ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04341545Updated Apr 10, 2023

Letrozole in Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy

A Phase 3 interventional study of Placebos and Letrozole tablets in Tubal Pregnancy, sponsored by Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong. Status unknown at 1 site in Hong Kong. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-04-10.

Sponsored by Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2023), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
214
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This is a multi-centred randomized controlled trial on the addition of letrozole in the medical management of tubal ectopic pregnancies.

Tubal ectopic pregnancies are abnormal pregnancies in the Fallopian tube, rather than in the womb. They occurred in around 1-2% of all pregnancies. Methotrexate (MTX) given by the intramuscular route i.e. systemic, a commonly used drug for cancer , was a widely used alternative for management for unruptured tubal ectopic pregnancies and was recommended as first line treatment for selected women.

Letrozole, aromatase inhibitor, can suppose oestradiol level. Combination of letrozole with misprostol has shown to improve the complete abortion rate in miscarriage. As a result, addition of letrozole may cause a higher success rate in the medical treatment of ectopic pregnancy.

As the evidence of combination of MTX and letrozole in tubal ectopic pregnancies is not available, the objective of the present study is to evaluate the efficacy of combination of MTX and letrozole compared to MTX alone in women with tubal ectopic pregnancies.

Read the detailed description

Tubal ectopic pregnancies occur in around 1-2% of all pregnancies. Traditionally, surgery with salpingectomy was the mainstay of treatment; however, it comes with anaesthetic and operatives risks in addition to an increased cost for operative procedures. In recent years, systemic methotrexate (MTX), a dihydrofolate reductase inhibitor, has been a widely used alternative for management for unruptured tubal ectopic pregnancies. The success rate of systemic MTX at a doses of 50mg/m2 body surface area is around 70% which ranges from 65 to 95%, depending greatly on the level of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG), the size of adnexal mass and presence of fetal heart pulsation.

Use of systemic MTX as the first-line management has been proposed for women with unruptured ectopic pregnancy where the adnexal mass is smaller than 35mm, serum hCG level is less than 5000 IU/l and fetal heartbeat is absent.

Letrozole is a third generation non-steroidal reversible aromatase inhibitor. It can suppress oestradiol level up to 95% to 99% after administration according to pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics studies. Oestrogen is important in the support of early pregnancy, other than progesterone with well-known pivotal effect on the maintenance of early pregnancy.

Animal studies showed the combination of mifepristone and letrozole worked synergistically and induced almost 100% termination of pregnancies in rats. Letrozole induced 50% miscarriage rate in pregnant baboons. Letrozole combined with vaginal misoprostol regimen was associated with a higher complete abortion rate than misoprostol alone in pregnancies up to 63 days.

The use of letrozole in ectopic pregnancy has never been explored. It is hypothesized that letrozole can suppress serum oestradiol level, which in turn, may cause failure of pregnancy in ectopic pregnancy. The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical effectiveness of letrozole in addition to MTX in the medical treatment of ectopic pregnancy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tubal Pregnancy

Keywords

  • Tubal ectopic pregnancy
  • Methotrexate
  • Letrozole
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong is the lead sponsor of 24 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Presence of heterogenous adnexal mass on USG suggestive of tubal ectopic pregnancy with hCG level >=1500 IU/L and \<= 5000 IU/L
  • Absence of fetal heart pulsation
  • Mean diameter of adnexal mass \<= 3.5cm
  • Haemodynamically stable
  • No significant abdominal pain

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of significant amount of free fluid in pelvis
  • Allergic to MTX
  • Deranged liver function test (/ ALT or GGT >= 2 )
  • Deranged renal function test ( \<= 45ml/min)
  • Heterotopic pregnancies
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
214 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Letrozole

    Participants will be given letrozole 10mg daily for one week after standard medical management for tubal ectopic pregnancy by methotrexate injection. Subsequently they will receive the standard management for medical management of tubal ectopic prengnacies.

    Drug: Letrozole tablets

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Participants will be given identical looking placebo for one week and receive the same standard management for medical management of tubal ectopic pregnancies.

    Other: Placebos

Interventions

  • OtherPlacebos

    Placebo 4 tablets a day for one week.

  • Letrozole 10mg daily for one week.

    Also known as: Letrozole

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Treatment success

    Proportion of women with treatment success defined as normalization of serum hCG level \<10IU/L without additional medical or surgical intervention

    Time frame: 2 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. hCG normalization duration

    Duration of time until hCG normalization measured in days

    Time frame: 2 months

  2. Number of participants experienced side effects

    Side effects after letrozole

    Time frame: 2 months

  3. Duration of hospitalization

    Duration of hospitalization

    Time frame: 2 months

  4. Participant satisfaction: proportion of women who would recommend this treatment to a friend

    Treatment satisfaction measured as proportion of women who would recommend this treatment to a friend

    Time frame: 2 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Mary Hospital
    Hong Kong, Hong Kong
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Panelli DM, Phillips CH, Brady PC. Incidence, diagnosis and management of tubal and nontubal ectopic pregnancies: a review. Fertil Res Pract. 2015 Oct 15;1:15. doi: 10.1186/s40738-015-0008-z. eCollection 2015. PubMed 28620520 ↗
  • Diagnosis and Management of Ectopic Pregnancy: Green-top Guideline No. 21. BJOG. 2016 Dec;123(13):e15-e55. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14189. Epub 2016 Nov 3. No abstract available. Erratum In: BJOG. 2017 Dec;124(13):e314. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14983. PubMed 27813249 ↗
  • Odejinmi F, Huff KO, Oliver R. Individualisation of intervention for tubal ectopic pregnancy: historical perspectives and the modern evidence based management of ectopic pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Mar;210:69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.10.037. Epub 2016 Oct 29. PubMed 27940397 ↗
  • National Collaborating Centre for Ws, Children's H. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: Guidance. Ectopic Pregnancy and Miscarriage: Diagnosis and Initial Management in Early Pregnancy of Ectopic Pregnancy and Miscarriage. London: Rcog National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health.; 2012.
  • Shi L, Shi SQ, Given RL, von Hertzen H, Garfield RE. Synergistic effects of antiprogestins and iNOS or aromatase inhibitors on establishment and maintenance of pregnancy. Steroids. 2003 Nov;68(10-13):1077-84. doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2003.09.002. PubMed 14668001 ↗
  • Albrecht ED, Aberdeen GW, Pepe GJ. The role of estrogen in the maintenance of primate pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Feb;182(2):432-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(00)70235-3. PubMed 10694348 ↗
  • Lee VCY, Ng EHY, Yeung WSB, Ho PC. Misoprostol with or without letrozole pretreatment for termination of pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Feb;117(2 Pt 1):317-323. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182073fbf. PubMed 21252745 ↗
  • Lee VC, Tang OS, Ng EH, Yeung WS, Ho PC. A pilot study on the use of letrozole with either misoprostol or mifepristone for termination of pregnancy up to 63 days. Contraception. 2011 Jan;83(1):62-7. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.05.014. Epub 2010 Jun 23. PubMed 21134505 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Other researchers may contact the chief investigator for the request of individual participant data.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Dec 2020 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2024, 48 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 7, 2020
First posted
Apr 10, 2020
StartActual
Dec 1, 2020
Primary completionEst.
Dec 30, 2024
CompletionEst.
Mar 31, 2025
Last update
Apr 10, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 10, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04341545
Lead sponsor
Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
Collaborators
Kwong Wah Hospital, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong
Responsible party
Evelyn Wong (Associate consultant, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 10, 2020
Start date
Dec 1, 2020
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 10, 2023

Study contacts

Evelyn Wong, MBBS
Contact
evelynwong.ew@gmail.com
22554517
Ernest H.Y. Ng, MD
study director · The University of Hong Kong

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Letrozole

Start the discussion