ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04419038Updated Jun 5, 2020

Evaluation of Conjunctival Autografting With MMC Application Versus Ologen Implantation of Recurrent Pterygium

An interventional study of conjunctival autografting augmented with topical application of Mitomycin C and conjunctival autografting augmented with Ologen implantation in Recurrent Pterygium of Eye, sponsored by Menoufia University. Completed. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-06-05.

Sponsored by Menoufia University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 years 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2016, registered May 2020).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
63
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Ologen implantation with conjunctival autografting shows promising results in surgical management of recurrent pterygium comparable to MMC application with conjunctival autografting with mild non vision threatening postoperative complications.

Read the detailed description

Patients were randomly enrolled into two groups. Group A included 32 eyes of 32 patients who underwent conjunctival autografting augmented with topical application of Mitomycin C (0.2 mg/mL). Group B included 31 eyes of 31 who underwent conjunctival autografting augmented with Ologen implantation.

All patients had a recurrent nasal pterygium after one surgical session for removal of the primary one. Any patient with primary nasal pterygium, or patients with recurrent pterygium who had more than one session for surgical removal were excluded. As well, patients with cicatrizing conjunctival disease or previous conjunctival surgery were excluded from the study.

A comprehensive ophthalmic examination, including best-corrected visual acuity testing, slit-lamp examination, Goldmann applanation tonometry, fundus examination, and examination of ocular motility, was carried out for all patients. According to their corneal extent, pterygia were classified into 3 grades:

Grade 1: Fibrovascular proliferations extend up to one quarter of the corneal diameter.

Grade 2: Fibrovascular proliferations extend up to the center of the cornea. Grade 3: Fibrovascular proliferations extend beyond the visual axis.

Consents were taken from all patients and research was approved by the institutional review board. All measures were in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

As for group A, 0.2 mg/mL MMC was prepared by reconstituting 2 mg vial of Mitomycin with 10 mL sterile water for injection. When using Mitomycin 10 mg vial, the same concentration was achieved by reconstituting the 10 mg vial 10 mL sterile water for injection. Then 1 ml of the prepared solution was diluted with 4 ml of saline to achieve 0.2 mg/mL (0.02% solution). This solution is stable for 2 weeks under refrigeration, and 24 hours at room temperature (59° to 86°F).

As for group B, 1×2 or 2×2 square millimeter porous collagen matrix was used for each patient

02

Conditions studied

  • Recurrent Pterygium of Eye

Browse trials for

03

In context

Pterygium

109 studies on the registry are indexed under Pterygium; 9 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 63 is close to the median of 60 across 93 interventional studies indexed under Pterygium.

Browse Pterygium studies →

Lead sponsor

Menoufia University is the lead sponsor of 199 studies on the registry; 54 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

recurrent nasal pterygium after one surgical session for removal of the primary one

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • primary nasal pterygium,
  • recurrent pterygium with more than one session for surgical removal
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
63 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    conjunctival autografting with MMC

    Group A included 32 eyes of 32 patients who underwent conjunctival autografting augmented with topical application of Mitomycin C (0.2 mg/mL).

    Procedure: conjunctival autografting augmented with topical application of Mitomycin C · Procedure: conjunctival autografting augmented with Ologen implantation

  • Active comparator
    conjunctival autografting augmented with Ologen implantation

    Group B included 31 eyes of 31 who underwent conjunctival autografting augmented with Ologen implantation.

    Procedure: conjunctival autografting augmented with topical application of Mitomycin C · Procedure: conjunctival autografting augmented with Ologen implantation

Interventions

  • Procedureconjunctival autografting augmented with topical application of Mitomycin C

    Group A included 32 eyes of 32 patients who underwent conjunctival autografting augmented with topical application of Mitomycin C (0.2 mg/mL).

  • Procedureconjunctival autografting augmented with Ologen implantation

    Group B included 31 eyes of 31 who underwent conjunctival autografting augmented with Ologen implantation.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 32 eyes with Topical application of Mitomycin C in concentration of (0.2 mg/mL).

    As for group A, 0.2 mg/mL MMC was prepared by reconstituting 2 mg vial of Mitomycin with 10 mL sterile water for injection. When using Mitomycin 10 mg vial, the same concentration was achieved by reconstituting the 10 mg vial 10 mL sterile water for injection. Then 1 ml of the prepared solution was diluted with 4 ml of saline to achieve 0.2 mg/mL (0.02% solution).

    Time frame: "through study completion, an average of 1 year".

  2. 31 eyes with ologen implantation(6 mm in diameter and 2 mm thick.) was used for each patient.

    In group B; Ologen was applied under the graft tissue once it is secured in place (half the vial is used for every patient)

    Time frame: "through study completion, an average of 1 year".

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Wagdy FM, Farahat HG, Ellakwa AF, Mandour SS. Evaluation of Conjunctival Autografting Augmented with Mitomycin C Application versus Ologen Implantation in the Surgical Treatment of Recurrent Pterygium. J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan 12;2021:8820926. doi: 10.1155/2021/8820926. eCollection 2021. PubMed 33505715 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 5, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04419038
Responsible party
Amin Faisal Ellakwa (clinical professor, Menoufia University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 5, 2020
Start date
Jan 15, 2016
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2019
Completion
Dec 30, 2019
Last update
Jun 5, 2020

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion