CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04377633Updated Dec 2, 2024

Anesthesia-handover Checklist and Perioperative Outcomes in Elderly

An interventional study of Oral handover and Checklist handover in Elderly Patients, Major Surgery and Anesthesia; Adverse Effect, sponsored by Peking University First Hospital. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-02.

Sponsored by Peking University First Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,421
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

With the increasing number of surgical cases, intraoperative handover of anesthesia care is common and inevitable. Verbal handover from one anesthesiologist to another during surgery are being used in many hospitals. However, verbal handover is often an informal, unstructured process during which omissions and errors can occur. It is possible that an improved anesthesia handover may reduce the related adverse events. This study aims to test the hypothesis that use of a well-designed, structured handover-checklist to improve handover quality may decrease the occurrence of postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery.

Read the detailed description

It was estimated that more than 9 million patients undergo surgery with a complete anesthesia handover each year worldwide. Verbal handover from one anesthesiologist to another during surgery are being used in many hospitals; and there is no unified patient handover guideline at present.

It is well recognized that the transfer-of-care is a point of vulnerability where valuable patient information can be distorted and omitted. A previous study of the investigators showed that handover of anesthesia care was associated with a higher risk of delirium in elderly patients after major noncardiac surgery. The World Health Organization has included communication during patient care handovers among its top 5 patient safety initiatives.

It is possible that an improved anesthesia-handover protocol may reduce the related adverse events. Many efforts have performed to optimize handover processes. However, handover quality between anesthesiologists has rarely been investigated. The investigators hypothesize that a well-designed, structured handover-checklist will improve handover quality and reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications.

02

Conditions studied

  • Elderly Patients
  • Major Surgery
  • Anesthesia; Adverse Effect
  • Prevention
  • Postoperative Complications

Keywords

  • Elderly patients
  • Major surgery
  • Anesthesia handover
  • Handover checklist
  • Postoperative complications
03

In context

Postoperative Complications

1,233 studies on the registry are indexed under Postoperative Complications; 292 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,421 is above the median of 119 across 689 interventional studies indexed under Postoperative Complications.

Browse Postoperative Complications studies →

Lead sponsor

Peking University First Hospital is the lead sponsor of 378 studies on the registry; 178 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Elderly patients (aged 65 years and over);
  2. Scheduled to undergo major non-cardiac surgery with an expected duration of at least 2 hours;
  3. Requirement of complete handover between anesthesiologists during surgery (initial anesthesiologist no longer returns).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Preoperative history of schizophrenia, epilepsy, Parkinsonism or myasthenia gravis;
  2. Inability to communicate before surgery (coma, profound dementia or language barrier);
  3. Craniocerebral injury or neurosurgery;
  4. Severe liver dysfunction (Child-Pugh grade C), severe renal dysfunction (requiring dialysis), or expected survival of \<24 hours.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1,421 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Sham comparator
    Pre-intervention

    Anesthesia handover during surgery will be performed as usual, i.e., a verbal exchange of pertinent clinical information.

    Procedure: Oral handover

  • Experimental
    Post-intervention

    Anesthesia handover during surgery will be performed according to a structured checklist.

    Procedure: Checklist handover

Interventions

  • ProcedureOral handover

    Anesthesia handover during surgery will be performed as usual, i.e., oral exchange of pertinent clinical information.

  • ProcedureChecklist handover

    Anesthesia handover during surgery will be performed according to a structured handover checklist.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. A composite incidence of all complications within 30 days after surgery.

    Include organ injury (delirium, acute kidney injury, and myocardial injury) within 3 days and other major complications (class II or higher on Clavien-Dindo classification) within 30 days after surgery.

    Time frame: Up to 30 days after surgery.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Intensive care unit admission after surgery.

    Intensive care unit admission after surgery.

    Time frame: Up to 30 days after surgery.

  2. Length of stay in the intensive care unit after surgery.

    Length of stay in the intensive care unit after surgery.

    Time frame: Up to 30 days after surgery.

  3. Incidence of organ injury (delirium, acute kidney injury, and acute myocardial injury) within 3 days after surgery.

    Delirium is diagnosed with the Confusion Assessment Method. Acute kidney injury is diagnosed according to the KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) Criteria. Acute myocardial injury is diagnosed according to the serum cardiac tropinin I level.

    Time frame: Up to 3 days after surgery.

  4. Incidence of major complications within 30 days after surgery.

    Major complications are defined as newly occurred conditions that are harmful to patients' recovery and required medical therapy, i.e., class II or higher on the Clavien-Dindo classification.

    Time frame: Up to 30 days after surgery.

  5. Length of hospital stay after surgery.

    Length of hospital stay after surgery.

    Time frame: Up to 30 days after surgery.

  6. All-cause mortality within 30 days after surgery.

    All-cause mortality within 30 days after surgery.

    Time frame: Up to 30 days after surgery.

Other outcomes

  1. Pain intensity within 3 days after surgery.

    Pain intensity is assessed with the Numeric Rating Scale, an 11-point scale where 0=no pain and 10=the worst pain.

    Time frame: Up to 3 days after surgery.

  2. Subjective sleep quality within 3 days after surgery.

    Subjective sleep quality is assessed with the Numeric Rating Scale, an 11-point scale where 0=the best sleep and 10=the worst sleep.

    Time frame: Up to 3 days after surgery.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Peking University First Hospital
    Beijing, Beijing 100034, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Choromanski D, Frederick J, McKelvey GM, Wang H. Intraoperative patient information handover between anesthesia providers. J Biomed Res. 2014 Sep;28(5):383-7. doi: 10.7555/JBR.28.20140001. Epub 2014 Jun 10. PubMed 25332710 ↗
  • Siddiqui N, Arzola C, Iqbal M, Sritharan K, Guerina L, Chung F, Friedman Z. Deficits in information transfer between anaesthesiologist and postanaesthesia care unit staff: an analysis of patient handover. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2012 Sep;29(9):438-45. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283543e43. PubMed 22569028 ↗
  • Singh H, Thomas EJ, Petersen LA, Studdert DM. Medical errors involving trainees: a study of closed malpractice claims from 5 insurers. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Oct 22;167(19):2030-6. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.19.2030. PubMed 17954795 ↗
  • Arora V, Johnson J, Lovinger D, Humphrey HJ, Meltzer DO. Communication failures in patient sign-out and suggestions for improvement: a critical incident analysis. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Dec;14(6):401-7. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.015107. PubMed 16326783 ↗
  • Horwitz LI, Moin T, Krumholz HM, Wang L, Bradley EH. Consequences of inadequate sign-out for patient care. Arch Intern Med. 2008 Sep 8;168(16):1755-60. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.16.1755. PubMed 18779462 ↗
  • Hudson CC, McDonald B, Hudson JK, Tran D, Boodhwani M. Impact of anesthetic handover on mortality and morbidity in cardiac surgery: a cohort study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015 Feb;29(1):11-6. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2014.05.018. Epub 2014 Nov 24. PubMed 25440620 ↗
  • Jones PM, Cherry RA, Allen BN, Jenkyn KMB, Shariff SZ, Flier S, Vogt KN, Wijeysundera DN. Association Between Handover of Anesthesia Care and Adverse Postoperative Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Major Surgery. JAMA. 2018 Jan 9;319(2):143-153. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.20040. PubMed 29318277 ↗
  • Liu GY, Su X, Meng ZT, Cui F, Li HL, Zhu SN, Wang DX. Handover of anesthesia care is associated with an increased risk of delirium in elderly after major noncardiac surgery: results of a secondary analysis. J Anesth. 2019 Apr;33(2):295-303. doi: 10.1007/s00540-019-02627-3. Epub 2019 Feb 28. PubMed 30820749 ↗
  • Hyder JA, Bohman JK, Kor DJ, Subramanian A, Bittner EA, Narr BJ, Cima RR, Montori VM. Anesthesia Care Transitions and Risk of Postoperative Complications. Anesth Analg. 2016 Jan;122(1):134-44. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000692. PubMed 25794111 ↗
  • Kraman SS, Hamm G. Risk management: extreme honesty may be the best policy. Ann Intern Med. 1999 Dec 21;131(12):963-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-131-12-199912210-00010. PubMed 10610649 ↗
  • Berkenstadt H, Haviv Y, Tuval A, Shemesh Y, Megrill A, Perry A, Rubin O, Ziv A. Improving handoff communications in critical care: utilizing simulation-based training toward process improvement in managing patient risk. Chest. 2008 Jul;134(1):158-62. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-0914. PubMed 18628218 ↗
  • Wayne JD, Tyagi R, Reinhardt G, Rooney D, Makoul G, Chopra S, Darosa DA. Simple standardized patient handoff system that increases accuracy and completeness. J Surg Educ. 2008 Nov-Dec;65(6):476-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2008.06.011. PubMed 19059181 ↗
  • The Joint Commission releases Improving America's Hospitals: The Joint Commission's Annual Report on Quality and Safety, 2008. Jt Comm Perspect. 2009 Jan;29(1):3, 5. No abstract available. PubMed 19368073 ↗
  • Ferran NA, Metcalfe AJ, O'Doherty D. Standardised proformas improve patient handover: Audit of trauma handover practice. Patient Saf Surg. 2008 Sep 25;2:24. doi: 10.1186/1754-9493-2-24. PubMed 18817559 ↗
  • Riesenberg LA, Leitzsch J, Little BW. Systematic review of handoff mnemonics literature. Am J Med Qual. 2009 May-Jun;24(3):196-204. doi: 10.1177/1062860609332512. Epub 2009 Mar 5. PubMed 19269930 ↗
  • Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, Lipsitz SR, Breizat AH, Dellinger EP, Herbosa T, Joseph S, Kibatala PL, Lapitan MC, Merry AF, Moorthy K, Reznick RK, Taylor B, Gawande AA; Safe Surgery Saves Lives Study Group. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 29;360(5):491-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0810119. Epub 2009 Jan 14. PubMed 19144931 ↗
  • Shah AC, Oh DC, Xue AH, Lang JD, Nair BG. An electronic handoff tool to facilitate transfer of care from anesthesia to nursing in intensive care units. Health Informatics J. 2019 Mar;25(1):3-16. doi: 10.1177/1460458216681180. Epub 2016 Dec 1. PubMed 29231091 ↗
  • Hall M, Robertson J, Merkel M, Aziz M, Hutchens M. A Structured Transfer of Care Process Reduces Perioperative Complications in Cardiac Surgery Patients. Anesth Analg. 2017 Aug;125(2):477-482. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002020. PubMed 28504990 ↗
  • Kalkman CJ. Handover in the perioperative care process. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2010 Dec;23(6):749-53. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e3283405ac8. PubMed 21037475 ↗
  • Catchpole KR, de Leval MR, McEwan A, Pigott N, Elliott MJ, McQuillan A, MacDonald C, Goldman AJ. Patient handover from surgery to intensive care: using Formula 1 pit-stop and aviation models to improve safety and quality. Paediatr Anaesth. 2007 May;17(5):470-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2006.02239.x. PubMed 17474955 ↗
  • Philibert I, Barach P. The European HANDOVER Project: a multi-nation program to improve transitions at the primary care--inpatient interface. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Dec;21 Suppl 1:i1-6. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001598. No abstract available. PubMed 23173180 ↗
  • Wohlauer MV, Arora VM, Horwitz LI, Bass EJ, Mahar SE, Philibert I; Handoff Education and Assessment for Residents (HEAR) Computer Supported Cooperative Workgroup. The patient handoff: a comprehensive curricular blueprint for resident education to improve continuity of care. Acad Med. 2012 Apr;87(4):411-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318248e766. PubMed 22361791 ↗
  • Arriaga AF, Elbardissi AW, Regenbogen SE, Greenberg CC, Berry WR, Lipsitz S, Moorman D, Kasser J, Warshaw AL, Zinner MJ, Gawande AA. A policy-based intervention for the reduction of communication breakdowns in inpatient surgical care: results from a Harvard surgical safety collaborative. Ann Surg. 2011 May;253(5):849-54. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181f4dfc8. PubMed 21173696 ↗
  • Petrovic MA, Martinez EA, Aboumatar H. Implementing a perioperative handoff tool to improve postprocedural patient transfers. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2012 Mar;38(3):135-42. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(12)38018-5. PubMed 22435231 ↗
  • Pugel AE, Simianu VV, Flum DR, Patchen Dellinger E. Use of the surgical safety checklist to improve communication and reduce complications. J Infect Public Health. 2015 May-Jun;8(3):219-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2015.01.001. Epub 2015 Feb 26. PubMed 25731674 ↗
  • Gaba DM. Anaesthesiology as a model for patient safety in health care. BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):785-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.785. No abstract available. PubMed 10720368 ↗
  • Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae. PubMed 15273542 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 2, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04377633
Lead sponsor
Peking University First Hospital
Responsible party
Dong-Xin Wang (Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Peking University First Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 6, 2020
Start date
Jul 16, 2020
Primary completion
Nov 23, 2023
Completion
Dec 23, 2023
Last update
Dec 2, 2024

Study contacts

Dong-Xin Wang, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Peking University First Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion