CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04317352ERPANDIS-MRVUpdated Mar 23, 2020

Multivisceral Resection in Distal Pancreatectomy

An observational study in Pancreatic Neoplasms and Surgical Procedure, Unspecified, sponsored by Universidad de Extremadura. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-03-23.

Sponsored by Universidad de Extremadura · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
435
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of the study is to evaluate the characteristics of the patients and the results of morbidity and mortality after distal pancreatectomy isolated or accompanied by multivisceral resection including cholecystectomy.

Read the detailed description

Multicenter study that includes patients operated on for distal pancreatectomy between January 2009 to December 2019 for primary pancreatic tumors. Both open or laparoscopic approaches are considered in the study. The objective is to evaluate the characteristics of the patients and the results of morbidity and mortality after distal pancreatectomy isolated or accompanied by multivisceral resection including cholecystectomy. For this, demographic data, variables related to the tumor, surgical intervention and postoperative evolution were collected.

Definitions:

Diagnosis was based mainly on computed tomography (CT scan), Magnetic Resonance (MRI) and endoscopic ultrasonography (USE) plus biopsy. Surgical technique includes open and laparoscopic approach with or without spleen preservation. Complications were assessed at 90 days using the Clavien - Dindo classification, and those defined as Clavien - Dindo grade IIIA or higher were considered major. For the recording of complications, the medical and nursing notes of the electronic or histories of each patient were consulted. For the specific complications of pancreatic surgery, the definitions of the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) of delayed gastric emptying (21), post-pancreatic hemorrhage (22) and pancreatic fistula were used. The resection margins of the surgical specimen were categorized according to the definitions of the Royal College of Pathologists: R0 (margin to the tumor ≥ 1mm), R1 (margin to the tumor \<1mm) and R2 (macroscopically positive margin) (24). Tumors were staged according to the TNM classification 8 º Ed. (TNM). Follow up scheme was: 6-month outpatient clinic visit during first five years including tumoral markers and CT/MRI. After five years only once a year visit policy was applied.

Variables The following variables were studied: Epidemiological: age, sex, past medical history, medication, Charlson Index and American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification; Clinical: symptoms due to mucinous neoplasm (MCN); Serological tests: leukocytes, amylase; hemoglobin (gr/dl), bilirubin, creatinin, prothrombin time, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9; Radiological/diagnostic: diagnostic tests performed (CT/MRI/EUS), number, size and location of MCN, vascular infiltration (arterial and venous) and preoperative biopsy; Surgical: type of approach (open/laparoscopy/conversion), spleen preservation, associated procedures (organs resected), type of closure of pancreatic remnant, intraoperative bleeding (ml); postoperative course: morbidity and mortality (according to the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification) (13), pancreatic fistula, postoperative hemorrhage and delayed gastric empting, if present, was classified according to the International Group Study Pancreatic Surgery (IGSPS) classification (14,15), hospital stay and readmissions. The histological data retrieved were TNM: tumor size and lymph nodes harvested and R status. Postoperative follow-up (months) including endocrine and exocrine insufficiency rate.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pancreatic Neoplasms
  • Surgical Procedure, Unspecified

Keywords

  • Complications
  • distal pancreatectomy
  • Multivisceral
  • resection
03

In context

Pancreatic Neoplasms

3,235 studies on the registry are indexed under Pancreatic Neoplasms; 899 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 435 is above the median of 200 across 620 observational studies indexed under Pancreatic Neoplasms.

Browse Pancreatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Universidad de Extremadura is the lead sponsor of 38 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy for primary pancreatic tumor at participating centers during the period from January 2009 to December 2018

Inclusion criteria

  • Any distal pancreatectomy (DP) with multivisceral resection (MVR) defining MVR as any organ different from distal pancreas or spleen

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Distal Pancreatectomy with celiac trunk resection (Appleby procedure) or portal vein resection.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
435 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Multivisceral resection (MRV)

    MVR: Multivisceral resection was considered when the exeresis of an organ other than the pancreatic body-tail and / or spleen was performed.

    Procedure: MVR

Interventions

  • ProcedureMVR

    Multivisceral resection was considered when the exeresis of an organ other than the pancreatic body-tail and / or spleen was performed.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Morbidity

    Any complication in the postoperative period

    Time frame: 90 days

  2. Mortality

    If the patient dies in the postoperative period

    Time frame: 90 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Universidad de Extremadura- Facultad de Medicina
    Badajoz, 06080, Spain
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Malinka T, Klein F, Andreou A, Pratschke J, Bahra M. Distal Pancreatectomy Combined with Multivisceral Resection Is Associated with Postoperative Complication Rates and Survival Comparable to Those After Standard Procedures. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Sep;22(9):1549-1556. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3804-z. Epub 2018 May 10. PubMed 29748738 ↗
  • Burdelski CM, Reeh M, Bogoevski D, Gebauer F, Tachezy M, Vashist YK, Cataldegirmen G, Yekebas E, Izbicki JR, Bockhorn M. Multivisceral resections in pancreatic cancer: identification of risk factors. World J Surg. 2011 Dec;35(12):2756-63. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1263-8. PubMed 21938586 ↗
  • Panzeri F, Marchegiani G, Malleo G, Malpaga A, Maggino L, Marchese T, Salvia R, Bassi C, Butturini G. Distal pancreatectomy associated with multivisceral resection: results from a single centre experience. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 May;402(3):457-464. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1514-0. Epub 2016 Oct 27. PubMed 27787606 ↗
  • Irani JL, Ashley SW, Brooks DC, Osteen RT, Raut CP, Russell S, Swanson RS, Whang EE, Zinner MJ, Clancy TE. Distal pancreatectomy is not associated with increased perioperative morbidity when performed as part of a multivisceral resection. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Dec;12(12):2177-82. doi: 10.1007/s11605-008-0605-9. Epub 2008 Aug 2. PubMed 18677539 ↗
  • Song KB, Kwon J, Kim YW, Hwang DW, Lee JH, Hong S, Lee JW, Hwang K, Yoo D, Kim SC. Prognostic value of adjacent organ resection in patients with left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma following distal pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2019 Jun;26(6):227-234. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.627. Epub 2019 May 11. PubMed 30980486 ↗
  • Nikfarjam M, Sehmbey M, Kimchi ET, Gusani NJ, Shereef S, Avella DM, Staveley-O'Carroll KF. Additional organ resection combined with pancreaticoduodenectomy does not increase postoperative morbidity and mortality. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 May;13(5):915-21. doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-0801-2. Epub 2009 Feb 7. PubMed 19198960 ↗
  • Ramia JM, Del Rio-Martin JV, Blanco-Fernandez G, Cantalejo-Diaz M, Rotellar-Sastre F, Sabater-Orti L, Carabias-Hernandez A, Manuel-Vazquez A, Hernandez-Rivera PJ, Jaen-Torrejimeno I, Kalviainen-Mejia HK, Esteban-Gordillo S, Munoz-Forner E, De la Plaza R, Longoria-Dubocq T, De Armas-Conde N, Pardo-Sanchez F, Garces-Albir M, Serradilla-Martin M. Distal pancreatectomy with multivisceral resection: A retrospective multicenter study - Case series. Int J Surg. 2020 Oct;82:123-129. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.08.024. Epub 2020 Aug 26. PubMed 32860956 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — The study data will be available upon request to the principal investigator via e-mail.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 23, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04317352
Lead sponsor
Universidad de Extremadura
Responsible party
Gerardo Blanco-Fernández (Chief of department, Universidad de Extremadura) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 23, 2020
Start date
Mar 1, 2019
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2019
Completion
Mar 1, 2020
Last update
Mar 23, 2020

Study contacts

José Manuel Ramia, MD, PhD
study director · Hospital Universitario de Guadalajara

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion