A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Combination Intervention in HIV/AIDS, sponsored by University of California, San Francisco. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 67 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-28.
Sponsored by University of California, San Francisco · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment
Combination approaches will almost certainly be required to generate durable control of HIV in the absence of antiretroviral therapy (a "remission"). In this study, 20 individuals will receive a combination regimen administered during ART and then undergo an analytic treatment interruption (ATI).
The investigators will perform a single arm study of twenty individuals with HIV infection on effective ART. All participants will receive a combination regimen administered during ART and then undergo an analytic treatment interruption. Our strategy has five stages
Follow-up off ART will occur through at least Week 46 (expected) and on or off ART (depending on outcome) through Week 86.
Should this approach work, viral load would be expected to rebound in all individuals a few weeks after the bNAb levels decrease to sub-therapeutic levels. This acute rebound would be followed by a new lower viral load set-point and perhaps a long-term remission.
2,040 studies on the registry are indexed under Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; 272 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 11 is below the median of 105 across 1,543 interventional studies indexed under Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome.
Browse Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome studies →University of California, San Francisco is the lead sponsor of 2,132 studies on the registry; 375 are open to participants now.
Of its 262 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 196 (75%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Key Inclusion Criteria
Key Exclusion Criteria
9. Active hepatitis C (HCV) infection. 10. Presence of significant abnormalities on electrocardiogram. 11. History of potential immune-mediated medical conditions. Individuals with isolated Raynaud's phenomenon or localized disease requiring topical therapy alone will not be excluded.
All volunteers will receive the combination intervention outlined above.
Drug: Combination Intervention
1. IL-12 adjuvanted p24CE DNA prime (p24CE/IL-12) at Weeks 0 and 4 2. IL-12 adjuvanted DNA boost (p24CE plus p55gag) at Week 12 3. MVA/HIV62B (MVA62B) boost at Week 20 4. single dose of two bNAbs (VRC07-523LS and 10-1074, which target CD4 binding site and V3 loop, respectively) at week 24 with a TLR9 agonist (lefitolimod) administered weekly between Weeks 24 and 33 (10 doses) 5. ATI with single dose of VRC07 and 10-1074 at Week 34
Grade 3 or Greater Adverse Event Count
Number of participants who experience a new grade 3 or greater adverse event
Time frame: Week 0 through 102
Proportion of Participants Achieving Post-treatment Control
This will be defined as: 1. Participants who fail to show any consistent rebound above 400 copies RNA/mL between Week 12 of the ATI (when bNAb levels wane) and Week 36 of the ATI 2. Participants who exhibit a rebound and eventually achieve 24 weeks of virus control will be considered as having achieved post-treatment control
Time frame: Week 34 through 86
Any Grade 2, 3 or 4 Adverse Event Through Week 62
Occurrence of any unsolicited adverse events for 28 days after administration of each study agent
Time frame: Week 0 through 62
Any Serious Adverse Events, Medically Attended Adverse Event, and Potentially Immune-mediated Medical Condition
Occurrence of any serious adverse events, medically attended adverse event, and potentially immune-mediated medical condition from the time of administration of the first study injection through 12 months after administration of the final study injection
Time frame: Week 0 through 86
Magnitude of T Cell Responses
We measured the magnitude of the CD8+ T cells to gag conserved elements (CE) 2 weeks after MVA boost (Week 22). We measured new or boosted pre-existing interferon (IFN)ɣ+ Gag/CE-specific CD8+ T cell responses. The magnitude was determined based on intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) by measuring the frequency of interferon (IFN)ɣ+ Gag/CE-specific CD8+ T cell responses after 6 hour stimulation with peptide pools matching the CE immunogen.
Time frame: Week 22
Breadth of T Cell Responses
We measured the breadth of the vaccine-induced T cell response after DNA/MVA vaccination (two weeks after the MVA boost; Week 22). We defined breadth based on the number of conserved epitope (CE) pools with a positive CD8+ T cell responses, as defined by measuring the frequency of interferon (IFN)ɣ+ Gag/CE-specific CD8+ T cell responses after 6 hour stimulation with peptide pools matching the CE immunogen (using intracellular cytokine staining, ICS). Seven smaller CE pools were tested on each sample. Positive responses were determined based on a magnitude of IFNg+ cells greater than 0.001% of CD8+ T cells after peptide stimulation and after subtraction of background responses.
Time frame: Week 22
Intact Provirus DNA Levels
The HIV-1 DNA reservoir was estimated using digital droplet PCR (Intact Proviral DNA Assay; IPDA). The frequency of intact proviruses (per million CD4+ T cells) was estimated at baseline and prior to the antiretroviral treatment interruption (Week 34). The change from baseline to Week 34 was calculated. A decrease (negative number) is a better outcome. The units are intact genomes/million CD4+ T cells.
Time frame: Baseline to pre-interruption (week 34)
The final study included ten individuals who had initiated ART during the acute, early, or chronic phase of HIV infection (defined as \<30 days, between 1-6 months, or ≥6 months following estimated date of acquisition; n = 3, 4, and 3 participants, respectively). Participants were recruited from local clinics.
| Milestone | Combination Intervention Arm |
|---|---|
| Started | 11 |
| Completed | 10 |
| Not completed | 1 |
| Withdrew: Investigational product expired . | 1 |
Number of participants who experience a new grade 3 or greater adverse event
| Participants | Combination Intervention Arm |
|---|---|
| Grade 3 or Greater Adverse Event Count | 2 |
This will be defined as: 1. Participants who fail to show any consistent rebound above 400 copies RNA/mL between Week 12 of the ATI (when bNAb levels wane) and Week 36 of the ATI 2. Participants who exhibit a rebound and eventually achieve 24 weeks of virus control will be considered as having achieved post-treatment control
| Participants | Combination Immunotherapy |
|---|---|
| Proportion of Participants Achieving Post-treatment Control | 1 |
Occurrence of any unsolicited adverse events for 28 days after administration of each study agent
| Number of grade 2-4 AEs | Combination Intervention Arm |
|---|---|
| Any Grade 2, 3 or 4 Adverse Event Through Week 62 | 145 |
Occurrence of any serious adverse events, medically attended adverse event, and potentially immune-mediated medical condition from the time of administration of the first study injection through 12 months after administration of the final study injection
| Number of serious adverse events | Combination Intervention Arm |
|---|---|
| Any Serious Adverse Events, Medically Attended Adverse Event, and Potentially Immune-mediated Medical Condition | 3 |
We measured the magnitude of the CD8+ T cells to gag conserved elements (CE) 2 weeks after MVA boost (Week 22). We measured new or boosted pre-existing interferon (IFN)ɣ+ Gag/CE-specific CD8+ T cell responses. The magnitude was determined based on intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) by measuring the frequency of interferon (IFN)ɣ+ Gag/CE-specific CD8+ T cell responses after 6 hour stimulation with peptide pools matching the CE immunogen.
| Percentage of gag INFg+ CD8+ Cells | Combination Intervention Arm |
|---|---|
| Magnitude of T Cell Responses | 0.182 (0.111 to 0.643) |
We measured the breadth of the vaccine-induced T cell response after DNA/MVA vaccination (two weeks after the MVA boost; Week 22). We defined breadth based on the number of conserved epitope (CE) pools with a positive CD8+ T cell responses, as defined by measuring the frequency of interferon (IFN)ɣ+ Gag/CE-specific CD8+ T cell responses after 6 hour stimulation with peptide pools matching the CE immunogen (using intracellular cytokine staining, ICS). Seven smaller CE pools were tested on each sample. Positive responses were determined based on a magnitude of IFNg+ cells greater than 0.001% of CD8+ T cells after peptide stimulation and after subtraction of background responses.
| Epitope pools | Combination Intervention Arm |
|---|---|
| Breadth of T Cell Responses | 5.5 (5 to 7) |
The HIV-1 DNA reservoir was estimated using digital droplet PCR (Intact Proviral DNA Assay; IPDA). The frequency of intact proviruses (per million CD4+ T cells) was estimated at baseline and prior to the antiretroviral treatment interruption (Week 34). The change from baseline to Week 34 was calculated. A decrease (negative number) is a better outcome. The units are intact genomes/million CD4+ T cells.
| Intact genomes/million CD4+ T cells | Combination Intervention Arm |
|---|---|
| Intact Provirus DNA Levels | 1.90 ± 5.20 |
Number of participants who exhibit two consecutive measurements HIV RNA \>200 copies/mL during the analytic treatment interruption
| Participants | Combination Intervention Arm |
|---|---|
| Virologic Rebound | 9 |
Number of participants who resumed antiretroviral therapy after treatment interruption due to protocol-defined events, including virologic failure as defined in the protocol, CD4+ T cell declines as defined in the protocol, or clinical progression
| Participants | Combination Intervention Arm |
|---|---|
| Number of Participants Resuming Antiretroviral Therapy | 10 |
Proportion experiencing any clinically defined episode of acute retroviral syndrome
| Participants | Combination Intervention Arm |
|---|---|
| Acute Retroviral Rebound | 0 |
Number of participants experiencing confirmed declines (two consecutive measurements) in CD4+ T cell counts (\> 50% from baseline)
| Participants | Combination Intervention Arm |
|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Confirmed Declines in CD4+ T Cell Counts (> 50%) | 0 |
Collected over All adverse events through through Week 102. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Combination Intervention Arm | 0/11 (0%) | 3/11 (27.3%) | 11/11 (100%) |
| Event | Combination Intervention Arm |
|---|---|
| Elevated ALTHepatobiliary disorders | 1/11 |
| HypomaniaPsychiatric disorders | 1/11 |
| Suicide attemptPsychiatric disorders | 1/11 |
| Event | Combination Intervention Arm |
|---|---|
| Injection Site ReactionSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | 11/11 |
| MalaiseGeneral disorders | 10/11 |
| RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | 10/11 |
| Elevated blood pressureCardiac disorders | 8/11 |
| Non-specific viral infectionInfections and infestations | 8/11 |
| HeadacheNervous system disorders | 7/11 |
| NauseaGastrointestinal disorders | 7/11 |
| ChillsGeneral disorders | 6/11 |
| DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders | 6/11 |
| FatigueGeneral disorders | 6/11 |
| Age, Categorical(Participants) | Combination Intervention Arm |
|---|---|
| <=18 years | 0 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 11 |
| >=65 years | 0 |
| Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants) | Combination Intervention Arm |
|---|---|
| Male | 10 |
| Female | 0 |
| Prefer not to state | 1 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants) | Combination Intervention Arm |
|---|---|
| White Non-Hispanic | 6 |
| Hispanic or Latino | 4 |
| Mixed | 1 |
| Black or African American | 0 |
| Asian | 0 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Combination Intervention Arm |
|---|---|
| United States | 11 |
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome→
University of California, San Francisco