ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06963723PROOFUpdated May 12, 2026

Longitudinal Screening for Financial Hardship to Improve Outcomes in Patients With Advanced Cancer

An interventional study of Financial Hardship Screening and Enhanced Usual Care in Advanced Cancer and Metastatic Cancer, sponsored by Alliance Foundation Trials, LLC.. Recruiting at 7 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-12.

Sponsored by Alliance Foundation Trials, LLC. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2025; still recruiting 1 year 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,000
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study aims to determine whether monthly remote digital financial hardship screening among adults with advanced/metastatic cancer, undergoing outpatient systemic therapy with non-curative intent, improves patient-centered outcomes, including financial worry, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), symptom burden, patient-reported cancer treatment adherence, and exploratory outcomes of overall survival, patient-reported economic burden, patient-reported support received, patient-reported financial coping strategies, and health insurance literacy.

Read the detailed description

Financial hardship is a common problem that affects patients treated for advanced cancer and leads to poor outcomes related to financial worry, health related quality of life (HRQoL), symptom burden, treatment adherence, and overall survival. Prior studies have shown that financial navigation may be an effective strategy to attenuate the impact of financial hardship. However, patients and clinicians have identified communication as a key barrier that prevents patients from being connected to sources of financial assistance. To address this critical gap in patient care, and based on strong preliminary data that financial hardship screening may improve patient outcomes, this financial hardship screening intervention will help connect patients to financial navigation resources. It is hypothesized that by connecting patients experiencing financial hardship with financial navigation resources, this intervention will lead to improved patient-centered outcomes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Advanced Cancer
  • Metastatic Cancer

Keywords

  • Financial Toxicity
03

In context

Neoplasm Metastasis

4,040 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasm Metastasis; 886 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,000 is above the median of 50 across 3,268 interventional studies indexed under Neoplasm Metastasis.

Browse Neoplasm Metastasis studies →

Lead sponsor

Alliance Foundation Trials, LLC. is the lead sponsor of 22 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (83%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Minimum age of 21
  2. Understands English and/or Spanish
  3. Has a diagnosis of advanced/ cancer
  4. Currently undergoing systemic therapy (enteral or parenteral) with non-curative intent
  5. Has been receiving treatment for at least 2 months
  6. of at least 6 months, in the opinion of the treating oncologist
  7. Cognitively able to give

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Under the age of 21
  2. Does not understand English or Spanish
  3. Has cognitive deficits that would preclude understanding of consent form and/or questionnaires
  4. Undergoing treatment with curative intent (e.g., chemotherapy for breast, lung, or ovarian cancer, primary curative therapy for testis cancer or lymphoma)
  5. Not undergoing systemic therapy (enteral or parenteral) with non-curative intent
  6. Receiving treatment for fewer than 2 months
  7. is less than 6 months, in the opinion of the treating oncologist
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant

Neoadjuvant treatment is given before the main treatment (usually surgery), often to shrink a tumour. Adjuvant treatment is given after it, to lower the chance of the cancer coming back.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1,000 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention

    Participants randomized to the intervention arm will complete their monthly screening using the single-item screening question (every 4 weeks for 12 months).

    Other: Financial Hardship Screening

  • Active comparator
    Enhanced Usual Care

    Participants randomized to receive enhanced usual care will not be systematically screened for financial hardship through the electronic PRO Core system.

    Other: Enhanced Usual Care

Interventions

  • OtherFinancial Hardship Screening

    Financial Hardship Screening and Financial Needs Assessment

  • OtherEnhanced Usual Care

    Enhanced Usual Care

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Financial Worry

    Patient-reported financial worry will be measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (FACIT-COST) total scale. Possible score range: 0 to 44, with higher scores indicating better outcomes

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Health-related quality of life

    Patient-reported health-related quality of life will be measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) total scale. Possible score range: 0 to 108, with higher scores indicating better outcomes

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Symptom burden

    Patient-reported symptom burden will be measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) physical well-being scale. Possible score range: 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating better outcomes

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Cancer treatment adherence

    Patient-reported cancer treatment adherence will be measured by the Domains of Subjective Extent of Nonadherence-Cancer (DOSE-Nonadherence-Cancer) extent of nonadherence scale, with patients classified as adherent (i.e., all responses of "none of the time" on the DOSE-Nonadherence-Cancer items for missing, skipping, or not taking a dose of medicine) versus nonadherent

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

7 of 7 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2028, 39 months after the start.

Of 291 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Neoplasm Metastasis, half reached primary completion within 58 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 28 and three quarters within 93. This study's planned 39 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 316 studies reached it within 54 months; a quarter within 28 and three quarters within 91.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 1, 2025
First posted
May 9, 2025
StartActual
Jul 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Oct 1, 2028
CompletionEst.
Apr 1, 2029
Last update
May 12, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 12, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06963723
Lead sponsor
Alliance Foundation Trials, LLC.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 9, 2025
Start date
Jul 1, 2025
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 1, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
May 12, 2026

Study contacts

AFT Quality Management Group Inbox
Contact
clinicaltrials.queries@alliancefoundationtrials.org
617-732-8727
Victoria Blinder, MD, MSc
principal investigator · Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion