ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04378790ATS22Updated Feb 11, 2026

A Randomized Trial to Evaluate Sequential vs Simultaneous Patching

A Phase 3 interventional study of Patching and Glasses in Amblyopia, sponsored by Jaeb Center for Health Research. Recruiting at 68 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 3 Years to 13 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-11.

Sponsored by Jaeb Center for Health Research · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Dec 2020; still recruiting 5 years 11 months later.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
544
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
3 Years to 13 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A randomized trial to determine whether simultaneous treatment with spectacles and patching has an equivalent VA outcome compared with sequential treatment, first with spectacles alone followed by patching (if needed), for previously untreated amblyopia in children 3 to \<13 years of age.

Read the detailed description

At an enrollment visit, distance VA will be measured in trial frames with or without cycloplegia based on a cycloplegic refraction performed within 30 days. If still apparently eligible, children will be prescribed spectacles and will then return for a spectacle baseline visit, where they will wear their new spectacles for the first time for at least 10 minutes (but no more than 24 hours) and will be tested in those new spectacles to confirm final eligibility prior to randomization.

Participants not found to be eligible in their new spectacles will end study participation. Participants eligible for the study will be randomly allocated to one of two treatment groups: Sequential (spectacles alone) and then patching if needed (monitored by ODM), or Simultaneous (spectacles and patching monitored by ODM).

After randomization, follow-up visits will occur at 8-week intervals through 56 weeks. At each visit on or after the 8-week visit, participants will be classified as either: stable/worsening or improving; those stable/worsening are then classified as having either resolved or residual amblyopia, provided that the current and most recent previous visit were completed at least 6-weeks apart (target 8 weeks) and provided the required test and retest VA testing was completed. Participants who are stable/worsening and have residual amblyopia in the sequential group will start patching (monitored by ODM) and continue to be followed every 8 weeks. Participants in the simultaneous group, or in the sequential group after having advanced to patching, who are stable/worsening but have residual amblyopia will be released to treatment at investigator discretion.

All participants continue 8-weekly visits until 56 weeks when Study participation ends.

02

Conditions studied

  • Amblyopia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • patching
  • glasses
  • spectacles
  • simultaneous
  • sequential
03

In context

Amblyopia

189 studies on the registry are indexed under Amblyopia; 41 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 544 is above the median of 60 across 137 interventional studies indexed under Amblyopia.

Browse Amblyopia studies →

Lead sponsor

Jaeb Center for Health Research is the lead sponsor of 129 studies on the registry; 16 are open to participants now.

Of its 17 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 15 (88%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Years to 13 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age 3 to \<13 years at the time of randomization
  2. Amblyopia associated with anisometropia, strabismus, or both

    o Criteria for strabismic amblyopia: At least one of the following must be met:

    • Presence of a heterotropia on examination at distance or near fixation (with or without optical correction)
    • Documented history of strabismus which is no longer present (which in the judgment of the investigator could have caused amblyopia)

      • Criteria for anisometropia: At least one of the following criteria must be met:

        • 1.00 D difference between eyes in spherical equivalent (SE)
        • 1.50 D difference in astigmatism between corresponding meridians in the two eyes
      • Criteria for combined-mechanism amblyopia: Both of the following criteria must be met:
    • Criteria for strabismus are met (see above)

      • 1.00 D difference between eyes in spherical equivalent OR ≥1.50 D difference in astigmatism between corresponding meridians in the two eyes
  3. No previous treatment for amblyopia, including no more than 24 hours of spectacle wear.
  4. Investigator planning to initiate spectacle correction of refractive error meeting the following criteria based on a cycloplegic refraction that has been performed within 30 days:

    1. Full correction of anisometropia
    2. Full correction of astigmatism with the same axis found by the cycloplegic refraction
    3. Full correction of any myopia
    4. Hyperopia must not be under corrected by more than 1.50 D, and reduction in plus sphere must be symmetric in the two eyes.
  5. At enrollment, single VA measured in each eye assessed in trial frames with the spectacle correction the investigator plans to prescribe, using the investigator's routine method as follows:

    • VA in the amblyopic eye 20/40 to 20/200 inclusive.
    • Age-normal VA in the fellow eye:40,41

      • 3 years: 0.4 logMAR (20/50) or better
      • 4 years: 0.3 logMAR (20/40) or better
      • 5-6 years: 0.2 logMAR (20/32) or better
      • 7-12 years: 0.12 logMAR (78 letters) or better
    • Interocular difference ≥ 3 logMAR lines (0.3 logMAR) or ≥ 15 letters o When participants return for the Spectacle Baseline / Randomization Visit with their new spectacles, they will need to meet the same criteria as above using the ATS-HOTV or E-ETDRS protocol after wearing the new spectacles for at least 10 minutes (based upon the mean of a test and retest of VA in those new spectacles).
  6. Investigator is willing to prescribe spectacle wear followed sequentially by patching or simultaneous spectacles and patching treatment per protocol.
  7. Parent understands the protocol and is willing to accept randomization.
  8. Parent has phone (or access to phone) and is willing to be contacted by Jaeb Center staff or other study staff.
  9. Relocation outside of area of an active PEDIG site for this study within the next 56 weeks is not anticipated.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Myopia greater than -6.00 D spherical equivalent in either eye.
  2. Previous intraocular or refractive surgery.
  3. Planned strabismus surgery in the next 56 weeks.
  4. Any previous treatment for amblyopia (patching, atropine, Bangerter filter, vision therapy, or binocular treatment).
  5. Previous spectacle or contact lens wear for more than 24 hours.
  6. Parent and participant willing to forego option of contact lens wear for the duration of the study.
  7. Ocular co-morbidity that may reduce VA determined by an ocular examination performed within the past 7 months (Note: nystagmus per se does not exclude the participant if the above VA criteria are met).
  8. Severe developmental delay that would interfere with treatment or evaluation (in the opinion of the investigator). Participants with mild speech delay or reading and/or learning disabilities or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are not excluded.
  9. Known allergy to adhesive patches.
  10. Known allergy to silicone.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
544 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Sequential treatment

    full-time spectacle correction first, with subsequent patching for 2 hours per day/7 days per week only if needed (no improvement (stable/worsening) and residual)

    Other: Patching · Other: Glasses

  • Experimental
    Simultaneous treatment

    full-time spectacle correction and part-time patching for 2 hours per day/7 days per week

    Other: Patching · Other: Glasses

Interventions

  • OtherPatching

    Procedure in which the eye is covered utilizing a patch to increase the strength of the uncovered eye.

    Also known as: Eye Patch

  • OtherGlasses

    Eye Glasses are created and worn by patient to improve vision

    Also known as: Spectacles

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Change in Amblyopic Eye logMAR distance Visual Acuity

    1. Amblyopic eye VA (calculated as mean of test and retest) at the last visit that was the basis for a "stable resolved" or "stable residual" determination (in the sequential group, stable residual amblyopia criteria can be reached only after patching has been instituted); or 2. 56-week visit amblyopic-eye VA (calculated as mean of test and retest) in those completing a 56-week visit without ever meeting criteria for "stable resolved" or "stable residual" amblyopia (if retest missing at 56 weeks, the single test value will be used).

    Time frame: 56 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pediatric Eye Questionnaire (PedEyeQ)

    Rasch scores for each questionnaire item will be obtained from published look-up tables available at www.pedig.net, and used to calculate a score for each participant and a separate treatment group mean for the three PedEyeQ domains of the Child, Proxy and Parent PedEyeQ at randomization and at each visit. Scores will also be converted to a 0-100 scale to aid in interpretation. Multiplicity adjusted two sided P-values and confidence intervals will be produced. Child PedEyeQ: Functional Vision, Bothered by Eyes and Vision, Social, Frustration / Worry Proxy PedEyeQ: Functional Vision, Bothered by Eyes and Vision, Social, Frustration / Worry, Eyecare Parent PedEyeQ: Impact on Parent and Family, Worry about Child's Eye Condition, Worry about Self-perception and Interactions, Worry about Functional Vision

    Time frame: 56 weeks

  2. Proportion Achieving Stable Resolved Outcome with Spectacles Alone

    The proportion of participants in the Sequential Spectacles group who achieve "stable resolved" outcome status with spectacles alone will be calculated, along with a multiplicity adjusted two sided P-value and confidence interval.

    Time frame: 56 Weeks

  3. Proportion of participants who achieve Binary distance visual acuity outcomes

    The proportion of participants who achieve the following binary outcomes will be tabulated by treatment group to aid in the interpretation of the primary outcome: * The proportion of participants with outcome amblyopic-eye distance VA improvement of ≥ 2 logMAR lines (≥ 10 letters if E-ETDRS) from baseline. * The proportion of participants with stable resolved VA. Poisson regression with the log link will be used to estimate the relative risk of each outcome for the sequential versus simultaneous and a multiplicity adjusted two sided P-value and confidence interval. The Poisson models will include an adjustment for baseline amblyopic eye VA. In the event the number of outcomes is too small for reliable estimation with Poisson regression,43 a treatment group difference and 95% confidence interval will be estimated using the Farrington-Manning Score test or other exact method with no adjustment for baseline VA.

    Time frame: 56 weeks

  4. Time to Stable Resolved Amblyopia

    For those participants who are classified as "stable resolved," the time from baseline to the time meeting that classification will be compared between treatment groups, using a Kaplan-Meier analysis with the logrank test. Multiplicity adjusted two sided P-values and confidence intervals will be produced.

    Time frame: 56 weeks

  5. Difference in Mean Change of Distance Visual Acuity after 8 Weeks on Randomized Treatment

    An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) will be performed to compute the difference in mean change in amblyopic-eye distance logMAR VA after 8 weeks between the sequential and simultaneous treatment groups, adjusted for baseline amblyopic eye distance VA, and a multiplicity adjusted two sided P-value and confidence interval will be constructed on the treatment group difference for each time point.

    Time frame: 56 Weeks

  6. Change in binocularity levels

    Binocularity will be assessed on an ordered scale combining the results of the Randot Preschool Test, Randot butterfly, and Worth 4-Dot (W4D) at near. Results of each individual test also will be tabulated at baseline and at the final study visit according to treatment group. The possible levels of binocularity will be 40, 60, 100, 200, 400, 800 seconds of arc (Randot Preschool test), 2000 seconds of arc (Randot butterfly), binocular perception by W4D (4 or 5 lights), or no binocular perception by W4D (2 or 3 lights). This yields an ordered binocularity scale with 9 ordered levels. The change in binocularity levels for each test will be tabulated and compared between treatment groups using the exact Wilcoxon rank-sum test. The proportion of participants in each treatment group unable to perform testing will be tabulated but these participants will not be included in the analysis of change.

    Time frame: 56 Weeks

  7. Difference in mean change in amblyopic-eye log contrast sensitivity

    Contrast sensitivity scores range from unable (\<0.90), and then from 0.90 to 2.05 (by 0.05 log contrast sensitivity units). An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) will be performed to compute the difference in mean change in amblyopic-eye log contrast sensitivity units between the sequential and simultaneous treatment groups, adjusted for baseline amblyopic eye contrast sensitivity, and a multiplicity adjusted two sided P-value and confidence interval will be produced.

    Time frame: 56 weeks

07

Study locations

68 of 68 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — In accordance with the NIH data sharing policy, a de-identified database is placed in the public domain on the Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group (PEDIG) public website after the completion of each protocol and publication of the primary manuscript.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: Data will be made available after publication.

Access criteria: Users accessing the data must enter an email address.

Data sharing details ↗ · pedig.jaeb.org

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Dec 2020 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2028, 88 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 5, 2020
First posted
May 7, 2020
StartActual
Dec 8, 2020
Primary completionEst.
May 1, 2028
CompletionEst.
May 1, 2028
Last update
Feb 11, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 11, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04378790
Collaborators
National Eye Institute (NEI), Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 7, 2020
Start date
Dec 8, 2020
Primary completion
May 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
May 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 11, 2026

Study contacts

Raymond T Kraker, MSPH
Contact
rkraker@jaeb.org
813-975-8690
Brooke P Fimbel
Contact
813-975-8690
Vivian Manh
study chair · Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington
Michael Gray
study chair · Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion