CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04357340Updated Jun 2, 2020

The Effects of Pulmonary Physiotherapy Treatments on Patients With COVID-19

An interventional study of Pulmonary Physiotherapy Techniques in Covid-19, Pneumonia and SARS Pneumonia, sponsored by Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Completed at 1 site in Iran, Islamic Republic of. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-06-02.

Sponsored by Tehran University of Medical Sciences · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of pulmonary physiotherapy on respiratory functions in hospitalized patients with Novel Coronavirus 2019 pneumonia. Patients will be randomized into 1) intervention group: receiving pulmonary physiotherapy technique to improve pulmonary function and walking training or 2) control group: Usual medical care. Patients in both groups will receive therapeutic incentive spirometer. Various outcome measurements of pulmonary functions will be evaluated before and after of interventions. Mortality rate, hospitalization duration and re-admission will be followed until one month after end of intervention. Also, patient's quality of life will be measured after one month.

Read the detailed description

In late December 2019, the new coronavirus (COVID-19) emerged in Wuhan, China and it has been confirmed as the cause of pneumonia in a large number of Chinese patients. The virus, also known as SARS-CoV-2, has since then spread to more than 200 countries worldwide.

The most common symptoms of COVID-19 are fever, dry cough, shortness of breath and tiredness. In severe cases, the infection could cause pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and sometimes leads to death. Pulmonary physiotherapy is a comprehensive, effective and safe treatment method which is aimed at improving patient's respiratory symptoms, train effective coughing, clear the airway secretion, eliminate exacerbation and so on. It seems that pulmonary physiotherapy interventions can effectively decrease hospitalization, reduce the risk of complications and improve the patient's medical condition.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the hold breathing technique, chest expansion exercise, postural drainage procedure and Cough techniques carried out during pulmonary physiotherapy sessions.

The researchers will invite 40 hospitalized patients in Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran, Iran. All patients will be enrolled after taking informed consent. All of the procedure will be performed with the coordination of the patient's physicians. Patients will be randomized to the intervention or control group. Primary outcome measurements will be evaluated immediately before and after the interventions (with three days period). Also, patient's condition (including process of disease progression, mortality, hospital stay duration and re-admission) will be followed until one month using medical records review and interviewing with the patient or his/her family. Patient's health related quality of life will be measured using short form-36 quality of life assessment tool one month after the end of interventions. Intention-to-treat analysis will be performed in the patients that dropped out of the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Covid-19
  • Pneumonia
  • SARS Pneumonia

Keywords

  • Pulmonary Physiotherapy
  • 2019 novel coronavirus disease
  • COVID-19
  • Rehabilitation
03

In context

COVID-19

7,640 studies on the registry are indexed under COVID-19; 488 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 100 across 4,099 interventional studies indexed under COVID-19.

Browse COVID-19 studies →

Lead sponsor

Tehran University of Medical Sciences is the lead sponsor of 227 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients with COVID-19 pneumonia confirmed by RT-PCR test and diagnostic radiology.
  2. Non-intubated patients
  3. Patients with full consciousness
  4. Be able to walking and performing exercises.
  5. O2 Saturation \< 88% when free air breathing.
  6. be able to write and read in Farsi

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any type of musculoskeletal disorder disabling patient to participate to study.
  2. Intubation during the period of intervention
  3. Patients' dissatisfaction to continue the study for any reason.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Pulmonary Physiotherapy Techniques group

    Pulmonary physiotherapy techniques, 6 sessions during 3 days and incentive spirometer.

    Other: Pulmonary Physiotherapy Techniques

  • No intervention
    Control group

    Incentive spirometer only

Interventions

  • OtherPulmonary Physiotherapy Techniques

    Participants will receive pulmonary physiotherapy techniques in six session during three days (twice daily). Four distinguished interventions will be provided for the patients: 1) Chest expansion exercises (for prevention and treatment of potential atelectasis); 2) Techniques to Mobilize or loosen the pulmonary secretions (Active cycle breathing, Coughing techniques, Vibration and Postural drainage); 3) Hold breathing exercise (3 sets, 10 repetition) and; 4) Walking training (based on patient's tolerance until 6 minute).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mixed venous O2 pressure (PVO2)

    Partial pressure of oxygen in mixed venous blood.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Mixed venous O2 pressure (PVO2)

    Partial pressure of oxygen in mixed venous blood.

    Time frame: Day 3

  3. Mixed venous CO2 pressure (PVCO2)

    Partial pressure of carbon dioxide in mixed venous blood.

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Mixed venous CO2 pressure (PVCO2)

    Partial pressure of carbon dioxide in mixed venous blood.

    Time frame: Day 3

  5. PH

    Measure of the venous blood acidity or alkalinity

    Time frame: Baseline

  6. PH

    Measure of the venous blood acidity or alkalinity

    Time frame: Day 3

  7. HCO3

    The amount of bicarbonate ion in the venous blood

    Time frame: Baseline

  8. HCO3

    The amount of bicarbonate ion in the venous blood

    Time frame: Day 3

  9. Oxygen saturation (O2 Sat) from VBG

    The amount of oxygen-saturated hemoglobin relative to total hemoglobin (unsaturated + saturated) in the venous blood

    Time frame: Baseline

  10. Oxygen saturation (O2 Sat) from VBG

    The amount of oxygen-saturated hemoglobin relative to total hemoglobin (unsaturated + saturated) in the venous blood

    Time frame: Day 3

  11. Three minute walk test

    The distance a patient can walk during three minute

    Time frame: Baseline

  12. Three minute walk test

    The distance a patient can walk during three minute

    Time frame: Day 3

  13. O2 Sat after one minute walking

    Time frame: Baseline

  14. O2 Sat after one minute walking

    Time frame: Day 3

  15. O2 Sat after two minutes use of Partial Rebreather

    Time frame: Baseline

  16. O2 Sat after two minutes use of Partial Rebreather

    Time frame: Day 3

  17. O2 Sat after two minutes free air breathing

    Time frame: Baseline

  18. O2 Sat after two minutes free air breathing

    Time frame: Day 3

  19. O2 sat/ Fio2

    Time frame: Baseline

  20. O2 sat/ Fio2

    Time frame: Day 3

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mortality rate

    The number of dead subjects compared to total patients

    Time frame: until one month

  2. Number of participants with Rehospitalization

    Patients' hospitalization after discharge due to any reason

    Time frame: until one moth

  3. The Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)

    Using Short-form 36 questionnaire. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 100. Higher scores mean patient's better quality of life.

    Time frame: One month after end of intervention

  4. breathlessness

    The amount of shortness of breath using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The minimum score is 0 and maximum is 10. The 0 score means no breathlessness and the 10 score is the maximum breathlessness.

    Time frame: Baseline

  5. breathlessness

    The amount of shortness of breath using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The minimum score is 0 and maximum is 10. The 0 score means no breathlessness and the 10 score is the maximum breathlessness.

    Time frame: Day 3

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex
    Tehran, Iran, Islamic Republic of
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, Zhao X, Huang B, Shi W, Lu R, Niu P, Zhan F, Ma X, Wang D, Xu W, Wu G, Gao GF, Tan W; China Novel Coronavirus Investigating and Research Team. A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 20;382(8):727-733. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001017. Epub 2020 Jan 24. PubMed 31978945 ↗
  • Read JM, Bridgen JRE, Cummings DAT, Ho A, Jewell CP. Novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV (COVID-19): early estimation of epidemiological parameters and epidemic size estimates. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Jul 19;376(1829):20200265. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0265. Epub 2021 May 31. PubMed 34053269 ↗
  • Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, Zhang L, Fan G, Xu J, Gu X, Cheng Z, Yu T, Xia J, Wei Y, Wu W, Xie X, Yin W, Li H, Liu M, Xiao Y, Gao H, Guo L, Xie J, Wang G, Jiang R, Gao Z, Jin Q, Wang J, Cao B. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):497-506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5. Epub 2020 Jan 24. Erratum In: Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):496. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30252-X. PubMed 31986264 ↗
  • Chen J. Pathogenicity and transmissibility of 2019-nCoV-A quick overview and comparison with other emerging viruses. Microbes Infect. 2020 Mar;22(2):69-71. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2020.01.004. Epub 2020 Feb 4. PubMed 32032682 ↗
  • Liu T, Hu J, Kang M, Lin L, Zhong H, Xiao J, et al. Transmission dynamics of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). 2020.
  • Li Q, Guan X, Wu P, Wang X, Zhou L, Tong Y, Ren R, Leung KSM, Lau EHY, Wong JY, Xing X, Xiang N, Wu Y, Li C, Chen Q, Li D, Liu T, Zhao J, Liu M, Tu W, Chen C, Jin L, Yang R, Wang Q, Zhou S, Wang R, Liu H, Luo Y, Liu Y, Shao G, Li H, Tao Z, Yang Y, Deng Z, Liu B, Ma Z, Zhang Y, Shi G, Lam TTY, Wu JT, Gao GF, Cowling BJ, Yang B, Leung GM, Feng Z. Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 26;382(13):1199-1207. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001316. Epub 2020 Jan 29. PubMed 31995857 ↗
  • Bott J, Blumenthal S, Buxton M, Ellum S, Falconer C, Garrod R, Harvey A, Hughes T, Lincoln M, Mikelsons C, Potter C, Pryor J, Rimington L, Sinfield F, Thompson C, Vaughn P, White J; British Thoracic Society Physiotherapy Guideline Development Group. Guidelines for the physiotherapy management of the adult, medical, spontaneously breathing patient. Thorax. 2009 May;64 Suppl 1:i1-51. doi: 10.1136/thx.2008.110726. No abstract available. PubMed 19406863 ↗
  • Strickland SL, Rubin BK, Haas CF, Volsko TA, Drescher GS, O'Malley CA. AARC Clinical Practice Guideline: Effectiveness of Pharmacologic Airway Clearance Therapies in Hospitalized Patients. Respir Care. 2015 Jul;60(7):1071-7. doi: 10.4187/respcare.04165. PubMed 26113566 ↗
  • Yang F, Liu N, Hu JY, Wu LL, Su GS, Zhong NS, Zheng ZG. [Pulmonary rehabilitation guidelines in the principle of 4S for patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV)]. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2020 Mar 12;43(3):180-182. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2020.03.007. Chinese. PubMed 32164083 ↗
  • Jin X, Lian JS, Hu JH, Gao J, Zheng L, Zhang YM, Hao SR, Jia HY, Cai H, Zhang XL, Yu GD, Xu KJ, Wang XY, Gu JQ, Zhang SY, Ye CY, Jin CL, Lu YF, Yu X, Yu XP, Huang JR, Xu KL, Ni Q, Yu CB, Zhu B, Li YT, Liu J, Zhao H, Zhang X, Yu L, Guo YZ, Su JW, Tao JJ, Lang GJ, Wu XX, Wu WR, Qv TT, Xiang DR, Yi P, Shi D, Chen Y, Ren Y, Qiu YQ, Li LJ, Sheng J, Yang Y. Epidemiological, clinical and virological characteristics of 74 cases of coronavirus-infected disease 2019 (COVID-19) with gastrointestinal symptoms. Gut. 2020 Jun;69(6):1002-1009. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-320926. Epub 2020 Mar 24. PubMed 32213556 ↗
  • Novoa N, Ballesteros E, Jimenez MF, Aranda JL, Varela G. Chest physiotherapy revisited: evaluation of its influence on the pulmonary morbidity after pulmonary resection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Jul;40(1):130-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.11.028. Epub 2011 Jan 11. PubMed 21227711 ↗
  • Ambrosino N, Makhabah DN. Comprehensive physiotherapy management in ARDS. Minerva Anestesiol. 2013 May;79(5):554-63. Epub 2013 Jan 10. PubMed 23306398 ↗
  • Munshi L, Kobayashi T, DeBacker J, Doobay R, Telesnicki T, Lo V, Cote N, Cypel M, Keshavjee S, Ferguson ND, Fan E. Intensive Care Physiotherapy during Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Feb;14(2):246-253. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201606-484OC. PubMed 27898220 ↗
  • Paulus F, Binnekade JM, Vroom MB, Schultz MJ. Benefits and risks of manual hyperinflation in intubated and mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2012 Aug 3;16(4):R145. doi: 10.1186/cc11457. PubMed 22863373 ↗
  • Hillegass E. Essentials of Cardiopulmonary Physical Therapy-E-Book: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2016.
  • Iriberri M, Galdiz JB, Gorostiza A, Ansola P, Jaca C. Comparison of the distances covered during 3 and 6 min walking test. Respir Med. 2002 Oct;96(10):812-6. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2002.1363. PubMed 12412981 ↗
  • Pan AM, Stiell IG, Clement CM, Acheson J, Aaron SD. Feasibility of a structured 3-minute walk test as a clinical decision tool for patients presenting to the emergency department with acute dyspnoea. Emerg Med J. 2009 Apr;26(4):278-82. doi: 10.1136/emj.2008.059774. PubMed 19307390 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual participant data that underline the results reported in this article, after de-identification

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 2, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04357340
Lead sponsor
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Responsible party
Mohammad Javaherian (PhD. Candidate of Phyiotherapy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 22, 2020
Start date
Apr 2, 2020
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2020
Completion
May 30, 2020
Last update
Jun 2, 2020

Study contacts

Mohammad Javaherian, Ph.D. cand.
principal investigator · Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion