CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03453944Updated Mar 5, 2018

NMES to Prevent Respiratory Muscle Atrophy in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

An interventional study of VentFree prototype (VF03-K) active stimulation and VentFree prototype (VF03-K) sham stimulation in Mechanical Ventilation Complication, Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation and Muscle Weakness, sponsored by University Medical Center Nijmegen. Status unknown at 3 sites in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-03-05.

Sponsored by University Medical Center Nijmegen · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Feb 2018), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients requiring prolonged time on the ventilator are susceptible to a wide range of clinical complications and excess mortality. It is therefore imperative for them to wean at the earliest possible time.

Respiratory muscle weakness due to disuse of these muscles is a major underlying factor for weaning failure. Surprisingly, there is not much known about the impact of critical illness and MV on the expiratory abdominal wall muscles.These muscles are immediately activated as ventilation demands increase and are important in supporting respiratory function in patients with diaphragm weakness. Weakness of expiratory abdominal wall muscles will result in a decreased cough function and reduced ventilatory capacity. These are considerable causes of weaning failure and (re)hospitalisation for respiratory complications such as pneumonia.

Recent evidence shows that neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) can be used as a safe therapy to maintain skeletal muscle function in critically ill patients. This study will be the first to test the hypothesis that breath-synchronized NMES of the abdominal wall muscles can prevent expiratory muscle atrophy during the acute stages of MV.

Read the detailed description

Approximately 30-40% of intubated patients at the intensive care unit (ICU) take more than one attempt to wean from mechanical ventilation (MV). 6-14% of intubated patients take longer than 7 days to wean from MV. Patients requiring prolonged time on the ventilator are susceptible to a wide range of clinical complications and excess mortality. It is therefore imperative for them to wean at the earliest possible time.

Respiratory muscle weakness due to disuse of these muscles is a major underlying factor for weaning failure. It is known that diaphragm strength rapidly declines within a few days after the initiation of MV. Surprisingly, there is not much known about the impact of critical illness and MV on the expiratory abdominal wall muscles.These muscles are immediately activated as ventilation demands increase and are important in supporting respiratory function in patients with diaphragm weakness. Weakness of expiratory abdominal wall muscles will result in a decreased cough function and reduced ventilatory capacity. These are considerable causes of weaning failure and (re)hospitalisation for respiratory complications such as pneumonia.

Recent evidence shows that neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) can be used as a safe therapy to maintain skeletal muscle function in critically ill patients, e.g. by stimulating quadriceps muscles in patients receiving MV.

This study will be the first to test the hypothesis that exhalation synchronized NMES of the abdominal wall muscles can prevent expiratory muscle atrophy during the acute stages of MV. The investigators hypothesize that this approach will improve respiratory function and thereby will reduce the amount of time it takes to wean patients from mechanical ventilation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mechanical Ventilation Complication
  • Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation
  • Muscle Weakness

Keywords

  • Expiratory muscles
  • Mechanically ventilated patients
  • Neuromuscular electrical stimulation
  • Respiratory function
  • Ventilator-acquired muscle atrophy
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • age > 18 year
  • invasive mechanical ventilation less than 72 hours
  • expected duration of MV after inclusion > 72 hours

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • no clearly visible separate layers of the abdominal wall muscles (external oblique, internal oblique and transverse abdominal muscles), assessed with ultrasound during routine care
  • cardiac pacemaker
  • congenital myopathies and/or existing central or peripheral neuropathies
  • refractory epilepsy
  • recent abdominal surgery within four weeks prior to study inclusion
  • body mass index (BMI) greater than 35 kg/m2
  • pregnancy
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    VF03-K active stimulation

    NMES applied to the abdominal wall muscles using the VentFree prototype (VF03-K). Stimulation is applied twice daily for 30 minutes, 5 days per week, for 6 weeks or until the patient is weaned from mechanical ventilation, whichever occurs sooner.

    Device: VentFree prototype (VF03-K) active stimulation

  • Sham comparator
    VF03-K sham stimulation

    Sham stimulation applied to the abdominal wall muscles using the VentFree prototype (VF03-K). Sham stimulation is applied twice daily for 30 minutes, 5 days per week, for 6 weeks or until the patient is weaned from mechanical ventilation, whichever occurs sooner.

    Device: VentFree prototype (VF03-K) sham stimulation

Interventions

  • DeviceVentFree prototype (VF03-K) active stimulation

    Abdominal wall muscle stimulation synchronised with mechanical ventilation. Stimulation frequency: 30 Hz, pulse width: 352us, max. intensity: 100mA (threshold intensity determined using ultrasound)

  • DeviceVentFree prototype (VF03-K) sham stimulation

    Abdominal wall muscle sham-stimulation synchronised with mechanical ventilation. Stimulation frequency: 10 Hz, pulse width: 352us, intensity: 15 mA.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Thickness of the abdominal wall muscles

    Thickness of the abdominal wall muscles over time, for both groups, as measured by ultrasound.

    Time frame: Until study completion, up to 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Thickness of the diaphragm

    Thickness of the diaphragm over time, for both groups, as measured by ultrasound.

    Time frame: Until study completion, up to 6 weeks

  2. Thickness of the rectus abdominis muscle

    Thickness of the rectus abdominis mucle over time, for both groups, as measured by ultrasound.

    Time frame: Until study completion, up to 6 weeks

  3. Maximum expiratory pressure (MEP)

    Maximum expiratory pressure (MEP) to assess expiratory muscle function

    Time frame: Within 24 hours after extubation

  4. Maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP)

    Maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) to assess inspiratory muscle function

    Time frame: Within 24 hours after extubation

  5. Vital capacity (Vc)

    Vital capacity (Vc) to assess respiratory muscle strength

    Time frame: Within 24 hours after extubation

  6. Peak expiratory flow

    Peak expiratory flow (PEF) to assess cough strength

    Time frame: Within 24 hours after extubation

  7. Number of patients with extubation failure

    Weaning failure defined as the failure to pass a spontaneous-breathing trial or the need for reintubation within 48 hours following extubation

    Time frame: Within 24 hours after extubation

  8. Systemic inflammatory markers

    Among others, cytokines IL-6 and IL-1 will be determined from blood sample analysis

    Time frame: Within 24 hours after extubation

  9. Number of patients with respiratory complications after ICU discharge

    Number of patients with development of pneumonia, and readmission to the ICU due to atelectasis or respiratory problems that require mechanical ventilation.

    Time frame: Up to 6 weeks after ICU discharge

Other outcomes

  1. Expiratory flow limitation (optional)

    EFL test to determine flow limitation in COPD

    Time frame: Measured before the first NMES session and within 24 hours after extubation

06

Study locations

3 of 3 sites recruiting
  • UMC Nijmegen
    Nijmegen, Gelderland 6525 GA, Netherlands
    Recruiting
  • Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital
    Nijmegen, Gelderland 6532 SZ, Netherlands
    Recruiting
  • VU University Medical Center
    Amsterdam, Noord-Holland 1081 HV, Netherlands
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Jonkman AH, Frenzel T, McCaughey EJ, McLachlan AJ, Boswell-Ruys CL, Collins DW, Gandevia SC, Girbes ARJ, Hoiting O, Kox M, Oppersma E, Peters M, Pickkers P, Roesthuis LH, Schouten J, Shi ZH, Veltink PH, de Vries HJ, Shannon Weickert C, Wiedenbach C, Zhang Y, Tuinman PR, de Man AME, Butler JE, Heunks LMA. Breath-synchronized electrical stimulation of the expiratory muscles in mechanically ventilated patients: a randomized controlled feasibility study and pooled analysis. Crit Care. 2020 Oct 30;24(1):628. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03352-0. PubMed 33126902 ↗
08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03453944
Lead sponsor
University Medical Center Nijmegen
Collaborators
Liberate Medical, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital
Responsible party
Leo Heunks (MD, Prof, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 5, 2018
Start date
Mar 9, 2017
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2018 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2018 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 5, 2018

Study contacts

Leo MA Heunks, MD, Prof
Contact
l.heunks@vumc.nl
0204442209
Annemijn H Jonkman, MSc
Contact
ah.jonkman@vumc.nl
0204442209
Angelique ME Spoelstra-de Man, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Feb 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion