ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04335682ARACOGUpdated Sep 21, 2026Results posted

Androgen Receptor Directed Therapy on Cognitive Function in Patients Treated With Darolutamide or Enzalutamide

A Phase 2 interventional study of Darolutamide and Enzalutamide in Metastatic Prostate Cancer, Prostate Cancer Metastatic and Prostate Cancer, sponsored by Alliance Foundation Trials, LLC.. Completed at 8 sites in United States. Open to male participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-21.

Sponsored by Alliance Foundation Trials, LLC. · Phase 2, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
111
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

This is a prospective, randomized, open-label phase II study comparing cognitive outcomes between men with metastatic and non-metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) or metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC). Approximately 132 patients will be enrolled. Eligible patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to treatment with enzalutamide 160 mg orally daily or darolutamide 600 mg orally twice daily, in combination with standard LHRH agonist based treatment. Cognitive assessments will be performed using modules from Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) an internationally recognized software for assessing cognitive function and impairment.

Read the detailed description

The goal of the trial is to assess cognitive and quality of life outcomes over the 48-week primary data collection period of the trial. This is a prospective, randomized, open-label phase II study comparing cognitive outcomes between men with Advanced prostate cancer: metastatic and non-metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) or metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC).

The primary endpoint will be the percent change in the maximally changed cognitive domain by 24 weeks in each study arm. Patients will be stratified by age (\<65, 65-80, > 80). Patients will be allowed to cross over from either treatment to the opposite treatment arm at 12 and 24 weeks if they meet any of the cross-over criteria as described in the protocol.

Cognitive assessments will be performed using Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB), an internationally recognized software for assessing cognitive function and impairment. Tests available in the CANTAB battery include tests of learning and executive function; working memory; visual, verbal and episodic memory; and attention, information and processing time. The maximally changed cognitive domain is defined as the domain most changed from baseline in each individual.

Blood samples will be collected for exploratory genomic analyses (AR CAG repeat length, PHS, exosome analysis).

Patients will have the option to opt into an additional separate MRI sub-study. A subset of 40 patients (20 per arm) will undergo fMRI to measure percent signal change in the HP PFC circuit at baseline, 24 and 48 weeks or/and cross-over/end of treatment visit (if applicable).

02

Conditions studied

  • Metastatic Prostate Cancer
  • Prostate Cancer Metastatic
  • Prostate Cancer
  • Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer
  • Hormone Sensitive Prostate Cancer
  • Non-metastatic Prostate Cancer

Browse trials for

03

In context

Prostatic Neoplasms

7,046 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms; 1,580 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 111 is above the median of 60 across 5,348 interventional studies indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms.

Browse Prostatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Alliance Foundation Trials, LLC. is the lead sponsor of 22 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (83%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key inclusion criteria include:

  • or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate
  • Progressive disease per PCWG3 criteria with EITHER: CRPC or non- metastatic CRPC (M0CRPC)

    • For mCRPC: metastatic disease documented by standard or novel imaging techniques
    • OR for M0CPRC: no evidence of metastatic disease on standard imaging.
  • OR mHSPC
  • Surgically or medically castrated, with testosterone levels of \<50 ng/dL. If the patient is medically castrated, continuous dosing with GnRH agonist or antagonist must have been initiated at least 4 weeks prior to randomization and must be continued throughout the study.
  • (ECOG) performance status ≤2
  • Able to complete cognitive testing and patient reported outcome surveys in English.
  • Ability to swallow study medications whole.
  • Able to provide .
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
111 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Darolutamide (DARO)

    Patients will take DARO at a dose of 600 mg (300 mg ×2 tablets) by mouth twice daily beginning on Day 1, of Week 1. Patients will take DARO throughout planned treatment period or withdrawal of consent or progression of disease requiring change in therapy.

    Drug: Darolutamide

  • Active comparator
    Enzalutamide (ENZ)

    Patients will take ENZ at a dose of 160 mg PO once daily (QD), beginning on Day 1, of Week 1. Patients will take ENZ throughout planned treatment period or withdrawal of consent or progression of disease requiring change in therapy.

    Drug: Enzalutamide

Interventions

  • Patients randomized to darolutamide.

    Also known as: Nubeqa

  • Patients randomized to enzalutamide.

    Also known as: Xtandi

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in the Maximally Changed Cognitive Domain

    To compare the effects of treatment with enzalutamide (ENZ) versus darolutamide (DARO) on the cognitive function of men with non-metastatic and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer by comparing the change in the maximally changed cognitive domain utilizing Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery \[CANTAB\] cognitive tests from baseline in patients in each study arm. The maximally changed cognitive domain is defined as the domain most changed from baseline in each individual. CANTAB is the max score from 5 subscores Paired Associates Learning (0-20, Higher scores = better performance), Spatial Working Memory (0-63, Higher scores = worse performance), Rapid Visual Information Processing (0-1, Higher scores = better performance), Spatial Span (2-9, Higher scores = better performance), and One Touch Stockings of Cambridge (1-7, Higher scores = worse performance).

    Time frame: 24 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Crossover From Enzalutamide to Darolutamide and Darolutamide to Enzalutamide

    Proportion of patients crossing over from each treatment arm based on subjective (self-reported, FACT-Cognitive Function \[Version 3\], FACT-Cog V3, decline by \>10 points from baseline score) cognitive effects. * Proportion of patients crossing over from each treatment arm based on objective cognitive effects (the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery \[CANTAB\] , decline by \> 30% from baseline on any cognitive domain). * Proportion of patients crossing over from ENZ to DARO based on Timed Up and Go (TUG) times \>12 seconds or 12 seconds or increase from baseline by \>1 second. * Proportion of patient crossing over due to neurologic toxicity (fatigue) with a preference to cross over (ENZ or DARO) or severe neurological toxicity \[seizures or posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome PRES\]). Cross over for severe neurologic toxicity is allowed for patients on ENZ only.

    Time frame: 48 weeks

  2. Maximally Changed Cognitive Domain

    Average decline in maximally changed cognitive domain in patients in each arm based on self-reported cognitive tests (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery \[CANTAB\]). Tests in the CANTAB battery include tests of learning and executive function; working memory; visual, verbal and episodic memory; and attention, information and processing time. The maximally changed cognitive domain is defined as the domain most changed from baseline in each individual.

    Time frame: 48 weeks

  3. Proportion of Impaired Patients

    Cumulative proportion of impaired patients in each arm

    Time frame: 24 weeks

  4. Proportion of Impaired Patients

    Cumulative proportion of impaired patients in each arm

    Time frame: 48 weeks

  5. Change in Lowest Ranking Domain

    Average change in lowest ranking domain Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery \[CANTAB\] questionnaire outcomes at baseline (in a given individual). Tests in the CANTAB battery include tests of learning and executive function; working memory; visual, verbal and episodic memory; and attention, information and processing time.

    Time frame: 24 weeks

  6. Change in Lowest Ranking Domain

    Average change in lowest ranking domain in Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery \[CANTAB\] outcomes at baseline (in a given individual). Tests in the CANTAB battery include tests of learning and executive function; working memory; visual, verbal and episodic memory; and attention, information and processing time.

    Time frame: 48 weeks

  7. Improve in Cognitive Function After Crossover

    Improvement in cognitive function after crossover from each treatment arm based on Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery \[CANTAB\] modules. Tests in the CANTAB battery include tests of learning and executive function; working memory; visual, verbal and episodic memory; and attention, information and processing time.

    Time frame: 48 weeks

  8. Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Progression.

    Estimation of the probability of PSA progression over time using the cumulative incidence function.

    Time frame: 104 weeks

  9. Progression Free Survival

    Progression-free survival will be evaluated for each cohort.

    Time frame: 104 weeks

  10. Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Response Rate

    Estimation or the proportion PSA responses at 24 weeks (on the basis of a decrease from baseline of ≥ 50%)

    Time frame: 24 weeks

07

Results

Posted Sep 21, 2026

Participant flow

Initial Treatment
Participant flow — Initial Treatment
MilestoneDarolutamide (DARO) First, Then Enzalutamide (ENZ)Enzalutamide (ENZ) First, Then Darolutamide (DARO)
Started5556
Completed4847
Not completed79
Period 2: Optional Cross-over Week 12
Participant flow — Period 2: Optional Cross-over Week 12
MilestoneDarolutamide (DARO) First, Then Enzalutamide (ENZ)Enzalutamide (ENZ) First, Then Darolutamide (DARO)
Started018
Completed018
Not completed00
Period 3: Optional Cross-over Week 24
Participant flow — Period 3: Optional Cross-over Week 24
MilestoneDarolutamide (DARO) First, Then Enzalutamide (ENZ)Enzalutamide (ENZ) First, Then Darolutamide (DARO)
Started012
Completed012
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in the Maximally Changed Cognitive Domain

To compare the effects of treatment with enzalutamide (ENZ) versus darolutamide (DARO) on the cognitive function of men with non-metastatic and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer by comparing the change in the maximally changed cognitive domain utilizing Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery \[CANTAB\] cognitive tests from baseline in patients in each study arm. The maximally changed cognitive domain is defined as the domain most changed from baseline in each individual. CANTAB is the max score from 5 subscores Paired Associates Learning (0-20, Higher scores = better performance), Spatial Working Memory (0-63, Higher scores = worse performance), Rapid Visual Information Processing (0-1, Higher scores = better performance), Spatial Span (2-9, Higher scores = better performance), and One Touch Stockings of Cambridge (1-7, Higher scores = worse performance).

Time frame:
24 weeks
Reported as:
Median · Percent change
Change in the Maximally Changed Cognitive Domain
Percent changeDarolutamide (DARO) First, Then Enzalutamide (ENZ)Enzalutamide (ENZ) First, Then Darolutamide (DARO)
Change in the Maximally Changed Cognitive Domain-15.8 (-38.8 to -2.6)-36.1 (-59.3 to -16.7)
Statistical analysis
  • Darolutamide (DARO) First, Then Enzalutamide (ENZ) vs Enzalutamide (ENZ) First, Then Darolutamide (DARO) · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.009
SecondaryCrossover From Enzalutamide to Darolutamide and Darolutamide to Enzalutamide

Proportion of patients crossing over from each treatment arm based on subjective (self-reported, FACT-Cognitive Function \[Version 3\], FACT-Cog V3, decline by \>10 points from baseline score) cognitive effects. * Proportion of patients crossing over from each treatment arm based on objective cognitive effects (the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery \[CANTAB\] , decline by \> 30% from baseline on any cognitive domain). * Proportion of patients crossing over from ENZ to DARO based on Timed Up and Go (TUG) times \>12 seconds or 12 seconds or increase from baseline by \>1 second. * Proportion of patient crossing over due to neurologic toxicity (fatigue) with a preference to cross over (ENZ or DARO) or severe neurological toxicity \[seizures or posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome PRES\]). Cross over for severe neurologic toxicity is allowed for patients on ENZ only.

Time frame:
48 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Crossover From Enzalutamide to Darolutamide and Darolutamide to Enzalutamide
ParticipantsDarolutamide (DARO) First, Then Enzalutamide (ENZ)Enzalutamide (ENZ) First, Then Darolutamide (DARO)
Subjective Decline (FACT-COG) Only02
Objective Decline (CANTAB) Only09
Increased Risk of Falls Only01
Neurologic Toxicity (Fatigue / AE grade ≥ 2) Only03
Severe Neurologic Toxicity (seizure, falls, PRES) Only01
TUG Time Increase (removed as crossover reason after 1/5/2023) Only02
Multiple Crossover Reasons012
SecondaryMaximally Changed Cognitive Domain

Average decline in maximally changed cognitive domain in patients in each arm based on self-reported cognitive tests (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery \[CANTAB\]). Tests in the CANTAB battery include tests of learning and executive function; working memory; visual, verbal and episodic memory; and attention, information and processing time. The maximally changed cognitive domain is defined as the domain most changed from baseline in each individual.

Time frame:
48 weeks

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryProportion of Impaired Patients

Cumulative proportion of impaired patients in each arm

Time frame:
24 weeks

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryProportion of Impaired Patients

Cumulative proportion of impaired patients in each arm

Time frame:
48 weeks

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryChange in Lowest Ranking Domain

Average change in lowest ranking domain Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery \[CANTAB\] questionnaire outcomes at baseline (in a given individual). Tests in the CANTAB battery include tests of learning and executive function; working memory; visual, verbal and episodic memory; and attention, information and processing time.

Time frame:
24 weeks

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryChange in Lowest Ranking Domain

Average change in lowest ranking domain in Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery \[CANTAB\] outcomes at baseline (in a given individual). Tests in the CANTAB battery include tests of learning and executive function; working memory; visual, verbal and episodic memory; and attention, information and processing time.

Time frame:
48 weeks

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryImprove in Cognitive Function After Crossover

Improvement in cognitive function after crossover from each treatment arm based on Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery \[CANTAB\] modules. Tests in the CANTAB battery include tests of learning and executive function; working memory; visual, verbal and episodic memory; and attention, information and processing time.

Time frame:
48 weeks

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryProstate-specific Antigen (PSA) Progression.

Estimation of the probability of PSA progression over time using the cumulative incidence function.

Time frame:
104 weeks

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryProgression Free Survival

Progression-free survival will be evaluated for each cohort.

Time frame:
104 weeks

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryProstate-specific Antigen (PSA) Response Rate

Estimation or the proportion PSA responses at 24 weeks (on the basis of a decrease from baseline of ≥ 50%)

Time frame:
24 weeks

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 24 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Darolutamide (DARO)0/55 (0%)52/55 (94.5%)12/55 (21.8%)
Enzalutamide (ENZ)2/56 (3.6%)51/56 (91.1%)7/56 (12.5%)
Crossover Enzalutamide (ENZ)0/30 (0%)27/30 (90%)3/30 (10%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 199
Most frequent serious events
EventDarolutamide (DARO)Enzalutamide (ENZ)Crossover Enzalutamide (ENZ)
FatigueGeneral disorders33/5535/5612/30
AnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders28/5520/5610/30
Hot flashesVascular disorders18/5522/564/30
HypertensionVascular disorders19/5521/567/30
HyperlipidemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders15/5510/560/30
Cognitive disturbanceNervous system disorders6/557/567/30
Urinary frequencyRenal and urinary disorders12/5510/565/30
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders9/556/566/30
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders11/5510/562/30
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders8/5511/564/30
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 30
Most frequent other events
EventDarolutamide (DARO)Enzalutamide (ENZ)Crossover Enzalutamide (ENZ)
Neoplasms benign, mal, uncpec - Oth specNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)2/550/560/30
Vascular disorders - Other, specifyVascular disorders2/550/560/30
Heart failureCardiac disorders0/550/561/30
Generalized muscle weaknessMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/550/561/30
HematuriaRenal and urinary disorders0/550/561/30
Renal and urinary disorders - Oth specRenal and urinary disorders0/550/561/30
DyspneaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/550/561/30
Blurred visionEye disorders1/550/560/30
Duodenal perforationGastrointestinal disorders1/550/560/30
Small intestinal obstructionGastrointestinal disorders1/550/560/30

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Darolutamide (DARO) First, Then Enzalutamide (ENZ)Enzalutamide (ENZ) First, Then Darolutamide (DARO)Total
Median70.7 (66.0 to 75.4)71.3 (66.4 to 77.0)71.1 (66.3 to 76.0)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Darolutamide (DARO) First, Then Enzalutamide (ENZ)Enzalutamide (ENZ) First, Then Darolutamide (DARO)Total
Female000
Male5556111
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Darolutamide (DARO) First, Then Enzalutamide (ENZ)Enzalutamide (ENZ) First, Then Darolutamide (DARO)Total
Hispanic or Latino336
Not Hispanic or Latino504999
Unknown or Not Reported246
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Darolutamide (DARO) First, Then Enzalutamide (ENZ)Enzalutamide (ENZ) First, Then Darolutamide (DARO)Total
American Indian or Alaska Native011
Asian112
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American178
White514192
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported268
08

Study locations

8 sites
  • University of California - San Francisco at Mount Zion
    San Francisco, California 94115, United States
  • Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
  • University of Chicago
    Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States
  • University of Kansas Cancer Center
    Fairway, Kansas 66205, United States
  • Dana Farber Cancer Institute
    Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
  • University of Minnesota
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
  • University of Oklahoma
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104, United States
  • Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Fizazi K, Shore N, Tammela TL, Ulys A, Vjaters E, Polyakov S, Jievaltas M, Luz M, Alekseev B, Kuss I, Kappeler C, Snapir A, Sarapohja T, Smith MR; ARAMIS Investigators. Darolutamide in Nonmetastatic, Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019 Mar 28;380(13):1235-1246. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1815671. Epub 2019 Feb 14. PubMed 30763142 ↗
  • Apple AC, Ryals AJ, Alpert KI, Wagner LI, Shih PA, Dokucu M, Cella D, Penedo FJ, Voss JL, Wang L. Subtle hippocampal deformities in breast cancer survivors with reduced episodic memory and self-reported cognitive concerns. Neuroimage Clin. 2017 Mar 16;14:685-691. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.03.004. eCollection 2017. PubMed 28377882 ↗
  • Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Feb;39(2):142-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x. PubMed 1991946 ↗
  • Wang L, Apple AC, Schroeder MP, Ryals AJ, Voss JL, Gitelman D, Sweet JJ, Butt ZA, Cella D, Wagner LI. Reduced prefrontal activation during working and long-term memory tasks and impaired patient-reported cognition among cancer survivors postchemotherapy compared with healthy controls. Cancer. 2016 Jan 15;122(2):258-68. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29737. Epub 2015 Oct 20. PubMed 26484435 ↗
  • de Souza JA, Yap BJ, Wroblewski K, Blinder V, Araujo FS, Hlubocky FJ, Nicholas LH, O'Connor JM, Brockstein B, Ratain MJ, Daugherty CK, Cella D. Measuring financial toxicity as a clinically relevant patient-reported outcome: The validation of the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST). Cancer. 2017 Feb 1;123(3):476-484. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30369. Epub 2016 Oct 7. PubMed 27716900 ↗
  • Hussain M, Fizazi K, Saad F, Rathenborg P, Shore N, Ferreira U, Ivashchenko P, Demirhan E, Modelska K, Phung D, Krivoshik A, Sternberg CN. Enzalutamide in Men with Nonmetastatic, Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 28;378(26):2465-2474. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800536. PubMed 29949494 ↗
  • Evans CP, Higano CS, Keane T, Andriole G, Saad F, Iversen P, Miller K, Kim CS, Kimura G, Armstrong AJ, Sternberg CN, Loriot Y, de Bono J, Noonberg SB, Mansbach H, Bhattacharya S, Perabo F, Beer TM, Tombal B. The PREVAIL Study: Primary Outcomes by Site and Extent of Baseline Disease for Enzalutamide-treated Men with Chemotherapy-naive Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol. 2016 Oct;70(4):675-683. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.03.017. Epub 2016 Mar 19. PubMed 27006332 ↗
  • Lim YY, Pietrzak RH, Ellis KA, Jaeger J, Harrington K, Ashwood T, Szoeke C, Martins RN, Bush AI, Masters CL, Rowe CC, Villemagne VL, Ames D, Darby D, Maruff P. Rapid decline in episodic memory in healthy older adults with high amyloid-beta. J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;33(3):675-9. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2012-121516. PubMed 23001710 ↗
  • Rosario ER, Carroll JC, Pike CJ. Evaluation of the effects of testosterone and luteinizing hormone on regulation of beta-amyloid in male 3xTg-AD mice. Brain Res. 2012 Jul 23;1466:137-45. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.05.011. Epub 2012 May 14. PubMed 22587890 ↗
  • Cherrier MM, Aubin S, Higano CS. Cognitive and mood changes in men undergoing intermittent combined androgen blockade for non-metastatic prostate cancer. Psychooncology. 2009 Mar;18(3):237-47. doi: 10.1002/pon.1401. PubMed 18636420 ↗
  • Nead KT, Gaskin G, Chester C, Swisher-McClure S, Leeper NJ, Shah NH. Association Between Androgen Deprivation Therapy and Risk of Dementia. JAMA Oncol. 2017 Jan 1;3(1):49-55. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.3662. PubMed 27737437 ↗
  • Gonzalez BD, Jim HS, Booth-Jones M, Small BJ, Sutton SK, Lin HY, Park JY, Spiess PE, Fishman MN, Jacobsen PB. Course and Predictors of Cognitive Function in Patients With Prostate Cancer Receiving Androgen-Deprivation Therapy: A Controlled Comparison. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jun 20;33(18):2021-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.60.1963. Epub 2015 May 11. PubMed 25964245 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 21, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04335682
Lead sponsor
Alliance Foundation Trials, LLC.
Collaborators
Bayer
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 6, 2020
Start date
Aug 17, 2021
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2025
Completion
May 1, 2026
Results posted
Sep 21, 2026
Last update
Sep 21, 2026

Study contacts

Evanthia Galanis, MD
principal investigator · Alliance Foundation Trials

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Darolutamide · Enzalutamide

Start the discussion