ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04417959Updated Apr 29, 2026

A Comparison of Visual Functions and Side-effects After DSAEK or DMEK for Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy

An interventional study of Phaco-DSAEK and Phaco-DMEK in Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy, sponsored by University of Aarhus. Completed at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 50 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-29.

Sponsored by University of Aarhus · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
112
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) are becoming increasingly popular as treatments for Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy. However, despite several years of use the incidence of cystoid macular edema and damage related to increased intraocular pressure (IOP), and the forward scattering of light through the eye following DSAEK or DMEK have to our knowledge not been prospectively described. Therefore, this project will be a randomized controlled trial investigating these matters.

Read the detailed description

Purpose:

To investigate 3 different side-effects after DSAEK, DMEK, and cataract extraction (CE) in a randomized controlled trial with 12 months follow-up with CE as an additional control group.

  1. To investigate the extend of subclinical cystoid macular edema (CME) and epiretinal membrane (ERM) after DSAEK, DMEK, and CE.
  2. To investigate IOP-related changes after DSAEK, DMEK, and CE in means of pupil diameter and cpRNFLT. Further, to describe iris alterations including Urrets-Zavalia Syndrome (UZS).
  3. To compare the difference in forward scatter, visual acuity (VA), and low-contrast VA after DSAEK, DMEK, and CE and relate this to the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Further, to investigate changes in higher-order aberrations, patient reported outcome measures (PROM), and total corneal refraction after the procedures.

Hypotheses:

  1. Subclinical CME and ERM are adverse effects that occur equally often following DSAEK, DMEK, and CE.
  2. Following DSAEK, DMEK, and CE, there are no differences in the amount of IOP-related changes in means of pupil diameter,cpRNFLT thinning or iris alterations.
  3. Changes in OSI, HOA, PROM, VA, contrast sensitivity, and total corneal refraction occur to the same extend after DSAEK, DMEK, and CE.

Materials and Methods:

Patients referred to the Department of Ophthalmology at Aarhus University Hospital (AUH) for EK or CE will be assessed in order to identify suitable study subjects.

Only patients with primary endothelial failure (Fuchs endothelial dystrophy) and a concomitant need for CE will be considered eligible for randomization to either the DSAEK or the DMEK study groups. Patients included in the study will be randomized 1:1 to the DSAEK or DMEK study groups. Patients referred for CE will be offered to participate in the project and will be included in the CE group. Based on power calculations, it is planned to include 40 patients in each of the 3 groups.

Subject and donor characteristics will be gathered. Subjects with prior uveitis, severe vitreous opacities, diabetes, retinal vein occlusion, glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration, macular atrophy, trauma or corneal grafting will be excluded from the study. Data collection will be conducted at AUH before the interventions and in the follow-up period.

Donor tissue will be prepared in the Danish Cornea Bank, either pre-pealed for DMEK or pre-cut for DSAEK.

Measurements as described below will be conducted both prior to the surgical intervention and 3, 6, and 12 months after this.

Patients lost to follow-up during the project will only be used for analysis at the time-point they have attended. Therefore, for all time-points after the loss to follow-up these subjects will be excluded from our investigation.

In case of capsule rupture where the intraocular lens still is positioned into the lens bag during CE or if rebubbling is needed after DSAEK or DMEK, the subjects will still be eligible for further participation in the project. Adverse events such as primary graft failure or rejection is considered to be rare events for both DSAEK and DMEK and subjects with these will be excluded from our final estimates.

02

Conditions studied

  • Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy
03

In context

Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy

92 studies on the registry are indexed under Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy; 27 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 112 is above the median of 50 across 62 interventional studies indexed under Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy.

Browse Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Aarhus is the lead sponsor of 1,300 studies on the registry; 189 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Cataract and/or
  • Fuch's endothelial dystrophy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Uveitis
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Retinal vein occlusion
  • Glaucoma
  • Exudative age-related macular degeneration
  • Advanced macular atrophy
  • Ocular trauma
  • Prior corneal grafting
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
112 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Phaco-DSAEK

    Subjects randomized to this arm will consist of patients with both Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy and cataract. These will be treated with phacoemulsification and Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

    Procedure: Phaco-DSAEK

  • Other
    Phaco-DMEK

    Subjects randomized to this arm will consist of patients with both Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy and cataract. These will be treated with phacoemulsification and Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

    Procedure: Phaco-DMEK

Interventions

  • ProcedurePhaco-DSAEK

    The intervention will be performed as a DSAEK triple-procedure with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation prior to DSAEK.

  • ProcedurePhaco-DMEK

    The intervention will be performed as a DMEK triple-procedure with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation prior to DMEK.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA)

    BCVA will be measured using the early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) chart.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cystoid macular edema

    This will be quantified as central retinal thickness (µm) measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans.

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Largest pupil diameter (mm)

    The pupil diameter will be measured using the pupillometer DP-2000, Neuroptics.

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Iris contraction velocity (mm/s)

    The contraction velocity will be measured using the pupillometer DP-2000, Neuroptics.

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Circumpapillary Retinal Nerve Fibre Layer Thickness (cpRNFLT) (µm)

    The cpRNFLT will be measured using OCT-scans.

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Contrast-sensitivity (Weber contrast units)

    This will be measured using the Freiburg Visual Acuity and Contrast Test (FrACT)

    Time frame: 12 months

  6. Forward light scatter

    Forward light scatter will be measured using the HD Analyzer, Optical Quality Analysis System (OQAS), Visiometrics. The forward light scatter will be assessed using the objective scattering index (OSI). This system evaluates the intraocular scattering of light.

    Time frame: 12 months

  7. Higher-order aberrations (HOA) (µm)

    Measurements will be performed using Pentacam, Oculus. HOA will be quantified as the root mean square (RMS).

    Time frame: 12 months

Other outcomes

  1. Epiretinal membrane (ERM) formation

    Formation and changes will be assessed using OCT-scans.

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Ophthalmology
    Aarhus, Central Jutland 8200, Denmark
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Madsen MBM, Ivarsen A, Hjortdal J. Optical quality after ultrathin Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Br J Ophthalmol. 2026 May 20;110(6):607-614. doi: 10.1136/bjo-2025-328970. PubMed 41381122 ↗
  • Madsen MBM, Ivarsen A, Hjortdal J. Visual function after ultrathin Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty or Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty combined with cataract surgery: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Br J Ophthalmol. 2024 May 21;108(5):654-661. doi: 10.1136/bjo-2023-323304. PubMed 37290822 ↗
  • Molbech Madsen MB, Ivarsen A, Hjortdal J. Macular Thickness After Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Combined With Cataract Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Cornea. 2023 Dec 1;42(12):1536-1543. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000003256. Epub 2023 Feb 24. PubMed 36853598 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 29, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04417959
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 5, 2020
Start date
Jul 1, 2020
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2022
Completion
Sep 1, 2025
Last update
Apr 29, 2026

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion