CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04401956Updated Oct 27, 2021

Bread Study: Comparison of the Tolerance of Spelt and Wheat Bread

An interventional study of bread in Non-celiac Gluten Sensitivity and Wheat Intolerance, sponsored by University of Hohenheim. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-10-27.

Sponsored by University of Hohenheim · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This project aims to verify the hypothesis that spelt products are more tolerable than bread wheat products in a target group of individuals with self-diagnosed wheat sensitivity. In addition, the influence of different manufacturing processes will be considered.

Read the detailed description

Wheat cereals are known to be capable of triggering wheat allergy and celiac disease. The prevalence of both diseases is about 1%. Recently, another clinical entity was described, the non-celiac wheat sensitivity (NCWS). The origin and mechanisms of NCWS are unclear at present, but the existence of this new disease entity has been proven by double-blind placebo-controlled challenge tests. Three different grain components have been proposed as triggers of NCWS, gluten, α-amylase trypsin inhibitors or fermentable carbohydrates (FODMAPs).

It is reported that individuals with self-diagnosed NCWS quite often tolerate spelt products much better, even though spelt shows a higher gluten content than bread wheat products. Therefore, the question arises whether this putative spelt tolerance can be confirmed on an objective basis and whether the underlying molecular mechanisms can be elucidated. So far, human study addressing such questions are lacking.

This project aims to verify the hypothesis that spelt products are more tolerable than bread wheat products in a target group of individuals with self-diagnosed wheat sensitivity. In addition, the influence of different manufacturing processes on wheat sensitivity will be revealed.

For this purpose, the trial involves individuals with self-diagnosed wheat sensitivity and spelt tolerance. Six different kinds of bread will be tested, including 4 wheat and spelt breads, each of them produced following a traditional or a conventional way. Aim of this part is to objective bread wheat and spelt intolerance in a defined population. To find out whether FODMAPs or gluten affect the tolerance of bread, two additional breads will be tested, a gluten-free bread with added gluten and a gluten-free bread with added FODMAPs.

02

Conditions studied

  • Non-celiac Gluten Sensitivity
  • Wheat Intolerance

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Human Nutrition
  • NCWS
  • Spelt
  • Wheat Bread
03

In context

Hypersensitivity

1,916 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypersensitivity; 265 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 24 is below the median of 57 across 1,384 interventional studies indexed under Hypersensitivity.

Browse Hypersensitivity studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Hohenheim is the lead sponsor of 42 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 ≤70 years
  • Signed declaration of consent
  • Willingness to adhere to the prescribed diet for the duration of the study
  • Subjective bread wheat intolerance
  • No known spelled intolerance
  • No acute or chronic gastrointestinal diseases (e.g. celiac disease / wheat allergy)
  • No participation in another clinical trial (current or within the past 30 days)
  • Gluten-containing diet at least 6 weeks before the start of the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Taking intestinal therapeutics, antibiotics, immunosuppressants or similar
  • Pregnancy / lactation
  • Relevant violations of the nutritional protocol
  • Occurrence of relevant diseases (possibly individual decision)
  • Revocation of consent
  • Accommodation in a clinic or similar facility based on an official or judicial order
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
24 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Gluten free bread with added gluten

    Bread will be eaten by the participants for 4 consecutive days.

    Other: bread

  • Active comparator
    Gluten free bread with added FODMAPs

    Bread will be eaten by the participants for 4 consecutive days.

    Other: bread

  • Experimental
    Traditional manufactured wheat bread

    Bread will be eaten by the participants for 4 consecutive days.

    Other: bread

  • Experimental
    Traditional manufactured spelt bread

    Bread will be eaten by the participants for 4 consecutive days.

    Other: bread

  • Experimental
    Conventional manufactured wheat bread

    Bread will be eaten by the participants for 4 consecutive days.

    Other: bread

  • Experimental
    Conventional manufactured spelt bread

    Bread will be eaten by the participants for 4 consecutive days.

    Other: bread

Interventions

  • Otherbread

    Different types of bread

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change of IBS-SSS Total score

    IBS-SSS Total score will be collected with a questionnaire

    Time frame: Study examinations are at baseline, after wash out phases (day 3, 10, 17, 24, 31, 38) and after bread intervention phases (day 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42).)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Extraintestinal Symptoms

    The study team will ask the participants for typical extraintestinal symptoms in NCWS like headache, foggy-mind, nausea, heartburn, exhaustion

    Time frame: Study examinations are at baseline, after wash out phases (day 3, 10, 17, 24, 31, 38) and after bread intervention phases (day 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42).)

  2. Blood and fecal markers

    Change of blood- and fecal markers that will reveal inflammation or intestinal permeability (Anti-gliadin Immunglobulin G antibody, lipase, ferritin, zonulin, calprotectin and lactoferrin)

    Time frame: Study examinations are at baseline and after bread intervention phases (day 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42).

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Hohenheim
    Stuttgart, 70599, Germany
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 27, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04401956
Lead sponsor
University of Hohenheim
Responsible party
Stephan C. Bischoff, MD, Professor (Professor Dr. med., University of Hohenheim) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 26, 2020
Start date
May 15, 2020
Primary completion
Aug 10, 2021
Completion
Sep 7, 2021
Last update
Oct 27, 2021

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion