ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04289077QUALIFIEDUpdated Sep 7, 2023

Quality of Life of Patients With Desmoid-type Fibromatosis

An observational study in Desmoid Tumor and Desmoid-type Fibromatosis, sponsored by Erasmus Medical Center. Completed at 4 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-07.

Sponsored by Erasmus Medical Center · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
156
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Rationale: Desmoid-type fibromatosis (DTF) is a rare, histologically benign, soft tissue tumour. Although incapable of metastasizing, the clinical course is unpredictable and can be aggressive because of local invasive growth. Various treatments are available including; surgical resection, radiotherapy, hormonal therapy and chemotherapy. Nowadays there is a trend towards a more conservative strategy with a wait and see policy because of high recurrence rates after surgical resection. Health-related quality of life (HRQL) is a corner stone in treatment choice and can be used during the disease for monitoring the impact of the disease on physical, psychological and social level. Additionally, HRQL can be in important endpoint for future clinical trials. Today, no HRQL-tools are available which capture the needs of DTF patients. The hypothesis is that patients with DTF have issues on several HRQL domains including physical, social and emotional well-being. For this reason we developed a list of items based on previous research. This study aims to evaluate HRQL issues experienced by DTF patients.

Purpose: Multi-centre, cross-sectional, observational study to measure HRQL of DTF patients and to evaluate the prevalence of the experienced problems.

Read the detailed description

Objectives: The primary objective is to evaluate HRQoL problems in adult DTF patients. The secondary objectives are: 1) to compare the level of HRQoL of DTF patients to the general population, 2) to identify patient subgroups who are at risk for developing certain HRQoL problems, 3) to evaluate patient preferences regarding their health care needs for DTF.

Outline: All patients, aged above 18 years, with a histopathological proved DTF tumour and sufficient Dutch language skills who have received their last check-up in the hospital within the last five years (April 2014). Patients treated in one of the participating centres, will be asked to fill out a set of questionnaires (baseline questionnaire, health care utilization, decision making, EORTC QLQ-C30, DTF-specific questionnaire, and the EQ-5D-5L). Patients will only have to fill out these questionnaires once.

02

Conditions studied

  • Desmoid Tumor
  • Desmoid-type Fibromatosis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Health-related quality of life
  • Quality of life
03

In context

Desmoid Tumors

71 studies on the registry are indexed under Desmoid Tumors; 21 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 156 is above the median of 100 across 19 observational studies indexed under Desmoid Tumors.

Browse Desmoid Tumors studies →

Lead sponsor

Erasmus Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 478 studies on the registry; 183 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients, aged ≥18 years, diagnosed with a histopathological proven DTF, regardless of disease stage and received treatment(s) who have received their last check-up of their DTF in one of the participating hospitals the hospital between October 2014 and July 2020.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 18 years and older
  • Histopathological proven DTF, regardless of disease stage or treatment.
  • Diagnosed between January 1990 and July 2020, with a visit to the hospital for their DTF (between October 2014 and July 2020)
  • Sufficient Dutch language skills
  • Competent to complete a questionnaire
  • Written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
156 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients with histopathological proven DTF

    Other: Questionnaires

Interventions

  • OtherQuestionnaires

    - Baseline questionnaire, version 1.0, October 29 2019, (Dutch) - Health care utilization, version 1.0, October 29 2019, (Dutch) - Decision-making, version 1.0, October 29 2019, (Dutch) - EORTC QLQ-C30, version 3.0, (Dutch) - DTF-QoL, version 1.0, October

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core-30; version 3.0)

    Each question will be scored: not at all (1), a little (2), quite a bit (3), very much (4). The scores of the EORTC-QLQ30 will be calculated using a Likert scale from 1-4. The scoring manual of the EORTC will be followed. After linear transformation, all scales and single item measures range in score from 0-100. Scores for each scale will be reported as mean (SD), or as median (IQR). A higher score on the functional scales and global quality of life means better functioning and HRQoL, whereas a higher score on the symptom scales means more complaints. The EORTC QLQ-C30 summary score will be calculated using the mean scores of the function scales and the reversed mean scores of the symptom scales and represented as the mean of the combined 13 QLQ-C30 scale scores (financial impact and global health status excluded). A higher summary score represented a better outcome.

    Time frame: Participants have to fill out the questionnaire once and have to complete the questionnaire within 3 months after the invitation. A reminder for participation will be send one month after the initial invitation.

  2. DTF-QoL questionnaire (Desmoid-type fibromatosis Quality of Life Questionnaire)

    The scores for each item of the DTF-QoL will be calculated using a Likert scale from 1-4. The scores of each item will be calculated as mean ± SD, or as median (IQR). These scores (median or mean) will be reported per item.

    Time frame: Participants have to fill out the questionnaire once and have to complete the questionnaire within 3 months after the invitation. A reminder for participation will be send one month after the initial invitation.

  3. EQ-5D-5L questionnaire (EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire; version 1.0)

    Measures health-related quality of life on five dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain-discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Additionally two questions aim to rank a patients' health (scale 0-100, with 100 representing a better health). Each of the five dimensions can be divided into five levels of perceived problems: no problems (level 1), slight problems (level 2), moderate problems (level 3), severe problems (level 4) and extreme problems (level). Health states can be converted into single index values. The outcomes will be reported as frequency (proportion) of reported problems for each level and for each dimension. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) data will be presented as a mean value (SD). In case of skewed data, median values and IQR will be used.

    Time frame: Participants have to fill out the questionnaire once and have to complete the questionnaire within 3 months after the invitation. A reminder for participation will be send one month after the initial invitation.

Secondary outcomes

  1. EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core-30; version 3.0)

    See primary outcome 1 for a detailed description of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. The median or mean values for each scale of the EORTC QLQ-C30 from DTF patients will be compared to the median or mean scores per scale of the general population.

    Time frame: Participants have to fill out the questionnaire once and have to complete the questionnaire within 3 months after the invitation. A reminder for participation will be send one month after the initial invitation.

  2. Baseline questionnaire (version 1.0)

    Subgroups will be created based on the information of the baseline questionnaire and will encompass: sex (male, female), age groups (categorized based by the median age and/or quartiles), primary treatment type (surgical resection, systemic treatment, radiotherapy, local treatment (e.g. cryoablation), ethnicity, educational level, relationship status, job demands, comorbidities, tumour location, and tumour recurrences. Outcomes of this questionnaire will be descriptive and are expressed as numbers with corresponding percentages. Mean or median scores of each scale (EORTC QLQ-C30, version 3.0), items (DTF-QoL, version 1,0) or frequency scores (EQ-5D-5L, version 1,0) will be calculated for each relevant subgroup.

    Time frame: Participants have to fill out the questionnaire once and have to complete the questionnaire within 3 months after the invitation. A reminder for participation will be send one month after the initial invitation.

  3. Healt care utilization questionnaire (version 1.0)

    The health care utilization questionnaire contains the following topics: satisfaction with received care, frequency of visits to the general practitioner / specialist, satisfaction with the follow-up schedule, preferences and needs for receiving care in a DTF expert centre, receiving additional care of support from professionals (medical and non-medical). Outcomes will be descriptive and reported in numbers and corresponding frequencies per answer option.

    Time frame: Participants have to fill out the questionnaire once and have to complete the questionnaire within 3 months after the invitation. A reminder for participation will be send one month after the initial invitation.

  4. Decision making questionnaire (version 1.0)

    Six questions were designed to obtain information on how patients make medical decisions, what their current role is and what their preferred role, and one question regarding their awareness of their choices, the benefits and risks of certain treatment and whether they received support an advice are designed. Two questions were designed to gain insight into the reasons for choosing an active form of treatment. Outcomes of this questionnaire will be descriptive and expressed as numbers with corresponding percentages.

    Time frame: Participants have to fill out the questionnaire once and have to complete the questionnaire within 3 months after the invitation. A reminder for participation will be send one month after the initial invitation.

07

Study locations

4 sites
  • 3. Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Ziekenhuis (AVL) / The Netherlands Cancer Instituut , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    Amsterdam, 1066 CX, Netherlands
  • Radboud University Medical Center (MC), Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    Nijmegen, 6525 GA, Netherlands
  • Erasmus MC Cancer Institute
    Rotterdam, 3015 GD, Netherlands
  • Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
    London, SW3 6JJ, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kasper B, Baumgarten C, Garcia J, Bonvalot S, Haas R, Haller F, Hohenberger P, Penel N, Messiou C, van der Graaf WT, Gronchi A; Desmoid Working Group. An update on the management of sporadic desmoid-type fibromatosis: a European Consensus Initiative between Sarcoma PAtients EuroNet (SPAEN) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)/Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group (STBSG). Ann Oncol. 2017 Oct 1;28(10):2399-2408. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx323. PubMed 28961825 ↗
  • Posner MC, Shiu MH, Newsome JL, Hajdu SI, Gaynor JJ, Brennan MF. The desmoid tumor. Not a benign disease. Arch Surg. 1989 Feb;124(2):191-6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1989.01410020061010. PubMed 2916941 ↗
  • Crago AM, Denton B, Salas S, Dufresne A, Mezhir JJ, Hameed M, Gonen M, Singer S, Brennan MF. A prognostic nomogram for prediction of recurrence in desmoid fibromatosis. Ann Surg. 2013 Aug;258(2):347-53. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828c8a30. PubMed 23532110 ↗
  • Gronchi A, Colombo C, Le Pechoux C, Dei Tos AP, Le Cesne A, Marrari A, Penel N, Grignani G, Blay JY, Casali PG, Stoeckle E, Gherlinzoni F, Meeus P, Mussi C, Gouin F, Duffaud F, Fiore M, Bonvalot S; ISG and FSG. Sporadic desmoid-type fibromatosis: a stepwise approach to a non-metastasising neoplasm--a position paper from the Italian and the French Sarcoma Group. Ann Oncol. 2014 Mar;25(3):578-583. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt485. Epub 2013 Dec 9. PubMed 24325833 ↗
  • Gundle KR, Cizik AM, Jones RL, Davidson DJ. Quality of life measures in soft tissue sarcoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2015 Jan;15(1):95-100. doi: 10.1586/14737140.2015.972947. Epub 2014 Nov 7. PubMed 25377073 ↗
  • Gounder MM, Mahoney MR, Van Tine BA, Ravi V, Attia S, Deshpande HA, Gupta AA, Milhem MM, Conry RM, Movva S, Pishvaian MJ, Riedel RF, Sabagh T, Tap WD, Horvat N, Basch E, Schwartz LH, Maki RG, Agaram NP, Lefkowitz RA, Mazaheri Y, Yamashita R, Wright JJ, Dueck AC, Schwartz GK. Sorafenib for Advanced and Refractory Desmoid Tumors. N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 20;379(25):2417-2428. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1805052. PubMed 30575484 ↗
  • Husson O, Younger E, Dunlop A, Dean L, Strauss DC, Benson C, Hayes AJ, Miah A, van Houdt W, Zaidi S, Smith M, Williams J, Jones RL, van der Graaf WTA. Desmoid fibromatosis through the patients' eyes: time to change the focus and organisation of care? Support Care Cancer. 2019 Mar;27(3):965-980. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4386-8. Epub 2018 Aug 28. PubMed 30155568 ↗
  • van Broekhoven DL, Grunhagen DJ, den Bakker MA, van Dalen T, Verhoef C. Time trends in the incidence and treatment of extra-abdominal and abdominal aggressive fibromatosis: a population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Sep;22(9):2817-23. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4632-y. Epub 2015 Jun 5. PubMed 26045393 ↗
  • Bonvalot S, Ternes N, Fiore M, Bitsakou G, Colombo C, Honore C, Marrari A, Le Cesne A, Perrone F, Dunant A, Gronchi A. Spontaneous regression of primary abdominal wall desmoid tumors: more common than previously thought. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Dec;20(13):4096-102. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3197-x. Epub 2013 Sep 20. PubMed 24052312 ↗
  • Penel N, Le Cesne A, Bonvalot S, Giraud A, Bompas E, Rios M, Salas S, Isambert N, Boudou-Rouquette P, Honore C, Italiano A, Ray-Coquard I, Piperno-Neumann S, Gouin F, Bertucci F, Ryckewaert T, Kurtz JE, Ducimetiere F, Coindre JM, Blay JY. Surgical versus non-surgical approach in primary desmoid-type fibromatosis patients: A nationwide prospective cohort from the French Sarcoma Group. Eur J Cancer. 2017 Sep;83:125-131. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.06.017. Epub 2017 Jul 20. PubMed 28735069 ↗
  • Timbergen MJM, van de Poll-Franse LV, Grunhagen DJ, van der Graaf WT, Sleijfer S, Verhoef C, Husson O. Identification and assessment of health-related quality of life issues in patients with sporadic desmoid-type fibromatosis: a literature review and focus group study. Qual Life Res. 2018 Dec;27(12):3097-3111. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1931-3. Epub 2018 Jul 16. PubMed 30014458 ↗
  • Nolte S, Liegl G, Petersen MA, Aaronson NK, Costantini A, Fayers PM, Groenvold M, Holzner B, Johnson CD, Kemmler G, Tomaszewski KA, Waldmann A, Young TE, Rose M; EORTC Quality of Life Group. General population normative data for the EORTC QLQ-C30 health-related quality of life questionnaire based on 15,386 persons across 13 European countries, Canada and the Unites States. Eur J Cancer. 2019 Jan;107:153-163. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.11.024. Epub 2018 Dec 19. PubMed 30576971 ↗
  • Giesinger JM, Kieffer JM, Fayers PM, Groenvold M, Petersen MA, Scott NW, Sprangers MA, Velikova G, Aaronson NK; EORTC Quality of Life Group. Replication and validation of higher order models demonstrated that a summary score for the EORTC QLQ-C30 is robust. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;69:79-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.007. Epub 2015 Sep 28. PubMed 26327487 ↗
  • Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, Bonsel G, Badia X. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x. Epub 2011 Apr 9. PubMed 21479777 ↗
  • von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007 Oct 20;370(9596):1453-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X. PubMed 18064739 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Aug 2020 to primary completion in Feb 2021, 5 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 24, 2020
First posted
Feb 28, 2020
StartActual
Aug 6, 2020
Primary completionActual
Feb 1, 2021
CompletionActual
Feb 1, 2021
Last update
Sep 7, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 7, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04289077
Responsible party
C. Verhoef (Prof. dr. C. Verhoef, MD, PhD, Erasmus Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 28, 2020
Start date
Aug 6, 2020
Primary completion
Feb 1, 2021
Completion
Feb 1, 2021
Last update
Sep 7, 2023

Study contacts

C. Verhoef, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Erasmus Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion