ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04291989Updated Mar 2, 2020

Optimal Blood Sampling Site for Point of Care Lactate Assessment

An interventional study of Optimal Blood Sampling Site for Point of Care Lactate Assessment using the handled Lactate-Pro 2 device in Blood Lactic Acid Increased and Hip Fractures, sponsored by University Hospitals, Leicester. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-03-02.

Sponsored by University Hospitals, Leicester · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2018, registered Feb 2020).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study was to compare blood Lactate levels between ear lobe and finger against venous forearm blood sample using the electronic hand held lactate device in hip fracture patients with good cognitive function (AMT >/= 7)

Read the detailed description

Following a hip fracture, surgical treatment is advocated to improve pain and mobility. Most patients are elderly and a majority of them are frail. Current best practice tariff and National Institute for health and care excellence guidelines recommends that all those patients who undergo an operation should be performed within 36 hours from the time of injury to optimise recovery and function. The patients need to be medically optimised to undergo a major operation to have their hip fracture fixed. The adequacy of resuscitation is monitored by several clinical and biochemical markers. One of the important markers of resuscitation is serum lactate levels. This is used routinely in polytrauma patients. (Moran and Forward, 2012) The initial interest in lactate in hip fracture patients was based on the philosophy that a hip fracture in a frail elderly patient may be equivalent to a polytrauma in a young fit patient. Subsequently, high serum lactate levels on admission in hip fracture patients have been shown to be associated with higher mortality1. However, at present, this is not routinely monitored in hip fracture patients. Measurement of serum lactate levels presents logistics difficulties, as the blood sample has to be taken to an analyser and analysed within 20 minutes. Hence the investigators want to use a point of care electronic hand held device - the Lactate Pro 2. The investigators have already tested this device against the laboratory analysers and it has been proven to be accurate. However in preliminary testing the investigators found a significant difference between fingertip and earlobe samples in volunteers. The volunteers do not represent our population of interest, which are hip fracture patients. The investigators aim is to determine which sample site; earlobe or fingertip, for Lactate Pro 2 testing best matches venous forearm samples upon which the association of higher mortality with high lactate was based.

Any risk to the patients participating in this study would be very small. The inclusion criteria to participate in this research study is a patient who has had a recent hip fracture awaiting surgery with a Mental Test score of 7/10 or above and is able to consent.

02

Conditions studied

  • Blood Lactic Acid Increased
  • Hip Fractures

Keywords

  • BLOOD LACTATE
  • EARLOBE SAMPLE
  • FINGER PRICK SAMPLE
03

In context

Hyperlactatemia

50 studies on the registry are indexed under Hyperlactatemia; 7 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 50 is above the median of 38 across 32 interventional studies indexed under Hyperlactatemia.

Browse Hyperlactatemia studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospitals, Leicester is the lead sponsor of 68 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or Female, aged 18 years or above.
  • Diagnosed with an acute hip fracture.
  • Have a mental test score of 7/10 or greater on assessment during admission.
  • Participant is willing to consent to the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The participant will not enter the study if

    1. There are Injuries other than isolated hip fracture
    2. Age \<18 years
    3. They are not willing to consent for the study
    4. They have a mental test score less than 7/10 at the time of admission.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Earlobe and Finger Prick versus venous blood lactate sampling

    Compare blood Lactate levels between ear lobe and finger against venous forearm blood sample using the electronic hand held lactate device in hip fracture patients with good cognitive function (AMT \>/= 7)

    Device: Optimal Blood Sampling Site for Point of Care Lactate Assessment using the handled Lactate-Pro 2 device

Interventions

  • DeviceOptimal Blood Sampling Site for Point of Care Lactate Assessment using the handled Lactate-Pro 2 device

    This study aims to compare lactate levels using the Lactate Pro 2 device from the same patient at the same time with blood samples taken from three locations - fingertip, earlobe and forearm venepuncture

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Finger prick blood sample and earlobe prick blood sample compared to forearm venepuncture blood sample to measure blood Lactate levels in mmol/l using the point of care Lactate-Pro2 device

    Which of the two sample sites - finger or earlobe most closely matches the forearm venepuncture blood sample for measuring blood lactate levels?

    Time frame: The investigators aim to recruit 50 acute hip fracture patients over a time period of upto 6 months for our study. The outcome will be measured only once and recorded at the point of care for each patient.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Leicester Royal Infirmary
    Leicester, Please Select LE1 5WW, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant date for primary outcomes will be made available

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report

Time frame: for 6 months after publication of the study

Access criteria: Data access will be reviewed by an external review panel. Requestors will be required to sign a Data Access Agreement form.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jul 2018 to primary completion in Mar 2019, 8 months.

Of 17 interventional studies with no phase under Hyperlactatemia, half reached primary completion within 8 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 12. This study's 8 months is close to that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 26, 2020
First posted
Mar 2, 2020
StartActual
Jul 18, 2018
Primary completionActual
Mar 20, 2019
CompletionActual
Mar 20, 2019
Last update
Mar 2, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 2, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04291989
Lead sponsor
University Hospitals, Leicester
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 2, 2020
Start date
Jul 18, 2018
Primary completion
Mar 20, 2019
Completion
Mar 20, 2019
Last update
Mar 2, 2020

Study contacts

GANAPATHY RAMAN R Perianayagam, FRCS (Orth)
principal investigator · University Hospitals, Leicester

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion