ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04389749Updated May 4, 2026

Continuous Passive Motion Following Fixation of Pelvic and Knee Fractures

An interventional study of CPM in Fractures, Bone, sponsored by University of Cincinnati. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-04.

Sponsored by University of Cincinnati · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2026, 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Oct 2020; still recruiting 6 years 1 month later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators will directly compare the visual analog scale scores and narcotic pain medication requirements in the patients who have continuous passive motion (CPM) versus those who do not during the course of the hospital admission following an open reduction internal fixation surgery for acetabular fracture, supracondylar femur fracture, or a tibial plateau fracture.

Read the detailed description

This will be a prospective comparative cohort study analyzing the practices of three surgeons, one of whom routinely uses CPM following fixation of pelvic and acetabular fractures, and two surgeons who do not.

All patients, over the age of 18 years who have undergone open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of isolated acetabular fractures, supracondylar femur fractures, or tibial plateau fracture will be asked to participate. Those who consent will be randomized into two groups. The experimental group will have a CPM applied in the PACU immediately post-op and it will be utilized while the patient is awake in bed for 2 hours on and 2 hours off, when not mobilizing with Physical Therapy (PT). The experimental group will also have traditional PT, including sessions 1 to 3 times a week. The control group will have typical care, including working with physical therapy 1 to 3 times a week. The investigators will directly compare the VAS scores and narcotic pain medication requirements in the patients who have CPM versus those who do not during the course of the hospital admission. VAS scores will be assessed throughout the day by RN and/or PT. Functional outcomes will be assessed at the one-year mark using the Iowa and Majeed pelvic functional outcome tools along with the SF-12. Orthopedic Resident or Nurse Clinical will check the patient for incision integrity each day and each session of using the CPM, the patient will be monitored for adverse events. Data will be collected using Epic.

The investigators will record patient demographics including age, sex, and pre-existing narcotic usage. Fracture type according to the Orthopaedic Trauma Association will be recorded. VAS scores and pain medication requirements will be recorded from the first 48 hours during the patient's stay. Pain scores and CPM use will be obtained from Epic using the flowsheet.

Functional outcomes will be assessed at the one-year mark using the Iowa and Majeed pelvic functional outcome tools along with the SF-12.

02

Conditions studied

  • Fractures, Bone

Browse trials for

03

In context

Fractures, Bone

723 studies on the registry are indexed under Fractures, Bone; 114 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 80 across 458 interventional studies indexed under Fractures, Bone.

Browse Fractures, Bone studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Cincinnati is the lead sponsor of 324 studies on the registry; 42 are open to participants now.

Of its 24 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 15 (63%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 or greater
  • Isolated acetabular fractures, supracondylar femur fractures, or tibial plateau fracture
  • Have undergone operative intervention for fracture

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Injury to either lower extremity that affects the patient's ability to weight bear
  • Under the age of 18
  • Pregnant
  • A prisoner
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    CPM

    The experimental group will have a CPM applied in the PACU immediately post-op and it will be utilized while the patient is awake in bed for 2 hours on and 2 hours off, when not mobilizing with Physical Therapy (PT). The experimental group will also have traditional PT, including sessions 1 to 3 times a week.

    Device: CPM

  • No intervention
    No CPM

    The control group will have typical care, including working with physical therapy 1 to 3 times a week.

Interventions

  • DeviceCPM

    CPM-continuous passive motion device.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. VAS Pain Score

    Pain will be assessed by the patient on a scale of 1-10 during hospitalization. 1=no pain; 10=worst pain

    Time frame: Visual Analog Score for pain will be recorded daily after the surgery each day until the patient is discharged or up to 365 days..

Secondary outcomes

  1. SF-12

    The Short Form 12 (SF-12) uses just 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view. An algorithm is used to generate the physical and mental health composite scores for comparison to normative data. The mean score is set to 50. Scores \>50 indicate better physical or mental health than to mean. Scores \<50 indicate worse physical or mental health than the mean.

    Time frame: This score will be completed at the one-year post-operative visit.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Univrsity of Cincinnati Medical Center
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45267, United States
    Recruiting
    • Kim Hasselfeld, MS · Contacthasselky@uc.edu · 5137776213
    • Henry Sagi, MD · Contact5137776213
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Oct 2020 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2026, 68 months after the start.

Of 148 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Fractures, Bone, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 57. This study's planned 68 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 166 studies reached it within 29 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 57.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 26, 2020
First posted
May 15, 2020
StartActual
Oct 6, 2020
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2026
CompletionEst.
Jun 2027
Last update
May 4, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 4, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04389749
Responsible party
H. Claude Sagi, MD (Principal Investigator, University of Cincinnati) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 15, 2020
Start date
Oct 6, 2020
Primary completion
Jun 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Last update
May 4, 2026

Study contacts

Kimberly A Hasselfeld, MS
Contact
hasselky@uc.edu
513-558-1933
Henry C Sagi, MD
principal investigator · University of Cincinnati

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion