ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04295603Updated Jun 8, 2023

Impacts of Touch-massage on the Experience of Patients With Chronic Pain: a Mixed Study.

An interventional study of Toucher Massage (TM) on the feet and Homedics HM MP RELEX 90 device in Chronic Pain, sponsored by School of Health Sciences Geneva. Completed at 2 sites in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-06-08.

Sponsored by School of Health Sciences Geneva · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2019, registered Feb 2020).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
82
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the impacts of Toucher-Massage on the experience of patients with chronic pain. The study takes place in two rehabilitation internal medicine services of the University Hospitals of Geneva at 2 inpatients units with 78 participants (39 per group).

Read the detailed description

This is a monocentric study with a design of non-randomized cluster trial with an exploratory qualitative part. The treatment is assigned to one of two care units and subjects are allocated to the care unit not according to a randomization process but based on administrative basis.

The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the impacts of Toucher-Massage (TM) on the experience of patients with chronic pain hospitalized in two rehabilitation internal medicine services.

The main objective is to measure the effects of TM on the global impression of change of the perception of pain.

The secondary objectives are:

  1. Measure the effects on

    1. the severity and impact of pain
    2. anxiety/depression
    3. caregiver-patient interaction
  2. Explore the experiences of patients benefiting from TM
  3. Explore perceptions, resistance, barriers and facilitators regarding the proposed interventions with the health care teams of the units.

The population is patients suffering from chronic pain in two units of the internal medicine rehabilitation service at Beau-Séjour. The two units are similar in terms of care intake and populations cared for.

The required sample size is 78 participants (39 per group)

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Toucher-Massage
  • Well-being
  • Gratitude
03

In context

Chronic Pain

2,999 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Pain; 706 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 82 is above the median of 60 across 2,209 interventional studies indexed under Chronic Pain.

Browse Chronic Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

School of Health Sciences Geneva is the lead sponsor of 22 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Hospitalized for a minimum of two weeks
  • Suffering from chronic pain for more than 3 months
  • Having sufficient command of French in reading, writing or speaking

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Documented cognitive impairments, and jeopardizing their ability to discern
  • Diagnosed with cancer that does interfere with foot massage (extremities metastases)
  • Dermatological conditions that interfere with foot massage
  • Suffering from major polyneuropathy
  • Taking anticoagulants or bleeding disorders
  • Being pregnant
  • Having a pacemaker
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
82 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Toucher Massage intervention

    The intervention for the Experimental Group (EG) includes a massage time of about 15 minutes on the foot area .

    Other: Toucher Massage (TM) on the feet

  • Experimental
    Homedics Machine intervention

    The Control Group (CG) will benefit from an intervention of identical duration. The treatment consists of a foot massage with a Homedics HM MP RELEX 90 device, a heat-free "shiatsu" program, which lasts about 15 minutes.

    Other: Homedics HM MP RELEX 90 device

Interventions

  • OtherToucher Massage (TM) on the feet

    The intervention for the Experimental Group (EG) includes a massage time of about 15 minutes (according to current Geneva Hospital practice) on the foot area. At least four sessions will be delivered and spread over two weeks. The TM will be provided by the care team. The training time for the workers corresponds to 2 times 2 hours. In order to be as close as possible to a standardized session, practitioners will benefit from an intervention guide.

  • OtherHomedics HM MP RELEX 90 device

    The Control Group (CG) will benefit from an intervention of identical duration. The treatment consists of a foot massage with a Homedics HM MP RELEX 90 device, a heat-free "shiatsu" program, which lasts about 15 minutes. The use of the Homedics device is no more a common treatment than the practice of Touch-Massage. TM involves a therapeutic relationship between caregiver and patient. It is for this reason that we need a comparator that should allow us to keep the aspect of the massage while decreasing the aspect of the therapeutic relationship and therefore offer us an adequate comparator.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Global impression of change

    Global impression of change will be measured by The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC). Minimum value = 1 (no change or condition has got worse) Maximum value = 7 (a great deal better, and a considerable improvement that has made all the difference)

    Time frame: Baseline, two weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Severity of pain

    The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) assesses the severity of pain and the impact on activities. The scale contains nine items: four of which have a numerical assessment scale for pain severity ranging from 0-10 (0= no pain and 10 representing the strongest possible). The impact of pain is assessed on general activity activities, mood, walking ability, work, relationships, sleep, and taste for life (0= does not interfere, 10= gene completely). The scale provides two main scores: a severity score and a pain repercussions score.

    Time frame: Baseline, two weeks

  2. Anxiety, depression

    The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is composed of seven items measuring anxiety, and seven items concerning depression. Minimum value= 0 (never) Maximum value = 3 (really very often). A score greater than or equal to 11 indicates that the person is suffering from anxiety or depression.

    Time frame: Baseline, two weeks

  3. The patient's perception of their interaction with the caregiver

    The Nurse-Patient-Interaction Scale (NPIS) questionnaire will be used to assess the patient's perception of interaction with caregivers across 14 items. Minimum value = 1 (not at all) Maximum value = 10 (a lot). The higher the score, the better the interaction with caregivers.

    Time frame: Baseline, two weeks

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Haute Ecole de Santé
    Geneva, 1206, Switzerland
  • Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève
    Geneva, 1206, Switzerland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Da Rocha Rodrigues MG, Bollondi Pauly C, Thentz C, Boegli M, Curtin F, Luthy C, Cedraschi C, Desmeules J. Impacts of Touch massage on the experience of patients with chronic pain: A protocol for a mixed method study. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2021 May;43:101276. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2020.101276. Epub 2020 Nov 28. PubMed 33548750 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 8, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04295603
Lead sponsor
School of Health Sciences Geneva
Responsible party
Gora Da Rocha (Professor assistant, School of Health Sciences Geneva) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 4, 2020
Start date
Oct 1, 2019
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2021
Completion
Jun 30, 2021
Last update
Jun 8, 2023

Study contacts

Jules Desmeules, PhD
principal investigator · University Hospital, Geneva
Christine Cedraschi, PhD
principal investigator · University Hospital, Geneva
Catherine Bollondy Pauly, MSc
principal investigator · University Hospital, Geneva

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion