a - mild, zone 3, perisinusoidal; Score 1: Perisinusoidal or periportal - 1b - moderate, zone 3, perisinusoidal; Score 1: Perisinusoidal or periportal - 1c - portal/periportal; Score 2: Both perisinusoidal and portal/periportal; Score 3: Bridging fibrosis; and Score 4: Cirrhosis. Higher scores indicated greater fibrosis.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 48 (Treatment Period)

  2. Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Metavir Fibrosis Score at Week 48 (Treatment Period)

    Fibrosis from histology was evaluated by Metavir Fibrosis Score, which was ranged from 0 to 4 where Score 0: No fibrosis; Score 1: Stellate enlargement of portal tract but without septa formation; Score 2: Enlargement of portal tract with rare septa formation; Score 3: Numerous septa without cirrhosis; and Score 4: Cirrhosis. Higher scores indicated greater fibrosis.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 48 (Treatment Period)

  3. Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Ishak Fibrosis Score at Week 48 (Treatment Period)

    Fibrosis from histology was evaluated by Ishak Fibrosis Score, which was ranged from 0 to 6 where Score 0: No fibrosis; Score 1: Fibrous expansion of some portal areas, with or without short fibrous septa; Score 2: Fibrous expansion of most portal areas, with or without short fibrous septa; Score 3: Fibrous expansion of most portal areas with occasional portal to portal (P-P) bridging; and Score 4: Fibrous expansion of portal areas with marked bridging (P-P) as well as portal central (P-C); Score 5: Marked bridging (P-P and/or P-C) with occasional nodules (incomplete cirrhosis); and Score 6: Cirrhosis, probable or definite. Higher scores indicated greater fibrosis.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 48 (Treatment Period)

  4. Change From Baseline in Hepatic Collagen Content at Week 48 (Treatment Period)

    Fibrosis from histology was evaluated by morphometric quantification of hepatic collagen content.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 48 (Treatment Period)

  5. Change From Baseline in a-SMA Content at Week 48 (Treatment Period)

    Fibrosis from histology was evaluated by morphometric quantification of hepatic a-SMA content.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 48 (Treatment Period)

  6. Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in NAS Steatosis Grading Score at Week 48 (Treatment Period)

    Steatosis from histology was evaluated by the steatosis component of the NAS, which was ranged from 0 to 3 where Score 0: \< 5% (minimal); Score 1: 5 - 33% (mild); Score 2: 34 - 66% (moderate); and Score 3: \> 66% (severe). Higher scores indicated greater steatosis.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 48 (Treatment Period)

  7. Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Content at Week 48 (Treatment Period)

    Steatosis from histology was evaluated by morphometric quantification of hepatic fat content.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 48 (Treatment Period)

  8. Change From Baseline in NAS Total Score at Week 48 (Treatment Period)

    Inflammation was quantified by the NAS total score. The score is defined as the unweighted sum of the scores for steatosis (0 \[minimal\] to 3 \[severe\]), lobular inflammation (0 \[none\] to 3 \[\>4 foci / 200x field\]), and hepatocellular ballooning (0 \[none\] to 2 \[many\]), thus ranging from 0 (no inflammation) to 8 (severe inflammation), with higher scores indicating more severe disease.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 48 (Treatment Period)

  9. Treatment Period: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug related. An SAE was an AE that met at least 1 of the following criteria: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization for the AE, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, congenital anomaly/birth defect (in the child of a participant who was exposed to the study drug), important medical event or reaction. The TEAEs were AEs with onset on or after the first study drug dose. A summary of all Serious Adverse Events and Other Adverse Events (nonserious) regardless of causality is located in the 'Reported Adverse Events' Section.

    Time frame: Day 1 (Treatment Period) up to Week 48 (Treatment Period)

  10. Extension Period: Number of Participants With TEAEs

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug related. An SAE was an AE that met at least 1 of the following criteria: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization for the AE, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, congenital anomaly/birth defect (in the child of a participant who was exposed to the study drug), important medical event or reaction. The TEAEs were AEs with onset on or after the first study drug dose. A summary of all Serious Adverse Events and Other Adverse Events (nonserious) regardless of causality is located in the 'Reported Adverse Events' Section.

    Time frame: Day 1 (Extension Period) up Week 52 (Extension Period)

  11. Treatment Period: Predose Trough Plasma Total Mo Concentration

    Time frame: Predose up to 4 hours postdose at Week 6 (Day 43) and Week 36 (Day 253)

  12. Treatment Period: Predose Trough Plasma Total PUF Mo Concentration

    Time frame: Predose up to 4 hours postdose at Week 6 (Day 43) and Week 36 (Day 253)

  13. Change From Baseline in Mo in Liver Biopsy Specimen at Week 48 (Treatment Period)

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 48 (Treatment Period)

  14. Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale Score at Week 48 (Treatment Period)

    The CGI-I is a 7-point scale clinician assessment where 1= very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 = minimally worse; 6 = much worse; or 7 = very much worse. Higher scores indicated worsening of disease.

    Time frame: Week 48 (Treatment Period)

  15. Change From Baseline in CGI-S Scale Score at Week 48 (Treatment Period)

    The CGI-S is a 7-point scale clinician assessment. Participants were assessed on severity of illness at the time of rating/assessment as follows: 1 = normal, not at all ill; 2 = borderline ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; or 7 = extremely ill. Higher scores indicated worsening of disease.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 48 (Treatment Period)

07

Results

Posted Jul 3, 2023

Participant flow

Treatment Period (48 Weeks)
Participant flow — Treatment Period (48 Weeks)
MilestoneALXN1840
Started31
Received at least 1 dose of study drug31
Completed26
Not completed5
Withdrew: Adverse event3
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1
Withdrew: Other than specified1
Extension Period (48 Weeks)
Participant flow — Extension Period (48 Weeks)
MilestoneALXN1840
Started25
Received at least 1 dose of study drug25
Completed21
Not completed4
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up1
Withdrew: Other than specified2

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline in Liver Cu Concentration at Week 48 (Treatment Period)

Liver biopsy samples were taken for the assessment of liver Cu concentration. Multiple imputation was used to impute missing data at Week 48 due to any reason based on Baseline values.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 48 (Treatment Period)
Reported as:
Mean · μg/g
Change From Baseline in Liver Cu Concentration at Week 48 (Treatment Period)
μg/gALXN1840
Change From Baseline in Liver Cu Concentration at Week 48 (Treatment Period)92.8 ± 56.34
Statistical analysis
  • ALXN1840 · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.1002
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network (NASH CRN) Fibrosis Stage at Week 48 (Treatment Period)

Fibrosis from histology was evaluated by NASH CRN Fibrosis Stage, which was scaled from 0 to 4 stages where Score 0: None; Score 1: Perisinusoidal or periportal - 1a - mild, zone 3, perisinusoidal; Score 1: Perisinusoidal or periportal - 1b - moderate, zone 3, perisinusoidal; Score 1: Perisinusoidal or periportal - 1c - portal/periportal; Score 2: Both perisinusoidal and portal/periportal; Score 3: Bridging fibrosis; and Score 4: Cirrhosis. Higher scores indicated greater fibrosis.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 48 (Treatment Period)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network (NASH CRN) Fibrosis Stage at Week 48 (Treatment Period)
ParticipantsALXN1840
Baseline — Score 07
Baseline — Score 1a1
Baseline — Score 1b0
Baseline — Score 1c7
Baseline — Score 23
Baseline — Score 38
Baseline — Score 42
Baseline — Not evaluable1
Week 48 — Score 05
Week 48 — Score 1a0
Week 48 — Score 1b0
Week 48 — Score 1c6
Week 48 — Score 26
Week 48 — Score 37
Week 48 — Score 40
Week 48 — Not evaluable0
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Metavir Fibrosis Score at Week 48 (Treatment Period)

Fibrosis from histology was evaluated by Metavir Fibrosis Score, which was ranged from 0 to 4 where Score 0: No fibrosis; Score 1: Stellate enlargement of portal tract but without septa formation; Score 2: Enlargement of portal tract with rare septa formation; Score 3: Numerous septa without cirrhosis; and Score 4: Cirrhosis. Higher scores indicated greater fibrosis.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 48 (Treatment Period)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Metavir Fibrosis Score at Week 48 (Treatment Period)
ParticipantsALXN1840
Baseline — Score 08
Baseline — Score 17
Baseline — Score 24
Baseline — Score 37
Baseline — Score 42
Baseline — Not evaluable1
Week 48 — Score 05
Week 48 — Score 14
Week 48 — Score 28
Week 48 — Score 37
Week 48 — Score 40
Week 48 — Not evaluable0
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Ishak Fibrosis Score at Week 48 (Treatment Period)

Fibrosis from histology was evaluated by Ishak Fibrosis Score, which was ranged from 0 to 6 where Score 0: No fibrosis; Score 1: Fibrous expansion of some portal areas, with or without short fibrous septa; Score 2: Fibrous expansion of most portal areas, with or without short fibrous septa; Score 3: Fibrous expansion of most portal areas with occasional portal to portal (P-P) bridging; and Score 4: Fibrous expansion of portal areas with marked bridging (P-P) as well as portal central (P-C); Score 5: Marked bridging (P-P and/or P-C) with occasional nodules (incomplete cirrhosis); and Score 6: Cirrhosis, probable or definite. Higher scores indicated greater fibrosis.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 48 (Treatment Period)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Ishak Fibrosis Score at Week 48 (Treatment Period)
ParticipantsALXN1840
Baseline — Score 08
Baseline — Score 16
Baseline — Score 22
Baseline — Score 39
Baseline — Score 41
Baseline — Score 51
Baseline — Score 61
Baseline — Not evaluable1
Week 48 — Score 05
Week 48 — Score 14
Week 48 — Score 24
Week 48 — Score 38
Week 48 — Score 43
Week 48 — Score 50
Week 48 — Score 60
Week 48 — Not evaluable0
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Hepatic Collagen Content at Week 48 (Treatment Period)

Fibrosis from histology was evaluated by morphometric quantification of hepatic collagen content.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 48 (Treatment Period)
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of collagen
Change From Baseline in Hepatic Collagen Content at Week 48 (Treatment Period)
percentage of collagenALXN1840
Change From Baseline in Hepatic Collagen Content at Week 48 (Treatment Period)8.5445 ± 15.54224
SecondaryChange From Baseline in a-SMA Content at Week 48 (Treatment Period)

Fibrosis from histology was evaluated by morphometric quantification of hepatic a-SMA content.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 48 (Treatment Period)
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of a-SMA
Change From Baseline in a-SMA Content at Week 48 (Treatment Period)
percentage of a-SMAALXN1840
Change From Baseline in a-SMA Content at Week 48 (Treatment Period)1.6002 ± 5.47274
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in NAS Steatosis Grading Score at Week 48 (Treatment Period)

Steatosis from histology was evaluated by the steatosis component of the NAS, which was ranged from 0 to 3 where Score 0: \< 5% (minimal); Score 1: 5 - 33% (mild); Score 2: 34 - 66% (moderate); and Score 3: \> 66% (severe). Higher scores indicated greater steatosis.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 48 (Treatment Period)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in NAS Steatosis Grading Score at Week 48 (Treatment Period)
ParticipantsALXN1840
Baseline — Score 019
Baseline — Score 16
Baseline — Score 23
Baseline — Score 31
Week 48 — Score 015
Week 48 — Score 16
Week 48 — Score 22
Week 48 — Score 31
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Content at Week 48 (Treatment Period)

Steatosis from histology was evaluated by morphometric quantification of hepatic fat content.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 48 (Treatment Period)
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of fat
Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Content at Week 48 (Treatment Period)
percentage of fatALXN1840
Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Content at Week 48 (Treatment Period)-0.2504 ± 2.19263
SecondaryChange From Baseline in NAS Total Score at Week 48 (Treatment Period)

Inflammation was quantified by the NAS total score. The score is defined as the unweighted sum of the scores for steatosis (0 \[minimal\] to 3 \[severe\]), lobular inflammation (0 \[none\] to 3 \[\>4 foci / 200x field\]), and hepatocellular ballooning (0 \[none\] to 2 \[many\]), thus ranging from 0 (no inflammation) to 8 (severe inflammation), with higher scores indicating more severe disease.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 48 (Treatment Period)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in NAS Total Score at Week 48 (Treatment Period)
units on a scaleALXN1840
Change From Baseline in NAS Total Score at Week 48 (Treatment Period)0.1 ± 1.69
SecondaryTreatment Period: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug related. An SAE was an AE that met at least 1 of the following criteria: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization for the AE, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, congenital anomaly/birth defect (in the child of a participant who was exposed to the study drug), important medical event or reaction. The TEAEs were AEs with onset on or after the first study drug dose. A summary of all Serious Adverse Events and Other Adverse Events (nonserious) regardless of causality is located in the 'Reported Adverse Events' Section.

Time frame:
Day 1 (Treatment Period) up to Week 48 (Treatment Period)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Treatment Period: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
ParticipantsALXN1840
Treatment Period: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)30
SecondaryExtension Period: Number of Participants With TEAEs

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug related. An SAE was an AE that met at least 1 of the following criteria: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization for the AE, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, congenital anomaly/birth defect (in the child of a participant who was exposed to the study drug), important medical event or reaction. The TEAEs were AEs with onset on or after the first study drug dose. A summary of all Serious Adverse Events and Other Adverse Events (nonserious) regardless of causality is located in the 'Reported Adverse Events' Section.

Time frame:
Day 1 (Extension Period) up Week 52 (Extension Period)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Extension Period: Number of Participants With TEAEs
ParticipantsALXN1840
Extension Period: Number of Participants With TEAEs24
SecondaryTreatment Period: Predose Trough Plasma Total Mo Concentration
Time frame:
Predose up to 4 hours postdose at Week 6 (Day 43) and Week 36 (Day 253)
Reported as:
Mean · nanograms (ng)/milliliter (mL)
Treatment Period: Predose Trough Plasma Total Mo Concentration
nanograms (ng)/milliliter (mL)ALXN1840
Week 6174.39 ± 113.824
Week 36131.19 ± 103.359
SecondaryTreatment Period: Predose Trough Plasma Total PUF Mo Concentration
Time frame:
Predose up to 4 hours postdose at Week 6 (Day 43) and Week 36 (Day 253)
Reported as:
Mean · ng/mL
Treatment Period: Predose Trough Plasma Total PUF Mo Concentration
ng/mLALXN1840
Week 65.888 ± 2.0176
Week 367.843 ± 6.0564
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mo in Liver Biopsy Specimen at Week 48 (Treatment Period)
Time frame:
Baseline, Week 48 (Treatment Period)
Reported as:
Mean · μg/g
Change From Baseline in Mo in Liver Biopsy Specimen at Week 48 (Treatment Period)
μg/gALXN1840
Change From Baseline in Mo in Liver Biopsy Specimen at Week 48 (Treatment Period)69.6976 ± 43.02655
SecondaryClinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale Score at Week 48 (Treatment Period)

The CGI-I is a 7-point scale clinician assessment where 1= very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 = minimally worse; 6 = much worse; or 7 = very much worse. Higher scores indicated worsening of disease.

Time frame:
Week 48 (Treatment Period)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale Score at Week 48 (Treatment Period)
units on a scaleALXN1840
Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale Score at Week 48 (Treatment Period)3.1 ± 1.26
SecondaryChange From Baseline in CGI-S Scale Score at Week 48 (Treatment Period)

The CGI-S is a 7-point scale clinician assessment. Participants were assessed on severity of illness at the time of rating/assessment as follows: 1 = normal, not at all ill; 2 = borderline ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; or 7 = extremely ill. Higher scores indicated worsening of disease.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 48 (Treatment Period)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in CGI-S Scale Score at Week 48 (Treatment Period)
units on a scaleALXN1840
Change From Baseline in CGI-S Scale Score at Week 48 (Treatment Period)-0.4 ± 1.50

Adverse events

Collected over Day 1 (Treatment Period) up to Week 52 (Extension Period) (up to a total of approximately 100 weeks). Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Treatment Period: ALXN18400/31 (0%)3/31 (9.7%)30/31 (96.8%)
Extension Period: ALXN18400/25 (0%)2/25 (8%)24/25 (96%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventTreatment Period: ALXN1840Extension Period: ALXN1840
Suicidal ideationPsychiatric disorders0/311/25
Humerus fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/311/25
Drug-induced liver injuryHepatobiliary disorders1/310/25
Hepatic enzyme increasedInvestigations1/310/25
Bence Jones proteinuriaRenal and urinary disorders1/310/25
Ureteric obstructionRenal and urinary disorders1/310/25
ProstatitisReproductive system and breast disorders1/310/25
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 170
Most frequent other events
EventTreatment Period: ALXN1840Extension Period: ALXN1840
COVID-19Infections and infestations4/3110/25
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations5/318/25
Alanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigations8/318/25
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increasedInvestigations8/317/25
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders6/316/25
HeadacheNervous system disorders7/316/25
Heavy menstrual bleedingReproductive system and breast disorders1/112/9
PyrexiaGeneral disorders5/313/25
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations2/314/25
Blood alkaline phosphatase increasedInvestigations4/314/25

Baseline characteristics

The Full Analysis Set in the Treatment Period included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug in the Treatment Period and had at least a Baseline liver copper (Cu) value evaluable.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)ALXN1840
Mean37.9 ± 13.81
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)ALXN1840
Female10
Male19
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)ALXN1840
Hispanic or Latino2
Not Hispanic or Latino23
Unknown or Not Reported4
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)ALXN1840
Race — White19
Race — Asian6
Race — Other3
Race — Unknown1
Liver Cu Concentration
Liver Cu Concentration(micrograms (μg)/gram (g))ALXN1840
Mean511.2 ± 361.85
Hepatic Collagen Content
Hepatic Collagen Content(percentage of collagen)ALXN1840
Mean10.2993 ± 6.81501
Alpha-Smooth Muscle Actin (a-SMA) Content
Alpha-Smooth Muscle Actin (a-SMA) Content(percentage of a-SMA)ALXN1840
Mean5.3134 ± 3.25982
Hepatic Fat Content
Hepatic Fat Content(percentage of fat)ALXN1840
Mean1.5815 ± 2.60491

3 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

12 sites
  • Research Site
    Sacramento, California 95817, United States
  • Research Site
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
  • Research Site
    Dallas, Texas 75235, United States
  • Research Site
    Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C4, Canada
  • Research Site
    Århus N, 8200, Denmark
  • Research Site
    Grafton, 1010, New Zealand
  • Research Site
    Moscow, 119021, Russian Federation
  • Research Site
    St. Petersburg, 194017, Russian Federation
  • Research Site
    Singapore, 169608, Singapore
  • Research Site
    Barcelona, 08036, Spain
  • Research Site
    Valencia, 46026, Spain
  • Research Site
    London, SE5 9RS, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Related links

Study documents

  • Study protocol · May 27, 2022
  • Statistical analysis plan · Feb 22, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 18, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04422431
Lead sponsor
Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 9, 2020
Start date
Dec 2, 2020
Primary completion
May 21, 2022
Completion
May 17, 2023
Results posted
Jul 3, 2023
Last update
Oct 18, 2024

Study contacts

Eugene S. Swenson, MD, PhD
study director · Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion